Because he doesn't know anything about us
Advertisement

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:48 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Lambrinisia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:49 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Lambrinisia wrote:
And better credit rating, secular government and better education standards.
So do you have answers?
Secular government?! Dude the US is secular too. Or have you never heard of the separation of church and state.
Anyway, I'm not answering any of your questions. You called me a moron, and insulting people isn't going to get them to debate you, at least not in an intelligent manner.
There's a feeling deep inside me,
And it's always there to guide me.
It's in my heart and in my soul,
Leading me to the ultimate goal!
You can try your best this might be fun,
You'll go down in defeat before you've begun!
Samuraikoku wrote:You're entitled to your own opinions, your own car and your own plane, but not to your own facts.

by Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:50 pm

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:50 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
Okay, you've sold me on your plan if you tell me this,
Why would Southern Ontario be renamed Toronto?
I thought since New York State is named after our largest city. Canada's largest city should also be the name of the state it resides in.
Ergo, Southern Ontario becomes Toronto.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Sulamalik » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:51 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by Soviet Canuckistan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:51 pm

by Oneracon » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:52 pm
Sulamalik wrote:Speaking as a person who believe the Golden Horseshoe should secede from the nation as an independent city-state, even I think that's just too egotistical.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:52 pm

by Lancaster of Wessex » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:52 pm

by Sulamalik » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:52 pm
Greater Nilfgaard wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
Okay, you've sold me on your plan if you tell me this,
Why would Southern Ontario be renamed Toronto?
I thought since New York State is named after our largest city. Canada's largest city should also be the name of the state it resides in.
Ergo, Southern Ontario becomes Toronto.
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by Lancaster of Wessex » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:53 pm

by Sulfar » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:53 pm


by Oneracon » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:54 pm
Soviet Canuckistan wrote:Toronto's ego is bigger than an obese American.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Soviet Canuckistan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:54 pm

by Saruhan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:54 pm
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Socialdemokraterne » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:56 pm
Trolling Hajj wrote:But I think what the OP is trying to get at isn't just his specific plan for a Northern American union, but rather of the idea and concept that America and Canada are destined for each other. America needs Canada's injected liberalism(besides the tories eh? haha) and rich natural resources. And the Canadians would be well served by belonging to a broader northern american community, even larger and more open trade ties, and an army second to none in the world's history.
No matter what you believe we all must realize the world is changing. Food supplies become ever more strained, America;'s unemployment rate continues to swerve out of control( and please Canadians stop the smugness, the next time we go under, you guys will certainly go down too, your real estate bubble isn't exactly a beacon of regulation).
Canada would also be better served by finally also belonging to a nation whose primary identity was one actually based on the virtues of the nation and not on "We're not them!".
The idea of a nation-state that bounds from Montreal to Houston shall become a reality, weather you want it or not. It's already in the cards.

by Farnhamia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:56 pm

by Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:56 pm

by Dread Lady Nathicana » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:59 pm
Lambrinisia wrote:Greater Nilfgaard wrote:
Secular government?! Dude the US is secular too. Or have you never heard of the separation of church and state.
Anyway, I'm not answering any of your questions. You called me a moron, and insulting people isn't going to get them to debate you, at least not in an intelligent manner.
I call bullshit. I have heard of the separation of church and state. It is my belief that the US does not practise this.
I call you a moron because you have not once said, apart from "getting to be American and vote for the President" one reason why this would benefit Canada. If you don't want to be a moron, start coming up with answers and I will gladly retract calling you a moron and apologise.

by Greater Nilfgaard » Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:59 pm

by Soviet Canuckistan » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:00 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
I'm pretty sure New York State was named after York, not New Amsterdam.
New York, the city, was originally New Amsterdam, named after ... Amsterdam. After the British took it over in the 1660s, it was renamed in honor of the Duke of York (later James II). The name of the city was applied to the rest of the colony.

by Camwood » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:01 pm

by Farnhamia » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:01 pm
Soviet Canuckistan wrote:Farnhamia wrote:New York, the city, was originally New Amsterdam, named after ... Amsterdam. After the British took it over in the 1660s, it was renamed in honor of the Duke of York (later James II). The name of the city was applied to the rest of the colony.
They sold it for nutmeg!

by Sulamalik » Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:01 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Shrillland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement