White Britons to be minority IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY by 2066

[The UK in Exile]

its worse than you think, in some living rooms in the united kingdom white people are already a minority.

[Yankee Empire]

Damn straight. Besides, the influx of new races will be good for British genetic diversity.

This, especially their oral health.

But mutts are more of an American thing...

[Khadgar]

You know, posts like this make me wish William had married some nice Pakistani girl.

[Ikarouss]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

[Valikrynn]

White Britons are not a fucking minority ffs.

[Novaya Tselinoyarsk]

Because white people own the country, right?

Them dirty brown people are just renting it.

Because those damn immigrants won't adapt their culture and eat their food.

[Nadkor]

It's not genocide. But feel free to start a colony on a the moon or something.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

Please quote the following directly, with links to official sources:
1) where international law (this "UN" bit you keep referring to doesn't come into it - international law is international law) defines genocide as including "large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population",
2) Where the Genocide Convention defines genocide as including "large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population", and
3) Where, even if you had answers for the first two, international law covers population movements and transfers that aren't specifically directed by state actors or other specifically covered actors

Thanks.

[Samuraikoku]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11784808#p11784808

[Khadgar]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

Feel free to quote the text, provide page and section you're quoting. We'll wait.

[Czechanada]

This reminds me of the scene from The Holy Grail where the peasant doesn't understand when King Arthur says that he is king of all the Britons.

[Placian]

OP, I think you should retaliate by moving to Afghanistan.

[South Asia Minor]

Foreign workers will "change national identity" according to a population expert, unless the flow of immigration is dealt with.

The white British-born community (defined as English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish-born citizens) will fall to less than half of the overall population in just over 50 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -2066.html

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

From the dawn of Humanity in Britain it has always been white. 30, 50, 100 or more thousand years. Now we have this. This is treason and utter failure. Becoming Pakistan and Africa all at the same time is a bad idea.This is what genocide looks like.

That's nice.

[Novaya Tselinoyarsk]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

Good for you, repeating something that is completely irrelevant.

[Divair]

You know, posts like this make me wish William had married some nice Pakistani girl.

Imagine if the royal family decides to start randomly marrying different ethnicities.


That'll be quite a show.

[Ikarouss]

White, British, wouldn't care even if it was true. Why does ethnicity matter anyway?

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

[Nazi Flower Power]

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone?
Why is it that ethno-nationalism is wonderful in the cases of Kenya, Israel, Japan, China, the Middle East, South America, etc. etc. etc. yet if a white person ever dares to even suggest setting aside a country for white people, they're automatically a nazi racist who hates freedom?

What kind of sense does that make?

You just need to stop taking it as an insult if someone calls you a Nazi. It will make your life so much better.

[Nova Res Publica Romanorum]

You hear this a lot in the U.S too. First of all, I don't even see it as a problem at all, but secondly: Usually what happens is the media groups together "minorities" under one group, and so people can correctly say something along the lines of "minorities will become the majority in the United States by the year XXXX!". But here's the thing, it's because they group "whites" into one group and then all other races/ethnicities in another. So in country Y, by the year XXXX the population will look something like this. Caucasian: 45%, Hispanic: 15%, Asian: 25%, African: 15%. If you break it into "White" Vs. "Minority" you'd get White: 45%, Minority: 55%, and thus the minorities must be taking over! When in reality of course, they're just skewing the data.

[The UK in Exile]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

I don't think it counts if the natives bone themselves out of existence.

[San Leggera]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

You've repeated that at least twice already. Are your batteries running low?

[Divair]

White, British, wouldn't care even if it was true. Why does ethnicity matter anyway?

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

No one is dying, so why should we care?

[The Greater Afghan Republic]

Is this supposed to be a problem? They're all human so I really do not understand what the problem is it is not like aliens are taking over...

[Lenehen]

OP, indulge me into why you think Britain having a smaller percentage of Caucasians is bad.

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

Your argument doesn't improve through repetition.

[Samuraikoku]

White, British, wouldn't care even if it was true. Why does ethnicity matter anyway?

Under U.N International Law and the Genocide Convention of 1945, large scale mass immigration or the replacement of an indigenous population with a foreign population is defined as genocide.

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=11784808#p11784808

[Khadgar]

You know, posts like this make me wish William had married some nice Pakistani girl.

Imagine if the royal family decides to start randomly marrying different ethnicities.


That'll be quite a show.

Harry could always marry some black woman, of course he's not the heir. Oh even better, he could marry some Arabic guy. Man that'd be comedy gold.

[Suidwes-Afrika]

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for everyone?
Why is it that ethno-nationalism is wonderful in the cases of Kenya, Israel, Japan, China, the Middle East, South America, etc. etc. etc. yet if a white person ever dares to even suggest setting aside a country for white people, they're automatically a nazi racist who hates freedom?

What kind of sense does that make?

You just need to stop taking it as an insult if someone calls you a Nazi. It will make your life so much better.

Quite so.