NATION

PASSWORD

Virginity

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:03 am

Mavorpen wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
You could have sex with someone whos positive and not even get infected.

Impossible. Sex was cursed by Satan so that you always get HIV.


:eek:
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:03 am

Euronion wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
Public health? Did someone implant this idea in your head that people who aren't virgins go around having intercourse with everything on two legs?

Rampant promiscuity and safe pre-marital sex is what separates us from the burkas.


I do not find your reference to Islam to be in any way humorous. If someone stays a virgin they WILL NEVER contract a sexually transmitted disease barring needles and blood transplants. Whereas if you lose your virginity and find out five years later that the person you lost your virginity to infected you with AIDS, everyone you had sex with or will have sex with are now infected (except for the rare few who are immune).

Unless, of course... your partner has AIDS... Or you are born with AIDS... Or your children are born with AIDS. And seeing how alot of AIDS is spread through contaminated needles... well...
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:04 am

Euronion wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
Public health? Did someone implant this idea in your head that people who aren't virgins go around having intercourse with everything on two legs?

Rampant promiscuity and safe pre-marital sex is what separates us from the burkas.


I do not find your reference to Islam to be in any way humorous. If someone stays a virgin they WILL NEVER contract a sexually transmitted disease barring needles and blood transplants. Whereas if you lose your virginity and find out five years later that the person you lost your virginity to infected you with AIDS, everyone you had sex with or will have sex with are now infected (except for the rare few who are immune).

MALE CONDOMS!
FEMALE CONDOMS!
STD TESTING!
Planned parenthood does it ALL for extremely cheap or FREE.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Distributist Chestertonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 222
Founded: Nov 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Distributist Chestertonia » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:04 am

Perhaps people would be less troubled by the idea of sexual purity if they approached it from a positive rather than a negative standpoint - from a standpoint of love, care, and concern rather than punishment and strict standards.

The Theology of the Body, a Catholic conception of human sexuality, attempts to do just that. Bl. Pope John Paul II took Scripture and gave it a renewed lookover. Assuming you believe in God, Christ, and His Church, it's very interesting.

This is a video I offer as kind of an introduction to it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Qc4x98gH0E
(No, I didn't make it myself. But it covers the subject fairly well.)

Further resources include Christopher West's "Theology of the Body for Beginners" and "Theology of the Body Explained" - and of course, John Paul's "Theology of the Body" itself.
"Angels fly because they take themselves lightly." - G.K. Chesterton

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:05 am

North Calaveras wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Didn't you hear? If you have sex, you'll die of HIV immediately, period.


You could have sex with someone whos positive and not even get infected.

(i know your being sarcastic btw, just sayin


Still safer to use a condom. To each to judge the risk though, *shrugs*.
Taking a break.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:06 am

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
You could have sex with someone whos positive and not even get infected.

(i know your being sarcastic btw, just sayin


Still safer to use a condom. To each to judge the risk though, *shrugs*.


agreed
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Euronion
Senator
 
Posts: 4786
Founded: Apr 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Euronion » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:06 am

North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.


because it is an incurable illness that severally damages the person who is infected with it, the costs for and the amount of medication (the medication to soothe it because it is incurable) are simply outrageous. As for your second point, you are correct, but you are seriously seriously risking it, it is less of a Russian roulette and more of a, load 6 bullets in the revolver, spin it and shoot it at your head hoping that all you'll hear is a click. Mind you, the only way to control the spread of STDs and HIVs barring blood to blood transmission is a condom. Not even a vasectomy will inhibit its spread.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!
The Official Euronion Website
Proud Catholic and Member of the Tea Party; militant atheists, environmental extremists, fem-nazis, Anti-Lifers, Nazists, and Communists you have been warned
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
The name of our country is Euronion, the name of anything that is Euronion is called the/a Euronion ____, please do not say "the Euronionian, or the Euronionion people or military, it is simply the Euronion people, the Euronion military, ect. nor is Euronion a reference to the European Union or some United Europe.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:06 am

EnragedMaldivians wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:
You could have sex with someone whos positive and not even get infected.

(i know your being sarcastic btw, just sayin


Still safer to use a condom. To each to judge the risk though, *shrugs*.

Condoms were created by Satan to ruin the fantastic gift given by God that is babymaking.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:06 am

Euronion wrote:I do not find your reference to Islam to be in any way humorous.


I find your references to Vulcans insulting to those make believe peoples but you don't see me bitching about it.

If someone stays a virgin they WILL NEVER contract a sexually transmitted disease barring needles and blood transplants.


Ever considered something called "safe sex", i.e with a condom? Because it is clear you haven't, otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Whereas if you lose your virginity and find out five years later that the person you lost your virginity to infected you with AIDS, everyone you had sex with or will have sex with are now infected (except for the rare few who are immune).


Again, safe sex practices will ensure you'll make the right decision. I've already made the decision that when and if I have sexual intercourse with a partner, I shall use a condom to protect myself from any rouge infections, diseases and lumps and prevent them from becoming pregnant.

Super Simple Stuff.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:07 am

Euronion wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.


because it is an incurable illness that severally damages the person who is infected with it, the costs for and the amount of medication (the medication to soothe it because it is incurable) are simply outrageous. As for your second point, you are correct, but you are seriously seriously risking it, it is less of a Russian roulette and more of a, load 6 bullets in the revolver, spin it and shoot it at your head hoping that all you'll hear is a click. Mind you, the only way to control the spread of STDs and HIVs barring blood to blood transmission is a condom. Not even a vasectomy will inhibit its spread.


your vastly exaggerating it, it's actually much harder to get HIV through sex than you think.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:07 am

North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.

Yes, but certain people love trying their luck at it. These are the same people that cry about teen pregnancy and needing abortions, but they don't want to take the necessary precautions to prevent such things.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8450
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am

Mavorpen wrote:
EnragedMaldivians wrote:
Still safer to use a condom. To each to judge the risk though, *shrugs*.

Condoms were created by Satan to ruin the fantastic gift given by God that is babymaking.


Naughtyheathensex is bestsex.
Taking a break.

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:08 am

North Calaveras wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Impossible. Sex was cursed by Satan so that you always get HIV.


:eek:


And then, he'll reward your lapse of judgement with sodomy by pineapple.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Avenio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11113
Founded: Feb 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Avenio » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:09 am

Quintium wrote:They had an experiment once. It was published in some academic journal, but I seem to be unable to find it now.


How surprising.

Quintium wrote:They asked a group of both men and women what their partner preferences were. Both extensively listed personality traits and indicated that they thought those were their genuine preferences. After that, they paired them up with several people for a date and asked them which one they had preferred. Men usually ignored or abandoned the idea of all desired personality traits for physical attractiveness, and women usually ignored or abandoned the idea of all desired personality traits for material wealth and social status.


You cannot make conclusions about biology based upon data from the humanities. They have very different standards of data and experimental procedures; biology is a hard science and psychology is a soft science. You cannot assume the existence of a heritable trait based upon a survey - you'd be laughed out of any evolutionary biology conference.

Costa Alegria wrote:A little tongue and cheek wouldn't go amiss.


That was humour?
Last edited by Avenio on Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:09 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.

Yes, but certain people love trying their luck at it. These are the same people that cry about teen pregnancy and needing abortions, but they don't want to take the necessary precautions to prevent such things.


Agreed, ive taken risks at times, though I usually don't go after sketchy looking people and people who have had lots of partners so it helps.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:10 am

Euronion wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.


because it is an incurable illness that severally damages the person who is infected with it, the costs for and the amount of medication (the medication to soothe it because it is incurable) are simply outrageous. As for your second point, you are correct, but you are seriously seriously risking it, it is less of a Russian roulette and more of a, load 6 bullets in the revolver, spin it and shoot it at your head hoping that all you'll hear is a click. Mind you, the only way to control the spread of STDs and HIVs barring blood to blood transmission is a condom. Not even a vasectomy will inhibit its spread.

HIV is no longer a death sentence. FFS they've even learned how to, in limited circumstances, cure HIV. HIV does not automatically mean you are damaged, and it definitely does not bean you will die.
LERN2SCIENCE
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Euronion
Senator
 
Posts: 4786
Founded: Apr 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Euronion » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:10 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Euronion wrote:
I do not find your reference to Islam to be in any way humorous. If someone stays a virgin they WILL NEVER contract a sexually transmitted disease barring needles and blood transplants. Whereas if you lose your virginity and find out five years later that the person you lost your virginity to infected you with AIDS, everyone you had sex with or will have sex with are now infected (except for the rare few who are immune).

MALE CONDOMS!
FEMALE CONDOMS!
STD TESTING!
Planned parenthood does it ALL for extremely cheap or FREE.


Male Condoms Break and are misused
Female Condoms also break and are also misused and no where near as effective as a male condom
As for STD testing, some strains of STDs remain dormant for a very long time, I've heard of some cases where the person only notices symptoms 10-15 years after contracting the virus. There is also that mentality that because your partner is "clean" then he/she doesn't have an STD and you do not need to be tested as testing is embarrassing for many people.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!
The Official Euronion Website
Proud Catholic and Member of the Tea Party; militant atheists, environmental extremists, fem-nazis, Anti-Lifers, Nazists, and Communists you have been warned
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
The name of our country is Euronion, the name of anything that is Euronion is called the/a Euronion ____, please do not say "the Euronionian, or the Euronionion people or military, it is simply the Euronion people, the Euronion military, ect. nor is Euronion a reference to the European Union or some United Europe.

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:10 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.

Yes, but certain people love trying their luck at it. These are the same people that cry about teen pregnancy and needing abortions, but they don't want to take the necessary precautions to prevent such things.

Even though teen pregnancy and STD generally happens at higher rates where such things aren't public knowledge... such as the South.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:11 am

Avenio wrote:
Quintium wrote:They had an experiment once. It was published in some academic journal, but I seem to be unable to find it now.


How surprising.

Actually, I've seen it, but not in academic journals.

"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Costa Alegria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6454
Founded: Aug 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Alegria » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:12 am

Avenio wrote:That was humour?


The bitterness is strong in this one.
I AM THE RHYMENOCEROUS!
Member of the [under new management] in the NSG Senate

If You Lot Really Must Know...
Pro: Legalisation of Marijuana, LGBT rights, freedom of speech, freedom of press, democracy yadda yadda.
Con: Nationalism, authoritariansim, totalitarianism, omnipotent controlling religious beliefs, general stupidity.
Meh: Everything else that I can't be fucked giving an opinion about.

User avatar
Transhuman Proteus
Senator
 
Posts: 3788
Founded: Mar 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Transhuman Proteus » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:12 am

Euronion wrote:
Costa Alegria wrote:
Public health? Did someone implant this idea in your head that people who aren't virgins go around having intercourse with everything on two legs?

Rampant promiscuity and safe pre-marital sex is what separates us from the burkas.


I do not find your reference to Islam to be in any way humorous. If someone stays a virgin they WILL NEVER contract a sexually transmitted disease barring needles and blood transplants. Whereas if you lose your virginity and find out five years later that the person you lost your virginity to infected you with AIDS, everyone you had sex with or will have sex with are now infected (except for the rare few who are immune).


Well, not necessarily, AIDs isn't a sure deal kind of thing. And many people who discover they have aids do refrain from sex.

But anyway - obvious logic is obvious. Yes, if you never have sex you wont get pregnant, you are safe from most STDs. Is that reason enough to refrain when one feels ready to have sex and wants to, since it is an enjoyable, natural activity with benefits? No, since we now have the means to reduce the undersired risks to ridicuously low levels.

Of course you can say "but condoms break!" Sure, but not often. It's like saying "but seat belts have been known to fail! And airbags! Stay out of cars!"

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:13 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Why do people bring up HIV so much?

btw even if the person has an STD it doesn't guarantee you will receive it if you have unprotected sex, it's a Russian roulette kind of thing.

Yes, but certain people love trying their luck at it. These are the same people that cry about teen pregnancy and needing abortions, but they don't want to take the necessary precautions to prevent such things.

Because *certain groups of people* won't educate people to use precautions properly. I have had to teach at least 250 people how to properly use a condom in the past year. It's ridiculous that that many people on my campus don't know how to use a condom, and that's only out of the people we got to come to our booths and sessions.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:13 am

Costa Alegria wrote:
Avenio wrote:That was humour?


The bitterness is strong in this one.

Avenio: Proving that scientists are cold, unfeeling jerks since 2009. *nods*
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:13 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:HIV is no longer a death sentence. FFS they've even learned how to, in limited circumstances, cure HIV. HIV does not automatically mean you are damaged, and it definitely does not bean you will die. LERN2SCIENCE


HIV might as well be a death sentence if you aren't rich enough to afford the medication. I know I'd prefer to commit suicide than to allow my immune system to torment me until death.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Nov 24, 2012 1:14 am

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Because *certain groups of people* won't educate people to use precautions properly. I have had to teach at least 250 people how to properly use a condom in the past year. It's ridiculous that that many people on my campus don't know how to use a condom, and that's only out of the people we got to come to our booths and sessions.

I actually had one of those presentations last week during one of my required Freshman courses on my campus.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Techocracy101010, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads