NATION

PASSWORD

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Crimes or Reasonable Use of Force?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Was the use of Nuclear Weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki a War Crime?

No, because it saved American lives
166
30%
No, because the Japanese committed atrocities as well
87
16%
I can't decide, you can make a convincing argument either way
47
9%
Yes, because it was on civilian targets
123
22%
Yes, because nothing excuses Atomic Warfare
78
14%
Monkeys and Unicorns and Rainbows!
48
9%
 
Total votes : 549

User avatar
United States of Peace
Minister
 
Posts: 2314
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:45 am

Mkuki wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."

No. Japan was given French Indochina by the Vichy Government. Japan invaded much of SE Asia because FDR cut off shipments of oil and rubber to Japan. Which was, itself, a protest to Japan's invasion of China.

Alowwvia wrote:
It was oil and rubber.

They could of got on without it.

And also stopped fucking conquesting.

You try and successfully run an industrial, 1940s economy without oil and rubber. Especially when conducting a war.

To be clear, I'm just saying that FDR did provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_o ... _Indochina

And what provoked FDR to provoke the Japanese? The Invasion of China and the seizing of French Indochina.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:46 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Oh yes, three days is so patient.


Three days is plenty of time for someone to get on an open radio channel and go "Uhhhh... W-we give up now?"

Plenty of time for the Emporeror to try to make contact with Truman. Plenty of time to make SOME form of contact saying 'FOR THE LOVE OF HIROHITO DON'T FUCKING BOMB US WE QUIT!'

High command did not give a fuck, and the military was in control from a decade before the war, clearly evidenced by the associated coup attempts and officer rebellions and the way all of Japan's wars started, as independent actions with no order from the civilian government aimed at territorial conquest.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:46 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.


That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.


Wow. That was unnecessarily racist.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Stattr
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17982
Founded: Mar 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Stattr » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:46 am

I say that it was not necessary.

Do you guys even know the real reason as to why they bombed pearl harbor?
"The world is full of stupid people, get used to it."
Pasong Tirad wrote:Heresy. The earth is flat. It's evening everywhere. Stattr needs to be guillotined.

Hlad:And after that?
Ethel: She is moving in with you, you will equip a throne room for her, and bring her rose petals everyday. You shall dress in a french maid's outfit, and only speak english with a bad french accent.
Drown wrote:
The balkens wrote:Why hello fellow privileged manape.

A cordial salutations towards a fellow scholar of the mythical 'White Privilege'

I am a 100% authentic D&D nerd. I love me some Barbs <3

User avatar
Hikari Hachi
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hikari Hachi » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:47 am

America went on to embargo and sanction Japan, because Japan wasn't keen on trading with America, and all of our trading partners in Asia (China), were becoming apart of the empire of Japan. So we went on to poke and poke Japan, until they attacked us, then pointed our finger at them like every war we have ever been in.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:48 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
Mkuki wrote:No. Japan was given French Indochina by the Vichy Government. Japan invaded much of SE Asia because FDR cut off shipments of oil and rubber to Japan. Which was, itself, a protest to Japan's invasion of China.


You try and successfully run an industrial, 1940s economy without oil and rubber. Especially when conducting a war.

To be clear, I'm just saying that FDR did provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia.

If they hadn't been conducting the war then they wouldn't have had to run it without oil and rubber.


We can take that line of reasoning as far back as it needs to go.

If the Europeans hadn't constructed imperialism as the only viable route to being considered a modern, industralised power, then the Japanese wouldn't have been pushed toward empire building.

And so on. It's all irrelevant, though.

Because considering the embargo in the plainest context, it was a provocation. Not one without justification, but a provocation nonetheless.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:48 am

Mkuki wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Japan's naval forces were quite adequate, and a blockade would have been difficult to affect without significant loss of life.

No they weren't. The IJN was wrecked after the Battle of Leyte Gulf in 1944. There would have been a major risk from kamikaze planes, but to say that the IJN posed a real threat to any blockade of Japan is ridiculous.

Which is why casualty projections for Operation Downfall were so low.

Wait....no they weren't.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:48 am

Stattr wrote:I say that it was not necessary.

Do you guys even know the real reason as to why they bombed pearl harbor?


I know, but I bet you're going to offer up some absurdly one-sided explanation, and I'd like a good chuckle, so let's hear what you have to say.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
The United Colonies of Earth
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9727
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:50 am

Personally, I feel that the bomb drops were war crimes committed to test the deadliness of actinide bombs, in addition to the many other justifications for Hiroshima and Nagasaki discussed above.
The United Colonies of Earth exists:
to encourage settlement of all habitable worlds in the Galaxy and perhaps the Universe by the human race;
to ensure that human rights are respected, with force if necessary, and that all nations recognize the inevitable and unalienable rights of all human beings regardless of their individual and harmless differences, or Idiosyncrasies;
to represent the interests of all humankind to other sapient species;
to protect all humanity and its’ colonies from unneeded violence or danger;
to promote technological advancement and scientific achievement for the happiness, knowledge and welfare of all humans;
and to facilitate cooperation in the spheres of law, transportation, communication, and measurement between nation-states.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:50 am

Hikari Hachi wrote:America went on to embargo and sanction Japan, because Japan wasn't keen on trading with America, and all of our trading partners in Asia (China), were becoming apart of the empire of Japan. So we went on to poke and poke Japan, until they attacked us, then pointed our finger at them like every war we have ever been in.

You heard it here first folks.

WWII's Eastern Theater? All America's fault.

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:50 am

Person012345 wrote:
Alowwvia wrote:
That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.

No, that's bullshit. More like "we just beat you in battle, want to accept these shitty terms where you suck us off? No? Fuck you then"


The terms weren't that shitty. They boiled down to 'Stop dicking the rest of Asia, Japan.' Japan seemed to do quite well when they finally let the Americans help them after the war, didn't they? They're thriving now.

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Alowwvia wrote:
Three days is plenty of time for someone to get on an open radio channel and go "Uhhhh... W-we give up now?"

Plenty of time for the Emporeror to try to make contact with Truman. Plenty of time to make SOME form of contact saying 'FOR THE LOVE OF HIROHITO DON'T FUCKING BOMB US WE QUIT!'

High command did not give a fuck, and the military was in control from a decade before the war, clearly evidenced by the associated coup attempts and officer rebellions and the way all of Japan's wars started, as independent actions with no order from the civilian government aimed at territorial conquest.


Well then, it's a good thing then that the bombs were there to let the people who DID give a fuck wrestle control then.
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:51 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Alowwvia wrote:
That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.


Wow. That was unnecessarily racist.


I suppose the ending scene of A Christmas Story was racist too?
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
United States of Peace
Minister
 
Posts: 2314
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:51 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Mkuki wrote:No they weren't. The IJN was wrecked after the Battle of Leyte Gulf in 1944. There would have been a major risk from kamikaze planes, but to say that the IJN posed a real threat to any blockade of Japan is ridiculous.

Which is why casualty projections for Operation Downfall were so low.

Wait....no they weren't.


Well...Japanese naval forces were wiped out, but considering that Operation Downfall is a plan for the land invasion of Japan, the high loss of life comes from that.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:51 am

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:If they hadn't been conducting the war then they wouldn't have had to run it without oil and rubber.


We can take that line of reasoning as far back as it needs to go.

If the Europeans hadn't constructed imperialism as the only viable route to being considered a modern, industralised power, then the Japanese wouldn't have been pushed toward empire building.

And so on. It's all irrelevant, though.

Because considering the embargo in the plainest context, it was a provocation. Not one without justification, but a provocation nonetheless.

They spent centuries in isolation and no outside power forced them to start conquering. They made a decision, the decision had consequences.

Now if you'll excuse me a while, I have homework to do.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
Hikari Hachi
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hikari Hachi » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:51 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Hikari Hachi wrote:America went on to embargo and sanction Japan, because Japan wasn't keen on trading with America, and all of our trading partners in Asia (China), were becoming apart of the empire of Japan. So we went on to poke and poke Japan, until they attacked us, then pointed our finger at them like every war we have ever been in.

You heard it here first folks.

WWII's Eastern Theater? All America's fault.



Yes we sent arms on passenger ships to support Great Britain, then Germany blows up an American Passenger ship, and we point are finger to get into the war.

User avatar
Stattr
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17982
Founded: Mar 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Stattr » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:52 am

Sdaeriji wrote:
Stattr wrote:I say that it was not necessary.

Do you guys even know the real reason as to why they bombed pearl harbor?


I know, but I bet you're going to offer up some absurdly one-sided explanation, and I'd like a good chuckle, so let's hear what you have to say.

Japan first of all sent a letter saying something and if we didn't comply or what ever then they would bomb pearl harbor. Unfortunantly that letter never arrived and since japan never got a responce they automatically assumed that we did not want to comply and they bombed pearl harbor trying to take out our aircraft carriers. Hence forth the reason we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Before that though (I hate my memory.) someone in japan said to the emperor or leader "I fear we have awakened a sleeping giant..."
"The world is full of stupid people, get used to it."
Pasong Tirad wrote:Heresy. The earth is flat. It's evening everywhere. Stattr needs to be guillotined.

Hlad:And after that?
Ethel: She is moving in with you, you will equip a throne room for her, and bring her rose petals everyday. You shall dress in a french maid's outfit, and only speak english with a bad french accent.
Drown wrote:
The balkens wrote:Why hello fellow privileged manape.

A cordial salutations towards a fellow scholar of the mythical 'White Privilege'

I am a 100% authentic D&D nerd. I love me some Barbs <3

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:52 am

Patheon Global Security wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:They never officially surrendered.

Seems like you're arguing poorly based on semantics.

Then why are you claiming that the Soviet invasion caused them to surrender? More like the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Again, no. The Japanese were more afraid of the Soviets than the bombs.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:52 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:No, that's bullshit. More like "we just beat you in battle, want to accept these shitty terms where you suck us off? No? Fuck you then"


The terms weren't that shitty. They boiled down to 'Stop dicking the rest of Asia, Japan.' Japan seemed to do quite well when they finally let the Americans help them after the war, didn't they? They're thriving now.

New England and The Maritimes wrote:High command did not give a fuck, and the military was in control from a decade before the war, clearly evidenced by the associated coup attempts and officer rebellions and the way all of Japan's wars started, as independent actions with no order from the civilian government aimed at territorial conquest.


Well then, it's a good thing then that the bombs were there to let the people who DID give a fuck wrestle control then.

Yep. The destruction of the japanese state was a good thing, but don't pretend that its part in that effort makes the US or Soviet states somehow better for it. States did what states do best, and the result was the loss of one of them.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:52 am

Hikari Hachi wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:You heard it here first folks.

WWII's Eastern Theater? All America's fault.



Yes we sent arms on passenger ships to support Great Britain, then Germany blows up an American Passenger ship, and we point are finger to get into the war.


And Germany still had no right to attack a neutral vessel, they did it to be assholes. What's your point.
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Hikari Hachi
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hikari Hachi » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:53 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Hikari Hachi wrote:

Yes we sent arms on passenger ships to support Great Britain, then Germany blows up an American Passenger ship, and we point are finger to get into the war.


And Germany still had no right to attack a neutral vessel, they did it to be assholes. What's your point.



smuggling arms to help one side in a war.... definitely neutral

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:53 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Oh yes, three days is so patient.


Three days is plenty of time for someone to get on an open radio channel and go "Uhhhh... W-we give up now?"

Plenty of time for the Emporeror to try to make contact with Truman. Plenty of time to make SOME form of contact saying 'FOR THE LOVE OF HIROHITO DON'T FUCKING BOMB US WE QUIT!'

And yet it took even longer for them to give up after the second bomb. Why didn't we drop a third?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Patheon Global Security
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:54 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:Then why are you claiming that the Soviet invasion caused them to surrender? More like the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Again, no. The Japanese were more afraid of the Soviets than the bombs.

Then how come the Japs surrendered after the bombs?
Militarist, Patriot and Capitalist; Your default Republican

User avatar
United States of Peace
Minister
 
Posts: 2314
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:54 am

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Wisconsin9 wrote:If they hadn't been conducting the war then they wouldn't have had to run it without oil and rubber.


We can take that line of reasoning as far back as it needs to go.

If the Europeans hadn't constructed imperialism as the only viable route to being considered a modern, industralised power, then the Japanese wouldn't have been pushed toward empire building.

And so on. It's all irrelevant, though.

Because considering the embargo in the plainest context, it was a provocation. Not one without justification, but a provocation nonetheless.


I don't mean to be a little annoying, but when we look at the embargo placed on Japan, we should take a look at the actions that caused the embargo placed in the first place, which were Japan provoking the embargo with their very long invasion of China and the seizure of French Indochina.

So, Japan made their own provocations, of course not entirely without justifications as well.

;)

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:55 am

Wisconsin9 wrote:
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
We can take that line of reasoning as far back as it needs to go.

If the Europeans hadn't constructed imperialism as the only viable route to being considered a modern, industralised power, then the Japanese wouldn't have been pushed toward empire building.

And so on. It's all irrelevant, though.

Because considering the embargo in the plainest context, it was a provocation. Not one without justification, but a provocation nonetheless.

They spent centuries in isolation and no outside power forced them to start conquering.


Very debatable. It was pressure from outside forces, and the tragic example of foreign influence in China, which influenced the Japanese decision to modernise and then militarise.

To protect themselves from conquest, in short.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:55 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Hikari Hachi wrote:

Yes we sent arms on passenger ships to support Great Britain, then Germany blows up an American Passenger ship, and we point are finger to get into the war.


And Germany still had no right to attack a neutral vessel, they did it to be assholes. What's your point.

Fucking hell learn your history all of you. The Lusitania was not an american vessel, first off, it was a british passenger liner with 128 americans on board. Secondly, when a war is ongoing and one combatant has declared open season on the north sea well beforehand, you can't expect any different result. It was not causa bellorum in any sense of the term, and as with the second world war, it was the US State looking for any "in" to become involved in the conflict.
Last edited by New England and The Maritimes on Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, Joss, Kon XXI, Senscaria, Terminus Station, TescoPepsi

Advertisement

Remove ads