Right, never mind then. (said in my best grahman chapman voice).
Advertisement

by Ethel mermania » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:08 pm

by Liriena » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:I think it's a continuation of the Liberal war on tradition and their hatred of it. It's freakin Christmas, and it should be called Christmas! I'm not even a Christian, but I go along with it. It's a good family oriented holiday....oh wait that's probably why the liberals want to kill it.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Dyakovo » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:39 pm
Copenhagen Metropolis wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I imagine Neo's point is, perhaps you should think twice before splashing your greeting on everyone you see, many of whom may not be of your particular spiritual persuasion.
''splashing your greeting'', yeah, it's like an assault isn't it...![]()
Anyway, my point was pretty clear; even though you're not part of someone's ''particular spiritual persuasion'', you've got no reason to get upset about being greeted. If you can turn a greeting into an insult, you've got some serious negativity issues you need to address.

by Dyakovo » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:45 pm
Brum Brum wrote:I hate the word winter holiday. Would you call eid or Divali something else? No... Well why treat Christian Christmas any different?

by Tunasai » Fri Nov 30, 2012 7:45 pm

by Alien Space Bats » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:31 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Be happy I didn't try do do it like that damned cattle-raid of Cooley where Cú Chulainn fights his brother for three friggin' days.

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:34 pm


by Ifreann » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:36 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Farnhamia wrote:There used to be a Mexican-East Indian restaurant in Greenwich Village in NYC. The medium chili was ... incandescent.
The only location nearby where the "Authentic" label shines is a German restaurant. It's run by a family from Straussberg, and they make beer sausage that cannot be beat.

by Alien Space Bats » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:42 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:48 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:49 pm

by Katganistan » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:12 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:36 pm
Katganistan wrote:Apparently, it's a war on media consumers.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Equestrian Democratic Republic » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:39 pm


by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:40 pm
Equestrian Democratic Republic wrote:Anything to de-christianize the world and make religious people feel more alienated.

by Menassa » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:42 pm

by Farnhamia » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:43 pm

by Menassa » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:44 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:47 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Mavorpen » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:48 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Absolutely. It's taken years but we're finally making progress.
I understand why you kids simply love to provocate and stuff, but trust me: it won't work. It just won't work. The problem ain't Christ, it's a specific part of his followers that tends to aggravate people like us.

by The Black Forrest » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:49 pm

by Genivaria » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:52 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Absolutely. It's taken years but we're finally making progress.
I understand why you kids simply love to provocate and stuff, but trust me: it won't work. It just won't work. The problem ain't Christ, it's a specific part of his followers that tends to aggravate people like us.


by Hurdegaryp » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:52 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Hurdegaryp » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:56 pm
Genivaria wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:I understand why you kids simply love to provocate and stuff, but trust me: it won't work. It just won't work. The problem ain't Christ, it's a specific part of his followers that tends to aggravate people like us.
Way to not sound patronizing there old-timer.
I'm 21 myself and there are many people here above the age of 30.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Altys, American Legionaries, Armeattla, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eahland, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Ethel mermania, Fractalnavel, Genivaria, Insaanistan, La Xinga, Mearisse, Necroghastia, New Imperial Britannia, New Vorindun, Northern Seleucia, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Astral Mandate, Urkennalaid
Advertisement