Oh would I love to see that.
Advertisement

by Eliasonia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:47 pm
Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D
by Shofercia » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:54 pm

by Shofercia » Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:46 pm
) 

by Fruition (Ancient) » Mon Apr 22, 2013 9:55 pm
Lesbia wrote:Let's go Jets! Boot the Rangers out!

by Lesbia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:17 pm

by Eliasonia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:19 pm

Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D
by Shofercia » Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:51 pm


by Qazox » Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:00 pm
Qazox wrote:Given the short schedule and based of the last shortened season, most likely teams that have had their core players together for at least 2-3 years will do well come playoff time. But with some many intra-divisional games most likely the team(s) that can counter their divisional opponents the best will make the playoffs.
My best guess (as of now) as to how it will all shake out:(Playoff teams in CAPS)
EASTERN CONFERENCE
NorthEast
BUFFALO
MONTREAL
Boston
Ottawa
Toronto
Atlantic
PITTSBURGH
NY RANGERS
PHILADELPHIA
NEW JERSEY
NY Islanders
SouthEast
WASHINGTON
TAMPA BAY
Winnipeg
Florida
Carolina
Playoffs:
#1 Pittsburgh def. #8 Montreal 4-1
#7 Tampa Bay def. #2 Washington 4-3
#6 New Jersey def. #3 Buffalo 4-2
#4 NY Rangers def. #5 Philadelphila 4-3
--------------------
#1 Pittsburgh def. #7 Tampa Bay 4-2
#4 NY Rangers def. #6 New Jersey 4-3
--------------------
#4 NY Rangers def. #1 Pittsburgh 4-2
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Central
ST. LOUIS
DETROIT
NASHVILLE
Chicago
Columbus
NorthWest
MINNESOTA
EDMONTON
VANCOUVER
Calgary
Colorado
Pacific
SAN JOSE
LOS ANGELES
Dallas
Phoenix
Anahiem
Playoffs:
#1 San Jose def. #8 Vancouver 4-3
#2 St. Louis def. #7 Nashville 4-1
#3 Minnesota def. #6 Los Angeles 4-3
#4 Detroit def. #5 Edmonton 4-1
--------------------
#4 Detroit def. #1 San Jose 4-3
#2 St. Louis def. #3 Minnesota 4-2
--------------------
#2 St. Louis def. #4 Detroit 4-2
STANLEY CUP FINAL
New York RANGERS 4
St. Louis Blues 2
that's something to be happy about, right??
by Shofercia » Sun Apr 28, 2013 7:02 pm
Qazox wrote:Qazox wrote:Given the short schedule and based of the last shortened season, most likely teams that have had their core players together for at least 2-3 years will do well come playoff time. But with some many intra-divisional games most likely the team(s) that can counter their divisional opponents the best will make the playoffs.
My best guess (as of now) as to how it will all shake out:(Playoff teams in CAPS)
EASTERN CONFERENCE
NorthEast
BUFFALO
MONTREAL
Boston
Ottawa
Toronto
Atlantic
PITTSBURGH
NY RANGERS
PHILADELPHIA
NEW JERSEY
NY Islanders
SouthEast
WASHINGTON
TAMPA BAY
Winnipeg
Florida
Carolina
Playoffs:
#1 Pittsburgh def. #8 Montreal 4-1
#7 Tampa Bay def. #2 Washington 4-3
#6 New Jersey def. #3 Buffalo 4-2
#4 NY Rangers def. #5 Philadelphila 4-3
--------------------
#1 Pittsburgh def. #7 Tampa Bay 4-2
#4 NY Rangers def. #6 New Jersey 4-3
--------------------
#4 NY Rangers def. #1 Pittsburgh 4-2
WESTERN CONFERENCE
Central
ST. LOUIS
DETROIT
NASHVILLE
Chicago
Columbus
NorthWest
MINNESOTA
EDMONTON
VANCOUVER
Calgary
Colorado
Pacific
SAN JOSE
LOS ANGELES
Dallas
Phoenix
Anahiem
Playoffs:
#1 San Jose def. #8 Vancouver 4-3
#2 St. Louis def. #7 Nashville 4-1
#3 Minnesota def. #6 Los Angeles 4-3
#4 Detroit def. #5 Edmonton 4-1
--------------------
#4 Detroit def. #1 San Jose 4-3
#2 St. Louis def. #3 Minnesota 4-2
--------------------
#2 St. Louis def. #4 Detroit 4-2
STANLEY CUP FINAL
New York RANGERS 4
St. Louis Blues 2
Oy... my picks were... WAYYYYYYYYYYYYY off..![]()
I did get Pittsburgh as the #1 seed in the East right...that's something to be happy about, right??


by The Royal Kingdom of Quebec » Sun Apr 28, 2013 7:32 pm

by Lesbia » Sun Apr 28, 2013 7:52 pm
Shofercia wrote:Now, I want to poke fun at Canada![]()
What is up with your team names? First you have the Canadiens. What the fuck? I mean even the Americans don't have the Americans as a hockey team. And if the Canadiens wasn't Nationalistic enough, you guys have the Canucks. On top of that, you have a team named for the only leaf on your flag, the Maple Leafs. And then you name a team after politicians, the Senators. Seriously Canada? Canadiens, Canucks, Maple Leafs, and Senators. What's next, naming a team after companies that pollute? Oh wait - that'd be the Oilers. Gotta love that one: "hey, if you don't lose to us, we'll spill oil all over your shore!" And when a team moves in, you call it after a popular Military Industrial Complex weapons, the Jets. Damn, your names are just jetting. And I'm guess you subconsciouly knew that you're going to be burned by a Russian for those team titles, so you named another team, the Flames. Oh Canadiens/Canucks/Maple Leafs/Senators - you guys are funny! Please, don't riot next to my house

by Lesbia » Sun Apr 28, 2013 8:09 pm

by Qazox » Sun Apr 28, 2013 9:29 pm
by Shofercia » Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:33 pm
Lesbia wrote:Shofercia wrote:Now, I want to poke fun at Canada![]()
What is up with your team names? First you have the Canadiens. What the fuck? I mean even the Americans don't have the Americans as a hockey team. And if the Canadiens wasn't Nationalistic enough, you guys have the Canucks. On top of that, you have a team named for the only leaf on your flag, the Maple Leafs. And then you name a team after politicians, the Senators. Seriously Canada? Canadiens, Canucks, Maple Leafs, and Senators. What's next, naming a team after companies that pollute? Oh wait - that'd be the Oilers. Gotta love that one: "hey, if you don't lose to us, we'll spill oil all over your shore!" And when a team moves in, you call it after a popular Military Industrial Complex weapons, the Jets. Damn, your names are just jetting. And I'm guess you subconsciouly knew that you're going to be burned by a Russian for those team titles, so you named another team, the Flames. Oh Canadiens/Canucks/Maple Leafs/Senators - you guys are funny! Please, don't riot next to my house
Have I ever told you that I love you?


by The Royal Kingdom of Quebec » Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:43 pm
Shofercia wrote:Lesbia wrote:
Have I ever told you that I love you?
You have now![]()
Also, here's the voting tally thus far, I'm keeping it open until the first puck drop of the first playoff game:
Chicago: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Minnesota: Not feeling the love yet, like a Parisian who's just been Sutered![]()
Anaheim: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Detroit: Ouch! Guys it's Detroit, no love?![]()
Vancouver: Quebec
San Jose: Shofercia, Lesbia, Qazox
St. Louis: NSG's predictions have them singing the Blues![]()
Los Angeles: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Pittsburgh: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Ottawa: What? You didn't expect NSG to vote for politicians, did you?![]()
Montreal: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
New York Islanders: They've been voted off the NSG Island!![]()
Washington: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia
New York Rangers: Qazox
Boston: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Toronto: True to tradition, the Maple Leafs...

by United Kingdom of Poland » Mon Apr 29, 2013 3:42 am
by Shofercia » Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:57 pm
Lesbia wrote:Um you guys... it's Montreal vs. Ottawa.

by United Kingdom of Poland » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:22 pm
Shofercia wrote:Lesbia wrote:Um you guys... it's Montreal vs. Ottawa.
You're right! Damn, NHL didn't change the chart until after I posted the line up.
So apparently it's Pittsburgh v New York Islanders and Montreal Canadiens vs Ottawa Senators. I'm not changing my bets. Guys, what about you? Especially Qazox, since he was the only one to bet on the Isles, are you staying by your bet, or would you like to change it?
by Shofercia » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:27 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Shofercia wrote:
You're right! Damn, NHL didn't change the chart until after I posted the line up.
So apparently it's Pittsburgh v New York Islanders and Montreal Canadiens vs Ottawa Senators. I'm not changing my bets. Guys, what about you? Especially Qazox, since he was the only one to bet on the Isles, are you staying by your bet, or would you like to change it?
well I'm still betting on long island,

by United Kingdom of Poland » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:36 pm

by Lesbia » Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:58 pm

by Qazox » Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:00 pm
The Royal Kingdom of Quebec wrote:Shofercia wrote:
You have now![]()
Also, here's the voting tally thus far, I'm keeping it open until the first puck drop of the first playoff game:
Chicago: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Minnesota: Not feeling the love yet, like a Parisian who's just been Sutered![]()
Anaheim: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Detroit: Ouch! Guys it's Detroit, no love?![]()
Vancouver: Quebec
San Jose: Shofercia, Lesbia, Qazox
St. Louis: NSG's predictions have them singing the Blues![]()
Los Angeles: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Pittsburgh: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Ottawa: What? You didn't expect NSG to vote for politicians, did you?![]()
Montreal: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
New York Islanders: They've been voted off the NSG Island!![]()
Washington: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia
New York Rangers: Qazox
Boston: Shofercia, Quebec, Lesbia, Qazox
Toronto: True to tradition, the Maple Leafs...
My reaction to these:
Chicago-Minnesota: Obviously. Not so surprising. Definitely going to be a blowout.
Anaheim-Detroit: Uh... Not surprising. Red Wings aren't what they used to be. Only Datsyuk and Howard still floats them.
Vanouver-San Jose: Hm... Interesting. I think it all depends on how Niemi, Kesler, Schneider and Sedins could play. Nucks screwed up early sans Kesler. They screwed up last time because a Sedin was injured(badly).
St.Louis-LA: I guess I'm not the only one who'd have Quick and/or Bernier over Brian Elliot.....
Pittsburgh-Ottawa: Not surprising. Ottawa fought well in the regular season, but still needs Spezza and possibly a goal-scorer to keep the things competitive. They need CASH line very soon, or else, they won't make it far.
Montreal-NYI: Surprising. Not even great jobs from Tavares and Nabokov can keep the Isles float, I guess. Or maybe Therrien just coaches really well.
Washington-NYR: Interesting Matchup. Surprised that Qazox voted in favour of NYR(probably because of King Henrik and Nash+Callahan, I guess) but he's Qazox. Obviously.
Boston-Toronto: Obviously. Unless Reimer pulls off Dryden-like numbers and Kessel and Kadri Gilmour-like numbers, It'll be very hard for them.

by Qazox » Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:03 pm
Shofercia wrote:Lesbia wrote:Um you guys... it's Montreal vs. Ottawa.
You're right! Damn, NHL didn't change the chart until after I posted the line up.
So apparently it's Pittsburgh v New York Islanders and Montreal Canadiens vs Ottawa Senators. I'm not changing my bets. Guys, what about you? Especially Qazox, since he was the only one to bet on theIslesRANGERS, are you staying by your bet, or would you like to change it?

by Eliasonia » Mon Apr 29, 2013 9:05 pm
Qazox wrote:Shofercia wrote:
You're right! Damn, NHL didn't change the chart until after I posted the line up.
So apparently it's Pittsburgh v New York Islanders and Montreal Canadiens vs Ottawa Senators. I'm not changing my bets. Guys, what about you? Especially Qazox, since he was the only one to bet on theIslesRANGERS, are you staying by your bet, or would you like to change it?
Fixed. I'd take Minnesota over Chicago before I took the Islanders.
Maineiacs wrote:There once was a man from Belfast
Whose balls were constructed of brass.
In stormy weather
They'd clang together
And lightening shot out of his ass. :D
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Comfed, Corporate Collective Salvation, Free Ravensburg, Habsburg Mexico, Lotha Demokratische-Republique, Ostroeuropa, Peacetime, Port Caverton, Rary, Sorcery, Subi Bumeen, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Unitarian Universalism, Vassenor
Advertisement