CTALNH wrote:Down with the American Bootlickers Boooo Taiwan....
And blind nationalism meets blind partisanship!
WHO! WILL! WIN?!
Advertisement
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:16 am
CTALNH wrote:Down with the American Bootlickers Boooo Taiwan....
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:30 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:33 am
by French Indochine » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:26 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:27 am
French Indochine wrote:In a military situation, as in the scenario in which hostilities break out between the PRC and ROC - as of 2012, the ROC's armed forces isn't capable of lasting even a week of combat at the most; 3-4 days is the more likely time that they can hold out, as recent defence studies have shown. Thus, the ROC's survival will fall into the hands of the US Pacific Fleet and military, since the US has signed a defense pact with the ROC. That is, if the US Navy will be aggressive and willing to go on with the fight for longer than that those three-four days.
"We are going to fight a long war, and Americans don't like long wars." -Ho Chi Minh
by Chinese Regions » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:36 am
Aardenland wrote:Chinese Regions wrote:And Germany committed the holocaust, so what? As long as Japan accepts its crime, I have no problem with them. I'm Chinese Japanophile, there's nothing wrong with that.
Maybe, but the point still stands that no matter how Japan is now, there is no way a majority of Taiwanese citizens would submit to a nation that subjugated some of their ancestors and brutally waged war against other ones. I am a Japanophile too, but Japanophilia doesn't make up a big chunk of our cultures, much more so in your case, I assume. We may have differences in opinion, but it remains the fact that your proposal was very unrealistic, and probably offensive to many Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, etc. (Though I'll admit I was the one who dropped the N-Bomb). My perspective probably isn't very insightful. My entire life up to this point has been spent bunkered up in Minneapolis, well away from the realities of global issues. Where does your viewpoint come from? (By now I can guess that your Japan comment was most likely offhand, but I'd still like to hear more)
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:40 am
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:CTALNH wrote:Does Taiwan have a billion people?
If not China wins....
p.s Yeah I know Taiwan has only around 20 million people...
So the sole determining factor of what country deserves to be the "victor" in a massively complex and nuanced geopolitical process is through population?
I suggest you look into the issue a little more.
by Chinese Regions » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:41 am
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:42 am
Chinese Regions wrote:Maybe get Taiwanese companies to dominate China?
by Calimera II » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:43 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:44 am
CTALNH wrote:The Tiger Kingdom wrote:So the sole determining factor of what country deserves to be the "victor" in a massively complex and nuanced geopolitical process is through population?
I suggest you look into the issue a little more.
Nah I am looking at the point of view of who has more reserves to throw at each other.....
China wins by default....
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:44 am
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:45 am
Chinese Regions wrote:Aardenland wrote:
Maybe, but the point still stands that no matter how Japan is now, there is no way a majority of Taiwanese citizens would submit to a nation that subjugated some of their ancestors and brutally waged war against other ones. I am a Japanophile too, but Japanophilia doesn't make up a big chunk of our cultures, much more so in your case, I assume. We may have differences in opinion, but it remains the fact that your proposal was very unrealistic, and probably offensive to many Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, etc. (Though I'll admit I was the one who dropped the N-Bomb). My perspective probably isn't very insightful. My entire life up to this point has been spent bunkered up in Minneapolis, well away from the realities of global issues. Where does your viewpoint come from? (By now I can guess that your Japan comment was most likely offhand, but I'd still like to hear more)
My point was, the RoC becomes the government of China and creates a united China which would eventually create a united Asia. Or it allies itself/becomes part of another Asian state, that way, a Japan+Taiwan or Korea+Taiwan union conquers the PRC and creating an united Asia.
by Calimera II » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:46 am
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:47 am
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:48 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:49 am
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:52 am
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:CTALNH wrote:I never said or supported that statement....
But the fact remains that their running their country with state capitalism....
You really need to cut down on ellipses. It starts to look really weird and kinda distracting when they're not used to any actual effect.
Also, your comment on "state-owned companies" led me on. But still, pure capitalism is a much stronger force in China now than any kind of state oversight is. One word: bribes.
by Vecherd » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:53 am
by Lindenholt » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:53 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:56 am
CTALNH wrote:The Tiger Kingdom wrote:You really need to cut down on ellipses. It starts to look really weird and kinda distracting when they're not used to any actual effect.
Also, your comment on "state-owned companies" led me on. But still, pure capitalism is a much stronger force in China now than any kind of state oversight is. One word: bribes.
Yes please cement my views that capitalism is the worst system ever by telling me that pure capitalism needs bribes....
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 4:59 am
Lindenholt wrote:Is Taiwan democratic??? If yes GO TAIWAN if no: Then they are both assholes
by CTALNH » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:00 am
The Tiger Kingdom wrote:CTALNH wrote:Yes please cement my views that capitalism is the worst system ever by telling me that pure capitalism needs bribes....
You're very, very bad at trying to direct the debate. That wasn't even remotely what I was saying, or what we're even debating about. That's basically just rude.
The fact of the matter is, China is run by bribes. State ownership there is effectively a fraud. It's not an inherent trait of capitalism at all, it's just how they do things.
Thus, China cannot be reliably characterized as a "state-run economy".
And "worst system ever"? You sound like Comic Book Guy.
And communism needs bribes, after all, you gotta get a second roll of toilet paper a month somehow.
by North Stradia » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:01 am
by The Tiger Kingdom » Sat Jan 05, 2013 5:01 am
CTALNH wrote:The Tiger Kingdom wrote:You're very, very bad at trying to direct the debate. That wasn't even remotely what I was saying, or what we're even debating about. That's basically just rude.
The fact of the matter is, China is run by bribes. State ownership there is effectively a fraud. It's not an inherent trait of capitalism at all, it's just how they do things.
Thus, China cannot be reliably characterized as a "state-run economy".
And "worst system ever"? You sound like Comic Book Guy.
And communism needs bribes, after all, you gotta get a second roll of toilet paper a month somehow.
Have you actually read how the soviet economy works?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Haganham, Sutalia, The Great Furrican Empire
Advertisement