No down here we just call it ham.
Advertisement

by Zathganastan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:21 pm

by North California » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:21 pm

by Charellia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Saruhan wrote:We will have no voice in politics. Our languages will be under threat, so will our environment and entire way of life, our society itself will be destroyed, and all to e chained to a corpse?
Your language is under threat? Dude you guys speak English too. The only thing under threat would be those spelling issues.
Colour would become color. Other than that I see no problems.

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Phreakadise » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:22 pm

by Ruridova » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm

by Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm

by Oneracon » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:23 pm
Ruridova wrote:Oneracon wrote:As has been said earlier: Over my dead body.
There are literally no positives from Canada's side of the issue: Losing sovereignty, moving backwards at least 10 years on civil rights, being tied to a failing economy, losing our social programs like universal healthcare, completely undermining ethnic diversity (cultural mosaic not a melting pot), no doubt we'd be required to privatise Crown Corporations, and not to mention the extra hassle of travel now that we would be using US Passports instead of Canadian ones.
I would and will take up arms to defend my country, my government, my rights, and my Queen.
Okay, I know our nation is exceedingly skilled at screwing up big time but are we really that bad?
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by The Zeonic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:24 pm
Charellia wrote:Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Your language is under threat? Dude you guys speak English too. The only thing under threat would be those spelling issues.
Colour would become color. Other than that I see no problems.
Most of us speak English but most of Quebec is French and if you know anything about Canadian history that will never ever change.

by Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

by Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm
Oneracon wrote:Ruridova wrote:Okay, I know our nation is exceedingly skilled at screwing up big time but are we really that bad?
Civil Rights
Nationwide same-sex marriage: Yes (since 2006 - Civil Marriage Act)
No laws restricting abortion nationwide: Yes (since 1988 - R v Morgentaler)
Nationwide universal healthcare: Yes (since 1985 - Canada Health Act)
Economically
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) - Most Stable Commercial Bank in North America
Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) - Expanding into American markets as smaller banks go under
Governor of the Bank of Canada (Canada's federal reserve) is also the head of the global Financial Stability Board
Higher GDP per capita then the United States according to: IMF, World Bank, CIA World Factbook, and the UN
Resources
Proven Oil Reserves: 3rd largest in the world (behind Saudi Arabia and Venezuela)
Total Renewable Water Resources: 3rd largest in the world (behind Brazil and Russia)
Leading global producer of gold, diamonds, potash, and uranium

by Old Tyrannia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:25 pm
Ublia wrote:Saruhan wrote:Take the back bacon and well give you the entire French Canadian population as a bonus
Not the bacon. And the French are needed a lot of Canadas industries in Quebec. plus I love visiting Montreal and third the Maritimes would be severed from the rest of Canada! So lets keep those Quebecois for a while at least until Maine joins us.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Osaea » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm
Phreakadise wrote:I don't particularly care for a NAU (North American Union). It seems to me that all of the nations involved in such unionizations (EU, I'm looking at you) gain each other's problems while gaining little benefit.
I would be more for the US breaking into 5 or 6 seperate regional countries. Alaska, Texas, Western NA, Central NA, Southern NA, Atlantic NA.
Texas could probably be split between Central and Southern NA.
Hell, I think that's the way it will go once the US implodes anyway. I'll be going where the Libertarians are, just a little FYI.

by Divair » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

by Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

by Old Tyrannia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:26 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Charellia wrote:
Most of us speak English but most of Quebec is French and if you know anything about Canadian history that will never ever change.
A quarter of Chicago and new york speak German and French ._. It has yet to change but it also has not interfered greatly with them living among other language speakers.
Heck there is a fellow down just four blocks from that speaks russian, Language would not be a massive barrier.
Of course there might be issues if they also don't understand or speak english...But cross that bridge when it comes to it.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by North California » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm

by The Zeonic States » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:27 pm
Ublia wrote:Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.
Oh no you don't! You are not brining all your pollution! Poor gun restrictions! Ultra-Conmservative mumbo-jumbo up here. We are Canada and again we are free!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good luck fighting those guys off.
by Inyourfaceistan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Ok so here's a thought. The USA and Canada share one of the longest borders in the world. They are also very close trading partners and are culturally quite similar (except for Canadian thanksgiving being too early and them pronouncing certain words wrong, but these are quite minor). Compared to US-Mexican Relations which is compounded by issues like the Drug War and Immigration, US-Canadian relations have been very smooth for generations.
So here is my proposal. Canada and the USA should officially merge. Canada can be divided into like 5-6 new American states.
Here's my idea
Partition Plan
So what does NS think?
I think this would benefit the USA because it would give us all of Canada's significant natural resources. Also with global warming the area may become prime farmland. It would be good for Canadians too, because they would finally be US citizens and could vote for the President and join Congress.

by Zathganastan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Saruhan wrote:Greater Nilfgaard wrote:There is another, philosophical, reason why the US should annex Canada.
Utilitarianism
Basically this is the principle that whats better for more people is more desirable than whats good for less people.
Merging with Canada is good for the USA, because it gives us access to their resources and farmland (global warming will make Canada one of the most fertile nations on Earth). Since the US has a population of 310 million, and Canada has about a tenth of that. The merger should benefit the US the most. This is the fairest way to go about it, according to Utilitarianism.
No, because you'll probably end up trying to kill us in the end

by Charellia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm
The Zeonic States wrote::meh: It might as well be a colony of the United States already they depend upon the U.S.A for their Majority of their export income, They depend upon American Military Protection ever since the Brits sort of abandoned them to the results of their Actions after 1812.
I suppose making it offical and expanding the "Borders" of the United States though would make the Americans Happy i guess, but the Canadians are just deluding themselves if they view themselves as citizens of a sovereign state.
That entire country or rather collection of countries has been nothing but colonies of various Nations since it's founding.
._. So yeah let them Merge it might shut up uppity canadians a little bit.

by Ublia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Saruhan wrote:The Zeonic States wrote:
A quarter of Chicago and new york speak German and French ._. It has yet to change but it also has not interfered greatly with them living among other language speakers.
Heck there is a fellow down just four blocks from that speaks russian, Language would not be a massive barrier.
Of course there might be issues if they also don't understand or speak english...But cross that bridge when it comes to it.
Outside of the cities a lot of them don't speak English, it's like France basically.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Armeattla, Atrito, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Floofybit, Galactic Powers, Getijden, Ifreann, La Xinga, Mearisse, Molchistan, New Unita, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, The Republic of Western Sol, Tinhampton, Whuhu, Yasuragi
Advertisement