NATION

PASSWORD

Spanking

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Are you for Spanking or Against?

Yes I would Spank my child When they do wrong
76
22%
Yes I would Spank my child, but only if they did something horrible
109
32%
No I would not spank my child, but i wouldn't care if someone else did
28
8%
No I would not spank my child, and i would stop someone if i saw someone doing it.
126
37%
 
Total votes : 339

User avatar
Xhaine
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 65
Founded: Oct 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Xhaine » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:07 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Hitting children (or adults) is wrong and abusive. Parents who spank their children teach the idea that violence is the proper way to solve disagreements.

And yet, oddly enough, I was spanked as a child and do not think that violence is the proper way to solve disagreements... :unsure:


Exactly.

Look, just because parents spank their children doesn't make them evil child abusers. I can, from experience, say that I acted up as a kid, I mean who doesn't right? My parents would give me time out, or take away privileges, and that just made me want to act up even more. Once it got to the point where I had finally aggravated them enough, I got spanked, and I can tell you I didn't act up after that. It sure as hell didn't instill any violent thoughts or actions or a deep hatred or fear of my parents, it made me stop. I wouldn't use this for every time my kid acted up, no way! That would be very excessive. But if you don't set a definite line and a punishment for crossing this line, kids think they can do whatever the hell they want. It's a sad fact, but sometimes kids need discipline, and a few spanks isn't going to scar them for life.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:13 am

If it has not happened already, I foresee this thread quickly becoming a zero sum game of "Spanking is child abuse" vs. "Not spanking is child neglect".

I just spoke to an 80 year old lady who was very nice. She told me that her dad was crippled by getting beat with a metal logging tool. Obviously, that was abuse. Obviously, spanking kids is not going to cripple them so it is not abuse.

Not spanking your kids is probably a bad idea but I am not sure that it is child neglect. Kids need discipline and maybe parents are sometimes able to come up with effective ways of providing it without spanking them.

I am squarely in the camp of if you don't love your kids then do not spank them. If you love your kids you will spank them.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:14 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Natapoc wrote:Hitting children (or adults) is wrong and abusive. Parents who spank their children teach the idea that violence is the proper way to solve disagreements.

And yet, oddly enough, I was spanked as a child and do not think that violence is the proper way to solve disagreements... :unsure:


If you support spanking, then yes, you do see violence as a way to solve disagreements.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:17 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Obviously, spanking kids is not going to cripple them so it is not abuse.


Now you're just making up your own definitions.

If you love your kids you will spank them.


So my parents don't love me?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:22 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Obviously, spanking kids is not going to cripple them so it is not abuse.


Now you're just making up your own definitions.

If you love your kids you will spank them.


So my parents don't love me?


A post modernist would tell you that we all make up definitions. I am not one of them but I see their point kinda. A good spanking does lasting good and no lasting harm. Child abuse does no good but does lasting harm. Do you agree? What do you think is the definition of child abuse?

I do not know enough about your situation to know if your parents loved you or not. Maybe you never needed disciplined. If you needed it and did not get it then they did not love you enough to do right by you.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:23 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:And yet, oddly enough, I was spanked as a child and do not think that violence is the proper way to solve disagreements... :unsure:


If you support spanking, then yes, you do see violence as a way to solve disagreements.


How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.
Last edited by Glorious Freedonia on Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:23 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:24 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Now you're just making up your own definitions.



So my parents don't love me?


A post modernist would tell you that we all make up definitions. I am not one of them but I see their point kinda. A good spanking does lasting good and no lasting harm. Child abuse does no good but does lasting harm. Do you agree? What do you think is the definition of child abuse?


This being the internet, I have a dictionary handy.

dictionary.com wrote:child abuse
noun

mistreatment of a child by a parent or guardian, including neglect, beating, and sexual molestation.


Underlining mine.

I do not know enough about your situation to know if your parents loved you or not. Maybe you never needed disciplined. If you needed it and did not get it then they did not love you enough to do right by you.


But I did get discipline.
Last edited by Ovisterra on Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:25 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
If you support spanking, then yes, you do see violence as a way to solve disagreements.


How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.


If it's not resolving anything, then why are we doing it?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:27 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
A post modernist would tell you that we all make up definitions. I am not one of them but I see their point kinda. A good spanking does lasting good and no lasting harm. Child abuse does no good but does lasting harm. Do you agree? What do you think is the definition of child abuse?


This being the internet, I have a dictionary handy.

dictionary.com wrote:child abuse
noun

mistreatment of a child by a parent or guardian, including neglect, beating, and sexual molestation.


Underlining mine.

I do not know enough about your situation to know if your parents loved you or not. Maybe you never needed disciplined. If you needed it and did not get it then they did not love you enough to do right by you.


But I did get discipline.


Ok, maybe they found a creative solution and they loved you. If you turned out ok, then they did their job. If you are a screw up then they did not love you enough to raise you right.

My definition and the internet's are harmonious.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:28 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
This being the internet, I have a dictionary handy.



Underlining mine.



But I did get discipline.


Ok, maybe they found a creative solution and they loved you. If you turned out ok, then they did their job. If you are a screw up then they did not love you enough to raise you right.


I don't think I'm that much of a screw up, but I may be biased here.

My definition and the internet's are harmonious.


So you agree that spanking is child abuse?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:29 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.


If it's not resolving anything, then why are we doing it?


To be successful parents. This is not the resolution of a conflict but the achievement of an important goal that when attained, society ought to give us a pat on the back for doing our jobs right.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:31 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
If it's not resolving anything, then why are we doing it?


To be successful parents. This is not the resolution of a conflict but the achievement of an important goal that when attained, society ought to give us a pat on the back for doing our jobs right.


But surely you're resolving this issue of discipline, are you not?
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:31 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ok, maybe they found a creative solution and they loved you. If you turned out ok, then they did their job. If you are a screw up then they did not love you enough to raise you right.


I don't think I'm that much of a screw up, but I may be biased here.

My definition and the internet's are harmonious.


So you agree that spanking is child abuse?


You are a screw up if the following is true: If everybody acted in accordance with your values, society would fall apart and we would be living in a post apocalyptic hell hole or caves.

Of course I do not agree with you that spanking is child abuse. You should come over to the light and agree with me and the internet that beating kids is bad.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:33 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
To be successful parents. This is not the resolution of a conflict but the achievement of an important goal that when attained, society ought to give us a pat on the back for doing our jobs right.


But surely you're resolving this issue of discipline, are you not?


No. There is no issue of discipline. There is a need for a spanking by the child and the fulfillment of that need by the parent. It is an unpleasant job, but it is better than changing a really dirty diaper. Am I right? *Looking for a high five here.*

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:33 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
I don't think I'm that much of a screw up, but I may be biased here.



So you agree that spanking is child abuse?


You are a screw up if the following is true: If everybody acted in accordance with your values, society would fall apart and we would be living in a post apocalyptic hell hole or caves.


So we're all screw-ups. Good to know.

Of course I do not agree with you that spanking is child abuse.


But you just agreed with the dictionary definition of child abuse, which spanking falls under.

You should come over to the light and agree with me and the internet that beating kids is bad.


Oh, everyone on the internet agrees with you?

Not only is that arrogant, it's false.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:35 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
But surely you're resolving this issue of discipline, are you not?


No. There is no issue of discipline. There is a need for a spanking by the child and the fulfillment of that need by the parent.


You're still resolving an issue. That issue is this apparent "need" for spanking. I disagree with you on that, but for the sake of my point I'm going along with it.


It is an unpleasant job, but it is better than changing a really dirty diaper. Am I right? *Looking for a high five here.*


One is not forthcoming from me.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:40 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
You are a screw up if the following is true: If everybody acted in accordance with your values, society would fall apart and we would be living in a post apocalyptic hell hole or caves.


So we're all screw-ups. Good to know.

Of course I do not agree with you that spanking is child abuse.


But you just agreed with the dictionary definition of child abuse, which spanking falls under.

You should come over to the light and agree with me and the internet that beating kids is bad.


Oh, everyone on the internet agrees with you?

Not only is that arrogant, it's false.


If we are all screw ups then according to logic then we are all living in a post apocalyptic hell hole or caves. If you know this to be true I shudder to think what sort of situation that you are in.

You gave me an internet definition of child abuse. It does not mention spanking as part of child abuse. Spanking is not beating which you underlined. Not everyone on the internet agrees on anything. I am not being arrogant. Then internet definition and mine are harmonious.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:42 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
No. There is no issue of discipline. There is a need for a spanking by the child and the fulfillment of that need by the parent.


You're still resolving an issue. That issue is this apparent "need" for spanking. I disagree with you on that, but for the sake of my point I'm going along with it.


It is an unpleasant job, but it is better than changing a really dirty diaper. Am I right? *Looking for a high five here.*


One is not forthcoming from me.


So you prefer changing really dirty diapers to spanking? You are a True Antispankite! Yeah that's right, I went there!

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:45 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
So we're all screw-ups. Good to know.



But you just agreed with the dictionary definition of child abuse, which spanking falls under.



Oh, everyone on the internet agrees with you?

Not only is that arrogant, it's false.


If we are all screw ups then according to logic then we are all living in a post apocalyptic hell hole or caves. If you know this to be true I shudder to think what sort of situation that you are in.


Nopedy nopdey nope. Your defintion of screw-ups requires everyone to agree with a person before the apocalypse arrives, so it's possible for everyone to be a screw up before said cataclysm happens.

You gave me an internet definition of child abuse. It does not mention spanking as part of child abuse. Spanking is not beating which you underlined. Not everyone on the internet agrees on anything. I am not being arrogant. Then internet definition and mine are harmonious.


dictionary.com wrote:Beating
Noun

1. the act of a person or thing that beats, as to punish, clean, mix, etc.: Give the rug a good beating.


dictionary.com wrote:Beat
Verb

1. to strike violently or forcefully and repeatedly.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:46 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
You're still resolving an issue. That issue is this apparent "need" for spanking. I disagree with you on that, but for the sake of my point I'm going along with it.




One is not forthcoming from me.


So you prefer changing really dirty diapers to spanking? You are a True Antispankite! Yeah that's right, I went there!


I would prefer any act of childcare above striking a child.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159037
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:51 am

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
If you support spanking, then yes, you do see violence as a way to solve disagreements.


How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.

So it's basically torture. You're causing pain to bring about some particular behaviour in a person.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:52 am

Ifreann wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.

So it's basically torture. You're causing pain to bring about some particular behaviour in a person.


Basically.

Either you admit that spanking is "resolving an issue" and therefore that you use violence to resolve issues, or you admit to torturing little kids.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Al Horeya
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 352
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Al Horeya » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:58 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
How does spanking solve disagreements? Spanking is not about resolving anything, it merely provides discipline.


If it's not resolving anything, then why are we doing it?

It's not about resolving a moral question, or telling you why you should do whatever you didn't do and got spanked for. Spanking teaches a very important lesson-sometimes, it's best to do as your told. If your parents tell you to do something, you should act now, ask later. This is very important for people to learn, since it will apply in many workplaces. It also teaches you how to ask questions appropriately-how to ask why without showing doubt in someone's ability, and how to give one's opinion despite being lower on the proverbial totem pole.
I was spanked as a kid, and now I feel like I'm doing pretty darn well for myself. I also helped raise my sister, and she is also doing very well. In fact, I don't know how I'll raise my kid the day I have one. Sometimes I think I should limit myself to spanking, like mum did, but other times I wonder if Grandma was on to something when she punished us, using worse punishments for repeat offences (she made us kneel on salt and uncoocked corn for an hour once. I'll never forget that punishment lol but it sure taught us not to cross her!).
The point is, your kid shouldn't do what he's told because you're right, or because he likes what he was told to do. He should do it because you said so, out of respect for you and your authority over him.
In den alten Zeiten, als das Wünschen noch geholfen hat...
La Nacia Himno (Annotations need updating)
CoA NationTracker Info
☻/ This is Bob. Copy & paste Bob in
/▌ your sig so Bob can take over the
/ \ world.
The proper gentilic is not Al Horeyan. We call ourselves Al Herhanii, which translates literally to "The Free." The English form is the Herhans; thus, one can say either "We traded with The Herhans," or "We traded with Al Herhanii."

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Nov 02, 2012 7:59 am

Ovisterra wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:
A post modernist would tell you that we all make up definitions. I am not one of them but I see their point kinda. A good spanking does lasting good and no lasting harm. Child abuse does no good but does lasting harm. Do you agree? What do you think is the definition of child abuse?


This being the internet, I have a dictionary handy.

dictionary.com wrote:child abuse
noun

mistreatment of a child by a parent or guardian, including neglect, beating, and sexual molestation.


Underlining mine.


I can't help but notice that the dictionary definition doesn't include "spanking"...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Fri Nov 02, 2012 8:01 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
This being the internet, I have a dictionary handy.



Underlining mine.


I can't help but notice that the dictionary definition doesn't include "spanking"...


It includes beating, which is defined as " the act of a person or thing that beats, as to punish, clean, mix, etc".
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Albaaa, Galloism, Giovanniland, Ifreann, Oceasia, Port Caverton, The Sherpa Empire, Trolleborg, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads