By FCE I guess you mean True Religion.
Advertisement

by The Klanton of the Mystic Shrine » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

by JuNii » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:54 pm

by Laerod » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:56 pm
JuNii wrote:I seem to recall when the Shrub was elected and re elected, several prominent/famous individuals swore that they would leave the country should he be president...
they're still here...
I call this sour grapes. Romney lost... the GOP lost... get over it and move on.

by The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:58 pm

by Laerod » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:00 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Laerod wrote:Srbo is talking about posting a picture a British poster posted to a forum to show secessionists what Unionist Americans think. Actually, he's probably already done it.
I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.
Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.

by Norsklow » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:03 pm
Laerod wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.
Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.
What's so appealing about "They'll take our slaves!"?

by JuNii » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:03 pm
Laerod wrote:JuNii wrote:I seem to recall when the Shrub was elected and re elected, several prominent/famous individuals swore that they would leave the country should he be president...
they're still here...
I call this sour grapes. Romney lost... the GOP lost... get over it and move on.
Dunno. I don't recall anybody getting run over by cars because Gore and Kerry lost.

by Greed and Death » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:07 pm

by The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:08 pm
Laerod wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.
Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.
What's so appealing about "They'll take our slaves!"?
I have explained this...Nevermind.
by Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:27 pm
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

by The Corparation » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:30 pm
Aglrinia wrote:Socialdemokraterne wrote:
Please don't confuse a mixed economy with a socialist one. This mistake is becoming way too common in US rhetoric.
I do wish there was less regulation than what we currently have today. It's practically impossible to start a business in my home state, and I truly believe the economy would pick itself up if we had bullet trains going to every major city in the nation. But no our Congress just loves filibuster and thinks compromise is a dirty word.
| Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
| Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |

by Alien Space Bats » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:41 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:Who are you trying to kid?
If the South had remained in the Union and not seceded, there is absolutely no way slavery could have ever been eliminated within the U.S.
Whatever the secessionists were trying to do, it sure as fuck wasn't protecting either slavery or their "way of life".
Yes let's ignore the Senate's cooling attidude towards Slavery, Northern Forces been stationed within Sovereign Foreign Territory and of course the fact that Abe's Predoccessor had a largely hand's off issue to the seccession issue and while i cannot cite him for basically pushing war upon the South i can cite him for appointing the man who did.
Do you know anything about the Day's before the civil war?
What reaction do you expect when North Forces are stationed not only within spitting distance of the confederacy and their are reinforcing a garrision right smack dab in State which is in the process of succedding.
I believe fighting a invading Army qualifies as protecting their way of life.

by Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:43 pm
The Corparation wrote:Aglrinia wrote:
I do wish there was less regulation than what we currently have today. It's practically impossible to start a business in my home state, and I truly believe the economy would pick itself up if we had bullet trains going to every major city in the nation. But no our Congress just loves filibuster and thinks compromise is a dirty word.
We really really do not have the money for bullet trains. And even if we did, I doubt they'd see the success in the US that they've seen in Japan and Europe.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

by The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:45 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
Yes let's ignore the Senate's cooling attidude towards Slavery, Northern Forces been stationed within Sovereign Foreign Territory and of course the fact that Abe's Predoccessor had a largely hand's off issue to the seccession issue and while i cannot cite him for basically pushing war upon the South i can cite him for appointing the man who did.
Do you know anything about the Day's before the civil war?
What reaction do you expect when North Forces are stationed not only within spitting distance of the confederacy and their are reinforcing a garrision right smack dab in State which is in the process of succedding.
I believe fighting a invading Army qualifies as protecting their way of life.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.
You say: FORT SUMTER!!!
<pause>
Non sequitir much?


by Torisakia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:48 pm

by Hatan » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:52 pm

by The Cookish States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:53 pm

by Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:56 pm
Torisakia wrote:I live in Alabama, and if this does happen, won't hurt me a bit.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

by Xsyne » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:56 pm
Laerod wrote:Tecknoko wrote:
I noticed this earlier today as well, on some of the secession boards and as a pettition. Thoughts?https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-request-obama-be-impeached-following-reasons/cpk4V6zK
That one's fucking hilarious. Do they really expect the President to impeach himself? He couldn't do that if he wanted to, he doesn't have the power to!
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Srboslavija » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:01 pm

by Xsyne » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:01 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.
You say: FORT SUMTER!!!
<pause>
Non sequitir much?
And I say Slavery was as good as Banned with the majority of the House of Rep's being against it and the Senate adopting their attidude, The presence of Military forces preparing for war was just the straw that broke the Camel's back.
You offered no real proof also for the declaration that slavery would have never been done away with under the assumption the C.S.A was never formed, Personally? I think it was formed precisely because of the Pro Slavery movement being ground away.
By the time Abe signed that bit of paper making it illegal it was all but dead anyway
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Greed and Death » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:02 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.
You say: FORT SUMTER!!!
<pause>
Non sequitir much?
And I say Slavery was as good as Banned with the majority of the House of Rep's being against it and the Senate adopting their attidude, The presence of Military forces preparing for war was just the straw that broke the Camel's back.
You offered no real proof also for the declaration that slavery would have never been done away with under the assumption the C.S.A was never formed, Personally? I think it was formed precisely because of the Pro Slavery movement being ground away.
By the time Abe signed that bit of paper making it illegal it was all but dead anyway

by Torisakia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:05 pm

by Alien Space Bats » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:10 pm
GWACA wrote:Give up friend a lengthy google search has told me that no nation officially recognized the CSA as a nation.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Continental Free States, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Heavenly Assault, Hispida, Loeje, Luziyca, Necroghastia, New haven america, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Holy Therns, Thermodolia, Wizlandia
Advertisement