Advertisement

by Landenburg » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:39 am

by Disserbia » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:40 am
Landenburg wrote:Stalin killed 60 million over a longer period of time.
You hail him as a hero.
He destroyed the USSR's economy.
He got more things than others did, making him not a true communist.
by The Remote Islands » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:40 am
Globocom Enterprises wrote:If any of you clowns knew anything about leadership as a skillset you would know that in fact - Hitler was an exemplary leader.
Leadership is about taking a group of people from once place to another, be it physically, spiritually, economically, or other.
Hitler's leadership was so impressive, that an entire generation of people followed him to thier deaths.
Ask any soldier you know, who the best commander they served for was, and if they'd follow them into hell, even if they knew it meant their death, and they'll pick one.
What Hitler was "bad" at was military strategy.
That said, if you still want to critique Hitlers leadership skillset, I would strike as some of the events he micro-managed, and his lack of delegating-to/trusting subordinates completly.
Mike the Progressive wrote:Usually when I do a hit of acid or coke, I avoid NS. But you didn't. Shows a lot of balls. I like that.

by Ovisterra » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:40 am
Landenburg wrote:I understand what communism is.
And I know that the USSR went by: Leninism, Stalinism, and Trotskyism.
True communism is Marxism but won't work.
An ingenious idea that just isn't possible.

by CTALNH » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am
Landenburg wrote:Stalin killed 60 million over a longer period of time.
You hail him as a hero.
He destroyed the USSR's economy.
He got more things than others did, making him not a true communist.

by The Mighty Warrior Horse » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am

by The Corparation » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am
Landenburg wrote:Stalin killed 60 million over a longer period of time.
You hail him as a hero.
He destroyed the USSR's economy.
He got more things than others did, making him not a true communist.
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by The Remote Islands » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:Usually when I do a hit of acid or coke, I avoid NS. But you didn't. Shows a lot of balls. I like that.

by Ostroeuropa » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am
The Mighty Warrior Horse wrote:Landenburg wrote:You speak as if America, France, England, and Russia had nothing to do with the deaths.
Yes, because its soooooooo easy to invade a country like ww2 Germany backed by at 1st one of the top 3 military's in the world. Please, explain how easy this is.
France was taken over by the nazis
Britain could barley fight with France
Russia couldn't fight a 1 front only war with Germany
And America couldn't fight Japan and Germany alone.
There main objective was to defeat Germany, not stop the holacaust.

by Divair » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:41 am
Landenburg wrote:I understand what communism is.
And I know that the USSR went by: Leninism, Stalinism, and Trotskyism.
True communism is Marxism but won't work.
An ingenious idea that just isn't possible.

by Senkaku » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:42 am
Landenburg wrote:First off, the Third Reich was a totalitarian dictatorship.
Second, everyone hated the jews, so why no blame them for your problems? Americans do it with Muslims and Mexicans.
Third, Hitler may have killed 6 million, but STALIN killed 60 MILLION.
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
by The Remote Islands » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:42 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:Usually when I do a hit of acid or coke, I avoid NS. But you didn't. Shows a lot of balls. I like that.

by Landenburg » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:44 am
CTALNH wrote:Landenburg wrote:Stalin killed 60 million over a longer period of time.
You hail him as a hero.
He destroyed the USSR's economy.
He got more things than others did, making him not a true communist.
First you got a sig with Hitler on it
Second go have a cold shower and think about how the heck did Stalin achieve to kill 60 million people and still have the a influx of people.

by The Mighty Warrior Horse » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:44 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Mighty Warrior Horse wrote:Yes, because its soooooooo easy to invade a country like ww2 Germany backed by at 1st one of the top 3 military's in the world. Please, explain how easy this is.
France was taken over by the nazis
Britain could barley fight with France
Russia couldn't fight a 1 front only war with Germany
And America couldn't fight Japan and Germany alone.
There main objective was to defeat Germany, not stop the holacaust.
To be fair,it's thanks to a tactical blunder at ardennes, the war happened.
If the British/French army had believed that the germans were going through the ardennes as scouts reported (Rather than believing it a diversion) the German army would have been utterly annihilated because the terrain of the ardennes SEVERELY handicapped them.
We would have a "Stupid germans" stereotype instead of a "Cowardly french" stereotype.
"Lol, you guys are so stupid. Why the ardennes? Srsly, that was dumb."
The fact that the germans snuck past, cut off supply routes, and basically captured the entire french army is what allowed them to occupy france. Most of the military build up occured AFTER that, thanks in part to looting france.

by Jewish-Polish Empire » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:45 am

by Landenburg » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:45 am
Senkaku wrote:Landenburg wrote:First off, the Third Reich was a totalitarian dictatorship.
Second, everyone hated the jews, so why no blame them for your problems? Americans do it with Muslims and Mexicans.
Third, Hitler may have killed 6 million, but STALIN killed 60 MILLION.
Check yourself before you wreck yourself.
The Third Reich was a Fascist totalitarian dictatorship.
Stalin did not kill 60 million, only about twenty. Hitler killed 10-15.
So check yourself before you wreck yourself.

by Vredlandia » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:45 am
Lindenholt wrote:The only bad things Hitler did was killing the Jews and starting a world war, but if he didn't do these things Hitler was maybe the best leader of Germany in history. Because he made jobs and roads

by Ralkovia » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:45 am
Chinamerica wrote:There was somebody on these forums who had a lot of info in their sig explaining why Hitler didn't 'fix' the German economy and how the statement 'he was a good leader apart from the Holocaust thing' is untrue.
Can someone help me find this person? I'm in an argument with a Nazi at the moment.
Kirav wrote:This is NationStates. Our Jews live in Ralkovia.
Maudlnya wrote:You guys talking about Ralkovia?
*mutters something about scariness up to 11*
Releign wrote:Leningrad Union: Help me against Ralkovia
That's a Jew octopus with a machine gun.
I think I will pass.

by Ostroeuropa » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:47 am
Vredlandia wrote:Lindenholt wrote:The only bad things Hitler did was killing the Jews and starting a world war, but if he didn't do these things Hitler was maybe the best leader of Germany in history. Because he made jobs and roads
Speaking as a german in favor for monarchism (Oh mein Preußenland, wo bist du nur? ): No, he wasn't. The jobs he made were mostly temporary (you can't build roads all the time) and almost everybody was oppressed. Further he would have killed his own people just to win the war (he ordered to blow up important supply devices, but the order was changed by an officer (I think Speer, I'm not sure though)).
I have to admit I like his architectural idea though

by Landenburg » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:47 am

by Rashuta » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:47 am

by Laerod » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:47 am
Vredlandia wrote:Lindenholt wrote:The only bad things Hitler did was killing the Jews and starting a world war, but if he didn't do these things Hitler was maybe the best leader of Germany in history. Because he made jobs and roads
Speaking as a german in favor for monarchism (Oh mein Preußenland, wo bist du nur? ): No, he wasn't. The jobs he made were mostly temporary (you can't build roads all the time) and almost everybody was oppressed. Further he would have killed his own people just to win the war (he ordered to blow up important supply devices, but the order was changed by an officer (I think Speer, I'm not sure though)).
I have to admit I like his architectural idea though

by Landenburg » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:48 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Vredlandia wrote:
Speaking as a german in favor for monarchism (Oh mein Preußenland, wo bist du nur? ): No, he wasn't. The jobs he made were mostly temporary (you can't build roads all the time) and almost everybody was oppressed. Further he would have killed his own people just to win the war (he ordered to blow up important supply devices, but the order was changed by an officer (I think Speer, I'm not sure though)).
I have to admit I like his architectural idea though
As an architect he was actually pretty good.
It's part of the tradgedy of the man really, he should have been an architect. I can cope with someone being a massive racist if they are an architect, after all, its not effecting their art...proooobabbbllly...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bracadun, Second Peenadian, Senkaku
Advertisement