NATION

PASSWORD

Should Canada merge with the USA?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:29 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Ublia wrote:
Oh no you don't! You are not brining all your pollution! Poor gun restrictions! Ultra-Conmservative mumbo-jumbo up here. We are Canada and again we are free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Until Another Nation decides to claim it anyway.

Maybe the French will want their colony back someday :P Good luck fighting those guys off.

The Quebekers begged France to take them a few years ago. The French turned them down
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:29 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Ruridova wrote:Okay, I know our nation is exceedingly skilled at screwing up big time but are we really that bad?


Civil Rights
Nationwide same-sex marriage: Yes (since 2006 - Civil Marriage Act)
Laws restricting abortion nationwide: No (since 1988 - R v Morgentaler)
Nationwide universal healthcare: Yes (since 1985 - Canada Health Act)

Economically
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) - Most Stable Commercial Bank in North America
Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) - Expanding into American markets as smaller banks go under
Governor of the Bank of Canada (Canada's federal reserve) is also the head of the global Financial Stability Board
Higher GDP per capita then the United States according to: IMF, World Bank, CIA World Factbook, and the UN

Resources
Proven Oil Reserves: 3rd largest in the world (behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela)
Total Renewable Water Resources: 3rd largest in the world (behind Brazil and Russia)
Leading global producer of gold, diamonds, potash, and uranium
Talking about America's fuckups not Canada's successes.
Old Tyrannia wrote:
Ruridova wrote:Oh deal with it.

It's not just the tea. It's the fact that you mangled our language, too. And you keep turning up late for wars. Apart from the ones you drag us into, at least.
Oh come now. We've just updated it. Besides, like spelling color and flavor with a u or maneuver manouvre makes sense anyways.
And we weren't provoked until the Zimmerman Telegram and Pearl Harbor! There was a time when we didn't attack people we vaguely didn't like on flimsy reasoning after all.
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Meritocratic States
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6154
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Meritocratic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:29 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.


"The merger should benefit the US the most."

You see what you are arguing? What about Canadians that are the Americans are annexing? What sort of economic benefits would they have?

DON'T mention that Canada would be a part of the "superpower" and we would have vote for the next US president. Other facts, bring it up.
This nation is now being retired.
Good-night, sweet prince.
Hello, Gristol-Serkonos.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:29 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.


Why shouldn't the United States be absorbed by China, and provide the Chinese with resources? There are more people in China, after all.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:29 pm

Saruhan wrote:Quebekers

Quebecois?
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Nightkill the Emperor
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 88776
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nightkill the Emperor » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Saruhan wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
Until Another Nation decides to claim it anyway.

Maybe the French will want their colony back someday :P Good luck fighting those guys off.

The Quebekers begged France to take them a few years ago. The French turned them down

Source?
Hi! I'm Khan, your local misanthropic Indian.
I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith.
P2TM RP Discussion Thread
If you want a good rp, read this shit.
Tiami is cool.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".

Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

Monfrox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
# went there....

It's Nightkill. He's been there so long he rents out rooms to other people at a flat rate, but demands cash up front.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Zathganastan wrote:
Saruhan wrote:No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in the end

Why would we every try and do such a thing, contrary to what the Op is suggesting most American's like Canada and the US the way they are now.

I'm talking a bunch of years down the road, after we've been treated as colonial slaves they'll think of us as a waste of resources
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Ile Tobi
Envoy
 
Posts: 249
Founded: Sep 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ile Tobi » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

Nope that's just imperialism.

User avatar
Osaea
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 132
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Osaea » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Ok so here's a thought. The USA and Canada share one of the longest borders in the world. They are also very close trading partners and are culturally quite similar (except for Canadian thanksgiving being too early and them pronouncing certain words wrong, but these are quite minor). Compared to US-Mexican Relations which is compounded by issues like the Drug War and Immigration, US-Canadian relations have been very smooth for generations.

So here is my proposal. Canada and the USA should officially merge. Canada can be divided into like 5-6 new American states.
Here's my idea
Partition Plan

So what does NS think?
I think this would benefit the USA because it would give us all of Canada's significant natural resources. Also with global warming the area may become prime farmland. It would be good for Canadians too, because they would finally be US citizens and could vote for the President and join Congress.


No. We don't want Canada. They remind us too much of Europe...


And Canada doesn't want the United States--they remind them too much of Georgia (not the republic on the Black Sea).

The status quo will stay just that.

User avatar
Meritocratic States
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6154
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Meritocratic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:30 pm

Ruridova wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Quebekers

Quebecois?

Both apply, it doesn't really matter.
This nation is now being retired.
Good-night, sweet prince.
Hello, Gristol-Serkonos.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29220
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:31 pm

Saruhan wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
I am particularly amused at the fact that almost all of Labrador is in 'Quebec', and most of Quebec is in 'Labrador'.

I don't think that partition plan is designed to reassure Canadians that US citizens know much about Canadian geography.

And how Quebec has annexed all of the Maritimes, which would mean that the majority of Quebec would be Anglophone :lol:


What always baffles me about these annexation plans is why they never call for all of the provinces to just be let in as individual states - they'd all qualify on the basis of population in their own right, even PEI.

Instead there's always an attempt to come up with some zany plan that pays absolutely no attention to actual Canadian geography, politics, or tradition.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Ruridova wrote:Talking about America's fuckups not Canada's successes.


I would call not having a few of those things (*cough*civil rights*cough*) to be a pretty major fuckup. Especially with being the only developed country in the world that doesn't offer some form of universal healthcare.
Last edited by Oneracon on Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Ile Tobi wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

Nope that's just imperialism.


As a Socialist and Canadain i will say this "Imperialism is dead! Long live Canada!"-Ublia Canadian nationalist and Socialist
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

User avatar
Greater Nilfgaard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 709
Founded: Aug 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end


No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.
We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
Put this as your sig if you have read our manifesto and support our plans.

User avatar
Nightkill the Emperor
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 88776
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nightkill the Emperor » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Saruhan wrote:No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end


No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.

Bullshit.
Hi! I'm Khan, your local misanthropic Indian.
I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith.
P2TM RP Discussion Thread
If you want a good rp, read this shit.
Tiami is cool.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".

Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

Monfrox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
# went there....

It's Nightkill. He's been there so long he rents out rooms to other people at a flat rate, but demands cash up front.

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:32 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Saruhan wrote:No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end


No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.


:rofl: You must be stoned to think we're similar!
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

User avatar
Zathganastan
Senator
 
Posts: 3830
Founded: Aug 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Zathganastan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:33 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Zathganastan wrote:Why would we every try and do such a thing, contrary to what the Op is suggesting most American's like Canada and the US the way they are now.

I'm talking a bunch of years down the road, after we've been treated as colonial slaves they'll think of us as a waste of resources


Ah well thankfully what the Op wants will never happen, as a lot of other people have suggested Canada should be for Canadians while America remains for American's.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall:I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
Shakespeare:All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;And one man in his time plays many parts
The Allied states Military, zathganastans pride and Joy:
Army: 35,000,000 armed forces
Navy: 18,000 ships
Air force: 10,000,000 air force personal
and National Marines: 8,000,000 marines
Zathgan speical forces:2,500,000 speical forces

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:33 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Saruhan wrote:No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end


No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.


Have you ever been to Canada?
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Osaea
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 132
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Osaea » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:33 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:
Saruhan wrote:And how Quebec has annexed all of the Maritimes, which would mean that the majority of Quebec would be Anglophone :lol:


What always baffles me about these annexation plans is why they never call for all of the provinces to just be let in as individual states - they'd all qualify on the basis of population in their own right, even PEI.

Instead there's always an attempt to come up with some zany plan that pays absolutely no attention to actual Canadian geography, politics, or tradition.


There's also the whole "Give all of this to Alaska."

Because Alaska is too crowded, and the solution is to redraw the lines so that it administers Yukon.

User avatar
Meritocratic States
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6154
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Meritocratic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:33 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Saruhan wrote:No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end


No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.


Nah, with your nations' current economic outlook, you might drag us into recession.
This nation is now being retired.
Good-night, sweet prince.
Hello, Gristol-Serkonos.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:33 pm

Ublia wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.


:rofl: You must be stoned to think we're similar!

No, just ignorant. Like anyone who would support such an insane plan.

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:34 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
BTW, to the various non-Americans on this thread, we're not all this crazy.
Last edited by Ruridova on Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Greater Nilfgaard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 709
Founded: Aug 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:34 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.


Why shouldn't the United States be absorbed by China, and provide the Chinese with resources? There are more people in China, after all.


The Chinese government is corrupt and totalitarian. The only people to benefit would be the Communist elite. Nice try tho.
We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
Put this as your sig if you have read our manifesto and support our plans.

User avatar
Greater Nilfgaard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 709
Founded: Aug 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:34 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
No we wont. The whole reason behind this plan is that Americans and Canadians are so similar and thus should be one country. And this would be beneficial to the majority of this "NEW" America, because we now have access to all those neat resources that used to belong to just Canada but now belong to all of us.


I'm doing the whole continent a favor with this plan.


Have you ever been to Canada?


To Toronto.
We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
Put this as your sig if you have read our manifesto and support our plans.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:35 pm

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
Saruhan wrote:The Quebekers begged France to take them a few years ago. The French turned them down

Source?

Un moment
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Shrillland, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads