It probably was.
Advertisement

by The Joseon Dynasty » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

by Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

by Kummen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

by Risottia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

by Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am
Patheon Global Security wrote:Mavorpen wrote:Seriously...?
More like how that changed Japan's view on surrendering.

by United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.
Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

by Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

by Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Alowwvia wrote:
It was oil and rubber.
They could of got on without it.
And also stopped fucking conquesting.
No, they couldn't have. The government was set up top to bottom to be stocked with people for whom "No more imperialism" was never on the table. There was no point at which the government could have changed direction in its policies, because it was not democratic in any way, shape or form, and the ruling class in Japanese society was conditioned and reinforced into a hyperaggressive, actively defensive, belligerent attitude toward any and every perceived threat or opportunity.

by Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am
Alowwvia wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:No, they couldn't have. The government was set up top to bottom to be stocked with people for whom "No more imperialism" was never on the table. There was no point at which the government could have changed direction in its policies, because it was not democratic in any way, shape or form, and the ruling class in Japanese society was conditioned and reinforced into a hyperaggressive, actively defensive, belligerent attitude toward any and every perceived threat or opportunity.
Then it's probably pretty good that their shit got slapped then, huh?
What, you just want to NOT embargo them? "Sure, Japan, go ahead and conquer Chine, we dgaf."
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

by Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am
Alowwvia wrote:Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.
That was tried a few times.
"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"
"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"
That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.

by Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am

by Mkuki » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.
Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."
Alowwvia wrote:Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.
It was oil and rubber.
They could of got on without it.
And also stopped fucking conquesting.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am

by Person012345 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am
Hikari Hachi wrote:Person012345 wrote:No, they weren't. Do some research. They were already negotiating peace with the soviets (even if the soviets were going to stab them in the back), they wanted to end the war, they simply couldn't fight it any more. But we didn't want them to surrender to the soviets, we wanted them to surrender to us, on our shitty ass terms. So we slaughtered a bunch of innocent civilians. They weren't in a fucking "trance".
Our shitty as terms??? I think that our terms kept them from turning into eastern Germany, and our terms are the reason they are an industrious self sufficient nation today.

by Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am
Mkuki wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."
No. Japan was given French Indochina by the Vichy Government. Japan invaded much of SE Asia because FDR cut off shipments of oil and rubber to Japan. Which was, itself, a protest to Japan's invasion of China.Alowwvia wrote:
It was oil and rubber.
They could of got on without it.
And also stopped fucking conquesting.
You try and successfully run an industrial, 1940s economy without oil and rubber. Especially when conducting a war.
To be clear, I'm just saying that FDR did provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia.

by United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:44 am

by Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:44 am
Mavorpen wrote:Alowwvia wrote:
That was tried a few times.
"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"
"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"
That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.
Oh yes, three days is so patient.

by Mkuki » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:45 am
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Person012345 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:45 am
Alowwvia wrote:Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.
That was tried a few times.
"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"
"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"
That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kenmoria, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Archregimancy, Tinhampton
Advertisement