Advertisement

by Senegaal » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:39 pm

by Thrice Crownlands » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:39 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:41 pm
Thrice Crownlands wrote:I for one am glad that there's at least one nation in the world that's willing to put the stand for stability and international brotherhood with blood and treasure.
Stability in nations is a concern for all people, everywhere. I applaud Paris, and hope they continue to provide concrete support for liberal democracy abroad.

by Mike the Progressive » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:45 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:48 pm

by Alice Gardens » Fri Jan 11, 2013 1:57 pm

by Senegaal » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:09 pm
Alice Gardens wrote:The only reason that makes sense for intervention is that there are French citizens there and that there are already French troops in the region (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20991719).
Otherwise I don't see how the EU should be involved. We already have the UN and the AU. What's the point of the AU forces if they can't even use them without needing last minute European training? And the entire AU can't field more than 3000 troops? Lame.


by Nazis in Space » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:15 pm

by Priory Academy USSR » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:15 pm

by Benutanairan » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:16 pm
Nazis in Space wrote:France launches the operations to topple Gaddafi, Gaddafi's Malian mercenaries return home and take over the northern half of Mali, France (And Britain, given that Cameron nuthugged Sarkozy throughout the whole Libya deal) has the god-damn obligation to assist Mali in solving the problem. Simple.

by Nazis in Space » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:17 pm
I imagine Mali would prefer the conflict to take less than a decade.Priory Academy USSR wrote:Meh. The idea behind it has happened before, and it's worked.

by Saruhan » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:18 pm
Priory Academy USSR wrote:Meh. The idea behind it has happened before, and it's worked.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Merriwhether » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:26 pm
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:It isn't France's responsibility. Mali needs to have the strength to overcome it's own problems

by Priory Academy USSR » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:36 pm
Nazis in Space wrote:I imagine Mali would prefer the conflict to take less than a decade.Priory Academy USSR wrote:Meh. The idea behind it has happened before, and it's worked.
Saruhan wrote:Priory Academy USSR wrote:Meh. The idea behind it has happened before, and it's worked.
That was actually a part of Britain though, plus the guerillas were only ethnically Chinese in a mostly Malay place, and only lived in deep jungle. And it still took around a decade to take them out

by Wind in the Willows » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:38 pm

by Rio Cana » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:38 pm
French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault said Friday that France had no intention of getting involved in the crisis, and would only intervene to protect its own nationals there.

by Costa Alegria » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:51 pm

by Costa Alegria » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:54 pm
Wind in the Willows wrote:France shouldn't help them as it isn't their problem.

by Costa Alegria » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:56 pm
Pope Joan wrote:Hey France, while you're at it, why don't you stop assailing Assad and help Syria defend itself against other Al Qaeda insurgents, hmm?

by Constaniana » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:07 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Thrice Crownlands wrote:I for one am glad that there's at least one nation in the world that's willing to put the stand for stability and international brotherhood with blood and treasure.
Stability in nations is a concern for all people, everywhere. I applaud Paris, and hope they continue to provide concrete support for liberal democracy abroad.
Aye, good on France. Here's hoping for a good resolution of this issue.
Ameriganastan wrote:I work hard to think of those ludicrous Eric adventure stories, but I don't think I'd have come up with rescuing a three armed alchemist from goblin-monkeys in a million years.
Kudos.

by The Free and Just Republic of Freedomol » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:12 pm

by Conserative Morality » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:21 pm
The Free and Just Republic of Freedomol wrote:I'll make it for him.
Alaska
Hawaii
Texas
Florida
The Midwest
The West
Puerto Rico
US virgin islands.

by Rio Cana » Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:06 pm
The Free and Just Republic of Freedomol wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:So what the hell does that have to do with our conversation?
You've failed to make your case.
I'll make it for him.
Alaska
Hawaii
Texas
Florida
The Midwest
The West
Puerto Rico
US virgin islands.
I'll concede that the US was not at all nice to the natives (in fact, we were absolutely brutal), but at this point in time, all are democracies, all are owned by the US, and we aren't restricting rights anymore. Given enough time, everything is possibls.
A former head of the Puerto Rico Police Department, Miguel Pereira, said Monday that the U.S. commonwealth has become a "narco state."
Pereira, a one-time federal prosecutor, told reporters that drug trafficking had infiltrated into all sectors of the Caribbean island.
it’s the mainland’s appetite for cocaine and heroin that fuels the drug trade on the island.

Puerto Rico is fighting to stay afloat in a rising sea of debt. Its economy is sputtering. Its population is shrinking. Its recent election is disputed. Its public pension fund is perilously low on cash. The American territory has just been through a brutal five-year recession, something not experienced in the United States as a whole since the 1930s.
Puerto Rico’s bonds are just a notch or two above junk status.

by Wallonochia » Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:11 pm
Benutanairan wrote:we have the French legion for a reason why should French citizens have to intervene in mali.
Rio Cana wrote:So France might get involved in Mali. This is strange. I say that since a few weeks ago, the French Prime Minister said that France would not get involved in propping up the government of the Central African Republic which was close to being toppled by rebels.
Conserative Morality wrote:Colonialism /=/ Annexation.

by Benutanairan » Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:58 pm
Wallonochia wrote:Benutanairan wrote:we have the French legion for a reason why should French citizens have to intervene in mali.
As an immigrant in France this made me much angrier than it should have.Rio Cana wrote:So France might get involved in Mali. This is strange. I say that since a few weeks ago, the French Prime Minister said that France would not get involved in propping up the government of the Central African Republic which was close to being toppled by rebels.
Not exactly surprising that Ayrault turns out to be a lying bastard.Conserative Morality wrote:Colonialism /=/ Annexation.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Asherahan, Atrito, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, Dumb Ideologies, Escalia, Fahran, Floofybit, Galactic Powers, Ifreann, La Xinga, Mearisse, Molchistan, New Unita, The Black Forrest, Whuhu, Zurkerx
Advertisement