NATION

PASSWORD

Socialismphobia

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:10 pm

Divair wrote:
Norsklow wrote:True. But he does get to pick that you are his enemy, and vice versa.
The rest of it follows from it.

You may well have no aggressive intentions towards him, but that does not stop him from having such towards yours.

If anarchists want to fight me, fine. But I don't consider them enemies.


Yes, I had come to that conclusion. It does not alter the point.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Camelza
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12604
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Camelza » Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:13 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Camelza wrote:Torture by Stalinists or Right-wingers is the same thing,people get hurt and people get killed,so you should've better picked no side.


That's entirely true.

The "west"(through its puppet governments) did the exact same things to Greece that any authoritarian could do,along with a bonus: state social conservatism
So,I beg to disagree about the fact that we got the better option.


I'd argue that the fact that Greece clawed back its democracy to an extent in the '70s is preferable to being trapped in the Eastern Bloc until 1989, but we're splitting hairs, really, because both scenarios are fundamentally unpleasant.

Exactly what I meant.

User avatar
Franklin Delano Bluth
Senator
 
Posts: 4962
Founded: Apr 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Franklin Delano Bluth » Sat Nov 03, 2012 12:19 pm

People who fear socialism, do so because they fear freedom.
The American Legion is a neo-fascist terrorist organization, bent on implementing Paulinist Sharia, and with a history of pogroms against organized labor and peace activists and of lynching those who dare resist or defend themselves against its aggression.

Pro: O'Reilly technical books, crew-length socks, Slide-O-Mix trombone lubricant, Reuben sandwiches
Anti: The eight-line signature limit, lift kits, cancelling Better Off Ted, Chicago Cubs

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:26 pm

Andropoland wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:i always though socialism meant government direction of capital.

the question then becomes what is socialism, is there a common definition of it?

i thought marx said socialism was a step on the way to communism.

Different Communism. Marx's definition of Communism was a stateless, moneyless society if I remember correctly.

In America, Communism is meant to be an Authoritarian state where the government controls all aspects of the economy.

Socialism is generally defined as a state with high income equality, and public ownership of the means of production. Not government ownership, public ownership,though government ownership is a kind of public ownership.

Thank Comrade Lenin and Stalin to explain that the Guys in the soviet union made it clear that they had barely touched the surface of Socialism!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:27 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Andropoland wrote:Different Communism. Marx's definition of Communism was a stateless, moneyless society if I remember correctly.

In America, Communism is meant to be an Authoritarian state where the government controls all aspects of the economy.

Socialism is generally defined as a state with high income equality, and public ownership of the means of production. Not government ownership, public ownership,though government ownership is a kind of public ownership.

Thank Comrade Lenin and Stalin to explain that the Guys in the soviet union made it clear that they had barely touched the surface of Socialism!


:palm: State ownership =/= public ownership, because the state =/= the workers.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:29 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Thank Comrade Lenin and Stalin to explain that the Guys in the soviet union made it clear that they had barely touched the surface of Socialism!


:palm: State ownership =/= public ownership, because the state =/= the workers.

Really we are gonna do this again!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:31 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
:palm: State ownership =/= public ownership, because the state =/= the workers.

Really we are gonna do this again!


The main reason that "socialismphobia" exists at all is because of the actions of the USSR, so it's probably worth showing that The Union of Somewhat Stalinist Republics wasn't socialist.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:32 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Really we are gonna do this again!


The main reason that "socialismphobia" exists at all is because of the actions of the USSR, so it's probably worth showing that The Union of Somewhat Stalinist Republics wasn't socialist.

The no true Scotsman argument for what 7th time!
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:34 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The main reason that "socialismphobia" exists at all is because of the actions of the USSR, so it's probably worth showing that The Union of Somewhat Stalinist Republics wasn't socialist.

The no true Scotsman argument for what 7th time!


No, because No True Scotsman would involve the USSR actually conforming to socialist criteria but me saying "Not socialist" on an arbitrary basis. As the USSR was demonstrably not socialist, as the means of production weren't owned by the workers, then it isn't a No True Scotsman.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:34 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The main reason that "socialismphobia" exists at all is because of the actions of the USSR, so it's probably worth showing that The Union of Somewhat Stalinist Republics wasn't socialist.

The no true Scotsman argument for what 7th time!

And I'm Japanese.

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:35 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
CTALNH wrote:The no true Scotsman argument for what 7th time!


No, because No True Scotsman would involve the USSR actually conforming to socialist criteria but me saying "Not socialist" on an arbitrary basis. As the USSR was demonstrably not socialist, as the means of production weren't owned by the workers, then it isn't a No True Scotsman.

Cry me a river I don't care what you say...
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:36 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No, because No True Scotsman would involve the USSR actually conforming to socialist criteria but me saying "Not socialist" on an arbitrary basis. As the USSR was demonstrably not socialist, as the means of production weren't owned by the workers, then it isn't a No True Scotsman.

Cry me a river I don't care what you say...

Always funny to see someone admit to willful ignorance.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:36 pm

CTALNH wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
No, because No True Scotsman would involve the USSR actually conforming to socialist criteria but me saying "Not socialist" on an arbitrary basis. As the USSR was demonstrably not socialist, as the means of production weren't owned by the workers, then it isn't a No True Scotsman.

Cry me a river I don't care what you say...


CTALNH claiming once again that the laws of logic are bourgeois Trotskyite fascist capitalist elements that must be purged from the Glorious Soviet Motherland. :roll:
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:20 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Cry me a river I don't care what you say...


CTALNH claiming once again that the laws of logic are bourgeois Trotskyite fascist capitalist elements that must be purged from the Glorious Soviet Motherland. :roll:


Reality has a leftist bias!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Scandinvans
Senator
 
Posts: 4948
Founded: Oct 09, 2004
Capitalizt

Postby The Scandinvans » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:36 pm

Zweite Alaje wrote:'m not a Marxist. Marxism is only one of the major branches of Socialism. My personal variant of Socialism is a synthesis of Market Socialism, Syndicalism, and Dirigisme.
To point out, you continually stress your own narrow definition of socialism despite the fact that the greater part of academia and the population disagree with you it seems.
We are the Glorious Empire of the Scandinvans. Surrender or be destroyed. Your civilization has ended, your time is over. Your people will be assimilated into our Empire. Your technological distinctiveness shall be added to our own. Your culture shall be supplanted by our own. And your lands will be made into our lands.

"For five thousand years has our Empire endured. In war and peace we have thrived. Against overwhelming odds we evolved. No matter what we face we have always survived and grown. We shall always be triumphant." -Emperor Godfrey II

Hope for a brighter tomorrow - fight the fight, find the cure

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:41 pm

As per ante - more lollercoaster. They're squabbling amongst themselves.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
The Scandinvans
Senator
 
Posts: 4948
Founded: Oct 09, 2004
Capitalizt

Postby The Scandinvans » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:41 pm

Franklin Delano Bluth wrote:People who fear socialism, do so because they fear freedom.
Please do not deal in such absolutes for they often have the habit of closing your eyes. People fear, dislike, despise, and consider socialism unwise or illogical for a number of different reasons. Many of them include the belief that it removes incentives, causes stagnation, has a propensity to encourage totalitarianism, does not provide what it promises, comes with an extreme price, etc.
We are the Glorious Empire of the Scandinvans. Surrender or be destroyed. Your civilization has ended, your time is over. Your people will be assimilated into our Empire. Your technological distinctiveness shall be added to our own. Your culture shall be supplanted by our own. And your lands will be made into our lands.

"For five thousand years has our Empire endured. In war and peace we have thrived. Against overwhelming odds we evolved. No matter what we face we have always survived and grown. We shall always be triumphant." -Emperor Godfrey II

Hope for a brighter tomorrow - fight the fight, find the cure

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:53 am

The Scandinvans wrote:
Zweite Alaje wrote:'m not a Marxist. Marxism is only one of the major branches of Socialism. My personal variant of Socialism is a synthesis of Market Socialism, Syndicalism, and Dirigisme.
To point out, you continually stress your own narrow definition of socialism despite the fact that the greater part of academia and the population disagree with you it seems.


Yes, I'm explaining to you my variant so that you know what mindset I'm speaking to you from. I don't claim my thought monopolizes Socialist thought, infact I'd probably say some of my preferences are atypical in comparison to my fellow Socialists.

But what I am saying is that despite the great amount of variation and flexiblity with in the socialist spectrum, there is a concrete and fundemental tenet that all of Socialism seeks to accomplish, that is workplace democracy/worker ownership of the means of production. If a regime or person doesn't support this they cannot possibly be a socialist no matter what they may call themselves.

The thing is the "academia" you applaud is biased and controlled by the capitalists, and hence their "definition" is warped and incorrect. The "populous" is thus kept ignorant of the true nature of Socialism and her various sub-branches.
Last edited by Zweite Alaje on Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Zweite Alaje
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9551
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zweite Alaje » Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:56 am

Norsklow wrote:As per ante - more lollercoaster. They're squabbling amongst themselves.


We Socialists have disagreements amongst ourselves, yes, so do Capitalists. What's your point?
Geist über Körper, durch Aktionen Ehrung
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Syndicalism, Progressivism, Pantheism, Gaia Hypothesis, Centrism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Modern Feminism
I've been: Communist , Fascist
Economic Left/Right: -7.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.18

NIFP
Please don't call me Zweite, Al or Ally is fine. Add 2548 posts, founded Oct 06, 2011

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:04 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Norsklow wrote:As per ante - more lollercoaster. They're squabbling amongst themselves.


We Socialists have disagreements amongst ourselves, yes, so do Capitalists. What's your point?

A common strategy used against leftist ideologies is to hold them to much higher standards than the leftist regime.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:05 am

Zweite Alaje wrote:
Norsklow wrote:As per ante - more lollercoaster. They're squabbling amongst themselves.


We Socialists have disagreements amongst ourselves, yes, so do Capitalists. What's your point?

I've never understood this.

Capitalists just LOVE to clump us all together. Immediately when discussing socialism, it's "LOOK AT WHUT MAO AND STALIN DID!" as though we're all Stalinists and Maoists. When I tell them I'm not a Stalinist or Maoist, they flip out, screaming that it's impossible, because socialism is socialism. I think from now on, I'm going to make sweeping generalizations about capitalism. From now on, all capitalists believe in Keynesian economics. Let's see how annoyed the libertarians get when I keep insisting all capitalism is created equally.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
SaintB
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21792
Founded: Apr 18, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby SaintB » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:07 am

Conservatives need to fear something, its that simple.
Hi my name is SaintB and I am prone to sarcasm and hyperbole. Because of this I make no warranties, express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of the above statement, of its constituent parts, or of any supporting data. These terms are subject to change without notice from myself.

Every day NationStates tells me I have one issue. I am pretty sure I've got more than that.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:09 am

Hatsunia wrote:Maybe it's the fear of more government control (of production) leading to corruption?

Dude.

The OP just said George Orwell advocate socialism. The George that fucking wrote 1984, for Christ's sakes.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:10 am

Norstal wrote:
Hatsunia wrote:Maybe it's the fear of more government control (of production) leading to corruption?

Dude.

The OP just said George Orwell advocate socialism. The George that fucking wrote 1984, for Christ's sakes.

$10 says he has to Google who George Orwell is, as well as 1984.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Sanroe Communista
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Nov 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanroe Communista » Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:17 am

It's because when the average American thinks of Socialism, they think of Communism, and then...

"AH!!!! COMMIES! COMMIES!!!!!"
RP Population: 45 Million

RP Military Forces: 200,000
Number of (Total) Warships, Cruisers, Destroyers, Frigates, etc.: 50
Number of (Total) Military Aircraft: 50

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Cachard Calia, The Black Forrest, Theodores Tomfooleries, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads