Swedish woman charged with having sex with a skeleton.

by **Big Jim P** » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:55 pm

Galloism wrote:Well, she definitely got boned.

[/thread]

by **Sardine World** » Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:01 pm

Where the fuck did she get a skeleton in the first place?

by **Kingdom of the Polar Bear** » Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:01 pm

Galloism wrote:Well, she definitely got boned.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMPAH67f4o

by **Big Jim P** » Fri Nov 23, 2012 8:03 pm

Sardine World wrote:Where the fuck did she get a skeleton in the first place?

Well, I don't know about Sweden, but there are legal channels here in the U.S.

by **Grenartia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 3:26 am

Cruciland wrote:Well, they already have legalized homosexual marriage... 'Mise as well legalize necrophilia, too.

Yes, because marrying a living member of the same gender is the exact same thing as fucking a dead body. :roll:

Seperates wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
A person near death can give consent for a specific person/group of people to fuck their remains...

Hmm... I guess that is true as well. That being said, can a person decree that no one can fuck their remains? And consent can be given, does that me that lack of non-consent is consent? Basically, "I can do that because it doesn't say anywhere that I can't??

I think that unless consent is explicitly given, it should be assumed that consent is not given.

by **Risottia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:34 am

Pope Joan wrote:To me this is repugnant and distasteful but also a victimless crime. The skeleton doesn't care, I'm sure.

The heirs of the skeleton's original proprietor might have something to object, though.
How did she obtain human remains?

by **Hamitsu** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:41 am

I think she's an okay lady.

by **Tubbsalot** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:42 am

Grenartia wrote:
Cruciland wrote:Well, they already have legalized homosexual marriage... 'Mise as well legalize necrophilia, too.

Yes, because marrying a living member of the same gender is the exact same thing as fucking a dead body.

There's a joke here about beating dead horses, but I can't quite grasp it. It'll come to me, I'm sure.

by **Arcada Xenon VI** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:46 am

Pope Joan wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/21/us-sweden-skeleton-idUSBRE8AK0IJ20121121?feedType=RSS&feedName=oddlyEnoughNews

Reuters) - "A woman in Sweden has been charged with engaging in sexual activities with a human skeleton and could face jail time [2 years max] for disturbing the peace of the dead, a Swedish prosecutor said.

Police found a full human skeleton, skulls and a box containing other human bones by chance....

They also discovered CD-ROMs titled "my necrophilia" and "my first experience", and photographs of the woman engaging in various sexual activities with a skeleton....

It said the woman had handled the bones in a "shameful" and "unethical" manner.

"She is interested in the dead," Prosecutor Kristina Ehrenborg-Staffas told Reuters. "She has pictures of morgues, churches and graveyards.""

So she is being prosecuted for causing the state to go "Ewww"?

To me this is repugnant and distasteful but also a victimless crime. The skeleton doesn't care, I'm sure.

Why not just leave her alone? There are more important objectives for law enforcement.

What are your reactions? Should this sort of thing be punished? Repressed but allowed? Ignored?

Or (ewwww) encouraged?

Pics or it didn't happen!

by **CTALNH** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:51 am

Kleomentia wrote:
Galloism wrote:Well, she definitely got boned.

No pun intended.
But seriously, a skeleton? Dat girl haz some issuez.

Whatever strikes your fancy....

by **ShadowyStealer** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:52 am

Giggity, interesting choice of er, fetish. Well technically she isn't hurting anyone still it is rather odd. More concerned where she got the bones from.

by **Orenica** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 5:56 am

I would do nothing more than get her to talk to a therapist/psychiatrist to find out why it is that she likes to fuck dead bodies....
But in terms of it being a crime? Not in my book, just an odd paraphilia.

by **Transhuman Proteus** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:17 am

Risottia wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:To me this is repugnant and distasteful but also a victimless crime. The skeleton doesn't care, I'm sure.

The heirs of the skeleton's original proprietor might have something to object, though.
How did she obtain human remains?

I'm curious about that as well. I know there are ways of getting human bones in the US, but in Sweden?

by **Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:26 am

So she had her way with a bunch of bones?

Weak.

There was a lass a couple of hours away from me who crawled naked into a disemboweled horse in order to, erm, "be at one" with it (the pictures were great).

by **Democratic Koyro** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:27 am

such behaviour should not be tolerated in modern society.

Jesus Christ...a skeleton? seriously?

by **Kleomentia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:36 am

CTALNH wrote:
Kleomentia wrote:No pun intended.
But seriously, a skeleton? Dat girl haz some issuez.

Whatever strikes your fancy....

Care to back up the opinion that fucking a skeleton should be a everyday thing?

by **Democratic Koyro** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:39 am

Kleomentia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Whatever strikes your fancy....

Care to back up the opinion that fucking a skeleton should be a everyday thing?

She should be given mental help.

by **Kleomentia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:40 am

Democratic Koyro wrote:
Kleomentia wrote:Care to back up the opinion that fucking a skeleton should be a everyday thing?

She should be given mental help.

Indeed. I fail to see the pleasure in it, or even how one would stoop for such a action.

by **Great Nepal** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:42 am

She had sex without consent of the individual unless she has evidence that the guy gave her consent to have sex with his skeleton.
And, on anther note: you are getting sued for few hundred tons of brain bleach.

by **Ile Tobi** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:43 am

Guess she got..
*Puts sunglasses on*
... several more bones in her body

by **Kleomentia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:44 am

Ile Tobi wrote:Guess she got..
*Puts sun glasses on*
... several more bones in her body

I think we're done with the puns. *nods*
Give the girl a break, cuz she gave a break to one of the skeletons bones. AM i right or am i right? No? ok....

by **Democratic Koyro** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:44 am

Kleomentia wrote:
Democratic Koyro wrote:
She should be given mental help.

Indeed. I fail to see the pleasure in it, or even how one would stoop for such a action.

Frankly im disgusted that 33% of NSG considers this an ok thing to do and that no action should be taken.

Although i suppose i can't be too surprised......

by **L Ron Cupboard** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:45 am

I think this thread has jumped the bones.

by **Kleomentia** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:45 am

Democratic Koyro wrote:
Kleomentia wrote:Indeed. I fail to see the pleasure in it, or even how one would stoop for such a action.

Frankly im disgusted that 33% of NSG considers this an ok thing to do and that no action should be taken.

Although i suppose i can't be too surprised......

*nods*

by **Ostroeuropa** » Sat Nov 24, 2012 6:45 am

Great Nepal wrote:She had sex without consent of the individual unless she has evidence that the guy gave her consent to have sex with his skeleton.
And, on anther note: you are getting sued for few hundred tons of brain bleach.

Nope.
The individual is gone. She didn't have sex with him without his consent, she had sex with an inanimate object. She didn't rape a ghost.

Swedish woman charged with having sex with a skeleton.

What should be done about such offenses?

Who is online