NATION

PASSWORD

Woman dies in Ireland for want of an abortion

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:17 am

Cu Math wrote:
Zephie wrote:"for want of an abortion"
no
it's
"from being denied an abortion"

nope, "for want of" implies a lack or deficit. It's correct

Uh, no it's not. She didn't die because she wanted an abortion. She died because she couldn't get an abortion. A big difference.
This generation.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:21 am

Brekka wrote:How is a fetus supposed to get permission?


It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:24 am

Risottia wrote:
Brekka wrote:How is a fetus supposed to get permission?


It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.

Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Cu Math
Senator
 
Posts: 3503
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:26 am

Zephie wrote:
Cu Math wrote:nope, "for want of" implies a lack or deficit. It's correct

Uh, no it's not. She didn't die because she wanted an abortion. She died because she couldn't get an abortion. A big difference.
This generation.

Umm....." If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible."
from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)
Those who are not willing to support us are second-rate nations, but first-rate main courses.
Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
From the Council of Terrible Elders
Distributor of Potato Medals
Acolyte of the NSG Sodomy Club
Requiescat In Pacem, Dyakovo. You were the best of us
Ordained Dudeist Priest
Divair's Big Guide to Proving Evolution
Atheist, Bisexual and Bagpiper
Palestinian-Scottish-American

The One And Only Duke Of The Potato

User avatar
Cu Math
Senator
 
Posts: 3503
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:28 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:
It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.

Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people

They aren't even alive. its a bundle of stem cells. Its as alive as your marrow
Those who are not willing to support us are second-rate nations, but first-rate main courses.
Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
From the Council of Terrible Elders
Distributor of Potato Medals
Acolyte of the NSG Sodomy Club
Requiescat In Pacem, Dyakovo. You were the best of us
Ordained Dudeist Priest
Divair's Big Guide to Proving Evolution
Atheist, Bisexual and Bagpiper
Palestinian-Scottish-American

The One And Only Duke Of The Potato

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:30 am

Cu Math wrote:
Zephie wrote:Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people

They aren't even alive. its a bundle of stem cells. Its as alive as your marrow

I'm a huge bundle of cells. I'm not alive?! SHIT
Wait, cells aren't alive either?
Damn.

This is sort of how growing up works. You get bigger and bigger and bigger. Does this mean a child isn't a human until they stop growing around the ages of 18-21?
Last edited by Zephie on Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Arthurista
Minister
 
Posts: 2310
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Arthurista » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:33 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:
It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.

Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people


What we define as 'people' is pretty much just whatever the politicians decide based on prevalent cultural views, which are in turn determined by the socio-economic conditions. As these conditions change, so will cultural views and hence the law. If animal rights campaigns pick up the pace, chimpanzees will be classified as hominids in the future, for example. The reverse side of the coin, of course, is that nasty regimes can legislate whole groups outside the ambit of 'human beings'.

Just how the world works in reality.
Last edited by Arthurista on Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cu Math
Senator
 
Posts: 3503
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Cu Math » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:35 am

Zephie wrote:
Cu Math wrote:They aren't even alive. its a bundle of stem cells. Its as alive as your marrow

I'm a huge bundle of cells. I'm not alive?! SHIT
Wait, cells aren't alive either?
Damn.

This is sort of how growing up works. You get bigger and bigger and bigger. Does this mean a child isn't a human until they stop growing around the ages of 18-21?

Seriously? No, cells aren't truly alive. And embryonic cells are even less alive than your stratum basale! They can't maintain homeostasis! And a last sting your cells keep growing, dividing, and dying after 18
But my original point: no, they aren't.
Those who are not willing to support us are second-rate nations, but first-rate main courses.
Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
From the Council of Terrible Elders
Distributor of Potato Medals
Acolyte of the NSG Sodomy Club
Requiescat In Pacem, Dyakovo. You were the best of us
Ordained Dudeist Priest
Divair's Big Guide to Proving Evolution
Atheist, Bisexual and Bagpiper
Palestinian-Scottish-American

The One And Only Duke Of The Potato

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:39 am

Zephie wrote:
Moving Forward Inc wrote:You're the one who is making it sound like that, with that giant imagination of yours.

"for want of an abortion"
no
it's
"from being denied an abortion"

Your "correction" and what was written mean the same thing.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:40 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Zephie wrote:"for want of an abortion"
no
it's
"from being denied an abortion"

Your "correction" and what was written mean the same thing.

No it doesn't.

If you would like some grammar lessons, I'd be happy to help you out.
Last edited by Zephie on Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Qazox
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21295
Founded: Jan 17, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Qazox » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:44 am

I hope her husband sues the crap out of the hospital. This was a case when an abortion was medically warrented, and not done. Shame on all involved with not getting this woman the treatment she needed.
Wikipage/Qazox National Football Team
Qualified for World Cups 31, 33, 35-50, 54-59, 61, 62. Runners-up: CoH 52
Baptism of Fire 44 (w/Mangolana); World Baseball Classics 1, 4, 5, 10, 13 and 23; World Cup of Hockey 7 and 14; World Bowls IV & IX; IBC X; Baptism of Iron III and VIII; NSCAA Tourney II, III (conferences/regionals), The OXEN Cup; the TOUR de QAZOX, Qazoxian Sports Festival and NS X-Games/Winter X-Games I.
World Cups of Hockey 4 & 6; World Baseball Classics 6, 8 and 9, World Bowls 3 and XXI; Draggonnii Inviyatii V, IBC XI
xkcd 1110 (zoomable!)

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:45 am

Zephie wrote:
Cu Math wrote:nope, "for want of" implies a lack or deficit. It's correct

Uh, no it's not. She didn't die because she wanted an abortion. She died because she couldn't get an abortion. A big difference.
This generation.

"She died for want of an abortion" doesn't mean "She died because she wanted an abortion."
:palm:
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:46 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:
It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.

Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people

A foetus isn't a person.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:48 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Zephie wrote:Uh, no it's not. She didn't die because she wanted an abortion. She died because she couldn't get an abortion. A big difference.
This generation.

"She died for want of an abortion" doesn't mean "She died because she wanted an abortion."
:palm:

Again, if you would like some free grammar lessons, feel free to send me a telegram.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:49 am

Zephie wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Your "correction" and what was written mean the same thing.

No it doesn't.

If you would like some grammar lessons, I'd be happy to help you out.

Yes, it does. As you've been shown already... So no, I don't want lessons in not understanding.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:52 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Zephie wrote:No it doesn't.

If you would like some grammar lessons, I'd be happy to help you out.

Yes, it does. As you've been shown already... So no, I don't want lessons in not understanding.


No, see. I'll try to use simple words. She died because she did not get an abortion which she had want for. Instead, the fetus was removed when it was too late, the infection killing her. So, she died because she was denied an abortion she originally wanted. When she ultimately got the abortion, it was already too late and she died of the infection. So she did get an abortion, but not when she originally wanted it. What killed her was being denied the original abortion, not 'wanting' one.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:57 am

Zephie wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Yes, it does. As you've been shown already... So no, I don't want lessons in not understanding.


No, see. I'll try to use simple words. She died because she did not get an abortion which she had want for. Instead, the fetus was removed when it was too late, the infection killing her. So, she died because she was denied an abortion she originally wanted. When she ultimately got the abortion, it was already too late and she died of the infection. So she did get an abortion, but not when she originally wanted it. What killed her was being denied the original abortion, not 'wanting' one.

Someone needs grammar lessons here... It's not me though...

" If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible." from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:04 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Zephie wrote:
No, see. I'll try to use simple words. She died because she did not get an abortion which she had want for. Instead, the fetus was removed when it was too late, the infection killing her. So, she died because she was denied an abortion she originally wanted. When she ultimately got the abortion, it was already too late and she died of the infection. So she did get an abortion, but not when she originally wanted it. What killed her was being denied the original abortion, not 'wanting' one.

Someone needs grammar lessons here... It's not me though...

" If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible." from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)

In this case it was not possible for her to keep the baby, so she wanted an abortion. Correct. Like I have been saying for quite a few posts. Not sure why you're going to me for your lessons when you just teach yourself. More power to ya.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:06 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:
It can't. Because it's not a person, neither legally nor neurobiologically.

Hence, abortion isn't murder, because it's not even the killing of a person.

Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people

Sure.
Should I discuss their being people or not within your hypothesis of them being people, though? Because, you know, your counter is nothing more than a tautology. Your argument translates as "I define foeti as being people, and now I dare you to prove that people aren't people."

Compelling argument.
Well, I think I already dismissed it.
Last edited by Risottia on Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:08 am

Risottia wrote:
Zephie wrote:Please tell me more about how people growing inside of people aren't people

Sure.
Should I discuss their being people or not within your hypothesis of them being people, though? Because, you know, your counter is nothing more than a tautology. "I define foeti as being people, and now I dare you to prove that people aren't people."

Compelling argument.
Well, I think I already dismissed it.

If you ever see pics of aborted fetuses really hard not to think it's human, when it already has the features of a human.

P.S. this is how we all were born
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:09 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:Sure.
Should I discuss their being people or not within your hypothesis of them being people, though? Because, you know, your counter is nothing more than a tautology. "I define foeti as being people, and now I dare you to prove that people aren't people."

Compelling argument.
Well, I think I already dismissed it.

If you ever see pics of aborted fetuses really hard not to think it's human, when it already has the features of a human.

P.S. this is how we all were born


Human =/= person.

Also, no, a foetus does not have all the features of an adult human. What's your point?

You're descended from tautologies to weaseling. What next? Appeal to emotions - nah, already done.
Quo usque tandem abuteris patientia nostra?
Last edited by Risottia on Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 am

Zephie wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Someone needs grammar lessons here... It's not me though...

" If you do something for want of something else, you do it because the other thing is not available or not possible." from Collins English Dictionary (Italics and bold mine)

In this case it was not possible for her to keep the baby, so she wanted an abortion. Correct. Like I have been saying for quite a few posts. Not sure why you're going to me for your lessons when you just teach yourself. More power to ya.

Because if you teach yourself, like you apparently did, you end up thinking "for want of" means "for wanting"...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 am

Risottia wrote:
Zephie wrote:If you ever see pics of aborted fetuses really hard not to think it's human, when it already has the features of a human.

P.S. this is how we all were born


Human =/= person.

You're descended from tautologies to weaseling. What next? Appeal to emotions - nah, already done.
Quo usque tandem abuteris patientia nostra?

Weasling? You're just using technicalities of words to try to prove a point, words don't change what something is. A fetus is a stage of human development. To deny that is to deny being human.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:11 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Zephie wrote:In this case it was not possible for her to keep the baby, so she wanted an abortion. Correct. Like I have been saying for quite a few posts. Not sure why you're going to me for your lessons when you just teach yourself. More power to ya.

Because if you teach yourself, like you apparently did, you end up thinking "for want of" means "for wanting"...

The woman wanted an abortion. Want is a verb.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:13 am

Zephie wrote:
Risottia wrote:
Human =/= person.

You're descended from tautologies to weaseling. What next? Appeal to emotions - nah, already done.
Quo usque tandem abuteris patientia nostra?

Weasling? You're just using technicalities of words to try to prove a point, words don't change what something is.

So, why are you still trying to argue that non-persons are persons because you say so?

A fetus is a stage of human development. To deny that is to deny being human.

A fetus is a stage of human development. This does not imply that it has rights. Because "being human" =/= "being a person".
Anyway, nice try at a "you're not human" argument.

So, after tautologies, weaseling, appeal to emotions, we are nearing the ad hominem now.

More and more cogent arguments. Sure.

Zephie wrote:Want is a verb.

Do yourself a favour and learn English. "want" is also a noun.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictiona ... 1352967228

2 want
noun
Definition of WANT
1
a : deficiency, lack <suffers from a want of good sense>
b : grave and extreme poverty that deprives one of the necessities of life
2
: something wanted : need, desire
3
: personal defect : fault
See want defined for English-language learners »
Examples of WANT

His attitude shows a want of proper respect.
He is suffering from want of adequate sleep.
people who are living in want

First Known Use of WANT
13th century
Related to WANT
Synonyms: absence, dearth, lack
Antonyms: presence
Last edited by Risottia on Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Anastasica, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Rio Grande River Basin

Advertisement

Remove ads