Has NS ever helped you?

[Cameroi]

Gotta admit that takes balls.

We don't really wear underwear under the dress....

never argue with a man wearing a dress when he's throwing a telephone pole.

[Dyakovo]

Only if one wears trousers.

Well except women who wear dresses and people who are naked who else doesn't wear trousers?

Men who wear dresses...

[Zweite Alaje]

Yes, NS has shown me just how disturbing Liberal thought is, and has solidified my hatred of Modern Liberalism. I've also met a good amount of fellow Quasi-Fascists, Third Position Socialists, Fascists here with whom I discuss my ideology with in detail.

Yes, please, do go on about how disturbing freedom and equality is...

Freedom from what? Equality for whom? Liberalism has produced nothing of value, it has contributed nothing to the progress of humanity's welfare, it is worthless.

[Esternial]

Yes, please, do go on about how disturbing freedom and equality is...

Freedom from what? Equality for whom? Liberalism has produced nothing of value, it has contributed nothing to the progress of humanity's welfare, it is worthless.

Women being able to vote really is nothing, I concur.

[Zweite Alaje]

Freedom from what? Equality for whom? Liberalism has produced nothing of value, it has contributed nothing to the progress of humanity's welfare, it is worthless.

Women being able to vote really is nothing, I concur.

Liberalism, not progressivism. They're not the samething.

[Esternial]

Women being able to vote really is nothing, I concur.

Liberalism, not progressivism. They're not the samething.

Oh I'm sorry, I forgot we're talking solely about America again. I thought you were talking about humanity. Yeah, then Liberals have really done nothing of value.

Then again, The Unitred Stated of 'Merica is the only country worth taking notice of.

[Zweite Alaje]

Liberalism, not progressivism. They're not the samething.

Oh I'm sorry, I forgot we're talking solely about America again. I thought you were talking about humanity. Yeah, then Liberals have really done nothing of value.

Then again, The Unitred Stated of 'Merica is the only country worth taking notice of.

Our liberals are Liberalism Lite, the Liberalism elsewhere is even worse.

[Esternial]

Oh I'm sorry, I forgot we're talking solely about America again. I thought you were talking about humanity. Yeah, then Liberals have really done nothing of value.

Then again, The Unitred Stated of 'Merica is the only country worth taking notice of.

Our liberals are Liberalism Lite, the Liberalism elsewhere is even worse.

So what about Roosevelt?

[Zweite Alaje]

Our liberals are Liberalism Lite, the Liberalism elsewhere is even worse.

So what about Roosevelt?

Progressive, not Liberal.

[Esternial]

So what about Roosevelt?

Progressive, not Liberal.

Depends on your definition of Liberal.

I guess with yours it doesn't exist, which explains why it didn't contribute anything in your book.

Also, LBJ

[Grenartia]

Yes, please, do go on about how disturbing freedom and equality is...

Freedom from what? Equality for whom? Liberalism has produced nothing of value, it has contributed nothing to the progress of humanity's welfare, it is worthless.

Freedom from oppression, equality for all. How is that worthless?

So what about Roosevelt?

Progressive, not Liberal.

What's the difference?

[Zweite Alaje]

Freedom from what? Equality for whom? Liberalism has produced nothing of value, it has contributed nothing to the progress of humanity's welfare, it is worthless.

Freedom from oppression, equality for all. How is that worthless?

Progressive, not Liberal.

What's the difference?

Freedom from responsiblity, equality without merit. How is that not worthless?

Liberalism is only about change for the sake of change, without thinking twice about whether there is anything that needs to be changed about something, or whether said changes will actually benefit society.

Progressivism emplements change as needed, only when and where needed. It is the exact center between liberalism's drive for needless change and conservatism's drive to retain obsolete practices.

[Grenartia]

Freedom from oppression, equality for all. How is that worthless?



What's the difference?

Freedom from responsiblity, equality without merit. How is that not worthless?

Liberalism is only about change for the sake of change, without thinking twice about whether there is anything that needs to be changed about something, or whether said changes will actually benefit society.

Progressivism emplements change as needed, only when and where needed. It is the exact center between liberalism's drive for needless change and conservatism's drive to retain obsolete practices.

When did I mention freedom from responsibility or equality without merit (though why somebody needs to have accomplished something to be considered equal to everybody else is beyond me)?

[Homosexy]

Liberalism is only about change for the sake of change, without thinking twice about whether there is anything that needs to be changed about something, or whether said changes will actually benefit society.

Progressivism emplements change as needed, only when and where needed. It is the exact center between liberalism's drive for needless change and conservatism's drive to retain obsolete practices.

Needless change? Just because it's not in your face, bothering you all the time, doesn't mean that it doesn't need to be changed. Your life might be just peachy, but change is possible and necessary for a lot of people in this country and in this world who have it a lot worse than you.

[Esternial]

Freedom from oppression, equality for all. How is that worthless?



What's the difference?

Freedom from responsiblity, equality without merit. How is that not worthless?

Liberalism is only about change for the sake of change, without thinking twice about whether there is anything that needs to be changed about something, or whether said changes will actually benefit society.

Progressivism emplements change as needed, only when and where needed. It is the exact center between liberalism's drive for needless change and conservatism's drive to retain obsolete practices.

This explains a lot.

You just don't know what Liberalism really is.

Don't worry, I forgive you.

[Dyakovo]

Freedom from responsiblity, equality without merit. How is that not worthless?

Liberalism is only about change for the sake of change, without thinking twice about whether there is anything that needs to be changed about something, or whether said changes will actually benefit society.

Progressivism emplements change as needed, only when and where needed. It is the exact center between liberalism's drive for needless change and conservatism's drive to retain obsolete practices.

This explains a lot.

You just don't know what Liberalism really is.

Don't worry, I forgive you.

Sure he does... Liberalism is everything he disagrees with... Rather like communism for McCarthyists...

[Zweite Alaje]

This explains a lot.

You just don't know what Liberalism really is.

Don't worry, I forgive you.

Sure he does... Liberalism is everything he disagrees with... Rather like communism for McCarthyists...

Ha, ha very funny. I don't blame liberals for everything, there's conservatives, fascists, libertarians. Liberalism isn't the only ideology I disagree with.