Kalakda wrote:Not unless you got a gun, a good AK-47 would suit.
Contrary to popular belief, AK-47s are not so cheap and easily accessible that your average shark fisherman would have one lying around on their boats.
Advertisement

by Non Aligned States » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:55 pm
Kalakda wrote:Not unless you got a gun, a good AK-47 would suit.

by Non Aligned States » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:56 pm
Muravyets wrote:For some fucking soup that tastes like shit anyway.

by Non Aligned States » Fri Oct 23, 2009 10:58 pm
Niur wrote:So? The aztec people had been sacrificing people to their gods for hundreds of years, it was traditition, did that make it right? But lets not make a straw man argument. I don't beilive traddition justifies driving any creature to extinction. If they really want shark fin soup, they should make shark farms. If they can't do that, synthisize it, or use some other fishes fin that are already farmes and spice it so that it tastes like shark.

by Callisdrun » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:00 pm

by Non Aligned States » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:04 pm
Callisdrun wrote:Why can't they just farm sharks instead?
This is amazingly short sighted. If sharks are hunted to extinction, then nobody'll get to have shark fin soup.
Plus, you know, sharks fill an essential ecological niche and it'll throw their ecosystems drastically off balance if they're gone and all that.

by East Congaree » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:10 pm
Kalakda wrote:You know, a while back, I read a series of Sherman's Lagoon comics where the main character gets scooped up by a bunch of (Chinese) fishermen, got his fins cut off, and is then dumped into the sea where he dies (temporarily). This got me thinking, so I looked up 'Shark Finning' on Wikipedia and it explained that one of the main points against this practice is the fact that after being finned, the sharks are dumped into the water-- while still alive! The sharks the die a slow agonizing death. This has got thinking, "Why don't the fishermen just kill the sharks before being thinned, why can't those Chinamen get the hint?

by Zombie PotatoHeads » Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:14 pm
Callisdrun wrote:This is amazingly short sighted. If sharks are hunted to extinction, then nobody'll get to have shark fin soup.

by Barringtonia » Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:02 am

by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:42 am


by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:44 am
Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:Kalakda wrote:Well, because the Chinese use shark fins to make some sort of soup that's commonly served at weddings and banquets and is very popular. The soup has been around since the Ming Dynasty, so it's an ancient tradition.
And, if you've ever had shark fin soup you'd know just what a nasty, vile dish it is - blecch.
Some traditions should die, this is one of them.

by Risottia » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:48 am
Kalakda wrote:You know, a while back, I read a series of Sherman's Lagoon comics where the main character gets scooped up by a bunch of (Chinese) fishermen, got his fins cut off, and is then dumped into the sea where he dies (temporarily).
This got me thinking, so I looked up 'Shark Finning' on Wikipedia and it explained that one of the main points against this practice is the fact that after being finned, the sharks are dumped into the water-- while still alive!

by Teletropis » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:49 am

by Tagmatium » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:50 am
Helgrin wrote:This seems culturalist to me. Or whatever you call the culture version of racism.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 4:57 am
Tagmatium wrote:Helgrin wrote:This seems culturalist to me. Or whatever you call the culture version of racism.
Whilst it does sound culturally imperialistic, it does make sense. Some traditions are just stupid and do more harm than good.
Like there was a Cornish festival called "Darkie Day", in which people dressed up in blackface. It's not done anymore, but it people were bitching about it being an old tradition for this thing. Frankly, it was just racist.
Someone on the Jolt NS forums had a quote in their signature which pretty much summed it up, and it was something like "Tradition is just another way of saying it's broken, but we're not going to fix it."

by Tagmatium » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:01 am
Helgrin wrote:But still, it seems a bit incensitive to just say that the culture of another country is stupid. And to say that it is dumb of them to think that it could have healing properties. It's another countries culture, and [puts on asbestos suit] One could say the same about religion.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...


by East Congaree » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:22 am
Teletropis wrote:Chinese with their finning, Japanese with their whaling.. Both fuckin' stupid in my opinion.

by Tagmatium » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:33 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:34 am

by Tagmatium » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:35 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by East Congaree » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:41 am

by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:41 am
Tagmatium wrote:
Not really, as s/he's attacking things that those countries are doing, rather than having a go at the populations themselves. If s/he said that "Those fucking nips are barbaric for eating whales, same as them Chinks!", then that would be racist.

by East Congaree » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:43 am
Helgrin wrote:Tagmatium wrote:
Not really, as s/he's attacking things that those countries are doing, rather than having a go at the populations themselves. If s/he said that "Those fucking nips are barbaric for eating whales, same as them Chinks!", then that would be racist.
So it's not racist if they don't use racist words? But they are still genrallising, which is racist. I bet there are a fair few Japanese and Chinese people against shark finning and whaling.

by Helgrin » Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:53 am
East Congaree wrote:Helgrin wrote:Tagmatium wrote:
Not really, as s/he's attacking things that those countries are doing, rather than having a go at the populations themselves. If s/he said that "Those fucking nips are barbaric for eating whales, same as them Chinks!", then that would be racist.
So it's not racist if they don't use racist words? But they are still genrallising, which is racist. I bet there are a fair few Japanese and Chinese people against shark finning and whaling.
Uhm? I could name practices i'm upset with in the food industry of any country. For example, the way "factory farms" are managed in America. Does that make me "rascist against Americans"? (Lol, that doesn't even make sense, as Americans aren't a clearly defined race, or even an ethnic group....)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom
Advertisement