Only 15% of Americans accept evolution.

[Mavorpen]

2. That is why it is called FAITH.

In other words, you're wrong.

3. The topic has also nothing to do with you or me accepting evolution. The topic's name is ''Only 15% of Americans accept evolution''.

That title is accurate.

[Maudlnya]

Guys... relax, attack one by one

But seriously I am surprised a flame war hasn't started.

Most of us are civil enough not to go for a cheap ad homimen in a debate.

NSG is literally like cancer... or was it the flu? Oh wait it's alcoholism

[Frisivisia]

Funny that.

Crazy shit, ain't it?

Indubitably.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Guys... relax, attack one by one

But seriously I am surprised a flame war hasn't started.

The thing about the liberal crowd on NSG is that we don't often get into flame wars. Certainly we get into fallacious grudge matches once in a while, but we're a rather peaceful people, due to the all-encompassing liberal hivemind.

It's because they put morphine in the download cables.

[Individuality-ness]

I felt rather sad, when talking to a couple of friends, and finding out that only three (out of probably 8 or 9) of us accept evolution, but one of my friends denies that we can have true evidence for it, and that humans don't evolve, just other animals...

This happened yesterday, and I was thinking about what the statistic is...

Either way, I was deeply upset, mainly because they used the same arguments you here constantly (why do we still have monkeys, why haven't we evolved, where is the intermediate fossil evidence etc...) and I know that some of them are pretty smart fellows, but they were just ignorant because they were told to, and they wanted to...

No. Just because they believe in something else, doesnt mean they are wrong.

So if someone said "I believe the Earth is flat!", does that mean they're right, because they believe it with all their heart?

[Maudlnya]

Guys... relax, attack one by one

But seriously I am surprised a flame war hasn't started.

The thing about the liberal crowd on NSG is that we don't often get into flame wars. Certainly we get into fallacious grudge matches once in a while, but we're a rather peaceful people, due to the all-encompassing liberal hivemind.

... Hivemind... I hate that word *blows up*

[Frisivisia]

The thing about the liberal crowd on NSG is that we don't often get into flame wars. Certainly we get into fallacious grudge matches once in a while, but we're a rather peaceful people, due to the all-encompassing liberal hivemind.

It's because they put morphine in the download cables.

That's how they make us sad about the 2000 election.

[Individuality-ness]

Most of us are civil enough not to go for a cheap ad homimen in a debate.

NSG is literally like cancer... or was it the flu? Oh wait it's alcoholism

Addiction, Maud, addiction. It's the biolink I tell you!

[National Socialists of America]

Relevant

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Relevant

Thanks for the insightful contribution.

[Ovisterra]

Relevant

Me. I care. Ignorance bothers me.

[Manahakatouki]

I felt rather sad, when talking to a couple of friends, and finding out that only three (out of probably 8 or 9) of us accept evolution, but one of my friends denies that we can have true evidence for it, and that humans don't evolve, just other animals...

This happened yesterday, and I was thinking about what the statistic is...

Either way, I was deeply upset, mainly because they used the same arguments you here constantly (why do we still have monkeys, why haven't we evolved, where is the intermediate fossil evidence etc...) and I know that some of them are pretty smart fellows, but they were just ignorant because they were told to, and they wanted to...

No. Just because they believe in something else, doesnt mean they are wrong.

Of course in many instances this is true. But in this case, they're just being ignorant, and they're not looking it up...

[Crolacia]

2. That is why it is called FAITH.

In other words, you're wrong.

3. The topic has also nothing to do with you or me accepting evolution. The topic's name is ''Only 15% of Americans accept evolution''.

That title is accurate.

2. In other words, I'm not.
3. Um, no. The title should be ''Do you believe in evoluton?'' or something liek that.


And guys I am also very liberal. It doesn't mean just because I'm a believer that I am not liberal.

[National Socialists of America]

Relevant

Thanks for the insightful contribution.

You're very welcome.

[Frisivisia]

Relevant

You... You'll go far kid.

Except no. You won't.

[Mavorpen]

2. In other words, I'm not.

So leprechauns cause rainbows?

3. Um, no. The title should be ''Do you believe in evoluton?'' or something liek that. .

Why?

[Maudlnya]

NSG is literally like cancer... or was it the flu? Oh wait it's alcoholism

Addiction, Maud, addiction. It's the biolink I tell you!

Argh. I poopy

[The Ehrlich]

Aside from the one article I posted, I really do not know any others in English. There are issues with Evolution, that is for a fact. In fact, in priest's terms these may even be understandable, it's not too complex.

[Maudlnya]

Aside from the one article I posted, I really do not know any others in English. There are issues with Evolution, that is for a fact. In fact, in priest's terms these may even be understandable, it's not too complex.

... No.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Aside from the one article I posted, I really do not know any others in English. There are issues with Evolution, that is for a fact. In fact, in priest's terms these may even be understandable, it's not too complex.

Could you link to any of the German articles?

[Ovisterra]

Aside from the one article I posted, I really do not know any others in English. There are issues with Evolution, that is for a fact. In fact, in priest's terms these may even be understandable, it's not too complex.

You could post German ones if you wanted. I can debunk stuff after running it through a translator. It'll be shit English grammar, but I'll happily do it.

[Crolacia]

2. In other words, I'm not.

So leprechauns cause rainbows?

3. Um, no. The title should be ''Do you believe in evoluton?'' or something liek that. .

Why?

2. /
3. Because no one here is debating about how Americans don't accept evolution.

[Dyakovo]

I felt rather sad, when talking to a couple of friends, and finding out that only three (out of probably 8 or 9) of us accept evolution, but one of my friends denies that we can have true evidence for it, and that humans don't evolve, just other animals...

This happened yesterday, and I was thinking about what the statistic is...

Either way, I was deeply upset, mainly because they used the same arguments you here constantly (why do we still have monkeys, why haven't we evolved, where is the intermediate fossil evidence etc...) and I know that some of them are pretty smart fellows, but they were just ignorant because they were told to, and they wanted to...

No. Just because they believe in something else, doesnt mean they are wrong.

If what they believe is wrong, that's exactly what it means.

[The Ehrlich]

No. Just because they believe in something else, doesnt mean they are wrong.

Of course in many instances this is true. But in this case, they're just being ignorant, and they're not looking it up...

I will "admit" to being a Catholic person. Is this really bad? Why do I not have the rights to say this without atheists and so on saying that 'you are ignorant' or that 'you are stupid'. It is really not fair, I do not attack your beliefs. Even if I am wrong, there is no need for you to put people down due to what they have belief in.

Sure we can debate, and I'd love to debate the proof of a higher god of some sort, which is quite likely, although it is true that which god cannot be said for. I don't know how to really put this in words, but if there is only one life, surely it's better to respect others' beliefs of a second life and you be right, rather than call them out, and vice-versa?

[Mavorpen]

3. Because no one here is debating about how Americans don't accept evolution.

Yes we have.