Advertisement
by North Calaveras » Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:59 pm
by Page » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:00 pm
North Calaveras wrote:I'm gay and Kim Jong Un is ugly as fuck
by North Calaveras » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:01 pm
by Meryuma » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:05 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Volnotova » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:07 pm
Page wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:Yeah, I'm like that most of the time. Sometimes I'm baffled at how some of my female friends think the fugliest dudes are attractive. IDK, maybe cuz I'm straight.
It is not because you're straight. It is because straight females often have baffling tastes.
Example: General Petraeus, he looks like a dork and when he's not in uniform he wears his pants half way up his belly. Only a woman would want to jump that, though he can get the range of women from his floppy dog ear wife to Paula Broadwell who is good except for a huge fucking forehead.
by The Zeonic States » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:08 pm
Neo Art wrote:You're a beautiful beautiful man, and I'd like to make sweet love to you under the moonlight.
No homo.
by Volnotova » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:09 pm
Meryuma wrote:I like boys (and more occasionally girls) so I can't comment exactly. I can sometimes see the appeal of people I don't personally find attractive, so I guess that's the equivalent.
Also, why is "I'm gay" not an option on the poll? Or "I'm female"?
by Antiliberalbis » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:14 pm
by Fluffy Coyotes » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:16 pm
Antiliberalbis wrote:Both men and women will compare their own physical beauty to others of the same gender in order to know where they stand in the competitive mating world. Therefore, yes to the poll.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.
by Page » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:16 pm
Antiliberalbis wrote:Both men and women will compare their own physical beauty to others of the same gender in order to know where they stand in the competitive mating world. Therefore, yes to the poll.
by Saruhan » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:17 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.
by Volnotova » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:18 pm
Fluffy Coyotes wrote:Antiliberalbis wrote:Both men and women will compare their own physical beauty to others of the same gender in order to know where they stand in the competitive mating world. Therefore, yes to the poll.
For women the comparison to each other is more about being fashionable; a lot of what is considered that is inconsistent with what guys tend to prefer in gals in the first place. (And male sexual selection isn't as picky as fashion is anyway.)
by DesAnges » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:18 pm
Volnotova wrote:Meryuma wrote:I like boys (and more occasionally girls) so I can't comment exactly. I can sometimes see the appeal of people I don't personally find attractive, so I guess that's the equivalent.
Also, why is "I'm gay" not an option on the poll? Or "I'm female"?
I think the Tom Jones option is supposed to entail that.
by Fluffy Coyotes » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:19 pm
Volnotova wrote:Fluffy Coyotes wrote:For women the comparison to each other is more about being fashionable; a lot of what is considered that is inconsistent with what guys tend to prefer in gals in the first place. (And male sexual selection isn't as picky as fashion is anyway.)
What.
As a (bi) guy I disagree.
Fashion is a big part of what makes (some) people hot (or not). At least for me.
Meryuma wrote:I like boys (and more occasionally girls) so I can't comment exactly. I can sometimes see the appeal of people I don't personally find attractive, so I guess that's the equivalent.
Also, why is "I'm gay" not an option on the poll? Or "I'm female"?
Nazi Flower Power wrote:If the teachings of Christ can't get his followers to behave peacefully, then he obviously did not teach them very well.
by Woodstead » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:20 pm
by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:30 pm
by Meryuma » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:32 pm
Woodstead wrote:I can never just comment back "Btw, I'm not gay", so I just drop hints like "Not up to much, just looking up some girls in...".
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Global American Empire » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:41 pm
by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:43 pm
Global American Empire wrote:To answer ur question Lancaster of Wessex, it has nothing to do with insecurities...
Unless they're good friends joking around, they shouldn't be talking aloud about other guys' looks...I for one wouldn't want my manhood questioned...its about what society thinks is acceptable or not. I think that's my answer to your question.
by Volnotova » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:43 pm
Global American Empire wrote:To answer ur question Lancaster of Wessex, it has nothing to do with insecurities...
Unless they're good friends joking around, they shouldn't be talking aloud about other guys' looks...I for one wouldn't want my manhood questioned...its about what society thinks is acceptable or not. I think that's my answer to your question.
by Lancaster of Wessex » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:45 pm
Volnotova wrote:Global American Empire wrote:To answer ur question Lancaster of Wessex, it has nothing to do with insecurities...
Unless they're good friends joking around, they shouldn't be talking aloud about other guys' looks...I for one wouldn't want my manhood questioned...its about what society thinks is acceptable or not. I think that's my answer to your question.
What the...
Are you saying I am less of a man than you because I am (also) attracted to guys?
If anything, stand up to this ridiculous bigotry.
by Volnotova » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:48 pm
Lancaster of Wessex wrote:Volnotova wrote:
What the...
Are you saying I am less of a man than you because I am (also) attracted to guys?
If anything, stand up to this ridiculous bigotry.
Don't take it personally; I for one would wager our friend in the Global American Empire is quite young - I'm not being ageist, I just have a feeling. Perhaps I'm right, perhaps I'm wrong. (And in no way am I defending any bigotry and prejudice re: "less of a man" etc.)
by Woodstead » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:49 pm
Meryuma wrote:Woodstead wrote:I can never just comment back "Btw, I'm not gay", so I just drop hints like "Not up to much, just looking up some girls in...".
For one thing, you're straight? I remember you being not straight.
For another thing, that's a horrible horrible tactic. It does not say anything about you being straight; it could just as easily mean you're bi and/or closeted. Not only will it not deter the person, it might strengthen their feelings, since they'd see themselves as being the person to make you realize you have feelings for the same sex. You cannot underestimate how excited and wanted it can make a gay boy feel when they think they have a straight-identified boy interested in them. Basically, if you feel bad, that's a good thing, because if this person is still expressing interest in you and still seems like he expects something to happen you should explain that you're not into him like that immediately and unambiguously. It's easier that way.
by Global American Empire » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:49 pm
Lancaster of Wessex wrote:Global American Empire wrote:To answer ur question Lancaster of Wessex, it has nothing to do with insecurities...
Unless they're good friends joking around, they shouldn't be talking aloud about other guys' looks...I for one wouldn't want my manhood questioned...its about what society thinks is acceptable or not. I think that's my answer to your question.
That's fine, but I think the bolded parts contradict each other.
Why don't you want your manhood questioned? Because it would cause you insecurity one way or another.
by Page » Wed Dec 19, 2012 1:50 pm
Global American Empire wrote:Unless they're good friends joking around, they shouldn't be talking aloud about other guys' looks...I for one wouldn't want my manhood questioned...its about what society thinks is acceptable or not. I think that's my answer to your question.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: East Leaf Republic, Pasong Tirad, Stellar Colonies, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement