NATION

PASSWORD

Should Canada merge with the USA?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Zathganastan
Senator
 
Posts: 3830
Founded: Aug 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Zathganastan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:21 pm

Nationalist Eminral Republic wrote:
North California wrote:

No. We want syrup. Hand it over, buddy.


How bout bacon?

No down here we just call it ham.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall:I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
Shakespeare:All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;And one man in his time plays many parts
The Allied states Military, zathganastans pride and Joy:
Army: 35,000,000 armed forces
Navy: 18,000 ships
Air force: 10,000,000 air force personal
and National Marines: 8,000,000 marines
Zathgan speical forces:2,500,000 speical forces

User avatar
North California
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby North California » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:21 pm

Saruhan wrote:
North California wrote:

America and Canada could still be close friends though, just not roommates. :p

And we would meet up at your basement to have a bowl



Wanna go egg Mexico?
I am a staunch supporter of Austrian Theory economics as defined by Ludwig von Mises, and I consider myself to be a libertarian and I support Ron Paul Gary Johnson. Basically, I am a capitalist revolutionary
Economic Left/Right: 6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.92

Everyone should watch this video

Factbook

Got a US-themed nation, and need a flag? This is the place

American Nationalist. Yet, anti-American government

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Saruhan wrote:We will have no voice in politics. Our languages will be under threat, so will our environment and entire way of life, our society itself will be destroyed, and all to e chained to a corpse?


Your language is under threat? Dude you guys speak English too. The only thing under threat would be those spelling issues.
Colour would become color. Other than that I see no problems.


Most of us speak English but most of Quebec is French and if you know anything about Canadian history that will never ever change.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm

Thurask wrote:
North California wrote:

No. We want syrup. Hand it over, buddy.

We'll give you some syrup and throw in Rob Ford gratis.

Take the back bacon and well give you the entire French Canadian population as a bonus
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Phreakadise
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Nov 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phreakadise » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm

I don't particularly care for a NAU (North American Union). It seems to me that all of the nations involved in such unionizations (EU, I'm looking at you) gain each other's problems while gaining little benefit.

I would be more for the US breaking into 5 or 6 seperate regional countries. Alaska, Texas, Western NA, Central NA, Southern NA, Atlantic NA.

Texas could probably be split between Central and Southern NA.

Hell, I think that's the way it will go once the US implodes anyway. I'll be going where the Libertarians are, just a little FYI.

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:
North California wrote:

You hear that Britain? We picked Canada over you guys! How does that make you feel?

Well, speaking as a Briton I must say I really don't care. You're a bunch of traitors anyway. We've never forgiven you for pouring away the tea.

Oh deal with it.
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Thurask wrote:We'll give you some syrup and throw in Rob Ford gratis.

Take the back bacon and well give you the entire French Canadian population as a bonus


Not the bacon. And the French are needed a lot of Canadas industries in Quebec. plus I love visiting Montreal and third the Maritimes would be severed from the rest of Canada! So lets keep those Quebecois for a while at least until Maine joins us.
Last edited by Ublia on Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm

Ruridova wrote:
Oneracon wrote:As has been said earlier: Over my dead body.

There are literally no positives from Canada's side of the issue: Losing sovereignty, moving backwards at least 10 years on civil rights, being tied to a failing economy, losing our social programs like universal healthcare, completely undermining ethnic diversity (cultural mosaic not a melting pot), no doubt we'd be required to privatise Crown Corporations, and not to mention the extra hassle of travel now that we would be using US Passports instead of Canadian ones.

I would and will take up arms to defend my country, my government, my rights, and my Queen.

Okay, I know our nation is exceedingly skilled at screwing up big time but are we really that bad?


Civil Rights
Nationwide same-sex marriage: Yes (since 2006 - Civil Marriage Act)
Laws restricting abortion nationwide: No (since 1988 - R v Morgentaler)
Nationwide universal healthcare: Yes (since 1985 - Canada Health Act)

Economically
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) - Most Stable Commercial Bank in North America
Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) - Expanding into American markets as smaller banks go under
Governor of the Bank of Canada (Canada's federal reserve) is also the head of the global Financial Stability Board
Higher GDP per capita then the United States according to: IMF, World Bank, CIA World Factbook, and the UN

Resources
Proven Oil Reserves: 3rd largest in the world (behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela)
Total Renewable Water Resources: 3rd largest in the world (behind Brazil and Russia)
Leading global producer of gold, diamonds, potash, and uranium
Last edited by Oneracon on Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:24 pm

Charellia wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Your language is under threat? Dude you guys speak English too. The only thing under threat would be those spelling issues.
Colour would become color. Other than that I see no problems.


Most of us speak English but most of Quebec is French and if you know anything about Canadian history that will never ever change.


A quarter of Chicago and new york speak German and French ._. It has yet to change but it also has not interfered greatly with them living among other language speakers.

Heck there is a fellow down just four blocks from that speaks russian, Language would not be a massive barrier.

Of course there might be issues if they also don't understand or speak english...But cross that bridge when it comes to it.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Greater Nilfgaard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 709
Founded: Aug 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.
We are the Great Souled Men of NS.
Put this as your sig if you have read our manifesto and support our plans.

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Ruridova wrote:Okay, I know our nation is exceedingly skilled at screwing up big time but are we really that bad?


Civil Rights
Nationwide same-sex marriage: Yes (since 2006 - Civil Marriage Act)
No laws restricting abortion nationwide: Yes (since 1988 - R v Morgentaler)
Nationwide universal healthcare: Yes (since 1985 - Canada Health Act)

Economically
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) - Most Stable Commercial Bank in North America
Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) - Expanding into American markets as smaller banks go under
Governor of the Bank of Canada (Canada's federal reserve) is also the head of the global Financial Stability Board
Higher GDP per capita then the United States according to: IMF, World Bank, CIA World Factbook, and the UN

Resources
Proven Oil Reserves: 3rd largest in the world (behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela)
Total Renewable Water Resources: 3rd largest in the world (behind Brazil and Russia)
Leading global producer of gold, diamonds, potash, and uranium


Ah shucks its good to be Canada!
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

Ruridova wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Well, speaking as a Briton I must say I really don't care. You're a bunch of traitors anyway. We've never forgiven you for pouring away the tea.

Oh deal with it.

It's not just the tea. It's the fact that you mangled our language, too. And you keep turning up late for wars. Apart from the ones you drag us into, at least.
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

Ublia wrote:
Saruhan wrote:Take the back bacon and well give you the entire French Canadian population as a bonus


Not the bacon. And the French are needed a lot of Canadas industries in Quebec. plus I love visiting Montreal and third the Maritimes would be severed from the rest of Canada! So lets keep those Quebecois for a while at least until Maine joins us.

Why don't we just import some Mexicans to fill the gap? Their food is better anyway (besides poutine, that stuffs awesome)
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Osaea
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 132
Founded: Oct 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Osaea » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm

Phreakadise wrote:I don't particularly care for a NAU (North American Union). It seems to me that all of the nations involved in such unionizations (EU, I'm looking at you) gain each other's problems while gaining little benefit.

I would be more for the US breaking into 5 or 6 seperate regional countries. Alaska, Texas, Western NA, Central NA, Southern NA, Atlantic NA.

Texas could probably be split between Central and Southern NA.

Hell, I think that's the way it will go once the US implodes anyway. I'll be going where the Libertarians are, just a little FYI.


You may have a dilemma, as a violent implosion that would cause such a splintering would probably necessitate well-organized military states, at least at first, until the lines stabilized.

"No such thing as a libertarian superpower," after all. It wouldn't be permanent by any means, but the first few years would probably demand it as a nature of the implosion (look at the demise of the Indian Empire, the Soviet Union, British Ireland, etc.) and an indefinite period of fighting.

On the other hand, if it was a peaceable collapse--difficult, but not impossible--that wouldn't be a problem.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

And so finally the OP admits the only country to benefit from this is the US and it's just an imperialist agenda packed in a neat package.


We all repeat:
No.

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.


Oh no you don't! You are not brining all your pollution! Poor gun restrictions! Ultra-Conmservative mumbo-jumbo up here. We are Canada and again we are free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 16569
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

That's only a logical argument if you're a utilitarian. And even then, I imagine you may be missing the point a bit.
Anglican monarchist, paternalistic conservative and Christian existentialist.
"It is spiritless to think that you cannot attain to that which you have seen and heard the masters attain. The masters are men. You are also a man. If you think that you will be inferior in doing something, you will be on that road very soon."
- Yamamoto Tsunetomo
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in tn the end
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
Saruhan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8013
Founded: Feb 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:
Charellia wrote:
Most of us speak English but most of Quebec is French and if you know anything about Canadian history that will never ever change.


A quarter of Chicago and new york speak German and French ._. It has yet to change but it also has not interfered greatly with them living among other language speakers.

Heck there is a fellow down just four blocks from that speaks russian, Language would not be a massive barrier.

Of course there might be issues if they also don't understand or speak english...But cross that bridge when it comes to it.

Outside of the cities a lot of them don't speak English, it's like France basically.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

User avatar
North California
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby North California » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:
North California wrote:You hear that Britain? We picked Canada over you guys! How does that make you feel?

Well, speaking as a Briton I must say I really don't care. You're a bunch of traitors anyway. We've never forgiven you for pouring away the tea.


The Spirit of '76 is strong with me.

Long live the Revolution!
I am a staunch supporter of Austrian Theory economics as defined by Ludwig von Mises, and I consider myself to be a libertarian and I support Ron Paul Gary Johnson. Basically, I am a capitalist revolutionary
Economic Left/Right: 6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.92

Everyone should watch this video

Factbook

Got a US-themed nation, and need a flag? This is the place

American Nationalist. Yet, anti-American government

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm

Ublia wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.


Oh no you don't! You are not brining all your pollution! Poor gun restrictions! Ultra-Conmservative mumbo-jumbo up here. We are Canada and again we are free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Until Another Nation decides to claim it anyway.

Maybe the French will want their colony back someday :P Good luck fighting those guys off.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Inyourfaceistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12585
Founded: Aug 20, 2012
Anarchy

Postby Inyourfaceistan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm

Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Ok so here's a thought. The USA and Canada share one of the longest borders in the world. They are also very close trading partners and are culturally quite similar (except for Canadian thanksgiving being too early and them pronouncing certain words wrong, but these are quite minor). Compared to US-Mexican Relations which is compounded by issues like the Drug War and Immigration, US-Canadian relations have been very smooth for generations.

So here is my proposal. Canada and the USA should officially merge. Canada can be divided into like 5-6 new American states.
Here's my idea
Partition Plan

So what does NS think?
I think this would benefit the USA because it would give us all of Canada's significant natural resources. Also with global warming the area may become prime farmland. It would be good for Canadians too, because they would finally be US citizens and could vote for the President and join Congress.


No. We don't want Canada. They remind us too much of Europe...


It's not French,it's not Spanish,it's Inyurstan
"Inyourfaceistan" refers to my player/user name, "Inyursta" is my IC name. NOT INYURSTAN. IF YOU CALL INYURSTA "INYURSTAN" THEN IT SHOWS THAT YOU CANT READ. Just refer to me as IYF or Stan.

User avatar
Zathganastan
Senator
 
Posts: 3830
Founded: Aug 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Zathganastan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm

Saruhan wrote:
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.

Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in the end

Why would we every try and do such a thing, contrary to what the Op is suggesting most American's like Canada and the US the way they are now.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall:I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it
Shakespeare:All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances;And one man in his time plays many parts
The Allied states Military, zathganastans pride and Joy:
Army: 35,000,000 armed forces
Navy: 18,000 ships
Air force: 10,000,000 air force personal
and National Marines: 8,000,000 marines
Zathgan speical forces:2,500,000 speical forces

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm

The Zeonic States wrote::meh: It might as well be a colony of the United States already they depend upon the U.S.A for their Majority of their export income, They depend upon American Military Protection ever since the Brits sort of abandoned them to the results of their Actions after 1812.

I suppose making it offical and expanding the "Borders" of the United States though would make the Americans Happy i guess, but the Canadians are just deluding themselves if they view themselves as citizens of a sovereign state.

That entire country or rather collection of countries has been nothing but colonies of various Nations since it's founding.

._. So yeah let them Merge it might shut up uppity canadians a little bit.


Are you aware that Canada is making trade deals with China and India for the sole purpose of reducing our dependence on America?
Also anybody who thinks we're not a sovereign nation might want to remember what we were doing during Iraq

User avatar
Ublia
Senator
 
Posts: 4637
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm

Saruhan wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:
A quarter of Chicago and new york speak German and French ._. It has yet to change but it also has not interfered greatly with them living among other language speakers.

Heck there is a fellow down just four blocks from that speaks russian, Language would not be a massive barrier.

Of course there might be issues if they also don't understand or speak english...But cross that bridge when it comes to it.

Outside of the cities a lot of them don't speak English, it's like France basically.


Yeah have you ever been to Montreal and Quebec in Montreal they'll gladlly speak English you go to Quebec City and you speak english you get dirty looks.
A Canadian Green Tory and Nationalist, who loves History, Sci-Fi, Fantasy and is always down to RP

"'Whither is God?' He cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him- you and I.'"- F. Neitzsche, The Gay Science
Economic Left/Right: -6.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Canada, Green and or Red Toryism, Environmentalism, Canadian Nationalism, Neo-Classical Realism
Neutral: Eggplants and Switzerland
Against: Communism, Separatism in Canada, Social Conservatism, Critical Theory (the last few years have been harsh), DESCARTES (don't blame me blame the Meditations)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Atrito, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Floofybit, Galactic Powers, Getijden, Ifreann, La Xinga, Mearisse, Molchistan, New Unita, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, The Republic of Western Sol, Tinhampton, Whuhu, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads