White Britons to be minority IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY by 2066

[Renegade Island]

See immediately below this quoted post and possibly just above this one.

If something doesn't jive with the facts, it doesn't matter HOW good it sounds. The GOP thought that their polling data sounded good, they still lost the general election.

I disagree, I've met several American Citizens here in Scotland who came here to "visit their homeland." Turned out they were at least 5th generation American.

[Libertarian California]

If something doesn't jive with the facts, it doesn't matter HOW good it sounds. The GOP thought that their polling data sounded good, they still lost the general election.

I disagree, I've met several American Citizens here in Scotland who came here to "visit their homeland." Turned out they were at least 5th generation American.

And I've met many "Mexicans" who are third generation Americans, yet consider themselves Mexican first, and American second.

[Transhuman Proteus]

Foreign workers will "change national identity" according to a population expert, unless the flow of immigration is dealt with.

The white British-born community (defined as English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish-born citizens) will fall to less than half of the overall population in just over 50 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -2066.html

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

From the dawn of Humanity in Britain it has always been white. 30, 50, 100 or more thousand years. Now we have this. This is treason and utter failure. Becoming Pakistan and Africa all at the same time is a bad idea.This is what genocide looks like.

I'm pretty sure the country belongs to its citizens, regardless of their color or whether they were immigrants.

And Briton may have been white, but they haven't been the same white. And why is it important they stay white?

[GCMG]

Largely unsubstantiated alarmist bullshit.

It is not alarmist in that Whites do face a real threat of self extinction, with few exceptions all of the majority white nations are experiencing demographic collapses while being lenient on immigration from majority non-White countries.

Which says nothing for the state of whites as a whole.

Here is a list of nations with significant White populations by fertility rate in 2012 per the CIA World Fact book:

Clearly working on a basis of numbers not proportions... hence South Africa's inclusion. Actually, just ignoring NZ because stuff it works better.

Minimum fertility rate required for sustainable population: 2.1 births/woman.

I think it varies somewhat but that's the case for developed nations with lower death rates.

USA 2.06
Russia 1.61
Brazil 2.16*
Germany 1.41
Italy 1.40
UK 1.91
Poland 1.31
Argentina 2.29*
Australia 1.77
Venezuela 2.40*
Chile 1.87
Portugal 1.51
Hungary 1.41
Cuba 1.45
Norway 1.77
South Africa 2.28*
Ireland 2.01
Croatia 1.44
Puerto Rico 1.63

Presumably the asterisk denotes non-majority. That said, I now see that it is an incomplete list.

As you can see from this listing, all of the majority white nations that still have growing White populations are either majority non-White or are close to shrinking like the others. Should this trend continue the White share of the global population will become smaller and smaller until they cease to exist as distinct ethnic groups.

Again that only speaks for countries. It is unlikely. Particularly because "white" isn't even an ethnic group but also because there's a reason why some people have white skin.

[Atomosea]

Yes it does. By definition.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

"Under U.N. International- *vwip* Under U.N. International- *vwip* Under U.N. International- *vwip* Under U.N. International- *vwip*..."

Oh, I'm so sorry, NS! This darn record always gets stuck at this part...

[GCMG]

Yes it does. By definition.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

Before anyone believes that you'll have to source it. The problem is that the current definitions which have been posted here repeatedly disagree.

[Augarundus]

White people... "their" country.

[troll]Actually, it's the King's country. Those Yeoman pikies should be grateful his (er... her) Majesty allows them on his (her) land.[/troll]

What does it matter? That brown people inhabit the same speck of Atlantic rock that Britons consider sacred? They steal nothing (the nation is not "yours". They have not broken into your house, no?).

[NERVUN]

I disagree, I've met several American Citizens here in Scotland who came here to "visit their homeland." Turned out they were at least 5th generation American.

And I've met many "Mexicans" who are third generation Americans, yet consider themselves Mexican first, and American second.

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

[Libertarian California]

And I've met many "Mexicans" who are third generation Americans, yet consider themselves Mexican first, and American second.

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

Mhmmm http://www.crossculturecommunications.com/latino-hispanic.pdf

[Chefdevergia]

And I've met many "Mexicans" who are third generation Americans, yet consider themselves Mexican first, and American second.

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

But this is the thread which proved that, objectively, white people are much more purdy than everyone else. And more compassionate also. Made me look in the mirror again and realize that I am much less ugly and selfish than I previously thought...

[Renegade Island]

And I've met many "Mexicans" who are third generation Americans, yet consider themselves Mexican first, and American second.

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

I'm not claiming that a majority of people have these views. Just that there are people that do.
And that is a fact.

[NERVUN]

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

Mhmmm http://www.crossculturecommunications.com/latino-hispanic.pdf

Exactly what the hell is this supposed to show me?

Oh, excuse me. Obviously you gentlemen's highly subjective, unverifiable, andotial 'experience' of meeting a few people out of a large population should trump actual research and stats.

No, the numbers don't lie. Sorry.

I'm not claiming that a majority of people have these views. Just that there are people that do.
And that is a fact.

Numbers that do not reach anything approaching significant size.

[Libertarian California]

Mhmmm http://www.crossculturecommunications.com/latino-hispanic.pdf

Exactly what the hell is this supposed to show me?/quote]

The paragraph that starts with "A simple guideline for..."

[NERVUN]

Exactly what the hell is this supposed to show me?/quote]

The paragraph that starts with "A simple guideline for..."

Oh fer... It means they want to be called (blank)-Americans! It does not prove your assertion any more than saying Italian-Americans are more Italian than American.

[Xathranaar]

I love the state of mind it must take for the OP to panic over something that will only happen if demographic trends remain unchanged for 54 years.

Because that has ever happened before.

[Renegade Island]

Mhmmm http://www.crossculturecommunications.com/latino-hispanic.pdf

Exactly what the hell is this supposed to show me?

I'm not claiming that a majority of people have these views. Just that there are people that do.
And that is a fact.

Numbers that do not reach anything approaching significant size.

I didn't claim they were significant. Are we arguing over nothing here?

[Chefdevergia]

I love the state of mind it must take for the OP to panic over something that will only happen if demographic trends remain unchanged for 54 years.

Because that has ever happened before.

Perhaps he is only 5 years old

[Vultasia]

Who cares about Britain anyway.

Bring it on, I ain't scared of you! Throw all your bombs in my direction! BRING IT ON!!!!!!!!!

(Raped, stabbed, and impaled by BNP people)

[Condunum]

Oh, you humans and your silly Xenophobia.

[Risottia]

Foreign workers will "change national identity" according to a population expert, unless the flow of immigration is dealt with.

The white British-born community (defined as English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish-born citizens) will fall to less than half of the overall population in just over 50 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -2066.html

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

From the dawn of Humanity in Britain it has always been white. 30, 50, 100 or more thousand years. Now we have this. This is treason and utter failure. Becoming Pakistan and Africa all at the same time is a bad idea.This is what genocide looks like.

Have you noticed that non-white British citizens born in Britain are either English-born, Welsh-born, Scottish-born or Northern-Irish-born? Hence, they're indigenous and not foreign.
OP fails.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

Largely unsubstantiated alarmist bullshit.

It is not alarmist in that Whites do face a real threat of self extinction, with few exceptions all of the majority white nations are experiencing demographic collapses while being lenient on immigration from majority non-White countries.

Here is a list of nations with significant White populations by fertility rate in 2012 per the CIA World Fact book:

Minimum fertility rate required for sustainable population: 2.1 births/woman.

USA 2.06
Russia 1.61
Brazil 2.16*
Germany 1.41
Italy 1.40
UK 1.91
Poland 1.31
Argentina 2.29*
Australia 1.77
Venezuela 2.40*
Chile 1.87
Portugal 1.51
Hungary 1.41
Cuba 1.45
Norway 1.77
South Africa 2.28*
Ireland 2.01
Croatia 1.44
Puerto Rico 1.63

As you can see from this listing, all of the countries that still have growing White populations are either majority non-White or are close to shrinking like the other traditionally White nations. Should this trend continue the White share of the global population will become smaller and smaller until they cease to exist as distinct ethnic groups.

I would very much mourn the disappearance of White ethnic groups not because they are superior, but because I find White people to be aesthetically beautiful and want them to still exist for future generations.

Oh come off it. White people will exist for a very, very long time.

[Vultasia]

I can explain with this simple thing called "Demographic Transition" but only some of you are remotely interested in it.
SIKE!
Demographic Transition occurred because of Industrialisation. In Agrarian societies, having more kids is needed for a helping hand and free social security when you're older. In Industrialised societies, education is required to work in the more complex fields of labour and thus more resources are needed for one child, so people have less kids. Here is the cycle

1. Agrarian society decides to industrialise
2. They industrialised
3. Living condition, sanitation, etc improved
4. Birth rates stayed in Agrarian level for a short time
5. Population grew massively because of Agrarian level births and less deaths
6. As more resources are being thrown into one child for labour in the industrialised society, less kids are needed now
7. Less births occurring throughout the years
8. Population starts to stablised and decline because of lack of birth
9. Need young workers, so imported immigrants


To make yall feel better, Japan do have immigrants. Mostly from China, Korea, Brazil, Nigeria for lower work, USA, Germany, and Hong Kong for the bigger works. They just find different ways to answer the Demographic Transition than lets say, Britain.
Und if it makes you feel better, Arabs make 19% of the United Arab Emirate's population.

[Miyager]

I can explain with this simple thing called "Demographic Transition" but only some of you are remotely interested in it.
SIKE!
Demographic Transition occurred because of Industrialisation. In Agrarian societies, having more kids is needed for a helping hand and free social security when you're older. In Industrialised societies, education is required to work in the more complex fields of labour and thus more resources are needed for one child, so people have less kids. Here is the cycle

1. Agrarian society decides to industrialise
2. They industrialised
3. Living condition, sanitation, etc improved
4. Birth rates stayed in Agrarian level for a short time
5. Population grew massively because of Agrarian level births and less deaths
6. As more resources are being thrown into one child for labour in the industrialised society, less kids are needed now
7. Less births occurring throughout the years
8. Population starts to stablised and decline because of lack of birth
9. Need young workers, so imported immigrants


To make yall feel better, Japan do have immigrants. Mostly from China, Korea, Brazil, Nigeria for lower work, USA, Germany, and Hong Kong for the bigger works. They just find different ways to answer the Demographic Transition than lets say, Britain.
Und if it makes you feel better, Arabs make 19% of the United Arab Emirate's population.

And I should add on to this, that according to U.N. population projections, birth rates in developed nations are due to rise once again, though slower and more steady than before.

[Ovisterra]

The very idea behind this is silly anyway. White Britons are no more or less British than any other citizens.

Take one of my friends for example. We'll call him Johnny for the purposes of this. Johnny's parents are from China. Johnny speaks fluent Chinese. But Johnny was born in Ireland and has lived here his whole life. He speaks Irish as well as or better than I do and has always been an Irish citizen.

So tell me. What makes Johnny any less Irish than I am?

[Free South Califas]

I guess it isn't just their country then, is it?