NATION

PASSWORD

Woman dies in Ireland for want of an abortion

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:57 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Yes... Let's get into the discussion of how we should forcibly remove someone's right to procreate...


I'm wondering how we're going to create this world Zweite Alaje envisions, where there are no risks of conception.

Mandatory sterilization at birth.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:58 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.


Racing. Your argument is invalid.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54367
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:58 pm

Galloism wrote:So, since the natural consequence of leaping from an airplane is death by sudden stoppage, we shouldn't take action to treat injured skydivers?

If the parachute fails, it's their fault, and they should live with the consequences (or not, as the case may be).

That's the best analogy I've seen so far.

Then again, most I've seen so far were pretty bad.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72161
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.

SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.


Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

Sex is only for reproduction if the couple decides to reproduce.

Otherwise, it's for pleasure.

I've flown a plane many times. While some would say it was for transportation, I flew for pleasure. Thus, flying, in that case, is for pleasure.

Just like sex.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm

Grimlundt wrote:
Yes.
Well ... when you do the categorical imperative test, you will be making guesses about consequences? Logical and practical
So the distinction is not as hard as you say
But regardless,, that does no bother me
What I think shows both systems to be useful is when they
1) Both endorse something like education for girls
OR come unstack when they contradict each other on something such as
2) freedom of religion and education of girls?
This clearly shows that both systems are useful but neither is 100% right? Or completely adequate.
I believe that a future ethics will combine these approaches and the way to do that? Levinas seems to me to have some important insights?


The entire premise of the categorical imperative is that you CANNOT consider consequences. The entire premise of utilitarianism is that you should ONLY consider the consequences. You can't combine those ideas.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:59 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.

SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.


Sex = for reproduction.


Not only 'no', but 'really, really no'.

Sex with contraception is absolutely not about reproduction - by definition. By DESIGN.

Anal sex. Not about reproduction. Oral sex. Not about reproduction. Manual stimulation. Not about reproduction.

Sex with your partner to express your love, not about reproduction.

Sex with your partner because one of you needs the comfort (or both of you), not about reproduction.

Sex... just because you're horny, not about reproduction.

Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.

Sex with your same-sex lover, not about reproduction.



Almost NONE of the sex humans engage in is about reproduction.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:00 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
I'm wondering how we're going to create this world Zweite Alaje envisions, where there are no risks of conception.

Mandatory sterilization at birth.


That and the Judge Death "The crime is life, the sentence is death" scenario are the only ways to be certain.

*shrugs*
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:
Typical of pro-choicers and liberals, if it doesn't agree with the Liberal agenda, it can't be an actual opinion it has to be a joke.

How is it dumb? I'm saying that people who can't afford to have certain things shouldn't risk getting them...


What do you suggest, mandatory sterilisation?

(I'd actually agree with you on that one, but surprisingly few people are willing to go the whole hog).


Meh, I don't support sterilization as it could be used as a political tool. Doing that based on economic status isn't a good idea, people can change their socio-economic position.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Martean
Minister
 
Posts: 2017
Founded: Aug 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Martean » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Yeahhh! lets abort! it's fun!

No. That's not what women think, it's a trauma for them too, so at least let her do what she wants.
Compass:
Left/Right: -9.00
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.03
Spanish, communist
Pro: Democracy, Nationalized economy, socialism, LGTB Rights, Free Speech, Atheism, Inmigration, Direct Democracy
Anti: Dictatorship, Fascism, Social-democracy, Social Liberalism, Neoliberalism, Nationalism, Racism, Xenophobia, Homophobia.
''When you have an imaginary friend, you're crazy, but when many people have the same imaginary friend, it's called religion''

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.

SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.


Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

"purpose" is nonsense.
Sex is just as much not for procreation as it is for procreation. It's all what you want out of it.
If you want to drive, you can either drive crazy, or you can drive safe. Even if you drive crazy, you may not wreck. Even if you drive safe, you may still wreck.
If you want to have sex, you can either go bareback, or you can use protection. Even if you go bareback, you might not get pregnant/an STI/STD. Even if you use protection, you may still get pregnant/an STI/STD.
Should we not give medication to people who have HIV, either? Ban drivers from the hospital! Stop the sales of condoms! Kill doctors who prescribe birth control! Imprison people who have anal sex!
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Demara
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Nov 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demara » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.

I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.
"Eppie was a creature of endless claims and ever-growing desires, seeking and loving sunshine, and living sounds, and living movements; making trial of everything, with trust in new joy, and stirring the human kindness in all eyes that looked on her[...]The gold had asked that he should sit weaving longer and longer, deafened and blinded more and more to all things except the monotony of his loom and the repetition of his web; but Eppie called him away from his weaving, and made him think all its pauses a holiday, reawakening his senses with her fresh life, even to the old winter-flies that came crawling forth in the early spring sunshine, and warming him into joy because she had joy." - George Eliot, Silas Marner

User avatar
Grimlundt
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 388
Founded: Oct 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Grimlundt » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Sex doesn't imply a pregnancy.

SAFE SEX is to SAFE DRIVING as USING A CONDOM is to NOT DRIVING WHILE BLINDFOLDED.


Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.


naturalistic fallacy --
You impute a purpose to sex
and then make that purpose into a moral imperative
Your argument is fallacious and illogical
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IgfdE8Cueg
Watch this video and try to understand why your argument is fallacious, please

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
What do you suggest, mandatory sterilisation?

(I'd actually agree with you on that one, but surprisingly few people are willing to go the whole hog).


Meh, I don't support sterilization as it could be used as a political tool. Doing that based on economic status isn't a good idea, people can change their socio-economic position.


Are you under the impression that the whole procreation paradigm is not used as a political tool?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.

Sex isn't for reproduction alone, especially in humans.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm

Demara wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.

I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.


Maybe. Maybe I should have picked a women's team.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:Sex = for reproduction
Driving = for transportation

It is a difference in implied purpose. Sex is/can be pleasureable, but that isn't its inherent purpose. You can crash if you drive, but it isn't for crashing, its to get you from one location to the other.


Racing. Your argument is invalid.


Racing is still an effort to get to one place to another, the only difference is it's a sport.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm

Martean wrote:Yeahhh! lets abort! it's fun!

No. That's not what women think, it's a trauma for them too, so at least let her do what she wants.

The first sentence, I thought you were going to go downhill really fast.
But nope, you pulled it out and said something not stupid. Congrats! :clap:
(also, hiuk hiuk hiuk, "pulled it out.")
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:04 pm

Martean wrote:Yeahhh! lets abort! it's fun!

No. That's not what women think, it's a trauma for them too, so at least let her do what she wants.


I agree with the sentiment, but let me just throw in the consideration that it's often NOT about what she wants. It's more likely to be about what she feels she has to do.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:04 pm

Demara wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:Sex with a football team, just for the thrill, not about reproduction.

I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.

Fuck... I knew the condom didn't go there...
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:05 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
Racing. Your argument is invalid.


Racing is still an effort to get to one place to another, the only difference is it's a sport.


So provided you treat sex as a sport, all options are on the table?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:06 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:
Racing is still an effort to get to one place to another, the only difference is it's a sport.


So provided you treat sex as a sport, all options are on the table?

Yes! On the table! A great place!
:D



okay. I'm going to go play a rousing game of Sex.
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:07 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Demara wrote:I don't know...I find that when I have sex with a football team, it's only for the purpose of reproduction. Basically, I'm not sure how you have done it in the past, but I think you did it incorrectly.

Fuck... I knew the condom didn't go there...


Looking back, it suddenly being harder to breathe should have been an indicator.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Demara
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 120
Founded: Nov 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Demara » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:Maybe. Maybe I should have picked a women's team.

I imagine so. For me that would have removed the possibility of reproduction, so I don't think that would have been helpful on my end. Of course, we've already established that I did this correctly, so that's not at issue. Do it correctly next time (there's always a "next time", after all)!
Last edited by Demara on Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Eppie was a creature of endless claims and ever-growing desires, seeking and loving sunshine, and living sounds, and living movements; making trial of everything, with trust in new joy, and stirring the human kindness in all eyes that looked on her[...]The gold had asked that he should sit weaving longer and longer, deafened and blinded more and more to all things except the monotony of his loom and the repetition of his web; but Eppie called him away from his weaving, and made him think all its pauses a holiday, reawakening his senses with her fresh life, even to the old winter-flies that came crawling forth in the early spring sunshine, and warming him into joy because she had joy." - George Eliot, Silas Marner

User avatar
Torcularis Septentrionalis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9398
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torcularis Septentrionalis » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:08 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:Fuck... I knew the condom didn't go there...


Looking back, it suddenly being harder to breathe should have been an indicator.

Also, the lube taste takes hours to go away...
The Andromeda Islands wrote:This! Is! A! Bad! Idea!
Furious Grandmothers wrote:Why are you talking about murder when we are talking about abortion? Murdering a fetus is impossible. It's like smelling an echo. You're not making sense.



20 year old female. Camgirl/student. Call me Torc/TS/Alix

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:09 pm

Torcularis Septentrionalis wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
So provided you treat sex as a sport, all options are on the table?

Yes! On the table! A great place!
:D



okay. I'm going to go play a rousing game of Sex.


You are? Just... you?

Okay, got to add that to the list of why sex isn't all about reproduction. With the exception of one sketchy story that's more than twenty centuries old and has never been repeated, sex with yourself almost never leads to babies.
I identify as
a problem

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Escalia, Eternal Algerstonia, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Greater Qwerty, Grinning Dragon, Necroghastia, Rary, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads