Yeah but who gives a fuck, NS is just a bunch of arm-chair socialists(i used to be among them) anyways, save for a few good men/women.
Advertisement

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:01 am

by United States of Dixieland » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:02 am
New Sapienta wrote:How about we just place police stations near schools?
Seems the best of both worlds.

by Wikkiwallana » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:04 am
Vazdania wrote:And are we just forgetting what CAN happen if a government restricts the right of gun ownership? THINGS LIKE THE SYRIAN SITUATION HAPPEN. Governments can wipe out their citizens who are unarmed.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:04 am
United States of Dixieland wrote:New Sapienta wrote:How about we just place police stations near schools?
Seems the best of both worlds.
even if they are located near a school police get calls from all over. They cannot be everywhere at once. Then you have to define near. 1 block away? 2 blocks away? A killer would have aready killed a dozen by the tie they arrive. Whereas you give a teacher a gun and train her on how to handle one properly and safey the problem is solved by the time the police get there. Besides most of these shootings seems to happen in states where gun cntrol is stricter. From the day I was born in my hometown in Georgia I had never seen or heard of anything like Connt. in my area.

by New Sapienta » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:05 am
United States of Dixieland wrote:New Sapienta wrote:How about we just place police stations near schools?
Seems the best of both worlds.
even if they are located near a school police get calls from all over. They cannot be everywhere at once. Then you have to define near. 1 block away? 2 blocks away? A killer would have aready killed a dozen by the tie they arrive. Whereas you give a teacher a gun and train her on how to handle one properly and safey the problem is solved by the time the police get there. Besides most of these shootings seems to happen in states where gun cntrol is stricter. From the day I was born in my hometown in Georgia I had never seen or heard of anything like Connt. in my area.

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:07 am
Reichmar wrote:Guns are our second line of defense. FYI NBC is liberal and stupid p.

by Wikkiwallana » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:26 am
Reichmar wrote:Guns are our second line of defense. FYI NBC is liberal and stupid.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by The Black Forrest » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:32 am
Reichmar wrote:Guns are our second line of defense. FYI NBC is liberal and stupid.

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 29, 2012 12:33 am

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:15 am
Vazdania wrote:Zathganastan wrote:And if he had had a gun you would be dead, which is the major point.At current anyone can acquire a wind variety of guns with little to no issues at all, which they can then turn around and use to commit any number of violent crimes.
you can buy pencils, sharpen them, and go on a wild pencil stabbing spree aswell! I don't see lawmakers banning pencils!

by Trotskylvania » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:17 am
Nidaria wrote:Like it or not, students do need to be protected. In our backwards society, shootings happen, and we do not want the victims to be defenseless.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:20 am
Trotskylvania wrote:Nidaria wrote:Like it or not, students do need to be protected. In our backwards society, shootings happen, and we do not want the victims to be defenseless.
At the rate they happen, it is not worth the resources.
Seriously, does anyone stop to think what these inane proposals would cost? THere's on average one or two school shootings in the US per year. Yes, it horrible and it is inevitable that people will be deeply moved by this. But it's always far easier to have sympathy with suffering than sympathy with thought. And for the price of putting one extra police officer in every school in America, you could increase mental health funding to such a degree that you'd save a hundred people from suicide, and maybe one from shooting up his school.

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:21 am
North Calaveras wrote:United States of Dixieland wrote:
even if they are located near a school police get calls from all over. They cannot be everywhere at once. Then you have to define near. 1 block away? 2 blocks away? A killer would have aready killed a dozen by the tie they arrive. Whereas you give a teacher a gun and train her on how to handle one properly and safey the problem is solved by the time the police get there. Besides most of these shootings seems to happen in states where gun cntrol is stricter. From the day I was born in my hometown in Georgia I had never seen or heard of anything like Connt. in my area.
Civilians are incapable of learning how to handle a stressful situation "nods"

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:22 am
Dyakovo wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
Civilians are incapable of learning how to handle a stressful situation "nods"
Nice strawman... You build it yourself or did you need some help?
The actual statement that you are attempting to pervert is "most civilians are incapable of responding appropriately with a firearm in a life or death situation."

by The Black Forrest » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:30 am
North Calaveras wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Nice strawman... You build it yourself or did you need some help?
The actual statement that you are attempting to pervert is "most civilians are incapable of responding appropriately with a firearm in a life or death situation."
Thanks I got the straw from your farm
anyways yes people on NS seem to love to point out how incapable civilians are with firearms.

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:33 am
North Calaveras wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Nice strawman... You build it yourself or did you need some help?
The actual statement that you are attempting to pervert is "most civilians are incapable of responding appropriately with a firearm in a life or death situation."
Thanks I got the straw from your farm
anyways yes people on NS seem to love to point out how incapable civilians are with firearms.

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:34 am
Dyakovo wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
Thanks I got the straw from your farm
anyways yes people on NS seem to love to point out how incapable civilians are with firearms.
In high stress situations, they usually are. Attempting to accurately return fire when someone is shooting at you is vastly different from target shooting a a range.
It's really quite sad that you don't realize that.

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 1:42 am

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:26 am
Dyakovo wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
sauce?
Being trained to handle said situations, also difference in performance in combat situations between trained, professional soldiers and militias.
(Yes, I know its not a proper source, but I'm on my phone, so sourcing stuff is difficult...)
Look up the Gabrielle Gifford shooting...

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:30 am
North Calaveras wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Being trained to handle said situations, also difference in performance in combat situations between trained, professional soldiers and militias.
(Yes, I know its not a proper source, but I'm on my phone, so sourcing stuff is difficult...)
Look up the Gabrielle Gifford shooting...
We don't know if police are able to handle these situations until they are in them as well, we can only hope their training is enough but it's the individual that matters whether or not htey are going to act.
and I think i will just wait till you post a legitament source.

by North Calaveras » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:32 am
Dyakovo wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
We don't know if police are able to handle these situations until they are in them as well, we can only hope their training is enough but it's the individual that matters whether or not htey are going to act.
and I think i will just wait till you post a legitament source.
You realize you're supporting my position, yes?

by Dyakovo » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:34 am

by L Ron Cupboard » Sat Dec 29, 2012 2:42 am
However, there seems to be a consensus among practitioners and researchers alike that police marksmanship in real-life (scene of a crime) situations is less than desirable, something along the order of one hit for every six shots (Morrison 2002). This means that in gunfighting with actual criminals, the average police officer effectiveness is at the level of 17% proficiency. This is much less, as you will have noticed, than the 84% proficiency level required for qualification in police training. It also illustrates the problem, that real-life situations are so vastly different from training situations.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arval Va, Kenjino, Kubra, Life empire, Lowell Leber, Pridelantic people, Valoptia, Washington Resistance Army, Xind, Zhiyouguo
Advertisement