Advertisement

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:22 am

by Samozaryadnyastan » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:23 am
Farnhamia wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31/au ... tatistics/
Well, we'll have to see. There are differences between the criteria used to choose the incidents, for one thing. I looked at only one in the Daily Anarchist's list, the Odighizuwa shooting, and found that there are conflicting reports as to whether the shooter dropped his weapon in response to the appearance of the armed civilians or before. It seems that most of the civilian interventions consisted of tackling the shooter, not shooting him.
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Poorisolation » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:29 am
Farnhamia wrote:Samozaryadnyastan wrote:http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31/au ... tatistics/
Well, we'll have to see. There are differences between the criteria used to choose the incidents, for one thing. I looked at only one in the Daily Anarchist's list, the Odighizuwa shooting, and found that there are conflicting reports as to whether the shooter dropped his weapon in response to the appearance of the armed civilians or before. It seems that most of the civilian interventions consisted of tackling the shooter, not shooting him.

by Sidhae » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:31 am

by Genivaria » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:32 am
Gauthier wrote:Remember.
Wayne LaPierre said it's not gun accessibility that contributes to mass shootings, it's video games like Mortal Kombat and violent movies like Natural Born Killers.
So we should pack public schools with armed security guards.
And heavily regulate video games. Because guns with high ammunition capacity and firing rate are a Constitutional right but video games are culpable for mass shootings.
*Nod nod.*


by Genivaria » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:33 am
Sidhae wrote:Don't you find it a little amusing that whenever one random idiot fills a few kids with lead, all the big-mouthed political interest groups are up in flames, screaming about gun control (or less gun control), denouncing the shooter as everything from psycho to right-wing extremist and basically make a big circus to gain political capital from the public, basically blatantly profiteering on what's ultimately an insignificant tragedy blown out of proportion. At the same time these very same people don't see anything wrong with massacring women and children as long as it's handled by professionals in the name of a "greater good", in which case the killers are lauded as patriotic heroes and the victims politely described along the line of "unfortunate collateral damage".

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:34 am
Genivaria wrote:Gauthier wrote:Remember.
Wayne LaPierre said it's not gun accessibility that contributes to mass shootings, it's video games like Mortal Kombat and violent movies like Natural Born Killers.
So we should pack public schools with armed security guards.
And heavily regulate video games. Because guns with high ammunition capacity and firing rate are a Constitutional right but video games are culpable for mass shootings.
*Nod nod.*
Yes because after playing GTA there's nothing I wanna do more then drive on the sidewalk running people over.


by Des-Bal » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:35 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:Yes. If I cannot maintain my own ethical standards on an Internet forum where violating them doesn't mean a thing, how can I maintain them in the face of actual adversity?
Yes.
Er, no, in fact it feels quite shitty. I don't think you understand anything I've said so far in this thread, or any other thread about gun control for that matter. Treating the symptoms of the problem don't make the problem go away. They just make you feel good temporarily.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Formisia » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:42 am

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:59 am
Poorisolation wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Well, we'll have to see. There are differences between the criteria used to choose the incidents, for one thing. I looked at only one in the Daily Anarchist's list, the Odighizuwa shooting, and found that there are conflicting reports as to whether the shooter dropped his weapon in response to the appearance of the armed civilians or before. It seems that most of the civilian interventions consisted of tackling the shooter, not shooting him.
I think the point that seems to escape the majority of proponents of the "civilians stop shooters" argument like Ann Coulter and this Daily Anarchist guy is what a whole lot of examples they can draw upon....lots and lots and lots and lots and lots and lots....in fact so many that before long they can end up with more shooting incidents that fit their prescription than the total number of shooting incidents in say England and Wales plus France plus even Germany in total in the same time frame and theirs is just a subset of American firearms incidents. Oh and their body count ends up being far higher as well.

by L Ron Cupboard » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:02 am
Raziac wrote:If you do not wish to observe the above, kindly fuck off and comment on somebody else's post.
Thank you.

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:07 am

by Galla- » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:08 am
Gauthier wrote:Remember.
Wayne LaPierre said it's not gun accessibility that contributes to mass shootings, it's video games like Mortal Kombat and violent movies like Natural Born Killers.
So we should pack public schools with armed security guards.
And heavily regulate video games. Because guns with high ammunition capacity and firing rate are a Constitutional right but video games are culpable for mass shootings.
*Nod nod.*
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:09 am
Galla- wrote:Gauthier wrote:Remember.
Wayne LaPierre said it's not gun accessibility that contributes to mass shootings, it's video games like Mortal Kombat and violent movies like Natural Born Killers.
So we should pack public schools with armed security guards.
And heavily regulate video games. Because guns with high ammunition capacity and firing rate are a Constitutional right but video games are culpable for mass shootings.
*Nod nod.*
I know every time I pick up a gun, I can't help but shoot the closest thirty people around me.
It's a darn shame, too. If only guns didn't cause violence.

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:11 am

by Occupied Deutschland » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:11 am

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:12 am

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:14 am

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:16 am

by Des-Bal » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:16 am
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Samozaryadnyastan » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:16 am
Malgrave wrote:You are secretly Vladimir Putin using this forum to promote Russian weapons and tracking down and killing those who oppose you.

by Occupied Deutschland » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:17 am

by Occupied Deutschland » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:18 am

by Des-Bal » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:18 am
Gauthier wrote:
Why bother having gun regulations? Should be legal for anyone to carry a rocket launcher or flame thrower.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:20 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth of Adirondack, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Heavenly Assault, Nilokeras, Oneid1, Rary, Sky Reavers, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Two Jerseys, Valentine Z, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement