Advertisement
by Xathranaar » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:20 pm
by Farnhamia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:22 pm
by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:24 pm
by Nazis in Space » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:25 pm
by Farnhamia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:25 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:
you know what I just noticed? theres a dude who isn't wearing pants and a lady who isn't wearing a top, but one dude decided "no. just because we are having a revolution doesn't mean standards need to slip" wearing a top hat and bow tie.
EDIT: also Boboobies.
by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:26 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:you know what I just noticed? theres a dude who isn't wearing pants and a lady who isn't wearing a top, but one dude decided "no. just because we are having a revolution doesn't mean standards need to slip" wearing a top hat and bow tie.
EDIT: also Boboobies.
To be fair, the guy without pants is probably dead.
by Farnhamia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:27 pm
by Ceannairceach » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:29 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Although I am an overly zealous fan of the Byzantine Empire, especially Constantine XI Palaiologos, I have to say that the fall of the last vestige of the Roman Empire is something of an inspiring event. It paved the way, in many ways, for the creation of a new civilization, a new world in which an imperial Rome was no longer necessary or even existent.
Well, but the "new civilization" was already in flower in the West by 1453 (1460, when the Turks took the last last vestiges). And the Empire had been a vestige for a good century by then, too. The Romans never really recovered from the sack in 1204.
by Nazis in Space » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:30 pm
Define 'Roman way of life'.Ceannairceach wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Well, but the "new civilization" was already in flower in the West by 1453 (1460, when the Turks took the last last vestiges). And the Empire had been a vestige for a good century by then, too. The Romans never really recovered from the sack in 1204.
Of course. I'm just using the fall of Constantinople and subsequent destruction of the holdouts as a symbol for the larger destruction of the Roman way of life.
by Farnhamia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:31 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Well, but the "new civilization" was already in flower in the West by 1453 (1460, when the Turks took the last last vestiges). And the Empire had been a vestige for a good century by then, too. The Romans never really recovered from the sack in 1204.
Of course. I'm just using the fall of Constantinople and subsequent destruction of the holdouts as a symbol for the larger destruction of the Roman way of life.
by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:38 pm
by 4years » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:45 pm
by United Horizon » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:50 pm
by Grand Duchy of Prussia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:54 pm
by The New Lowlands » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:55 pm
by Euronion » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:56 pm
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
by Euronion » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:57 pm
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:58 pm
by Grand Duchy of Prussia » Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:59 pm
by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:04 pm
Grand Duchy of Prussia wrote:The battle of New Orleans crushing the the very same unit that beat Napoleon and a great end to an average war
by Cameroi » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:04 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fame And Even More Fame, Likhinia, Republics of the Solar Union, Shrillland, Singaporen Empire, Soviet Haaregrad
Advertisement