Uh, no it's not. She didn't die because she wanted an abortion. She died because she couldn't get an abortion. A big difference.
This generation.
Advertisement

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:17 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:21 am
Brekka wrote:How is a fetus supposed to get permission?

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:24 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:26 am

by Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:28 am

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:30 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Arthurista » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:33 am

by Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:35 am
Zephie wrote:Cu Math wrote:They aren't even alive. its a bundle of stem cells. Its as alive as your marrow
I'm a huge bundle of cells. I'm not alive?! SHIT
Wait, cells aren't alive either?
Damn.
This is sort of how growing up works. You get bigger and bigger and bigger. Does this mean a child isn't a human until they stop growing around the ages of 18-21?

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:39 am

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:40 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Qazox » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:44 am

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:45 am


by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:46 am

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:48 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:49 am

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:52 am
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:57 am
Zephie wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Yes, it does. As you've been shown already... So no, I don't want lessons in not understanding.
No, see. I'll try to use simple words. She died because she did not get an abortion which she had want for. Instead, the fetus was removed when it was too late, the infection killing her. So, she died because she was denied an abortion she originally wanted. When she ultimately got the abortion, it was already too late and she died of the infection. So she did get an abortion, but not when she originally wanted it. What killed her was being denied the original abortion, not 'wanting' one.

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:04 am
Dyakovo wrote:Zephie wrote:
No, see. I'll try to use simple words. She died because she did not get an abortion which she had want for. Instead, the fetus was removed when it was too late, the infection killing her. So, she died because she was denied an abortion she originally wanted. When she ultimately got the abortion, it was already too late and she died of the infection. So she did get an abortion, but not when she originally wanted it. What killed her was being denied the original abortion, not 'wanting' one.
Someone needs grammar lessons here... It's not me though...
" If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible." from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:06 am

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:08 am
Risottia wrote:Zephie wrote:Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people
Sure.
Should I discuss their being people or not within your hypothesis of them being people, though? Because, you know, your counter is nothing more than a tautology. "I define foeti as being people, and now I dare you to prove that people aren't people."
Compelling argument.
Well, I think I already dismissed it.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:09 am
Zephie wrote:Risottia wrote:Sure.
Should I discuss their being people or not within your hypothesis of them being people, though? Because, you know, your counter is nothing more than a tautology. "I define foeti as being people, and now I dare you to prove that people aren't people."
Compelling argument.
Well, I think I already dismissed it.
If you ever see pics of aborted fetuses really hard not to think it's human, when it already has the features of a human.
P.S. this is how we all were born

by Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 am
Zephie wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Someone needs grammar lessons here... It's not me though...
" If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible." from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)
In this case it was not possible for her to keep the baby, so she wanted an abortion. Correct. Like I have been saying for quite a few posts. Not sure why you're going to me for your lessons when you just teach yourself. More power to ya.

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 am
Risottia wrote:Zephie wrote:If you ever see pics of aborted fetuses really hard not to think it's human, when it already has the features of a human.
P.S. this is how we all were born
Human =/= person.
You're descended from tautologies to weaseling. What next? Appeal to emotions - nah, already done.
Quo usque tandem abuteris patientia nostra?
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:11 am
Dyakovo wrote:Zephie wrote:In this case it was not possible for her to keep the baby, so she wanted an abortion. Correct. Like I have been saying for quite a few posts. Not sure why you're going to me for your lessons when you just teach yourself. More power to ya.
Because if you teach yourself, like you apparently did, you end up thinking "for want of" means "for wanting"...
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:13 am
Zephie wrote:Risottia wrote:
Human =/= person.
You're descended from tautologies to weaseling. What next? Appeal to emotions - nah, already done.
Quo usque tandem abuteris patientia nostra?
Weasling? You're just using technicalities of words to try to prove a point, words don't change what something is.
A fetus is a stage of human development. To deny that is to deny being human.
Zephie wrote:Want is a verb.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Anastasica, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement