And how was I supposed to know that?
Advertisement
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:00 pm
by Abatael » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:02 pm
by Greed and Death » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:24 pm
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:26 pm
by Greed and Death » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:28 pm
by Abatael » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:29 pm
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 12:29 pm
by Grave_n_idle » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:21 pm
Abatael wrote:We are done here as you are failing in this.
Here is everything, if you still feel the same after this, then you're blind:
Yep, these are the friendly, non-criminal, completely legal Occupy Wall Street "protesters" we all know and love. (There's more if you want it.)
by Augarundus » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:24 pm
Quebec and Atlantic Canada wrote:Oh come on, PressTV is the least reliable news source this side of RT.
The Guardian article only says that the FBI coordinated a "crackdown" on OWS. They didn't plan to assassinate anybody.
by Greed and Death » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:29 pm
by Quebec and Atlantic Canada » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:29 pm
Augarundus wrote:Quebec and Atlantic Canada wrote:Oh come on, PressTV is the least reliable news source this side of RT.
The Guardian article only says that the FBI coordinated a "crackdown" on OWS. They didn't plan to assassinate anybody.
Yeah, I don't know what the fuck PressTV is, and they didn't post a link to any other source where we can view clips of even the redacted document. This needs some sauces.
by Grave_n_idle » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:32 pm
Hippostania wrote:Sounds good to me, it's good to know that there were indeed plans to assasinate these domestic terrorists. Terrorists don't deserve a trial
by Abatael » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:32 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Abatael wrote:We are done here as you are failing in this.
Here is everything, if you still feel the same after this, then you're blind:
Yep, these are the friendly, non-criminal, completely legal Occupy Wall Street "protesters" we all know and love. (There's more if you want it.)
Your claim was that the OWS crowd were terrorists. You've completely failed to prove that claim.
You moved the goalposts to rapists - and found some evidence that there might have been some such crimes taking place - but such are not condoned, are not policy, and the organising voices of the OWS movement(s) have condemned such action.
So you shifted the goalposts again, to 'malefactors' - and you presented sources that suggest there may, indeed, have been wrongdoing - even crime - from people at the protests. But again such are not representative, or condoned.
You've claimed that the protests are not protests, which is a bizarre claim.
I think you're being unrealistic when you say that the other poster is 'failing' - your sources don't back the level of claim you're making, and some of those sources are very questionable.
You might also want to look up a definition for 'terrorist'.
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:34 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Hippostania wrote:Sounds good to me, it's good to know that there were indeed plans to assasinate these domestic terrorists. Terrorists don't deserve a trial
Since you're neither a citizen nor a resident, you're complete lack of regard for the American legal system is fortunately unimportant.
Innocent until proven guilt, my friend. They're not terrorists unless they are tried and found guilty.
And this is another occasion on which I'm going to recommend that the poster takes a few minutes to get familiar with the the definition of 'terrorism'.
by Grave_n_idle » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:34 pm
Abatael wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Your claim was that the OWS crowd were terrorists. You've completely failed to prove that claim.
You moved the goalposts to rapists - and found some evidence that there might have been some such crimes taking place - but such are not condoned, are not policy, and the organising voices of the OWS movement(s) have condemned such action.
So you shifted the goalposts again, to 'malefactors' - and you presented sources that suggest there may, indeed, have been wrongdoing - even crime - from people at the protests. But again such are not representative, or condoned.
You've claimed that the protests are not protests, which is a bizarre claim.
I think you're being unrealistic when you say that the other poster is 'failing' - your sources don't back the level of claim you're making, and some of those sources are very questionable.
You might also want to look up a definition for 'terrorist'.
When did I claim they were terrorists?
by Augarundus » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:35 pm
Quebec and Atlantic Canada wrote:PressTV is the propaganda arm of the Iranian government FYI.
by Grave_n_idle » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:35 pm
Wisconsin9 wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Since you're neither a citizen nor a resident, you're complete lack of regard for the American legal system is fortunately unimportant.
Innocent until proven guilt, my friend. They're not terrorists unless they are tried and found guilty.
And this is another occasion on which I'm going to recommend that the poster takes a few minutes to get familiar with the the definition of 'terrorism'.
See, you're basing your whole point in this post on the idea that the right-wingers who've been posting here have any respect at all for the American legal system when it involves an ideology they find distasteful.
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:37 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:See, you're basing your whole point in this post on the idea that the right-wingers who've been posting here have any respect at all for the American legal system when it involves an ideology they find distasteful.
Oh, no - not at all. I don't think Hippo has any interest at all in the American legal system, or anything about America except it's militant rightwing. Based purely on what I've seen posted.
I could be wrong, of course.
by Quebec and Atlantic Canada » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:53 pm
by Charlotte Ryberg » Mon Dec 31, 2012 11:54 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jan 01, 2013 12:10 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Abatael wrote:
When did I claim they were terrorists?
viewtopic.php?p=12299065#p12299065
You agreed with Hippo's nonsensical bullshit claim that they were terrorists and didn't deserve a trial.
by Wikipedia and Universe » Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:46 am
An ODECON Naval Analyst wrote:Superior tactics and training can in fact triumph over force of numbers and missile spam.
Bottle wrote:This is not rocket surgery, folks.
Senestrum wrote:This is relativity, the theory that takes everything we know about the world, bends it over, and fucks it to death with a spiked dildo.
by Norstal » Tue Jan 01, 2013 2:31 am
Wikipedia and Universe wrote:I'm not even going to address the topic directly, as it was clearly established to be complete rubbish well before the end of the first page of this thread. COINTELPRO is not making a comeback.
Funny, I thought the the rate of crazy nutter threads would subside and calm down at the end of the summer.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by LeftNightmare » Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:28 am
by Qasaqi » Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:30 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ickerija, Ifreann, Ineva, ML Library, Qahrania, Saiwana, The Huskar Social Union, TheKeyToJoy, Tungstan
Advertisement