NATION

PASSWORD

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Crimes or Reasonable Use of Force?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Was the use of Nuclear Weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki a War Crime?

No, because it saved American lives
166
30%
No, because the Japanese committed atrocities as well
87
16%
I can't decide, you can make a convincing argument either way
47
9%
Yes, because it was on civilian targets
123
22%
Yes, because nothing excuses Atomic Warfare
78
14%
Monkeys and Unicorns and Rainbows!
48
9%
 
Total votes : 549

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

United States of Peace wrote:
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Precisely what I'm wondering.


Well, the invasion of China and the seizure of French Indochina could be considered a provocation by Japan towards the rest of the European colonial nations in Asia.


It probably was.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

Person012345 wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:Unconditional surrender which the Japanese never would accept.

Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.


That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Kummen
Envoy
 
Posts: 230
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kummen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:39 am

I would say both bombs were perfectly justifiable in their use, it ended the war before more lives could be lost. If we had gone through with an invasion of Japan, both the Americans and the Japanese would have lost countless more soldiers, to say nothing of the innumerable civilian casualties that Japan would have incurred. If anything, those bombs saved more lives than any conventional attack.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54748
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

Patheon Global Security wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.

By what? Throwing flowers?

What about a blockade?
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

Patheon Global Security wrote:

More like how that changed Japan's view on surrendering.

In other words, it caused them to surrender. Glad you're admitting to being wrong.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
United States of Peace
Minister
 
Posts: 2314
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.

Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."


Embargo came first, then Japan invaded almost every portion of SE Asia. East Asia came before Embargo.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

Risottia wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:By what? Throwing flowers?

What about a blockade?

Japan's naval forces were quite adequate, and a blockade would have been difficult to affect without significant loss of life.

User avatar
Patheon Global Security
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

Risottia wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:By what? Throwing flowers?

What about a blockade?

Like in Serbia? Or North Korea? Didn't change alot did it?
Last edited by Patheon Global Security on Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Militarist, Patriot and Capitalist; Your default Republican

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:40 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Alowwvia wrote:
It was oil and rubber.

They could of got on without it.

And also stopped fucking conquesting.

No, they couldn't have. The government was set up top to bottom to be stocked with people for whom "No more imperialism" was never on the table. There was no point at which the government could have changed direction in its policies, because it was not democratic in any way, shape or form, and the ruling class in Japanese society was conditioned and reinforced into a hyperaggressive, actively defensive, belligerent attitude toward any and every perceived threat or opportunity.



Then it's probably pretty good that their shit got slapped then, huh?

What, you just want to NOT embargo them? "Sure, Japan, go ahead and conquer Chine, we dgaf."
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

Risottia wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:By what? Throwing flowers?

What about a blockade?

If I recall correctly, we tried that.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:More like how that changed Japan's view on surrendering.

In other words, it caused them to surrender. Glad you're admitting to being wrong.

It more allowed people who were intent on a surrender to quickly take control.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

Alowwvia wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:No, they couldn't have. The government was set up top to bottom to be stocked with people for whom "No more imperialism" was never on the table. There was no point at which the government could have changed direction in its policies, because it was not democratic in any way, shape or form, and the ruling class in Japanese society was conditioned and reinforced into a hyperaggressive, actively defensive, belligerent attitude toward any and every perceived threat or opportunity.



Then it's probably pretty good that their shit got slapped then, huh?

What, you just want to NOT embargo them? "Sure, Japan, go ahead and conquer Chine, we dgaf."

Never said that, but you're presenting it as a conscious choice, even though it clearly wasn't. The war was inevitable thanks to the developments of the 19th century.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Patheon Global Security
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:More like how that changed Japan's view on surrendering.

In other words, it caused them to surrender. Glad you're admitting to being wrong.

They never surrendered as a matter of a fact,

Seems like you are keen on seeing other fail.
Militarist, Patriot and Capitalist; Your default Republican

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:41 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.


That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.

Oh yes, three days is so patient.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:In other words, it caused them to surrender. Glad you're admitting to being wrong.

It more allowed people who were intent on a surrender to quickly take control.


I'm sure at least a couple people intent of fighting thought 'Sweet merciful fuck, they can blow up entire cities now.' and decided that surrender was a pretty good idea.
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.

Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."

No. Japan was given French Indochina by the Vichy Government. Japan invaded much of SE Asia because FDR cut off shipments of oil and rubber to Japan. Which was, itself, a protest to Japan's invasion of China.

Alowwvia wrote:
Mkuki wrote:The fact that the embargo threatened to shut down the entire Japanese economy is much more than just denying access to a third person's wallet. It's more akin to losing the vast majority of your money and health.


It was oil and rubber.

They could of got on without it.

And also stopped fucking conquesting.

You try and successfully run an industrial, 1940s economy without oil and rubber. Especially when conducting a war.

To be clear, I'm just saying that FDR did provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:42 am

Patheon Global Security wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:In other words, it caused them to surrender. Glad you're admitting to being wrong.

They never surrendered as a matter of a fact,

Seems like you are keen on seeing other fail.

They never officially surrendered.

Seems like you're arguing poorly based on semantics.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am

Hikari Hachi wrote:
Person012345 wrote:No, they weren't. Do some research. They were already negotiating peace with the soviets (even if the soviets were going to stab them in the back), they wanted to end the war, they simply couldn't fight it any more. But we didn't want them to surrender to the soviets, we wanted them to surrender to us, on our shitty ass terms. So we slaughtered a bunch of innocent civilians. They weren't in a fucking "trance".


Our shitty as terms??? I think that our terms kept them from turning into eastern Germany, and our terms are the reason they are an industrious self sufficient nation today.

[citation needed]

If you mean because the soviets would have invaded, not if we'd given them good terms that they actually wanted to accept because they were reasonable (they would still have been surrendering and they would still have been under our protection), instead of shitting on a piece of paper and then slaughtering hundreds of thousands when they didn't accept it.

Hyperbole added for dramatic effect.

User avatar
Wisconsin9
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35753
Founded: May 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wisconsin9 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am

Mkuki wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Except your money and health are coming from another person who didn't consent to giving it to you. Japan invaded almost every portion of SE and Eastern Asia. They were embargoed and sanctioned BECAUSE they did so. This wasn't a random, "Hey, fuck you Japan." It was "Hey, stop that shit."

No. Japan was given French Indochina by the Vichy Government. Japan invaded much of SE Asia because FDR cut off shipments of oil and rubber to Japan. Which was, itself, a protest to Japan's invasion of China.

Alowwvia wrote:
It was oil and rubber.

They could of got on without it.

And also stopped fucking conquesting.

You try and successfully run an industrial, 1940s economy without oil and rubber. Especially when conducting a war.

To be clear, I'm just saying that FDR did provoke the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Burma and Indonesia.

If they hadn't been conducting the war then they wouldn't have had to run it without oil and rubber.
~~~~~~~~
We are currently 33% through the Trump administration.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................

User avatar
United States of Peace
Minister
 
Posts: 2314
Founded: Dec 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby United States of Peace » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
United States of Peace wrote:
Well, the invasion of China and the seizure of French Indochina could be considered a provocation by Japan towards the rest of the European colonial nations in Asia.


It probably was.


Yup, particularly considering Japan taking Indochina from the French. Considering the fragile position of the Dutch, and hard-pressed British, it would have been natural i think for the embargo to occur, since the embargoing nations most likely hoped to defer future seizures of their Empires. Of course, they proably underestimated Japan as well.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:43 am

Alowwvia wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:It more allowed people who were intent on a surrender to quickly take control.


I'm sure at least a couple people intent of fighting thought 'Sweet merciful fuck, they can blow up entire cities now.' and decided that surrender was a pretty good idea.

Maybe a few did. As a whole, the Japanese high command already showed that it did not care about civilian control, civilian well being, civilian intentions, or civilian or military lives. The bombing of tokyo killed more people and destroyed more property than hiroshima and nagasaki combined, and did nothing to phase them. The bombs were a shock that created a bit of pandemonium in military command while everyone was attempting to figure out what happened.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Patheon Global Security
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Patheon Global Security » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:44 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Patheon Global Security wrote:They never surrendered as a matter of a fact,

Seems like you are keen on seeing other fail.

They never officially surrendered.

Seems like you're arguing poorly based on semantics.

Then why are you claiming that the Soviet invasion caused them to surrender? More like the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Militarist, Patriot and Capitalist; Your default Republican

User avatar
Alowwvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1570
Founded: May 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alowwvia » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:44 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Alowwvia wrote:
That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.

Oh yes, three days is so patient.


Three days is plenty of time for someone to get on an open radio channel and go "Uhhhh... W-we give up now?"

Plenty of time for the Emporeror to try to make contact with Truman. Plenty of time to make SOME form of contact saying 'FOR THE LOVE OF HIROHITO DON'T FUCKING BOMB US WE QUIT!'
Reality Check about Gun Violence in America

Alowwvia under Quarantine!? [OPEN/MT]
http://tracker.conquestofabsolution.com/stats=alowwvia

^These are canon stats, though 'Land' forces compose three branches.

Economic Left/Right: 3.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.49

"Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. "
-Alexis de Tocqueville

"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty."
-Thomas Jefferson


Pro: ur mom
Anti: ur face

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:45 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Risottia wrote:What about a blockade?

Japan's naval forces were quite adequate, and a blockade would have been difficult to affect without significant loss of life.

No they weren't. The IJN was wrecked after the Battle of Leyte Gulf in 1944. There would have been a major risk from kamikaze planes, but to say that the IJN posed a real threat to any blockade of Japan is ridiculous.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:45 am

Alowwvia wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Which wasn't the only option. We just wanted them to. IE. The only options were not "invade" or "nuke", there were others. Make peace in the normal way, for example.


That was tried a few times.

"So, Japan, we just kicked your ass at [battle]. Wanna surrender yet?"

"YOU-A WRANT PREACE? FUK U, HERR BOM!"

That went one for a while. Japan never waved the white flag or anything, despite the fact that America would have accepted a surrender at pretty much any time.

No, that's bullshit. More like "we just beat you in battle, want to accept these shitty terms where you suck us off? No? Fuck you then"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kenmoria, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Archregimancy, Tinhampton

Advertisement

Remove ads