NATION

PASSWORD

Secession Movement in the United States

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Klanton of the Mystic Shrine
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Nov 14, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby The Klanton of the Mystic Shrine » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:51 pm

Ruridova wrote:
Norsklow wrote:

Your Cause being the Klan, eh?

Or Fundamentalist Christian Extremism maybe.

By FCE I guess you mean True Religion.

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:53 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Laerod wrote:Patently untrue. I'm so American they sent me two ballots this election. Norsklow, I believe, is British.


._. I was born in Norway and Live in America as a citizen

Srbo is talking about posting a picture a British poster posted to a forum to show secessionists what Unionist Americans think. Actually, he's probably already done it.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby JuNii » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:54 pm

I seem to recall when the Shrub was elected and re elected, several prominent/famous individuals swore that they would leave the country should he be president...

they're still here...

I call this sour grapes. Romney lost... the GOP lost... get over it and move on.
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:56 pm

JuNii wrote:I seem to recall when the Shrub was elected and re elected, several prominent/famous individuals swore that they would leave the country should he be president...

they're still here...

I call this sour grapes. Romney lost... the GOP lost... get over it and move on.

Dunno. I don't recall anybody getting run over by cars because Gore and Kerry lost.

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:58 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
._. I was born in Norway and Live in America as a citizen

Srbo is talking about posting a picture a British poster posted to a forum to show secessionists what Unionist Americans think. Actually, he's probably already done it.


I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.

Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Laerod
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26183
Founded: Jul 17, 2004
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Laerod » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:00 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Laerod wrote:Srbo is talking about posting a picture a British poster posted to a forum to show secessionists what Unionist Americans think. Actually, he's probably already done it.


I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.

Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.

What's so appealing about "They'll take our slaves!"?

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:03 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.

Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.

What's so appealing about "They'll take our slaves!"?

'our'. That's the key-word.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
JuNii
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13517
Founded: Aug 22, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby JuNii » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:03 pm

Laerod wrote:
JuNii wrote:I seem to recall when the Shrub was elected and re elected, several prominent/famous individuals swore that they would leave the country should he be president...

they're still here...

I call this sour grapes. Romney lost... the GOP lost... get over it and move on.

Dunno. I don't recall anybody getting run over by cars because Gore and Kerry lost.

your point is?

did she state that she would run over her hubby if obama won? is there any proof that the hubby would NOT have voted for Obama?

I see one nut with another...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI
on the other hand... I have another set of fingers.

Unscramble these words...1) PNEIS. 2)HTIELR 3) NGGERI 4) BUTTSXE
1) SPINE. 2) LITHER 3)GINGER 4)SUBTEXT

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:07 pm

Hungry wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:And surrender those who don't want to leave to reactionary parochial tyranny? No thanks.


Allow those who don't want to leave the Union to move and be fully compensated (by the seceding states, not us).

What is there to compensate a change of government does not mean less property protection
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:08 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
I am fairly neutral as far as the current issue of seccession goes, the entire current reasons for leaving the United States lack the appeal of the Confederacy, I mean economic devestation and such seem like a more important and valid reason then leaving merely because of a lost election.

Not to mention i do like the sitting President some of his policies i got my issues with but i consider him superior to the man he replaced as far as political stance.

What's so appealing about "They'll take our slaves!"?


:palm: I have explained this...Nevermind.

The Union had no issue of reducing the South's economic infastrucuture, Yes as you said Slavery which was what made southern production and exporting not only possible but profitable to ruin.

Instead of say offering to buy out slaves to offer something to southern bussiness and allow them pay for employee's to replace the lost manpower of the slave labor pool, the growing disillusionment with slavery in the Senate was all but driven to outlaw the practice entirely and not offer a dime in return.

Honestly? I view that as valid ground for seccession when Your own government cares that little about utterly ruining thousands of bussiness and offering not even a simple offer to buy out slaves and instead would just pluck them away let the economic status of the south plunge into the region of what we would consider in the Modern Day third world conditions.

I have explained it better in previous posts, If you really want to see actual detailed and fully explained explainations i suggest digging around about twenty or so pages back when i last explained it, It seems the more i explain this the less of an explaination i give.

Ultimately with Abe's predoccessors Hand's off approach to the growing seccession movement he was all but allowing the Senate and congress to continue to grind the Pro slavery Movement into dust. Which is fine IF you are willing to offer something in return, It worked fairly well for the French, No massive war was fought for slavery by the french no, The government gathered funds and bought out slave holding bussiness and privately owned slaves and the economy was able to recover and continue onward with out much of a hiccup.

It's not so much that i am Pro slavery as much as i can understand the reason for distancing Yourself from a government that cares that little about You.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Aglrinia
Minister
 
Posts: 2848
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:27 pm

Socialdemokraterne wrote:
Tovakestan wrote:If the South leaves all this socialism behind, i'm following them.


Please don't confuse a mixed economy with a socialist one. This mistake is becoming way too common in US rhetoric.


I do wish there was less regulation than what we currently have today. It's practically impossible to start a business in my home state, and I truly believe the economy would pick itself up if we had bullet trains going to every major city in the nation. But no our Congress just loves filibuster and thinks compromise is a dirty word.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34105
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:30 pm

Aglrinia wrote:
Socialdemokraterne wrote:

Please don't confuse a mixed economy with a socialist one. This mistake is becoming way too common in US rhetoric.


I do wish there was less regulation than what we currently have today. It's practically impossible to start a business in my home state, and I truly believe the economy would pick itself up if we had bullet trains going to every major city in the nation. But no our Congress just loves filibuster and thinks compromise is a dirty word.

We really really do not have the money for bullet trains. And even if we did, I doubt they'd see the success in the US that they've seen in Japan and Europe.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
Alien Space Bats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10073
Founded: Sep 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Secession Movement in the United States

Postby Alien Space Bats » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:41 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:Who are you trying to kid?

If the South had remained in the Union and not seceded, there is absolutely no way slavery could have ever been eliminated within the U.S.

Whatever the secessionists were trying to do, it sure as fuck wasn't protecting either slavery or their "way of life".


Yes let's ignore the Senate's cooling attidude towards Slavery, Northern Forces been stationed within Sovereign Foreign Territory and of course the fact that Abe's Predoccessor had a largely hand's off issue to the seccession issue and while i cannot cite him for basically pushing war upon the South i can cite him for appointing the man who did.

:meh: Do you know anything about the Day's before the civil war?

What reaction do you expect when North Forces are stationed not only within spitting distance of the confederacy and their are reinforcing a garrision right smack dab in State which is in the process of succedding.

I believe fighting a invading Army qualifies as protecting their way of life.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.

You say: FORT SUMTER!!!

<pause>

Non sequitir much?
"These states are just saying 'Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend, but I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore.'" — Stephen Colbert, Comedian, on Shelby County v. Holder

"Do you see how policing blacks by the presumption of guilt and policing whites by the presumption of innocence is a self-reinforcing mechanism?" — Touré Neblett, MSNBC Commentator and Social Critic

"You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."Songwriter Oscar Brown in 1963, foretelling the election of Donald J. Trump

President Donald J. Trump: Working Tirelessly to Make Russia Great Again

User avatar
Aglrinia
Minister
 
Posts: 2848
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:43 pm

The Corparation wrote:
Aglrinia wrote:
I do wish there was less regulation than what we currently have today. It's practically impossible to start a business in my home state, and I truly believe the economy would pick itself up if we had bullet trains going to every major city in the nation. But no our Congress just loves filibuster and thinks compromise is a dirty word.

We really really do not have the money for bullet trains. And even if we did, I doubt they'd see the success in the US that they've seen in Japan and Europe.

Believe me when I say they would pay for themselfs, even if we just did something small at first. Such as N.Y.C. to Boston, or Los Angeles to Las Vegas. Do you know what they called the Erie Canal at first? Governor Clinton's money pit. The Erie Canal proved to be a great success and helped build the cities of Syracuse, Rochester, and Buffalo and it helped populate the areas around the finglerlakes region.
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:45 pm

Alien Space Bats wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
Yes let's ignore the Senate's cooling attidude towards Slavery, Northern Forces been stationed within Sovereign Foreign Territory and of course the fact that Abe's Predoccessor had a largely hand's off issue to the seccession issue and while i cannot cite him for basically pushing war upon the South i can cite him for appointing the man who did.

:meh: Do you know anything about the Day's before the civil war?

What reaction do you expect when North Forces are stationed not only within spitting distance of the confederacy and their are reinforcing a garrision right smack dab in State which is in the process of succedding.

I believe fighting a invading Army qualifies as protecting their way of life.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.

You say: FORT SUMTER!!!

<pause>

Non sequitir much?


And I say Slavery was as good as Banned with the majority of the House of Rep's being against it and the Senate adopting their attidude, The presence of Military forces preparing for war was just the straw that broke the Camel's back.

You offered no real proof also for the declaration that slavery would have never been done away with under the assumption the C.S.A was never formed, Personally? I think it was formed precisely because of the Pro Slavery movement being ground away.

By the time Abe signed that bit of paper making it illegal it was all but dead anyway :meh:
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16484
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:48 pm

I live in Alabama, and if this does happen, won't hurt me a bit. :lol2:
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
Hatan
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Aug 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Hatan » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:52 pm

Why the heck is the country arguing about splitting up? I'm a democrat living in a republican area, and I don't want every single new president to have only ideas that oppose mine! The country should stay together so that we have two parties with similar amounts of people liking each one. The economies of each side need each other to be more efficient, and the combination of the two parties give the people more choices that make since. Therefore any division in the country would be stupid, retarded, AND demented!

User avatar
The Cookish States
Minister
 
Posts: 2497
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cookish States » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:53 pm

Eh, I was an advocate of peaceful Texan secession even during the Bush years, so it seems like everyone is jumping on my bandwagon. But that's because I believe that the more localized a government is, the easier it is for it to cater to those it governs. I'm comfortable with the reduction of power and influence my home state would receive due to it's secession. Texas could feasibly survive, though it would have a good chunk of debt to pay and would be fairly weak militarily (materiel-rich, manpower poor)

Which leads me to my next point. Anyone who is under the impression that there would be any significant conflict between any seceding state and the Federal government is wrong. The federal government would likely deny the legality of the act, but do little to actually stop it for fear of national and foreign backlash. Attacking peaceful secessionists is a sore subject around the States and Europe, with Libya and Syria showing how quickly things can escalate.

Of course, Obama will not mention the petition, that would only stoke the flame, put the message into more ears. I suspect he will ignore it, and the petition will die down. Secession will be put to the back of everyone's mind until the distant future, if it isn't put down permanently However, I can most certainly hope that my nation becomes a state (a nation and a state are not synonymous. Dictionary. Go.)
Oh, is this sig supposed to make you laugh?

User avatar
Aglrinia
Minister
 
Posts: 2848
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aglrinia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:56 pm

Torisakia wrote:I live in Alabama, and if this does happen, won't hurt me a bit. :lol2:

Except for the fact that Alabama's economy isn't on the rise, it's slowing and its GDP is falling - frankly you have my leave to secede from the union... >_>
Jakker wrote:TBH is Pro-bring Life to GP

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:56 pm

Laerod wrote:
Tecknoko wrote:
I noticed this earlier today as well, on some of the secession boards and as a pettition. Thoughts?

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/we-request-obama-be-impeached-following-reasons/cpk4V6zK

That one's fucking hilarious. Do they really expect the President to impeach himself? He couldn't do that if he wanted to, he doesn't have the power to!

Plus number two. "This thing declared constitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States is unconstitutional"!
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Srboslavija
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1636
Founded: Feb 20, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Srboslavija » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:01 pm

And look which side makes it a race issue. :roll:

Let’s Be Honest, Red States Want to Secede Because the White Guy Didn’t Win
http://www.politicususa.com/honest-republicans-secede-white-guy-win.html

Pathetic.

I couldn't make it past the third paragraph but I expect it was sprouting more of the same ignorant vitriol.
Pro: #FreeCrimea, justice, peace, LGBTIQ rights, love, choice, YOLO, God, separation of church and state, hugs, equal rights, most NSG moderators
Anti: war, hypocrisy, imperialism, homophobia, guns, inequality, racism, sexism

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:01 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.

You say: FORT SUMTER!!!

<pause>

Non sequitir much?


And I say Slavery was as good as Banned with the majority of the House of Rep's being against it and the Senate adopting their attidude, The presence of Military forces preparing for war was just the straw that broke the Camel's back.

You offered no real proof also for the declaration that slavery would have never been done away with under the assumption the C.S.A was never formed, Personally? I think it was formed precisely because of the Pro Slavery movement being ground away.

By the time Abe signed that bit of paper making it illegal it was all but dead anyway :meh:

Hey, ASB, what was the name of the court case that was about to strike down every state law against slavery?
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:02 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

I say: Had the South elected not to secede, slavery could have never been banned within the United States.

You say: FORT SUMTER!!!

<pause>

Non sequitir much?


And I say Slavery was as good as Banned with the majority of the House of Rep's being against it and the Senate adopting their attidude, The presence of Military forces preparing for war was just the straw that broke the Camel's back.

You offered no real proof also for the declaration that slavery would have never been done away with under the assumption the C.S.A was never formed, Personally? I think it was formed precisely because of the Pro Slavery movement being ground away.

By the time Abe signed that bit of paper making it illegal it was all but dead anyway :meh:


Not with the supreme court on the bench, they already reversed federal regulation that outlawed slavery in certain territories.

the 13th amendment was likely necessary to end slavery.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Torisakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16484
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Torisakia » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:05 pm

Aglrinia wrote:
Torisakia wrote:I live in Alabama, and if this does happen, won't hurt me a bit. :lol2:

Except for the fact that Alabama's economy isn't on the rise, it's slowing and its GDP is falling - frankly you have my leave to secede from the union... >_>

And yet, kicks ass at football. That's all I need.
Royal Alexandre Hockey Invitational II Champions, NS Sports' Unofficial Champions of Life™
Pro: truth
Anti: uptight short sided narrow minded hypocrites, neurotic psychotic pigheaded politicians, short-haired yellow-bellied sons of Tricky Dick who try to mother-hubbard soft soap me with pockets full of hopes, tight-lipped condescending mama's little chauvinists, Schizophrenic egocentric paranoiac primadonnas

User avatar
Alien Space Bats
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10073
Founded: Sep 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Secession Movement in the United States

Postby Alien Space Bats » Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:10 pm

GWACA wrote:Give up friend a lengthy google search has told me that no nation officially recognized the CSA as a nation.

The Duchy of Anhalt-Saxony did. They were the only nation.

The Duke was married to a Southern belle.
"These states are just saying 'Yes, I used to beat my girlfriend, but I haven't since the restraining order, so we don't need it anymore.'" — Stephen Colbert, Comedian, on Shelby County v. Holder

"Do you see how policing blacks by the presumption of guilt and policing whites by the presumption of innocence is a self-reinforcing mechanism?" — Touré Neblett, MSNBC Commentator and Social Critic

"You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in."Songwriter Oscar Brown in 1963, foretelling the election of Donald J. Trump

President Donald J. Trump: Working Tirelessly to Make Russia Great Again

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Continental Free States, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Heavenly Assault, Hispida, Loeje, Luziyca, Necroghastia, New haven america, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Holy Therns, Thermodolia, Wizlandia

Advertisement

Remove ads