Pornography

[Port Charlotte]

The definition is
Printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity.
I enjoy it in my personal time and I think it should be legal in all states, because if that is the occupation you choose to have than by all means do what you want!
Now the question for you is do you enjoy it? Think it should be legal?
I've said what I think. Please keep it professional language and no pictures

[Port Charlotte]

Hope this is better for you moderators

[Hydronium]

All that watches porn in my nation are burned at the stake.


Official position- NO PORN

Porn is just retarded

[Wisconsin9]

Porn good.

All that watches porn in my nation are burned at the stake.


Official position- NO PORN

Porn is just retarded

General is an OOC forum.

[Port Charlotte]

All that watches porn in my nation are burned at the stake.


Official position- NO PORN

Porn is just retarded

What's wrong with it? I mean if that's how you choose to live your life.

[Abatael]

I don't enjoy, but I have used it before (not anytime this week).
I think it should be illegal.

[Napkiraly]

Should it be legal? Yes, it's massive market the last thing we need is for it to fall into the hands of the black market.

Do I enjoy it? To be honest, I haven't watched any in quite awhile.

[Zepplien]

Both me and my girlfriend enjoy it, my girlfriend more than me.

Not that it is legal for us to, but who is checking?

[Royal Byzantine Federation]

watching and making porn is okay in the Royal Byzantine Federation

if you get caught with child porn you are killed with a chainsaw in the town square

[ALMF]

I don't like porn but am unalterably opposed to banning it.

[Napkiraly]

:eyebrow: watching and making porn is okay in the Royal Byzantine Federation

if you get caught with child porn you are killed with a chainsaw in the town square

General is OOC.

[Soviet Canuckistan]

I'm fine with it

[Tubbsalot]

Seeing as the internet isn't Saudi Arabia, you're unlikely to see much opposition to this, to the point where it seems useless to have made a thread on it.

Porn is just retarded

Says the person posting IC in an OoC forum, saying we should burn people at the stake? I don't think you have a lot of room to criticise people's wit.

[Castille de Italia]

Due to my religious beliefs (Mormon), I oppose it...

[Serrland]

I enjoy it in my personal time and I think it should be legal in all states, because if that is the occupation you choose to have than by all means do what you want!

I'm all for pornography (within legal limits, etc).

That being said, not sure I can get behind the bolded and underlined. If my occupation is as a resurrection-man (or as good old Jerry Cruncher would say, a fisherman), I'm not sure that means "by all means do what you want."

[Potlimitomaha]

For me a social taboo like crazy. But being a social libertarian I don't think I should impose my moral beliefs on others.

[Generic Socialist Country]

:eyebrow: watching and making porn is okay in the Royal Byzantine Federation

if you get caught with child porn you are killed with a chainsaw in the town square

This isn't a IC forum.

And why the spammed smilies?

Not necessary.

I enjoy porn, from time to time.

[NERVUN]

Meh, it gets repetitive after a while. That said, within certain limits, I don't have a problem with it.

[Saruhan]

I don't see why we should ban it, i've watched it before (and so have all of you, don't lie to the rest of us) and I don't consider myself harmed in any way

[Forsher]

Seeing as the internet isn't Saudi Arabia, you're unlikely to see much opposition to this, to the point where it seems useless to have made a thread on it.

Porn is just retarded

Says the person posting IC in an OoC forum, saying we should burn people at the stake? I don't think you have a lot of room to criticise people's wit.

I disagree.

Due to my religious beliefs (Mormon), I oppose it...

See?

There are also those particular feminists who are still anti-pornography. Which is just another form of exchange, exactly the same as choosing whether or not to be a cleaner.

[Bodies Without Organs]

The definition is
Printed or visual material containing the explicit
description or display of sexual organs or activity.

On the basis of this definition, aren't most medical textbooks or anatomy references deemed pornographic?

Potentially more interestingly, what do you and do you not consider to be sexual organs? Let us take feet as a fairly inoffensive example - perfectly acceptable for open display to many, but to others a source of fetishistic fascination - would you consider representations of the feet to be pornographic?

[The Emerald Dawn]

As someone who has been involved in the creation of Pornography, I feel that it serves a market that is far more diverse than people give it credit for.

Well done, well controlled, and full-consenting Pornography is actually quite lovely.

Is there too much "porn" out there? Yes. We need to stop being titillated (tee-hee) by an 18 year old girl with meh tits showing them off on a web cam. It's kinda, eh, whatever.

To the point, should it be legal? Yes. Absolutely. As long as Mary Jane decides that she wishes to boink Joe Q. Public on camera and sell the result to people, there is no positive being served by preventing that.

[Tubbsalot]

I disagree.

You'll change your tune soon enough, wait and see. Just let me set up the kindling around this stake.

Due to my religious beliefs (Mormon), I oppose it...

See?

There are also those particular feminists who are still anti-pornography. Which is just another form of exchange, exactly the same as choosing whether or not to be a cleaner.

Right, so we'll have a couple of ultra-religious Americans saying they oppose it (not making any arguments, just saying they oppose it and potentially that we're going to hell) and maybe one earnest feminist. I'm not actually saying "how dare you make this thread, you twit," just noting it's unlikely to be all that contentious.

[Abatael]

The definition is
Printed or visual material containing the explicit
description or display of sexual organs or activity.

On the basis of this definition, aren't most medical textbooks or anatomy references deemed pornographic?

Potentially more interestingly, what do you and do you not consider to be sexual organs? Let us take feet as a fairly inoffensive example - perfectly acceptable for open display to many, but to others a source of fetishistic fascination - would you consider representations of the feet to be pornographic?

A fetish (id est, the object itself, not the obsession) is not a sexual organ, even if one derives sexual pleasure from it.

[Kemalist]

It should be banned. And the citizens who engage in sexual activities should immediately be hanged in public as an object lesson.