NATION

PASSWORD

Obama Will Take Your Guns

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:37 pm

Agymnum wrote:If gun ownership was banned, I honestly wouldn't mind. But to appease all the gun nuts out there I'd at least hope Obama would keep low caliber rifles and semi-automatic pistols legal. Beyond that, you definitely don't need automatics or high-powered rifles (i.e. AKs, M-16s, etc) to do simple hunting or for home defense.


No one want's a M16, And those use 5.56mm Which is the Military version of a .223. The AK is a good hunting rifle because it uses basically a .308.

High powered rifles start at I believe anything firing a Supersonic load right spree?
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Rupture Farms co
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Rupture Farms co » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:37 pm

Agymnum wrote:If gun ownership was banned, I honestly wouldn't mind. But to appease all the gun nuts out there I'd at least hope Obama would keep low caliber rifles and semi-automatic pistols legal. Beyond that, you definitely don't need automatics or high-powered rifles (i.e. AKs, M-16s, etc) to do simple hunting or for home defense.

I hunt with my Mosin Nagant 7.62 by 54Rmm rifle myself, very highpowered weapon there. Tear a huge hole in the chest of a human being. I mean good luck hunting anything bigger then quail with a .22.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
If you were a cartel leader, worth millions of dollars, with your own private air fleet of, say, retired DC-3s, what would you rather do?

  • Pay some dude to sneak himself into the United States, find a straw purchaser, pay said purchaser ~$750.00 for a semi-automatic AK, attempt to smuggle said AK back into Mexico, use semi-automatic AK to shoot at other gang members.

OR

  • Tell pilot of one of your planes to fly to Somalia, trade several kilograms of cocaine for an entire plane full of fully-automatic AKs, fly back to Mexico, and use said full-autos to shoot at other gang members.


the top one, because when it goes wrong (and lets face it, murphy's law) you're out £750.

when option two goes wrong, you're out a couple of 100,000 plus a fucking plane. not to mention somalia is the other side of africa from america.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159060
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm

Sheariliik wrote:What? Can someone explain to me what the hell this is?

The mad ramblings of a peculiar person.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Wanna Explain that little bit of fail logic?


Well less guns = less people who can potentially kill with guns.

It's a bit of simply math, really.

If you're for gun-ownership, I don't mind. I just hope you're willing to give your life for all those kids who got senselessly wasted at Columbine, Virginia Tech, and that recent shooting in Connecticut.


Except that people who are fucked up enough to do those don't give 2 shit's about Law's perhaps?
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:38 pm

Agymnum wrote:
Yes Im Biop wrote:
Wanna Explain that little bit of fail logic?


Well less guns = less people who can potentially kill with guns.

It's a bit of simply math, really.

If you're for gun-ownership, I don't mind. I just hope you're willing to give your life for all those kids who got senselessly wasted at Columbine, Virginia Tech, and that recent shooting in Connecticut.

If you're for driving, I hope you're willing to give your organs for all those people who are senselessly killed in drunk driving accidents.

User avatar
Sheariliik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 517
Founded: Sep 29, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Sheariliik » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:39 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
Blazedtown wrote:
You make rational gun owners look bad. When you spew shit like this it only fuels lie-mongers like the Brady Campaign and MSNBC. Please stop.


I don't even think hes being serious, sounds like one of those guys who likes to get everyone pissed by making a ridiculous thread.


^this
Current flag: http://pre09.deviantart.net/b166/th/pre ... b64mmr.png
Old Flag: http://orig02.deviantart.net/3b91/f/201 ... akmzt1.jpg
___________________________________________________________________________________
Cill Charthaigh wrote:
Sheariliik wrote:they're to small to bother with. neutral.
You're too big to fuck with. Allied because you have a very large Arms Manufacturing sector.
Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/user/ViscaeleusXtheXGreat

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:39 pm

Rupture Farms co wrote:
Agymnum wrote:If gun ownership was banned, I honestly wouldn't mind. But to appease all the gun nuts out there I'd at least hope Obama would keep low caliber rifles and semi-automatic pistols legal. Beyond that, you definitely don't need automatics or high-powered rifles (i.e. AKs, M-16s, etc) to do simple hunting or for home defense.

I hunt with my Mosin Nagant 7.62 by 54Rmm rifle myself, very highpowered weapon there. Tear a huge hole in the chest of a human being. I mean good luck hunting anything bigger then quail with a .22.

Quail? Pffft. Use a 20 gauge shotgun.

User avatar
AntiSwagLand
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby AntiSwagLand » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:40 pm

Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:41 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day


It's not Obama were worried about, It's the Moron's in congress who can pass law's like that.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Gun Manufacturers
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9969
Founded: Jan 23, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gun Manufacturers » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:41 pm

Vareiln wrote:
Demphor wrote:
Not killing anyone

What purpose does it serve to have them out where someone can go break into schools and kill everyone there?

in Japan, for example, guns are completely outlawed, yet only 11 homicides were committed in 2008 because of gun violence.

We lost more twice that many in a day.

Except you would be talking about banning a massive amount of weapons, from this to this to this and so much more.
And how would banning those change a thing when the shooter could have done the exact same thing with this or this?


Do you do realize that the second link in your post is an airsoft pistol?
Gun control is like trying to solve drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to own cars.

Any accident you can walk away from is one I can laugh at.

DOJ's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/fi ... -p0126.pdf

Natapoc wrote:...You should post more in here so I don't seem like the extremist...


Auraelius wrote:If you take the the TITANIC, and remove the letters T, T, and one of the I's, and add the letters C,O,S,P,R, and Y you get CONSPIRACY. oOooOooooOOOooooOOOOOOoooooooo


Maineiacs wrote:Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll sit in a boat and get drunk all day.


Luw wrote:Politics is like having two handfuls of shit - one that smells bad and one that looks bad - and having to decide which one to put in your mouth.

User avatar
British Prussia
Minister
 
Posts: 2480
Founded: Jul 05, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby British Prussia » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:41 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day

How would you feel if Obama came along and started to chop people's dicks off? Because that's how I feel! Nvm. I'll just have to do this the hard way... Hide my gun...
British Prussia - Britisches Preußen
Content provided by: Foreign & Trade Office | Ministry of War
Embassy | Factbook | C.W.Sentinel | Regional Map
WARCON: | Critical | Severe | Substanial | Low
Response: | Execptional | Heightened | Normal
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 2.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.69

Conservative Cosmopolitan
Cosmopolitan 18%
Secular 17%
Reactionary 4%
Authoritarian 14%
Capitalistic 12%
Pro-Military 9%
Anthropocentric 43%
Monarchy, Centre-Right, Military, Economic Interventionism, Trade, Wealth, Living Wage, Social Conservatism, Capitalism, Pro-Choice, Lesbians/Gays/Bisexuals, Roman Catholicism, Hong Kong, Commonwealth of Nations, Anglosphere, Conservative Party (UK), National Party (NZ)

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day


Yeah, I used to be pro-gun, and then I got disgusted with how insane the NRA became with its fear-mongering "X PRESIDENT WILL TAKE OUR GUNS! TYRANNY!" tactics. Now I'm pro-gun control but anti-gun bans just because I'd hate to see how the NRA would start foaming at the mouth at even the mention of a gun ban.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

North Calaveras wrote:Even if there was a full on ban/massive restriction in effect you could always get your guns south of the border(i know I would) I brought this up earlier because it's a very valid tactic. I would go straight to the cartel to get my goods and when guns are banned every criminal, every person who wants a gun to defend themselves, every killer, regardless of what there intents are will be lining up to buy from them.


You know you're onto a loser when you set your moral platform up such that you align with 'killers'.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:This I find hard to believe. Based on what you've already written - if it were proved 100% that guns caused increased incidence of violence, and that banning them would reduce lethal violence to a tiny fraction of it's current level - (I believe, based on your already stated opinions) - that you'd still be arguing for the right to keep and bear arms.


I'm far less likely to agree to any gun control schemes if it impedes my ability to purchase the firearms that I want by too much. The peril is that agreeing to oblige by one form of restrictions will give way to having to comply with further restrictions until there is no longer any point in trying to only have legal firearms because they are too ineffective or obsolete compared to what the police and military will have at their disposal.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day

This is funny. Very very funny, especially since gun owners have a legitimate reason to be worried once many people start talking about banning many common types of guns.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day


No he dosn't want to take them away, but Democrats are wanting to grind away at it with more regulations and taxes, here in california it FUCKING SUCKS.

You dont tell people what they do and don't need, I will buy/steal a weapon to protect my family and loved ones because I know no matter how many laws are made there are going to be assholes that are also armed and there is no law going to stop them.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
AntiSwagLand
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Mar 20, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby AntiSwagLand » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:42 pm

British Prussia wrote:
AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day

How would you feel if Obama came along and started to chop people's dicks off? Because that's how I feel! Nvm. I'll just have to do this the hard way... Hide my gun...


This makes it sound like you own a gun to make up for the size of something that really matters
Last edited by AntiSwagLand on Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Yes Im Biop
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14942
Founded: Feb 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yes Im Biop » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Vareiln wrote:Except you would be talking about banning a massive amount of weapons, from this to this to this and so much more.
And how would banning those change a thing when the shooter could have done the exact same thing with this or this?


Do you do realize that the second link in your post is an airsoft pistol?


I knew something wasn't quite right with that gun.
Scaile, Proud, Dangerous
Ambassador
Posts: 1653
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...

Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.

Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)
Yes, I Am infact Biop.


Rest in Peace Riley. Biopan Embassy Non Military Realism Thread
Seeya 1K Cat's Miss ya man. Well, That Esclated Quickly

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm

Yes Im Biop wrote:
Agymnum wrote:If gun ownership was banned, I honestly wouldn't mind. But to appease all the gun nuts out there I'd at least hope Obama would keep low caliber rifles and semi-automatic pistols legal. Beyond that, you definitely don't need automatics or high-powered rifles (i.e. AKs, M-16s, etc) to do simple hunting or for home defense.


No one want's a M16, And those use 5.56mm Which is the Military version of a .223. The AK is a good hunting rifle because it uses basically a .308.

High powered rifles start at I believe anything firing a Supersonic load right spree?


All firearms outside of handguns in .45ACP fire at supersonic speeds. "High powered rifles" are about as technical as "assault weapons."

There are differences between intermediate cartridges (as used in the AR-15, AKs, .30-30s, Mini-14s, etc.) and "full-size" cartridges used in rifles such as the AR-10, M91/30, M1A, and about 95% of the firearms used for anything the size of whitetail deer or larger.

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm

Agymnum wrote:
AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day


Yeah, I used to be pro-gun, and then I got disgusted with how insane the NRA became with its fear-mongering "X PRESIDENT WILL TAKE OUR GUNS! TYRANNY!" tactics. Now I'm pro-gun control but anti-gun bans just because I'd hate to see how the NRA would start foaming at the mouth at even the mention of a gun ban.

I do agree with you, as I don't like the NRA, but I find the current regulations on the types of guns fine. What I would like to see are more regulations on who and how you can own a gun.

User avatar
Rupture Farms co
Diplomat
 
Posts: 833
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Rupture Farms co » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm

AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day

The same thing the Germans did... WITH HITLER!!!!

\thread

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:43 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Even if there was a full on ban/massive restriction in effect you could always get your guns south of the border(i know I would) I brought this up earlier because it's a very valid tactic. I would go straight to the cartel to get my goods and when guns are banned every criminal, every person who wants a gun to defend themselves, every killer, regardless of what there intents are will be lining up to buy from them.


You know you're onto a loser when you set your moral platform up such that you align with 'killers'.


That wasn't the message, the message is that if someone, regardless of beliefs, wants a gun they will be able to get ahold of one.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Agymnum
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7393
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Agymnum » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:44 pm

North Calaveras wrote:
AntiSwagLand wrote:Just saying, when all the gun owners go insane and start screaming "don't touch my gun", it just makes that whole group look immature. Second, is it THAT much of a need to own a gun? It's only a piece of metal held together with some bolts, not anything particularly holy or rare. Third, Obama's not taking your guns, calm down. This has probably been said for every other president. I got news for you all, NOTHING happened. So just sit back, have a bud, and enjoy the rest of the day


No he dosn't want to take them away, but Democrats are wanting to grind away at it with more regulations and taxes, here in california it FUCKING SUCKS.

You dont tell people what they do and don't need, I will buy/steal a weapon to protect my family and loved ones because I know no matter how many laws are made there are going to be assholes that are also armed and there is no law going to stop them.


Jesus, sometimes I'm afraid of gun owners. Really afraid.

Makes me a bit nervous that the only thing I own in my house is a machete. I'd get blown to bits by a decently-armed criminal. But, eh, the police is pretty good where I live so I see no need for guns.
Glorious puppet of Highfort

User avatar
Vareiln
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13052
Founded: Aug 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Vareiln » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:44 pm

Gun Manufacturers wrote:
Vareiln wrote:Except you would be talking about banning a massive amount of weapons, from this to this to this and so much more.
And how would banning those change a thing when the shooter could have done the exact same thing with this or this?


Do you do realize that the second link in your post is an airsoft pistol?

Shit... Didn't realize.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Canves, Dimetrodon Empire, Doichtland, Fahran, Galloism, Grande Brasil Ancap, Ifreann, Imperiul romanum, James_xenoland, Mesogiria, Snowhead, Soviet Haaregrad, The Archregimancy, The Huskar Social Union

Advertisement

Remove ads