SD residents can face 6 years in jail for washing their cars

[Armenia Reborn]

A conversation/discussion on an internet forum is not a debate.

The conversation thread is the most recent incarnation of The Eternal Thread. This is not the place for it.

So what determines what the place for a conversation/discussion thread is? I don't see anything in the rules that mandate that this is not the place for it.

[Laerod]

If you don't want a debate to take place, a debate forum is a rather foolish place to post your bullshit. Source your statements, from a reliable source, or piss off.

This is a debate forum? Where does it say that? In order for me to "debate" anyone, I must have a point and they must have a point which they are trying to logically prove. This doesn't seem to fall into that category.

Under the "General" in the list of forums.

What constitutes as a reliable source is also very subjective.

No it's not. A reliable source is one that verifies the things it claims.

[Laerod]

The conversation thread is the most recent incarnation of The Eternal Thread. This is not the place for it.

So what determines what the place for a conversation/discussion thread is? I don't see anything in the rules that mandate that this is not the place for it.

Pay more attention to what the mods have to say when they lock threads then. Chat threads apart from TET get locked.

[Armenia Reborn]

Under the "General" in the list of forums.

K I stand corrected. Note that it is not a debate.

What constitutes as a reliable source is also very subjective.

No it's not. A reliable source is one that verifies the things it claims.

Which my source did....

[The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace]

Under the "General" in the list of forums.

K I stand corrected. Note that it is not a debate.

What constitutes as a reliable source is also very subjective.

No it's not. A reliable source is one that verifies the things it claims.

Which my source did....

Government says that was bullshit.

[Armenia Reborn]

So what determines what the place for a conversation/discussion thread is? I don't see anything in the rules that mandate that this is not the place for it.

Pay more attention to what the mods have to say when they lock threads then. Chat threads apart from TET get locked.

The general section allows for discussion, which is what this specific topic is. In order for a debate to occur, we would all have to be interested in a debate.

[Arkinesia]

It's totally true you guys. I was washing my car and before I knew it I was arrested, tossed in jail and abused by an Illuminati United Nations lizardman police officer. I only got out because I always carry a copy of the Constitution in my pocket, and when I pulled it out the lizardman burst into flames and fled from its righteousness.

Yeah, that's pretty accurate.

[Armenia Reborn]

K I stand corrected. Note that it is not a debate.







Which my source did....

Government says that was bullshit.

The government isn't necessarily a reliable source. Watergate. WMDs. Benghazi, ect. Furthermore, where does the government say that its bullshit?

[Laerod]

Under the "General" in the list of forums.

K I stand corrected. Note that it is not a debate.

What constitutes as a reliable source is also very subjective.

No it's not. A reliable source is one that verifies the things it claims.

Which my source did....

Don't lie. I proved it false earlier.

[The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace]

Government says that was bullshit.

The government isn't necessarily a reliable source. Watergate. WMDs. Benghazi, ect. Furthermore, where does the government say that its bullshit?

They kinda are for THEIR OWN REGULATIONS.


EDIT:

http://www.sandiego.gov/water/conservat ... ment.shtml

Max penalty is water cut off.

[Armenia Reborn]

Im off to play a bit of SWOTOR.

Post your thoughts about my mistake assumptions, claims, misunderstandings, blatant lies, ect which I will look at later.

[Laerod]

Government says that was bullshit.

The government isn't necessarily a reliable source. Watergate. WMDs. Benghazi, ect. Furthermore, where does the government say that its bullshit?

We can be quite sure that the San Diego Municipal Code as presented on San Diego municipal websites is accurate.

[Armenia Reborn]

Don't lie. I proved it false earlier.

I strongly disagree.

[The Emerald Dawn]

The government isn't necessarily a reliable source. Watergate. WMDs. Benghazi, ect. Furthermore, where does the government say that its bullshit?

They kinda are for THEIR OWN REGULATIONS.

I gave up. Once he started trying to weasel out of the "debate" paradigm, I accepted that he has his own reality and moved on.

[Armenia Reborn]

The government isn't necessarily a reliable source. Watergate. WMDs. Benghazi, ect. Furthermore, where does the government say that its bullshit?

We can be quite sure that the San Diego Municipal Code as presented on San Diego municipal websites is accurate.

Yes because it will list all the federal EPA regulations on its municipal website?

Note the main issue: Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

[Laerod]

Don't lie. I proved it false earlier.

I strongly disagree.

Yeah, and? Your source claims that the EPA is behind this and that there's a 6 year jail term when in fact it's San Diego and at worst a fine and your water getting shut off. Your source lies. Whether you acknowledge that your source lies is irrelevant to it being a lie.

[Armenia Reborn]

They kinda are for THEIR OWN REGULATIONS.

I gave up. Once he started trying to weasel out of the "debate" paradigm, I accepted that he has his own reality and moved on.

Oh, you mean you wanted to prove that I was right/wrong and that what you were stating was right/wrong? I'm sorry but I'm interested in discussion, not debate.

[Armenia Reborn]

I strongly disagree.

Yeah, and? Your source claims that the EPA is behind this and that there's a 6 year jail term when in fact it's San Diego and at worst a fine and your water getting shut off. Your source lies. Whether you acknowledge that your source lies is irrelevant to it being a lie.

Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

[Laerod]

We can be quite sure that the San Diego Municipal Code as presented on San Diego municipal websites is accurate.

Yes because it will list all the federal EPA regulations on its municipal website?

Really? Do show me.

Note the main issue: Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

Has nothing to do with municipal regulations to prevent the water waste in an area plagued by droughts.

[Laerod]

Yeah, and? Your source claims that the EPA is behind this and that there's a 6 year jail term when in fact it's San Diego and at worst a fine and your water getting shut off. Your source lies. Whether you acknowledge that your source lies is irrelevant to it being a lie.

Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

Repeating the lie doesn't make it true.

[Farnhamia]

Yeah, and? Your source claims that the EPA is behind this and that there's a 6 year jail term when in fact it's San Diego and at worst a fine and your water getting shut off. Your source lies. Whether you acknowledge that your source lies is irrelevant to it being a lie.

Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

The EPA did not create the Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act is an act of Congress, passed in the 1970s.

[Armenia Reborn]

Yes because it will list all the federal EPA regulations on its municipal website?

Really? Do show me.

Note the main issue: Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

Has nothing to do with municipal regulations to prevent the water waste in an area plagued by droughts.

The point of the article was that Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act set the stage for San Diego to propose laws such as this.

[The Emerald Dawn]

Yes because it will list all the federal EPA regulations on its municipal website?

Really? Do show me.

Note the main issue: Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act

Has nothing to do with municipal regulations to prevent the water waste in an area plagued by droughts.

No, see he doesn't need to show you, because this isn't a debate.

[Laerod]

Really? Do show me.

Has nothing to do with municipal regulations to prevent the water waste in an area plagued by droughts.

The point of the article was that Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act set the stage for San Diego to propose laws such as this.

Which isn't true. The only source you have is a guy that scares people into buying water purifiers and gold and doesn't check his sources.

[Laerod]

Really? Do show me.

Has nothing to do with municipal regulations to prevent the water waste in an area plagued by droughts.

No, see he doesn't need to show you, because this isn't a debate.

Kinda like he was off to play SWOTOR? =P