Advertisement

by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:39 am

by Federated States of South Asia » Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:52 am

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Dec 07, 2012 10:00 am
Federated States of South Asia wrote:Which philosophy?
Yours is patent nonsense. It doesn't even have a basis in logic, since it consists of mere rhetorical trickery with no axiomatic foundation in 'reality'.
When you show that you can play with real concepts, then I'll admit you might have some grounds.
Til then;
"Anti-science" is in the title. Did you notice that? 'Science' is a philosophical system. I use it.
The only one 'owned' here, is you. No 'real' foundation laid, no 'structure' to your argument.
Even your definition of 'free' is a false one, as it assumes 'no limits'. But you see that is a limit as it rigidly defines the condition you accept. That is your argument's 'foundation'.
By the way a 'foundation' IS a limit in logic.![]()
Nice to teach someone, when they need the lesson.
FSoSA


by Federated States of South Asia » Fri Dec 07, 2012 11:50 am

by Linux and the X » Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:56 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:the end of the article brings up a couple of studies that say there may be an autism vacinne link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... _ref=false
which to my mind would suggest more work is needed, before calling these people the names you all have used.

by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:09 pm
Linux and the X wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:the end of the article brings up a couple of studies that say there may be an autism vacinne link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... _ref=false
which to my mind would suggest more work is needed, before calling these people the names you all have used.
Mr Kirby is a known anti-vaccination activist. Any studies he cites must be carefully reviewed before believing their results.

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:14 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Linux and the X wrote:Mr Kirby is a known anti-vaccination activist. Any studies he cites must be carefully reviewed before believing their results.
he did not start out that way, but your point is fair. though it agrees with my point, more review is necesarry before this book is closed.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Ifreann » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:16 pm
Jormengand wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
he did not start out that way, but your point is fair. though it agrees with my point, more review is necesarry before this book is closed.
I am still, however, of the opinion that if vaccines cause autism that seems to be a perfect reason to use them. As though there weren't enough already.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:34 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:the end of the article brings up a couple of studies that say there may be an autism vacinne link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... _ref=false
which to my mind would suggest more work is needed, before calling these people the names you all have used.
Federated States of South Asia wrote:At least I have one (several) in fact.
Nice talking to you. Let me know when you need another 'lesson'.
Endit.
FSoSA

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:35 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:37 pm

by Avenio » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:39 pm

by Ifreann » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:53 pm
Avenio wrote:Jormengand wrote:I seem to be doing well enough with it, do I not? On second thoughts, don't answer that.
Yes, and I like to spread antibiotic-resistant S. aureus around by smearing mucous on doorknobs. I seem to be doing fine with a latent infection in my sinonasal cavity, why shouldn't everyone else?

by The Emerald Dawn » Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:55 pm

by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:00 pm
Jormengand wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
he did not start out that way, but your point is fair. though it agrees with my point, more review is necesarry before this book is closed.
I am still, however, of the opinion that if vaccines cause autism that seems to be a perfect reason to use them. As though there weren't enough already.

by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:03 pm
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:the end of the article brings up a couple of studies that say there may be an autism vacinne link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... _ref=false
which to my mind would suggest more work is needed, before calling these people the names you all have used.
There have been studies that have made that link. All those studies have been discredited. There is no link. That is all there is to it.

by Avenio » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:07 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:no they have not, some of them are too new, to say some of them have not been peer reviewed would be fair. to say they have all been discredited, would be false.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:08 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
There have been studies that have made that link. All those studies have been discredited. There is no link. That is all there is to it.
no they have not, some of them are too new, to say some of them have not been peer reviewed would be fair. to say they have all been discredited, would be false.

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:11 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Jormengand wrote:I am still, however, of the opinion that if vaccines cause autism that seems to be a perfect reason to use them. As though there weren't enough already.
son, hopefully you are joking. i have a boy with autism that best case will wind up in a group home. to make that comment rl anywhere around me would be a remarkably bad idea.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Avenio » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:16 pm
Jormengand wrote:Obviously, it depends on the level of autism and peoples tolerance towards it, but most autistic people that I know are remarkably much more hard-working, don't waste time on society's bullshit expectations and get on with life instead, actually bother to think about what they're doing and actually say what they mean ("Stand up" rather than "Could you stand up?" Of course I could bloody stand up, now are you going to tell me to do it or aren't you?). All in all, if everyone were autistic to a decent extent then the world would be a far more efficient place.
It's like, I dunno, drinking water. It's generally a good thing, but too much of it is bad.

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:20 pm
Avenio wrote:Jesus Christ. Talk about a blatant case of ignorant privilege.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Avenio » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:26 pm

by Federated States of South Asia » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:28 pm
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:the end of the article brings up a couple of studies that say there may be an autism vacinne link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb ... _ref=false
which to my mind would suggest more work is needed, before calling these people the names you all have used.
There have been studies that have made that link. All those studies have been discredited. There is no link. That is all there is to it.Federated States of South Asia wrote:At least I have one (several) in fact.
Nice talking to you. Let me know when you need another 'lesson'.
Endit.
FSoSA
I'm happy for you and even more that once again you have utterly failed to grasp the point. I really don't think you are in a position to teach anyone. Except possibly spelling and grammar. I cannot fault you there in any way. Congratulations. Now kindly cease the off topic posts. Thank you.

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:34 pm
Avenio wrote:Jormengand wrote:As a further example, most autistic people I know, myself included, would refrain from wasting everyone's time by flaming their fellow posters and would actually bother arguing.
If you feel it was flaming, report me.
It was a comment on the fact that you're allowing your much more mild case of autism colour your views on a condition that can and does cause an inordinate amount of suffering in both the people that have more severe diagnoses and their family/friends/caretakers. That's pretty much a textbook definition of privilege.
Jormengand wrote:It's like, I dunno, drinking water. It's generally a good thing, but too much of it is bad.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Jormengand » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:36 pm
Federated States of South Asia wrote:-snip-
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Riograndense Republic-, Belarusball, Dumb Ideologies, Emotional Support Crocodile, Gran Cordoba, Greater Miami Shores 3, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Soloman, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP
Advertisement