that's how the police work. do you ever see a cop arriving at the home DURING a murder? no, they come after the fact.
Advertisement
by Stedicules » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
by Nidaria » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Neo Art wrote:Vareiln wrote:And I mean everyone is totally going to go on a shooting spree because they are all totally prone to mental breakdowns, and it couldn't at all be society's fault for causing said mental breakdowns, nope, not at all.
Wow.
It's like every time someone says the word "gun" the average IQ of the room lowers by 20 points.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Caninope wrote:Lancaster of Wessex wrote:So she shot someone dead because he wanted to take her things.
Sorry, I don't particularly care for that.
Now she'll forever live with herself reliving that moment of killing that man - hope she's ok with that.
No, she shot someone dead because he invaded her home where she and two children were at.
by Conventiala » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
by The Joseon Dynasty » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Arkinesia wrote:Stedicules wrote:Yeah because the intruder was definitely intent on murdering her and her children, that's why he knocked and rang the doorbell, to see if anyone was home. He assumed nobody was and broke in.
She murdered him, plain and simple, on a hunch. yay guns.
I wouldn't call “rummaging through my stuff” a hunch.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Cromarty » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Caninope wrote:Lancaster of Wessex wrote:So she shot someone dead because he wanted to take her things.
Sorry, I don't particularly care for that.
Now she'll forever live with herself reliving that moment of killing that man - hope she's ok with that.
No, she shot someone dead because he invaded her home where she and two children were at.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Gun Manufacturers » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Stedicules wrote:Gun Manufacturers wrote:So, this woman retreats with her children, and when the criminal discovers where they were hiding (I assume they had nowhere else to retreat to), she peppers him 5 times in the head and neck with .38 cal slugs. AND HE LIVES? I hope he remembers this day forever (and changes his life for the better), and I hope she gets some more range time (she would have been in deep shit if she'd missed with all six shots).
no, i don't think she would've been in 'deep shit' if she'd missed. If someone fired 5 shots at me and missed I'd count myself lucky and leave. You don't need to fire your gun in these kind of situations to keep your family safe.
Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...
Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo
Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.
Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.
by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:23 am
Paddy O Fernature wrote:United Aryan Asian Alliance wrote:It takes a very skewed mindset to think a home invader is a victim here. This is as terrible as that Brady Campaign ad that advises women to get raped rather then use guns for self defense.
Again, Welcome to NS. Tis the norm around here sadly.
by Paddy O Fernature » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:24 am
by Stedicules » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:24 am
United Aryan Asian Alliance wrote:It takes a very skewed mindset to think a home invader is a victim here. This is as terrible as that Brady Campaign ad that advises women to get raped rather then use guns for self defense.
by The Joseon Dynasty » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:24 am
by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:24 am
Gun Manufacturers wrote:Stedicules wrote:no, i don't think she would've been in 'deep shit' if she'd missed. If someone fired 5 shots at me and missed I'd count myself lucky and leave. You don't need to fire your gun in these kind of situations to keep your family safe.
Since it was a revolver, and she fired 6 times, he probably could have figured out that the revolver was now empty. Unless she was trained by Jerry Michulek, she probably wouldn't have had a chance to reload before he was on her.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:25 am
by Rentarium » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:25 am
by Kouralia » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
San-Silvacian wrote:If I invaded someones home and they simply walked out and said 'gtfo' I'd probably assault them.
Especially if they saw my face and good look at it. Though that would pretty much end up with me committing murder.
by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
by Chetssaland » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
by Dilange » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
Gun Manufacturers wrote:Stedicules wrote:no, i don't think she would've been in 'deep shit' if she'd missed. If someone fired 5 shots at me and missed I'd count myself lucky and leave. You don't need to fire your gun in these kind of situations to keep your family safe.
Since it was a revolver, and she fired 6 times, he probably could have figured out that the revolver was now empty. Unless she was trained by Jerry Michulek, she probably wouldn't have had a chance to reload before he was on her.
by Gauthier » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
by Tsuntion » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
Zombie Wasteland wrote:I don't know if anyone noticed, but the man didn't die. After emptying the mag, she threatened to shoot again and he begged for mercy (obviously still alive) and that is when everything finally stopped. Cops got there blah blah blah.
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Jumpin' on the SOURCE-TRAIN!
CHOO CHOO MUFUKA! We be ridin' the rails, checkin' the trails, you get nothin' and your argument fails!
by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:26 am
United Aryan Asian Alliance wrote:Odawara Hojo wrote:So now that's one story of guns actually doing good to.....what? 50 instances of them being used for ill? Sorry but this one story is not going to change my view that guns cause more problems than they solve.
http://rense.com/general76/univ.htm
http://www.cato.org/policy-report/march ... top-crimes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrESAKfGmmM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm9o3vhKoF8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Blq_a_lqDBs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4t1a_v9sG4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1zZGe3f0mc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNZ0z1h ... 6g&index=3
I could go on if you'd like.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
by Arkinesia » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:27 am
Dilange wrote:Wow.
So a woman open fires, out of fear, on a man who broke into her house with the intent to rob it. I see nothing in this that the man intended to KILL anyone. He had a crowbar for breaking in. Hes a plan. Why not point the gun at the man without firing the gun? He obviously had no weapon to counter it. She luckily didnt kill the man after shooting him in the face and neck.
This is why I hate guns. Everyone praises that the gun saved the family from a harmless robber who would have run away at the sight of people in the house, but instead ignore how this lady almost panic-killed this man. Such double standards.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Stedicules » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:27 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Since it was a revolver, and she fired 6 times, he probably could have figured out that the revolver was now empty. Unless she was trained by Jerry Michulek, she probably wouldn't have had a chance to reload before he was on her.
People count shots as they are being hit?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cessarea, Floofybit, Forsher, Hypron, Ifreann, Ineva, Juristonia, Plan Neonie, Talibanada, Xoshen
Advertisement