I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.
Advertisement

by Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:52 am
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:52 am

by Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:53 am
Delanshar wrote:Divair wrote:Unlikely. Maybe if Hamas wants to really build up their stockpile to enormous levels, but I doubt they'll wait that long. Just lets us get more Iron Domes operational.
I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.

by Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:55 am

by Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:56 am
Divair wrote:Vazdania wrote:It will probably make them STRONGER. Is it fair that there is only 1 entrance into the Dome on the Rock for Jews and non Muslims whereas there are 7 for Muslims? No. We need a stronger Israel.
"We"? I'm sorry, when did you become part of us? No, you're just like most foreigners. Not a single fucking clue as to how this region operates, both in terms of history and current events.
I expected better from NSG.
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:58 am

by Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:59 am


by Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:59 am
Divair wrote:Delanshar wrote:
I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.
I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.

by Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:00 am
Delanshar wrote:Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:02 am
Delanshar wrote:Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:02 am
Delanshar wrote:Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

by The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:03 am
Souseiseki wrote:Delanshar wrote:
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.
egypt and turkey care for obvious reasons. tunisia somewhat similar.
the u.s. cares because it is their ally to whom they give billions of dollars annually, THE ONLY DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, OUR CLOSEST ALLY, YAH YAH
it's actually more than that, but it's actually really really really obvious

by Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 am
Souseiseki wrote:Delanshar wrote:
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.
also the nukes which france helped them get probably puts them way up there


by The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:07 am

by Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:32 am
The Zeonic States wrote:
Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.
That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.
That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.
Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:34 am
Tyrants wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.
That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.
That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.
Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.
Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.

by Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:36 am

by Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:36 am

by The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:38 am
Tyrants wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.
That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.
That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.
Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.
Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.

by Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:42 am
Divair wrote:Tyrants wrote:
Sorry. I meant that if everyone who could afford it could have nukes, then they might not show the same levels of restraint as the West did.
Yes, they would. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction
by Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:43 am
Tyrants wrote:
I could see a nuclear Iran (other radical Islamist states available) ignoring this through the red mist and taking Israel with it to kingdom come.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:43 am
The Zeonic States wrote:Tyrants wrote:
Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.
So you assume M.A.D No longer applies in the Modern world? I don't Personally see even most of the supposed " radical" Islamist powers firing a Nuclear weapon with out something similar being done to them to be honest. And besides most of those supposed "radical" powers are gone due to what was it called "Arab Spring?"
Honestly the existing excuse for why Middle eastern powers cannot acheive Nuclear weapon status poccession is getting old this is no longer the time of Sadam or Gaddafi. And to be honest most evidence of Either leaders trying to get Nuclear weapons was mostly bogus it turned out to begin with.

by Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:44 am
Tyrants wrote:
I could see a nuclear Iran (other radical Islamist states available) ignoring this through the red mist and taking Israel with it to kingdom come.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Avstrikland, Benjium, Bienenhalde, Cappedore, Fartsniffage, Hispida, Ifreann, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rusozak, The Chinese Soviet, The Crimson Isles, Trump Almighty, Unreasonably Militarised State
Advertisement