NATION

PASSWORD

Who was worst US president in the 20th and 21st centuries?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who was the worst US president in the 20th and 21st centuries?

Woodrow Wilson
35
6%
Herbert Hoover
60
10%
JFK
11
2%
LBJ
16
3%
Nixon
39
6%
Ford
5
1%
Carter
37
6%
George W Bush
256
41%
Obama
96
16%
other (explain below)
62
10%
 
Total votes : 617

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:47 am

LochNessMontropolis wrote:I can only pick one?!
Okay, Carter - I'll have to say that he's a really nice guy, but I think that was the problem - Too nice.
and Obama - How can he NOT understand that spending money that you don't have gets you deeper in debt. (Adding negative numbers just makes a bigger negative number)


Yeeees.....because Obama had to cure the $1.3trn deficit Bush left him the very day he entered office, whilst dealing with what could have been the Second Great Depression, of course!!

/sarcasm
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:48 am

Hungry wrote:Reagan


I'm inclined to agree, to be honest.

I mean, other Presidents did some shitty stuff, don't get me wrong. Watergate, internment of Japanese Americans, Iran-Contra, Bay of Pigs... but Reagan is the President that instigated war between Americans and their government.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Demara
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Nov 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demara » Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:53 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:I mean, other Presidents did some shitty stuff, don't get me wrong. Watergate, internment of Japanese Americans, Iran-Contra, Bay of Pigs... but Reagan is the President that instigated war between Americans and their government.

(emphasis mine)
This only supports your point (and is a reason that many people, including myself, really dislike Ronald Reagan's presidency), but Iran-Contra was under the Reagan administration. I'm sure you know that, but just correcting the (I assume) typo.
Last edited by Demara on Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Eppie was a creature of endless claims and ever-growing desires, seeking and loving sunshine, and living sounds, and living movements; making trial of everything, with trust in new joy, and stirring the human kindness in all eyes that looked on her[...]The gold had asked that he should sit weaving longer and longer, deafened and blinded more and more to all things except the monotony of his loom and the repetition of his web; but Eppie called him away from his weaving, and made him think all its pauses a holiday, reawakening his senses with her fresh life, even to the old winter-flies that came crawling forth in the early spring sunshine, and warming him into joy because she had joy." - George Eliot, Silas Marner

User avatar
LochNessMontropolis
Attaché
 
Posts: 70
Founded: Oct 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby LochNessMontropolis » Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:13 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
LochNessMontropolis wrote:I can only pick one?!
Okay, Carter - I'll have to say that he's a really nice guy, but I think that was the problem - Too nice.
and Obama - How can he NOT understand that spending money that you don't have gets you deeper in debt. (Adding negative numbers just makes a bigger negative number)


Your nominations for worst president... are based on one guy being too nice, and another guy not immediately curing the excesses of the previous decade?

That seems like a harsh metric.

I find it hard to believe niceness and not being able to do magic are actually the worst things that have transpired in the Oval Office in the last century.


As for Carter, I said he is a nice man because he IS.
No, I didn't expect Obama to "immediately" cure the deficit problem. Nor did I expect that he would make it WORSE, but he did.
However I choose or whatever "metric" I use is not the issue here. The topic merely asks for my opinion, which I gave. I could have chosen JFK for his fashion sense or Bush for his Southern drawl.....

User avatar
LochNessMontropolis
Attaché
 
Posts: 70
Founded: Oct 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby LochNessMontropolis » Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:15 am

New Chalcedon wrote:
LochNessMontropolis wrote:I can only pick one?!
Okay, Carter - I'll have to say that he's a really nice guy, but I think that was the problem - Too nice.
and Obama - How can he NOT understand that spending money that you don't have gets you deeper in debt. (Adding negative numbers just makes a bigger negative number)


Yeeees.....because Obama had to cure the $1.3trn deficit Bush left him the very day he entered office, whilst dealing with what could have been the Second Great Depression, of course!!

/sarcasm


Yeeeees.....because solving a lack of money is by spending more that you don't have.........right..... (verbal irony)

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:41 am

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Yeeees.....because Obama had to cure the $1.3trn deficit Bush left him the very day he entered office, whilst dealing with what could have been the Second Great Depression, of course!!

/sarcasm


Yeeeees.....because solving a lack of money is by spending more that you don't have.........right..... (verbal irony)


Hi. I'm that drunk person who walks up so casually you don't see me coming, and puts an arm around your shoulders (you and New Chalcedon) and insists that you should be friends.

Then explains why you should both be friends, in such drunken and rambling detail that both of you begin to doubt whether there is or ever was such a thing as friendship. But before you can make the conceptual leap to questioning enmity too, you both independently decide that the first priority is to get rid of the drunk person who is holding you both by your necks and babbling nonsense. It has crossed both your minds that the drunken person may at any moment vomit over both of you, as the drunken person has a certain sashaying style which strong suggests the Jackson Pollock style of stand and deliver, should the opportunity arise.

Then, mercifully for both of you, the drunken person takes a sudden interest in something in the next room, lets go of the both of you, and lumbers away leaving you to resume your conversation. No harm done I hope.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:02 am

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Yeeees.....because Obama had to cure the $1.3trn deficit Bush left him the very day he entered office, whilst dealing with what could have been the Second Great Depression, of course!!

/sarcasm


Yeeeees.....because solving a lack of money is by spending more that you don't have.........right..... (verbal irony)


And yet, the deficit is lower than when Obama took office, and will go down further once the irresponsible, budget-busting Bush tac cuts finally expire at the end of this year. Fancy that!
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Frisivisia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18164
Founded: Aug 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Frisivisia » Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:07 am

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Yeeees.....because Obama had to cure the $1.3trn deficit Bush left him the very day he entered office, whilst dealing with what could have been the Second Great Depression, of course!!

/sarcasm


Yeeeees.....because solving a lack of money is by spending more that you don't have.........right..... (verbal irony)

It's not about debt, dumbass, it's about jobs, and getting the economy moving, and to get jobs flowing and the economy growing, you spend. In times where you have jobs and the economy is going, then you cut back and deal with the deal, a la Clinton. Just because you did not choose to educate yourself about economics doesn't mean you must ask to have your wrongful believes pushed on the rest of us.
Impeach The Queen, Legalize Anarchy, Stealing Things Is Not Theft. Sex Pistols 2017.
I'm the evil gubmint PC inspector, here to take your Guns, outlaw your God, and steal your freedom and give it to black people.
I'm Joe Biden. So far as you know.

For: Anarchy, Punk Rock Fury
Against: Thatcher, Fascists, That Fascist Thatcher, Reagan, Nazi Punks, Everyone
"Am I buggin' ya? I don't mean to bug ya." - Bono
Let's cram some more shit in my sig. Cool people cram shit in their sigs. In TECHNICOLOR!

User avatar
Tmutarakhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8361
Founded: Dec 06, 2007
New York Times Democracy

Postby Tmutarakhan » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:07 am

LochNessMontropolis wrote:No, I didn't expect Obama to "immediately" cure the deficit problem. Nor did I expect that he would make it WORSE, but he did.

Absolutely false.
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, a comedy to those who think, and a musical to those who sing.

I am the very model of a Nation States General,
I am a holy terror to apologists Confederal,
When called upon to source a line, I give citations textual,
And argue about Palestine, and marriage homosexual!


A KNIGHT ON KARINZISTAN'S SPECIAL LIST OF POOPHEADS!

User avatar
Zohai
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 118
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zohai » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:11 am

Hoover, Reagan and GWB.

User avatar
Radovia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Radovia » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:12 am

Other,

Clinton.

Was an ass all over the Yugoslavian shindig, messed up over Rwanda and basically bought in welfare reform that pleases no one.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:14 am

Radovia wrote:Other,

Clinton.

Was an ass all over the Yugoslavian shindig, messed up over Rwanda and basically bought in welfare reform that pleases no one.

Clinton over Bush?


wat

User avatar
Eaglleia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17378
Founded: Feb 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Eaglleia » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:29 am

Aglrinia wrote:
Eaglleia wrote:Oh, definitely Washington or Lincoln. FDR was terrible too.

Joking. XD I'd say Wilson, George W Bush, LBJ, Hoover, Nixon, Tyler, Reagan, Harding and Buchanan were amongst the worst. Obamas bad, but not that bad in comparison. People are just hating cause he's the current President.


The question is "Who was the worst US president in the 20th and 21st centuries?" Therefore Washington and Lincoln aren't an option even you're saying it out of jest. While although I agree that Presidents Tyler, and Buchanan were rather horrid that don't fit in that time frame.

I'm guessing you're one of the people that let Vietnam overshadow Lyndon B. Johnson's presidency despite the fact that he did tremendous work for civil rights. While despite the fact that Woodrow Wilson originally sidestepped the issue of Women's rights he later became a huge supporter of women's suffrage, he even approached the house personally (Something that was quite rare back than) and made a strong and widely published appeal to the House to pass the nineteenth amendment.

Yeah I forgot about that bit. I included a lot of current names.
We could say that people let Watergate overshadow Nixons Presidency too. But I understand your point.

User avatar
Scythian Nation
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Nov 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scythian Nation » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:33 am

I believe Obama is the worst U.S. President in the 20th and 21st centuries because he not only endorced the Bush policies of using the fear of international terrorism to radically expand executive power, he expanded those policies further by claiming the power not merely to detain citizens without judicial review but to assassinate them without due process. ;)

User avatar
Lyrantea
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Apr 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lyrantea » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:37 am

Definitely Obama.
[color=#0000FF][b]Please disregard all posts on the forum made by this account. [/b][/color]

User avatar
Grand Soviet Union
Minister
 
Posts: 2404
Founded: Apr 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grand Soviet Union » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:37 am

Bush Jr. or Reagan.
Map of GSU All of ISSU
embassy program

political compass economical -6.62 social -1.69
Proud Russian!!
Proud Jew!!
I am more of an intellectual Jew than a religious one
Pro LGBT, same sex marriage pro abortion, pro Israel (most of the time...)


funnyquotes:
"Yup. Anyhow, I got to napalm terrorist in Lebanon." - Treko
"I like how Jęk just like "we all need to work together" but Alexi is like "fuck you! You fucking Nazis!"" - Sedikal

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111685
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:37 am

Scythian Nation wrote:I believe Obama is the worst U.S. President in the 20th and 21st centuries because he not only endorced the Bush policies of using the fear of international terrorism to radically expand executive power, he expanded those policies further by claiming the power not merely to detain citizens without judicial review but to assassinate them without due process. ;)

You would, of course, be incorrect in that assessment. ;)
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Hollorous
Diplomat
 
Posts: 909
Founded: Nov 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Hollorous » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:08 am

Trotskylvania wrote:I will say Kennedy, because of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

Kennedy's brinkmanship threatened not just the US with destruction, but human civilization itself, and it was based entirely on faulty intelligence and a gross overestimation of US capabilities. Namely, the simple fact that the number of missiles in Cuba numbered in the hundreds, not a dozen.


I agree with this. His reckless (at best) policies created a bad situation and the Soviets were the ones reasonable enough to end it. Yet Kennedy was labeled a hero and Kruschev pretty much ended his career.

User avatar
Austriona
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Austriona » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:11 am

I would say Obama.

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:25 am

i say FDR his economic polocies mad a bad economic depression worse. his "new deal" was a "new faliure", the only thing that he did right was to declare war on japan and even then congress broke procedure to do it as Rankin (congress woman from montana) voted no and they brushed her aside instead of going by the numbers which would have allowed her to make her case against such a decleration. FDR was the first and only american monarch (12 years in office), he became president with isolationist policies as his platform and then started selling guns and material to the brits putting american sailors in harms way just as willson did 20 years before. his administration knew about pearl harbor several days in advance ect.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:26 am

Totalise wrote:i say FDR his economic polocies mad a bad economic depression worse. his "new deal" was a "new faliure", the only thing that he did right was to declare war on japan and even then congress broke procedure to do it as Rankin (congress woman from montana) voted no and they brushed her aside instead of going by the numbers which would have allowed her to make her case against such a decleration. FDR was the first and only american monarch (12 years in office), he became president with isolationist policies as his platform and then started selling guns and material to the brits putting american sailors in harms way just as willson did 20 years before. his administration knew about pearl harbor several days in advance ect.

The ignorance is overwhelming.

User avatar
Bojikami
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11276
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bojikami » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:26 am

Libertarian California wrote:
AETEN II wrote:Why the fuck is LBJ on that list? He was one of our greatest presidents and made look JFK look like a useless pile of great hair.

And Dubwah gets the obvious nomination of worst modern president.



LBJ heavily escalated the Vietnam War...

LBJ: Well that escalated quickly.
Be gay, do crime.
23 year old nonbinary trans woman(She/They), also I'm a Marxist-Leninist.
Economic Left/Right: -10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.33

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:31 am

Reagan's deregulation of commerce and industry did us more harm than any other single presidential tactic. Iran-Contra should have sent some politicos to jail (not just good old Ollie). Derailed social programs have cost us in the long run.

Short term gain, long term havoc. The legacy of the next face on Mount Rushmore.
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Paixao
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1040
Founded: Jul 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Paixao » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:43 am

Not quite sure where all the hate for JFK is coming in...

He was the first president to realize there actually was an environmental problem, passing the Clean Air Act as well as a few others to. Apart from that he put down the foundations for the civil rights movement that LBJ passed through after his death, playing the 'honor his last wish' card on Congress to get it through. He started up a social campaign that (although uninformed and not on-the-whole terribly successful) again laid down the foundations for much of what Johnson would achieve.

Much as people criticize him for Cuba, he was half of the deal that stopped us from nuclear annihilation, better for America to have backed down than for the world to have gone nuclear. The Berlin gaff, was just that - not a big deal - gave the Germans a laugh :lol:

On the whole he wasn't amazing, but far from the WORST in the 20th Century.
Economic Left/Right: -8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

[Citations Needed]

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:47 am

Harding, without a doubt. Maybe Wilson, too.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elwher, Eternal Algerstonia, Hispida, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads