> Jesus said nothing about women's' rights, slavery, and many other controversial topics condoned in the Bible
>> But what about the Bible's condemnation of the gays?
> It's in the Bible.
>> But Jesus said nothing of it.
Advertisement

by Sentinel XV » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:07 pm
‹ all genius is a conquering of chaos and mystery ›

by Vortropolis » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:10 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ordya wrote:So, I'm sure they supported breathing, too. What does that to do with anything?
That's our point.
If you say
"Stalin was an atheist, and killed loads of people. Therefore, atheism kills more people than religion has." that's completely untrue, because if you use the SAME CRITERIA, lots of people were religious and killed people, 809 million people to be exact.
BUT
If you say
"Stalin didn't kill anyone because of his atheism, he killed them for other reasons. However, religious people have killed because of their religion." thats true too.
By both sets of criteria, the religious have killed more people.
I say the second should be used.
They insist on the first one for Atheism, but the second one for religion.

by Mavorpen » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:11 pm
Vortropolis wrote:How is it that most atheist leaders are the ones that kill thousands or millions of their people?

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:12 pm
Vortropolis wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's our point.
If you say
"Stalin was an atheist, and killed loads of people. Therefore, atheism kills more people than religion has." that's completely untrue, because if you use the SAME CRITERIA, lots of people were religious and killed people, 809 million people to be exact.
BUT
If you say
"Stalin didn't kill anyone because of his atheism, he killed them for other reasons. However, religious people have killed because of their religion." thats true too.
By both sets of criteria, the religious have killed more people.
I say the second should be used.
They insist on the first one for Atheism, but the second one for religion.
How is it that most atheist leaders are the ones that kill thousands or millions of their people?

by Vortropolis » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:12 pm

by Valkmar » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:12 pm
Totalitarianism, fascism, militarism, pride, nationalism, consumerism, conformity, industry, humility, integrity, and isolationism."Curiosity is more alluring than danger is deterring." - Anonymous
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein
QUILTBAG rights, religion, capitalism, democracy, and abortion.Economic Left/Right: -0.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.51

by Vortropolis » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:13 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Vortropolis wrote:
How is it that most atheist leaders are the ones that kill thousands or millions of their people?
That's simply not true either. There are plenty of Atheist world leaders. It's nowhere near a "most" that kill their own people.
So, we'll remove "most" and replace with "some." and then remove "atheist" and place in "religious" and now you see why your question is so stupid. You completely ignored my post and just came up with another reason why you should read my post.
It explains precisely why the bullshit you are spewing is self-defeating.

by Suidwes-Afrika » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:13 pm

by Mavorpen » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:14 pm
Vortropolis wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's simply not true either. There are plenty of Atheist world leaders. It's nowhere near a "most" that kill their own people.
So, we'll remove "most" and replace with "some." and then remove "atheist" and place in "religious" and now you see why your question is so stupid. You completely ignored my post and just came up with another reason why you should read my post.
It explains precisely why the bullshit you are spewing is self-defeating.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_Mexico take some time to read about it.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:14 pm
Vortropolis wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's simply not true either. There are plenty of Atheist world leaders. It's nowhere near a "most" that kill their own people.
So, we'll remove "most" and replace with "some." and then remove "atheist" and place in "religious" and now you see why your question is so stupid. You completely ignored my post and just came up with another reason why you should read my post.
It explains precisely why the bullshit you are spewing is self-defeating.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_Mexico take some time to read about him.

by The USOT » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:15 pm
Vortropolis wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
That's our point.
If you say
"Stalin was an atheist, and killed loads of people. Therefore, atheism kills more people than religion has." that's completely untrue, because if you use the SAME CRITERIA, lots of people were religious and killed people, 809 million people to be exact.
BUT
If you say
"Stalin didn't kill anyone because of his atheism, he killed them for other reasons. However, religious people have killed because of their religion." thats true too.
By both sets of criteria, the religious have killed more people.
I say the second should be used.
They insist on the first one for Atheism, but the second one for religion.
How is it that most atheist leaders are the ones that kill thousands or millions of their people?

by Mavorpen » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:15 pm

by Ordya » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:17 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Vortropolis wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_Mexico take some time to read about him.
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s

by Sentinel XV » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:17 pm
Ordya wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s
You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?
‹ all genius is a conquering of chaos and mystery ›

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:18 pm
Ordya wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s
You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?

by The New World Oceania » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:18 pm
Ordya wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s
You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?

by Vortropolis » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:18 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:19 pm
Ordya wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s
You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:20 pm
Ordya wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ok, so you found a guy who persecuted christians, I can pull up case studies too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedro_de_Arbu%C3%A9s
You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?

by Ordya » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:20 pm

by Suidwes-Afrika » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:20 pm

by Vortropolis » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:20 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ordya wrote:You realize christians are currently the most persecuted minority in the world right now, right?
Cos mah Pastor tells me so wut wut!
*shoots a pistol into the sky*
This is PRECISELY the kind of shoddy thinking religion trains you to do. Next time someone gives you a claim like that, ask them for a source.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:21 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Ostroeuropa » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:21 pm

by Suidwes-Afrika » Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Ostroeuropa, Picairn, Port Caverton, The Archregimancy, The Notorious Mad Jack
Advertisement