Mandatory sterilization at birth.
Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:57 pm

by Samuraikoku » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:58 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

by Esternial » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:58 pm
Galloism wrote:So, since the natural consequence of leaping from an airplane is death by sudden stoppage, we shouldn't take action to treat injured skydivers?
If the parachute fails, it's their fault, and they should live with the consequences (or not, as the case may be).

by Galloism » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.
SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.
Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

by Des-Bal » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm
Grimlundt wrote:
Yes.
Well ... when you do the categorical imperative test, you will be making guesses about consequences? Logical and practical
So the distinction is not as hard as you say
But regardless,, that does no bother me
What I think shows both systems to be useful is when they
1) Both endorse something like education for girls
OR come unstack when they contradict each other on something such as
2) freedom of religion and education of girls?
This clearly shows that both systems are useful but neither is 100% right? Or completely adequate.
I believe that a future ethics will combine these approaches and the way to do that? Levinas seems to me to have some important insights?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:00 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:
Typical of pro-choicers and liberals, if it doesn't agree with the Liberal agenda, it can't be an actual opinion it has to be a joke.
How is it dumb? I'm saying that people who can't afford to have certain things shouldn't risk getting them...
What do you suggest, mandatory sterilisation?
(I'd actually agree with you on that one, but surprisingly few people are willing to go the whole hog).

by Martean » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.
SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.
Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Demara » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.

by Grimlundt » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.
SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.
Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
What do you suggest, mandatory sterilisation?
(I'd actually agree with you on that one, but surprisingly few people are willing to go the whole hog).
Meh, I don't support sterilization as it could be used as a political tool. Doing that based on economic status isn't a good idea, people can change their socio-economic position.

by Mavorpen » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm
Demara wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.
I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.

by Zweite Alaje » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation
It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.
Racing. Your argument is invalid.

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm
Martean wrote:Yeahhh! lets abort! it's fun!
No. That's not what women think, it's a trauma for them too, so at least let her do what she wants.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:04 pm
Martean wrote:Yeahhh! lets abort! it's fun!
No. That's not what women think, it's a trauma for them too, so at least let her do what she wants.

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:04 pm
Demara wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.
I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:05 pm

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:06 pm
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:07 pm

by Demara » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Maybe. Maybe I should have picked a women's team.

by Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 pm
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.

by Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Escalia, Eternal Algerstonia, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Greater Qwerty, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Rary, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valyxias
Advertisement