NATION

PASSWORD

Israeli "Operation Cloud Pillar" 2012

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:52 am

Divair wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:5-6 months?

Unlikely. Maybe if Hamas wants to really build up their stockpile to enormous levels, but I doubt they'll wait that long. Just lets us get more Iron Domes operational.


I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:52 am

Vazdania wrote:
Divair wrote:Good. Maybe it'll change your views.

It will probably make them STRONGER. Is it fair that there is only 1 entrance into the Dome on the Rock for Jews and non Muslims whereas there are 7 for Muslims? No. We need a stronger Israel.

"Many Orthodox rabbis regard entry to the compound to be a violation of Jewish law."

holy fuck, they want to take away all the entrances ):
Last edited by Souseiseki on Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:53 am

Delanshar wrote:
Divair wrote:Unlikely. Maybe if Hamas wants to really build up their stockpile to enormous levels, but I doubt they'll wait that long. Just lets us get more Iron Domes operational.


I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.

I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:55 am

Divair wrote:

I expected better from NSG.


Never expect much from NS and you'll never be disappointed. I've met all sorts of whackjobs here.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:56 am

Delanshar wrote:
Divair wrote:

I expected better from NSG.


Never expect much from NS and you'll never be disappointed. I've met all sorts of whackjobs here.

'Tis true and unfortunate.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:56 am

Divair wrote:
Vazdania wrote:It will probably make them STRONGER. Is it fair that there is only 1 entrance into the Dome on the Rock for Jews and non Muslims whereas there are 7 for Muslims? No. We need a stronger Israel.

"We"? I'm sorry, when did you become part of us? No, you're just like most foreigners. Not a single fucking clue as to how this region operates, both in terms of history and current events.


I expected better from NSG.

>.< Im really not being rational.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:58 am

Vazdania wrote:
Divair wrote:"We"? I'm sorry, when did you become part of us? No, you're just like most foreigners. Not a single fucking clue as to how this region operates, both in terms of history and current events.


I expected better from NSG.

>.< Im really not being rational.

must... resist... temptation for snide comment...
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:58 am

Vazdania wrote:
Divair wrote:"We"? I'm sorry, when did you become part of us? No, you're just like most foreigners. Not a single fucking clue as to how this region operates, both in terms of history and current events.


I expected better from NSG.

>.< Im really not being rational.

At least you're willing to admit it, unlike most foreigners who think they know everything about this region.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:59 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Vazdania wrote:>.< Im really not being rational.

must... resist... temptation for snide comment...

please go ahead. ;)
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:59 am

Divair wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
I suppose the real question then is will it just be rockets or will Hamas actually try to pull off suicide bombings.

I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.


True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:00 am

Delanshar wrote:
Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.


True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

its one of the worlds most active places for militaristic violence, of course its going to be a high press area
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:02 am

Delanshar wrote:
Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.


True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

egypt and turkey care for obvious reasons. tunisia somewhat similar.

the u.s. cares because it is their ally to whom they give billions of dollars annually, THE ONLY DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, OUR CLOSEST ALLY, YAH YAH

it's actually more than that, but it's actually really really really obvious
Last edited by Souseiseki on Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:02 am

Delanshar wrote:
Divair wrote:I think they've already realized by now that suicide bombings only damage the world's view of Palestine. Firing rockets and having Israel bomb you back at least splits the world in two.


True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

also the nukes which france helped them get probably puts them way up there
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:03 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

egypt and turkey care for obvious reasons. tunisia somewhat similar.

the u.s. cares because it is their ally to whom they give billions of dollars annually, THE ONLY DEMOCRACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, OUR CLOSEST ALLY, YAH YAH

it's actually more than that, but it's actually really really really obvious


<_< No comment

I resisted the temptation
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:04 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
True. To be honest, I've never understood the obsession the world has with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I mean if you live there thats one thing, but shit goes on all over the world. Nowhere else do you get the UN sec general, Foreign Minister of France, US, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia, and a bunch of others to visit in the span of like 5 days.

also the nukes which france helped them get probably puts them way up there


Nukes. What nukes?

... ;)
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:07 am

Delanshar wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:also the nukes which france helped them get probably puts them way up there


Nukes. What nukes?

... ;)


Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.

That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.

That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.

Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Tyrants
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Sep 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:32 am

The Zeonic States wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
Nukes. What nukes?

... ;)


Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.

That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.

That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.

Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.


Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.
Ladies and gentlemen, the following contest is scheduled for 1 fall, and is a Dixieland match!

Trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble....

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:34 am

Tyrants wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.

That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.

That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.

Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.


Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.

i can't what this even means
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Tyrants
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Sep 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:36 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Tyrants wrote:
Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.

i can't what this even means


Sorry. I meant that if everyone who could afford it could have nukes, then they might not show the same levels of restraint as the West did.
Ladies and gentlemen, the following contest is scheduled for 1 fall, and is a Dixieland match!

Trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble....

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:36 am

Tyrants wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:i can't what this even means


Sorry. I meant that if everyone who could afford it could have nukes, then they might not show the same levels of restraint as the West did.

Yes, they would. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:38 am

Tyrants wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
Another bit of Isreali arrogance that.

That they and they alone hold Nuclear power when they have not signed any sort of documentation to limit production what so ever and then feel threatened when other powers around them whom have also not signed anything such as a limitation treaty do the same.

That's reason number four why i Hate isreal; It's also reason number thirty two why i Hate the United State's.

Nuclear Weapons should not be denied to people merely because they disagree with the Western powers, Perhaps a few more would prevent America from playing policemen in the sandbox for a while.


Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.


So you assume M.A.D No longer applies in the Modern world? I don't Personally see even most of the supposed " radical" Islamist powers firing a Nuclear weapon with out something similar being done to them to be honest. And besides most of those supposed "radical" powers are gone due to what was it called "Arab Spring?"

Honestly the existing excuse for why Middle eastern powers cannot acheive Nuclear weapon status poccession is getting old this is no longer the time of Sadam or Gaddafi. And to be honest most evidence of Either leaders trying to get Nuclear weapons was mostly bogus it turned out to begin with.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Tyrants
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1626
Founded: Sep 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyrants » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:42 am

Divair wrote:
Tyrants wrote:
Sorry. I meant that if everyone who could afford it could have nukes, then they might not show the same levels of restraint as the West did.

Yes, they would. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction


I could see a nuclear Iran (other radical Islamist states available) ignoring this through the red mist and taking Israel with it to kingdom come.
Ladies and gentlemen, the following contest is scheduled for 1 fall, and is a Dixieland match!

Trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble trouble....

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:43 am

Tyrants wrote:


I could see a nuclear Iran (other radical Islamist states available) ignoring this through the red mist and taking Israel with it to kingdom come.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

~
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:43 am

The Zeonic States wrote:
Tyrants wrote:
Yeah, except if we give nukes to those who do disagree with the West... at least the West realised 2 would be enough to end a war.


So you assume M.A.D No longer applies in the Modern world? I don't Personally see even most of the supposed " radical" Islamist powers firing a Nuclear weapon with out something similar being done to them to be honest. And besides most of those supposed "radical" powers are gone due to what was it called "Arab Spring?"

Honestly the existing excuse for why Middle eastern powers cannot acheive Nuclear weapon status poccession is getting old this is no longer the time of Sadam or Gaddafi. And to be honest most evidence of Either leaders trying to get Nuclear weapons was mostly bogus it turned out to begin with.

Yeah, no.

See, nuclear weapons shouldn't even be in the hands of stable, moderate, governments. The US, UK, France, Russia, China...nobody wants the damn things. They're a necessary evil because everyone else has them. The last thing anyone wants and/or needs is a country in the middle of the world, without a stable political process, without pre-existing communications processes to defuse regional tensions, without an honest need to deter someone from erasing their country, having the biggest gun on the planet.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:44 am

Tyrants wrote:


I could see a nuclear Iran (other radical Islamist states available) ignoring this through the red mist and taking Israel with it to kingdom come.

This is implying leaders are irrational and willing to give up their power. They're not.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Avstrikland, Benjium, Bienenhalde, Cappedore, Fartsniffage, Hispida, Ifreann, Necroghastia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rusozak, The Chinese Soviet, The Crimson Isles, Trump Almighty, Unreasonably Militarised State

Advertisement

Remove ads