NATION

PASSWORD

Taiwan-ROC or the "People's Republic" of China

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:16 am

CTALNH wrote:Down with the American Bootlickers Boooo Taiwan....

And blind nationalism meets blind partisanship!
WHO! WILL! WIN?!
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:30 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Down with the American Bootlickers Boooo Taiwan....

And blind nationalism meets blind partisanship!
WHO! WILL! WIN?!

Does Taiwan have a billion people?
If not China wins....

p.s Yeah I know Taiwan has only around 20 million people...
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:33 am

CTALNH wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:And blind nationalism meets blind partisanship!
WHO! WILL! WIN?!

Does Taiwan have a billion people?
If not China wins....

p.s Yeah I know Taiwan has only around 20 million people...

So the sole determining factor of what country deserves to be the "victor" in a massively complex and nuanced geopolitical process is through population?
I suggest you look into the issue a little more.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
French Indochine
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 170
Founded: Nov 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby French Indochine » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:26 am

In a military situation, as in the scenario in which hostilities break out between the PRC and ROC - as of 2012, the ROC's armed forces isn't capable of lasting even a week of combat at the most; 3-4 days is the more likely time that they can hold out, as recent defence studies have shown. Thus, the ROC's survival will fall into the hands of the US Pacific Fleet and military, since the US has signed a defense pact with the ROC. That is, if the US Navy will be aggressive and willing to go on with the fight for longer than that those three-four days.

"We are going to fight a long war, and Americans don't like long wars." -Ho Chi Minh

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:27 am

French Indochine wrote:In a military situation, as in the scenario in which hostilities break out between the PRC and ROC - as of 2012, the ROC's armed forces isn't capable of lasting even a week of combat at the most; 3-4 days is the more likely time that they can hold out, as recent defence studies have shown. Thus, the ROC's survival will fall into the hands of the US Pacific Fleet and military, since the US has signed a defense pact with the ROC. That is, if the US Navy will be aggressive and willing to go on with the fight for longer than that those three-four days.

"We are going to fight a long war, and Americans don't like long wars." -Ho Chi Minh

Naval and inevitable air superiority are a helluva thing. And in such a war, we don't have to invade China to win. All we have to do is not lose Taiwan.
Last edited by The Tiger Kingdom on Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:36 am

Aardenland wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:And Germany committed the holocaust, so what? As long as Japan accepts its crime, I have no problem with them. I'm Chinese Japanophile, there's nothing wrong with that.


Maybe, but the point still stands that no matter how Japan is now, there is no way a majority of Taiwanese citizens would submit to a nation that subjugated some of their ancestors and brutally waged war against other ones. I am a Japanophile too, but Japanophilia doesn't make up a big chunk of our cultures, much more so in your case, I assume. We may have differences in opinion, but it remains the fact that your proposal was very unrealistic, and probably offensive to many Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, etc. (Though I'll admit I was the one who dropped the N-Bomb). My perspective probably isn't very insightful. My entire life up to this point has been spent bunkered up in Minneapolis, well away from the realities of global issues. Where does your viewpoint come from? (By now I can guess that your Japan comment was most likely offhand, but I'd still like to hear more)

My point was, the RoC becomes the government of China and creates a united China which would eventually create a united Asia. Or it allies itself/becomes part of another Asian state, that way, a Japan+Taiwan or Korea+Taiwan union conquers the PRC and creating an united Asia.
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:40 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Does Taiwan have a billion people?
If not China wins....

p.s Yeah I know Taiwan has only around 20 million people...

So the sole determining factor of what country deserves to be the "victor" in a massively complex and nuanced geopolitical process is through population?
I suggest you look into the issue a little more.

Nah I am looking at the point of view of who has more reserves to throw at each other.....

China wins by default....
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Chinese Regions
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16326
Founded: Apr 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Regions » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:41 am

Maybe get Taiwanese companies to dominate China?
Fan of Transformers?|Fan of Star Trek?|你会说中文吗?
Geopolitics: Internationalist, Pan-Asian, Pan-African, Pan-Arab, Pan-Slavic, Eurofederalist,
  • For the promotion of closer ties between Europe and Russia but without Dugin's anti-intellectual quackery.
  • Against NATO, the Anglo-American "special relationship", Israel and Wahhabism.

Sociopolitics: Pro-Intellectual, Pro-Science, Secular, Strictly Anti-Theocractic, for the liberation of PoCs in Western Hemisphere without the hegemony of white liberals
Economics: Indifferent

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:42 am

Chinese Regions wrote:Maybe get Taiwanese companies to dominate China?

How the heck are they gonna dominate state owned companies?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:43 am

China would never invade Taiwan, that would be economic and political suicide.
But china won't recognize taiwan, but will increas economic relations.

That's what I think at least.

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:44 am

CTALNH wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:So the sole determining factor of what country deserves to be the "victor" in a massively complex and nuanced geopolitical process is through population?
I suggest you look into the issue a little more.

Nah I am looking at the point of view of who has more reserves to throw at each other.....

China wins by default....

Oh Jesus, you're hilarious.
Take a look at a map of China/Taiwan/the general South Asian area. OK? Now you'll notice there's a relatively small patch of water between China and Taiwan, OK? You with me so far?
Now unless you suggest they form a goddamn human bridge and walk over each other all the way to Formosa, all of China's population superiority counts for jack shit, because you need a Navy to get across the water, and you need air superiority to protect the Navy on its way. China has neither, and we likely will have both, extremely quickly.
Historical precedence is clear: Napoleon had a gigantic army primed to invade England, but couldn't do anything because of the Royal Navy. Hitler had a gigantic army primed to invade England, but couldn't again, thanks again to the RN and RAF.
All China's population? All those people? All those legions of soldiers?
Mean nothing in the face of the gigantic, watery antitank trench that is the Strait of Formosa.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:44 am

CTALNH wrote:
Chinese Regions wrote:Maybe get Taiwanese companies to dominate China?

How the heck are they gonna dominate state owned companies?

Do you seriously think China is still actually communist?
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:45 am

Chinese Regions wrote:
Aardenland wrote:
Maybe, but the point still stands that no matter how Japan is now, there is no way a majority of Taiwanese citizens would submit to a nation that subjugated some of their ancestors and brutally waged war against other ones. I am a Japanophile too, but Japanophilia doesn't make up a big chunk of our cultures, much more so in your case, I assume. We may have differences in opinion, but it remains the fact that your proposal was very unrealistic, and probably offensive to many Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, etc. (Though I'll admit I was the one who dropped the N-Bomb). My perspective probably isn't very insightful. My entire life up to this point has been spent bunkered up in Minneapolis, well away from the realities of global issues. Where does your viewpoint come from? (By now I can guess that your Japan comment was most likely offhand, but I'd still like to hear more)

My point was, the RoC becomes the government of China and creates a united China which would eventually create a united Asia. Or it allies itself/becomes part of another Asian state, that way, a Japan+Taiwan or Korea+Taiwan union conquers the PRC and creating an united Asia.

I don't want to be offensive but....

What have you been smoking/drinking?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Calimera II
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8790
Founded: Jan 03, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Calimera II » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:46 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the heck are they gonna dominate state owned companies?

Do you seriously think China is still actually communist?

Let him think so, he still believes Stalin was a great man.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:47 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:How the heck are they gonna dominate state owned companies?

Do you seriously think China is still actually communist?

I never said or supported that statement....

But the fact remains that their running their country with state capitalism....
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:48 am

Calimera II wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:Do you seriously think China is still actually communist?

Let him think so, he still believes Stalin was a great man.

Stalin was a great leader not a great/good man....
Same thing with Mao...
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:49 am

CTALNH wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:Do you seriously think China is still actually communist?

I never said or supported that statement....

But the fact remains that their running their country with state capitalism....

You really need to cut down on ellipses. It starts to look really weird and kinda distracting when they're not used to any actual effect.
Also, your comment on "state-owned companies" led me on. But still, pure capitalism is a much stronger force in China now than any kind of state oversight is. One word: bribes.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:52 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:I never said or supported that statement....

But the fact remains that their running their country with state capitalism....

You really need to cut down on ellipses. It starts to look really weird and kinda distracting when they're not used to any actual effect.
Also, your comment on "state-owned companies" led me on. But still, pure capitalism is a much stronger force in China now than any kind of state oversight is. One word: bribes.

Yes please cement my views that capitalism is the worst system ever by telling me that pure capitalism needs bribes....
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Vecherd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6161
Founded: Jun 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vecherd » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:53 am

I feel inclined to support the ones that has not killed millions of people. So I'd say Taiwan should be called the Republic of China.
[align=center]Frie markeder Frie folk
[spoiler=Political Stuff]Left/Right: 8.12
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -10.00

User avatar
Lindenholt
Minister
 
Posts: 2071
Founded: Oct 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lindenholt » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:53 am

Is Taiwan democratic??? If yes GO TAIWAN if no: Then they are both assholes
For information: http://iiwiki.us/wiki/Lindenholt
Come to Sunalaya, you'll enjoy it! Sunalaya
This user supports a single state solution for Ventismar.

New Paris 2014, never forget
This user supports a seven state solution for Bograel-Joguestine.

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:56 am

CTALNH wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:You really need to cut down on ellipses. It starts to look really weird and kinda distracting when they're not used to any actual effect.
Also, your comment on "state-owned companies" led me on. But still, pure capitalism is a much stronger force in China now than any kind of state oversight is. One word: bribes.

Yes please cement my views that capitalism is the worst system ever by telling me that pure capitalism needs bribes....

You're very, very bad at trying to direct the debate. That wasn't even remotely what I was saying, or what we're even debating about. That's basically just rude.
The fact of the matter is, China is run by bribes. State ownership there is effectively a fraud. It's not an inherent trait of capitalism at all, it's just how they do things.
Thus, China cannot be reliably characterized as a "state-run economy".
And "worst system ever"? You sound like Comic Book Guy.
And communism needs bribes, after all, you gotta get a second roll of toilet paper a month somehow.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:59 am

Lindenholt wrote:Is Taiwan democratic??? If yes GO TAIWAN if no: Then they are both assholes

What is it with foreigner and democracy?

Do you even know what your saying?

Lindnholt what you meant to say is "Is Taiwan a real republic?"
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:00 am

The Tiger Kingdom wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Yes please cement my views that capitalism is the worst system ever by telling me that pure capitalism needs bribes....

You're very, very bad at trying to direct the debate. That wasn't even remotely what I was saying, or what we're even debating about. That's basically just rude.
The fact of the matter is, China is run by bribes. State ownership there is effectively a fraud. It's not an inherent trait of capitalism at all, it's just how they do things.
Thus, China cannot be reliably characterized as a "state-run economy".
And "worst system ever"? You sound like Comic Book Guy.
And communism needs bribes, after all, you gotta get a second roll of toilet paper a month somehow.

Have you actually read how the soviet economy works?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
North Stradia
Minister
 
Posts: 2077
Founded: Jan 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby North Stradia » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:01 am

CTALNH wrote:
Lindenholt wrote:Is Taiwan democratic??? If yes GO TAIWAN if no: Then they are both assholes

What is it with foreigner and democracy?

Do you even know what your saying?

Lindnholt what you meant to say is "Is Taiwan a real republic?"

Oh, maybe that amazing new idea that the people should have a say in their own affairs?
I am a Feudo-capitalist, egoist, and a supporter of plutocracy.
R.I.P. Sark, the last feudalist State in the world, born 933, died 2008
Economic Left/Right: +9.89
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: +8.12
Foreign Policy Non-Interventionist/Neocon: +5.88
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: +2.90

User avatar
The Tiger Kingdom
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12281
Founded: May 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:01 am

CTALNH wrote:
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:You're very, very bad at trying to direct the debate. That wasn't even remotely what I was saying, or what we're even debating about. That's basically just rude.
The fact of the matter is, China is run by bribes. State ownership there is effectively a fraud. It's not an inherent trait of capitalism at all, it's just how they do things.
Thus, China cannot be reliably characterized as a "state-run economy".
And "worst system ever"? You sound like Comic Book Guy.
And communism needs bribes, after all, you gotta get a second roll of toilet paper a month somehow.

Have you actually read how the soviet economy works?

I've read how Soviet propagandists claimed it worked, and I've read accounts of how it actually worked.
They don't match very well, and I know which I trust more.
When the war is over
Got to start again
Try to hold a trace of what it was back then
You and I we sent each other stories
Just a page I'm lost in all its glory
How can I go home and not get blown away

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Haganham, Sutalia, The Great Furrican Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron