Nidaria wrote:Edward Richtofen wrote:wilson needs more votes
he caused ww2 (dont get into a massive argument) by not being more forgiving to germany and by not punishing Austria
i know that britain and france were at versillas but if wilson was more forgiving the weak leaders of britain and france would have bent greatly
Wilson was a bad president, but he only went along with England and France in severely punishing Germany in exchange for getting his way in self-determination (which destroyed the Austrian Empire) and the League of Nations.
Wilson was a good President, his plan for the League of Nations was his plan to stop WWI from happening again, and he came up with it after the fact. He in fact did his best to stay out of the war, but continual attacks on American merchant ships forced his hand. Rather like the War of 1812, the US wouldn't've gotten involved had Britain not kept the US from trading with France. Not that it was necessarily in the wrong to do so, nor Germany for that matter, but from the American point of view her ships were being attacked.
Unfortunately, the Republicans sabotaged the League from the beginning by keeping the US out of it, and on top of that Britain and France saddled Germany with an outrageous debt after the war. Wilson argued against both of those things, and had he gotten his way, WWII may have been prevented.








