Ok, if that is really the case, then petty bourgeois would be the correct definition of his class.
Advertisement

by Socialist EU » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:49 pm
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:49 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Saruhan wrote:I doubt that the Gazans have as many airstrikes happen to them then Israelis have rocket and bomb attacks, else there would be a lot more news coming from Gaze
http://i.imgur.com/HGex2.jpg
compare israelis killed vs gazans killed

by Saruhan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:49 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:50 pm

by Seperates » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:50 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Seperates wrote:Where else would they have their war zone? The fact of the matter is that there are no rules to warfare, and quite honestly neither side really cares about civilian casualties, no matter what they say.
There are plenty of rules to warfare. Both sides do care about civilian casualties. how and to what degree they care may be different, but they do care.

by Ethel mermania » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:51 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Saruhan wrote:I doubt that the Gazans have as many airstrikes happen to them then Israelis have rocket and bomb attacks, else there would be a lot more news coming from Gaze
http://i.imgur.com/HGex2.jpg
compare israelis killed vs gazans killed

by Socialist EU » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:51 pm
Seperates wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:I disafuckinggree. Do not presume to tell me I don't care about civilian casualties.
Where else would you have them fight? This isn't the 1800's where soldiers stand out the open battlefield and fire at each other in deathrow lines.
I am talking about the people in charge. Individual soldiers care about civilian casualties, but the higher-ups only care about the PR fallout that may accompany it, not the act itself.
If they cared about civilian casualties, they wouldn't have a war in the first place. On either side. The simple fact of the matter is that through warfare or missile strikes or whatever they choose, they are going to cause civilian casualties. It is inevitable.

by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:51 pm
Seperates wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:I disafuckinggree. Do not presume to tell me I don't care about civilian casualties.
Where else would you have them fight? This isn't the 1800's where soldiers stand out the open battlefield and fire at each other in deathrow lines.
I am talking about the people in charge. Individual soldiers care about civilian casualties, but the higher-ups only care about the PR fallout that may accompany it, not the act itself.
If they cared about civilian casualties, they wouldn't have a war in the first place. On either side. The simple fact of the matter is that through warfare or missile strikes or whatever they choose, they are going to cause civilian casualties. It is inevitable.

by Saruhan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:53 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Potlimitomaha » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:53 pm
DogDoo 7 wrote:Geadland wrote:Panetta doesn't want Iraq to be wiped off the face of the earth. That's what Ahmed Said Khalil al-Jabari believed should happen to Israel.
I'm so sick of hearing what people here "want." Oh, "Israel wants peace," "Hamas wants to drive the Jews into the sea." ENOUGH! The only thing that matters is action. And the actions over the last 10 years show that Israel has been doing a hundred-fold better job at wiping Palestinians off the face of the earth than vice versa.
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:54 pm
Saruhan wrote:
Well, I would hope guided missiles and aircraft were better at killing then shitty rockets

by Seperates » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:54 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Seperates wrote:Where else would you have them fight? This isn't the 1800's where soldiers stand out the open battlefield and fire at each other in deathrow lines.
I am talking about the people in charge. Individual soldiers care about civilian casualties, but the higher-ups only care about the PR fallout that may accompany it, not the act itself.
If they cared about civilian casualties, they wouldn't have a war in the first place. On either side. The simple fact of the matter is that through warfare or missile strikes or whatever they choose, they are going to cause civilian casualties. It is inevitable.
The people in charge of every Op I went out on pounded into our heads the LOAC, ROW, GC regarding treatment of POW, and ROE. I've seen four stars cry about the fact that a civilian was killed on an Op gone screwball. You need to readjust your perspective, because while I may have become cynical, I don't make sweeping generalizations about people I've never met and only know about through the media.

by Norsklow » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:54 pm
Socialist EU wrote:Norsklow wrote:
Specific names of specific persons were mentioned. Athletes, Munich, 1972, Olympics, and all that.
He responded to it, considered it tough luck for them, too bad, felt bad about them on a personal level.
The event in which these people were murdered certainly qualified as terrorism in the Federal Republic of Germany.
So what, exactly, is your COMPLAINT?
This is a land war as far as I can see, unless you want to redefine Israel's action as state terrorism?
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:55 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:
the israelies are more accurate. hamas until these last few days shot way more rockets at israel than took in receiving fire. Body count is not the determining factor on right or wrong. The one in the wrong is who shot first, and that would be hamas. So we will go back to the "karma is a bitch" theory. you dont want to be killed dont try and kill anybody.

by Socialist EU » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:56 pm
Potlimitomaha wrote:DogDoo 7 wrote:
I'm so sick of hearing what people here "want." Oh, "Israel wants peace," "Hamas wants to drive the Jews into the sea." ENOUGH! The only thing that matters is action. And the actions over the last 10 years show that Israel has been doing a hundred-fold better job at wiping Palestinians off the face of the earth than vice versa.
So that means that you want to drive the Jews to the sea. There's no other reasonable excplaination of what you said.

by Saruhan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:56 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:56 pm
Seperates wrote:The Emerald Dawn wrote:The people in charge of every Op I went out on pounded into our heads the LOAC, ROW, GC regarding treatment of POW, and ROE. I've seen four stars cry about the fact that a civilian was killed on an Op gone screwball. You need to readjust your perspective, because while I may have become cynical, I don't make sweeping generalizations about people I've never met and only know about through the media.
While that does make your four-star a good man... if he is crying about a single civilian, he may need to get a re-adjustment. People die in war. If you don't want people to die, don't wage war.
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:57 pm
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:58 pm

by Saruhan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Saruhan wrote:Because Israel is a developed nation and an important Western ally in the middle east, the Hamas controlled Gaza... Isn't
though it's nice you appear to have moved from "if there were more airstrikes, there'd be more news" to "well of course it's not in the news, who cares if they die?"
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Seperates » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:01 pm
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Seperates wrote:While that does make your four-star a good man... if he is crying about a single civilian, he may need to get a re-adjustment. People die in war. If you don't want people to die, don't wage war.
Eh, the Op shouldn't have put us in the area it did. Intel went wrong, tits became upwardly inclined, and he was responsible ultimately. He kept his perspective, which included the fact that if we do our jobs right no civvies die.
by Souseiseki » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:02 pm
Saruhan wrote:Souseiseki wrote:though it's nice you appear to have moved from "if there were more airstrikes, there'd be more news" to "well of course it's not in the news, who cares if they die?"
It's all over the Western News, on Al Jezzera it's more focused on the Palestinians. It's more a bias think. Plus I get most of my news from AJE anyway so I see that news ever time an Israeli soldier farts near Gaza. I just sort of assumed it was a universal thing

by Saruhan » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm
Souseiseki wrote:Saruhan wrote:It's all over the Western News, on Al Jezzera it's more focused on the Palestinians. It's more a bias think. Plus I get most of my news from AJE anyway so I see that news ever time an Israeli soldier farts near Gaza. I just sort of assumed it was a universal thing
it isn't. everyone else is focused on the israelis.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Gravlen » Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:03 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Gravlen wrote:And when they don't hide, but just live there - and are blown up while driving down a crowded street?
that's sad, but its Hamas's responsibility not to use civilian neighborhoods as a war zone. So the blame still goes on the guys shooting the rockets in the first place.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cachard Calia, Cerespasia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Enormous Gentiles, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Ifreann, Rary, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement