What the fuck is that supposed to mean
Advertisement
by Sardine World » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:36 pm
by Saruhan » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:37 pm
Choronzon wrote:Saruhan wrote:That's because at the time it was pretty much the only African state left. But still, you don't exactly quiver in your boots at the thought of the mighty Ethiopian army
Ethiopia had artillery and firearms. Few if any other African nations did. Your belittling of the Ethiopian army is based on your views of them now. That is a mistake.
The most modern African army fought arguably the least modern and professional western European army at the time.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.
by Cetacea » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:38 pm
by Central Slavia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:39 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Czechanada » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:41 pm
by Choronzon » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:41 pm
by Ceannairceach » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:45 pm
Genivaria wrote:Simo Hayha single-handedly making 505 confirmed Soviet kills.
A hero to snipers and badasses everywhere.
by Genivaria » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:46 pm
Choronzon wrote:Sardine World wrote:
What the fuck is that supposed to mean
Gorbachev actually choosing to tear down the wall is far more inspiring than the leader of the Soviet Union's number one enemy and rival standing in front of a wall and saying "Tear this down!"
Your answer is shameless Reagan worship. Its sort of cute.
by Choronzon » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:48 pm
Genivaria wrote:Choronzon wrote:Gorbachev actually choosing to tear down the wall is far more inspiring than the leader of the Soviet Union's number one enemy and rival standing in front of a wall and saying "Tear this down!"
Your answer is shameless Reagan worship. Its sort of cute.
I always laugh when conservatives actually think that Reagan is responsible for the Berlin wall coming down.
by Genivaria » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:49 pm
Choronzon wrote:Genivaria wrote:I always laugh when conservatives actually think that Reagan is responsible for the Berlin wall coming down.
Right? All he did was stand there in front of cameras and say TEAR THIS DOWN!
Thats not brave. Thats not moving. Its not inspiring. He gave a speech. He used rhetoric. The Soviet leader actually chose to tear the wall down.
by Israslovakahzerbajan » Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:54 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.
by Hatsunia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:05 pm
by Central Slavia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:05 pm
Choronzon wrote:Sardine World wrote:
What the fuck is that supposed to mean
Gorbachev actually choosing to tear down the wall is far more inspiring than the leader of the Soviet Union's number one enemy and rival standing in front of a wall and saying "Tear this down!"
Your answer is shameless Reagan worship. Its sort of cute.
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]
by Castille de Italia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:25 pm
The Castillian Federation | La Fédération Castillia
Fraternité sous notre Fédération
Main Directory | Dramatis Personae | Pan Dienstadi World Airways | Latest Political Crisis
by Vetalia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:27 pm
Choronzon wrote:Right? All he did was stand there in front of cameras and say TEAR THIS DOWN!
Thats not brave. Thats not moving. Its not inspiring. He gave a speech. He used rhetoric. The Soviet leader actually chose to tear the wall down.
by Ratateague » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:30 pm
Castille de Italia wrote:The Man Who Outran Hitler: Jesse Owens
by Castille de Italia » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:33 pm
The Castillian Federation | La Fédération Castillia
Fraternité sous notre Fédération
Main Directory | Dramatis Personae | Pan Dienstadi World Airways | Latest Political Crisis
by Occupied Deutschland » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:34 pm
by The Humanist Federation » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:35 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Pretty easily the moon landing.
Hell, I personally like "Tranquility base here, the Eagle has landed." more than Armstrong's words but that's just me.
by Ratateague » Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ci Arovannea, Port Carverton, Tungstan
Advertisement