NATION

PASSWORD

Miliband Should Know Better; Doesn't Shocker.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:36 am

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Norsklow wrote:To me it is another 'Labour Party = rank opportunists interspersed with idjits shocker*

*turns to page 3*


Bigger tits on page 1...


I thought this was the BBC, not The Sun.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57896
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:37 am

This will hit him a lot harder than it will help him.
The kind of people who would consider voting labour AND hate europe were already voting labour, or vote for UKIP and always will.
The kind of people who will see this and think "Fuck you ed" are going to be annoyed.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Aclany
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Oct 27, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aclany » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:41 am

This is just pure opportunism from Miliband, and resonates with the blue labour trend of the party, a faction I thought Miliband was to the left of. Nonetheless, it is likely labour will have to be 'bluer' at the next election (e.g. adopting tougher stances on immigration, justice, and, as in this case, Europe) to win back working class support, lost under the Europhile administration of Blair-Brown. Yet again, the Labour party compromises its founding values for popular support.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:41 am

Yewhohohopia wrote:
Norsklow wrote:

That's about tactics.

I'm suggesting,pushing, for a total review of Ideology.
What is our End State, our vision of a Better Future for our grandchildren in when THEY are grand parents themselves?

I think the rapid development of technology prevents any kind of 'end state' from being A Thing We Can Predict. Certainly it would be nice if we could have a society with generally less Being A Pleb and more Getting Along And Such, including generally minimising the damage we do to the environment as far as is possible while still maintaining quality of life. That would be top.



If you take that stand ( and I am not suggesting that it is wrong ) then you'll have to develop a vision of lazily drifting along the stream, occasionally putting out an oar to avoid a rock.

Seems to me the Tories have already monopolised that market, though.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:45 am

New Chalcedon wrote:
Ideology? New Labour?? Surely you jest - New Labour was, as you should recall, started as a response to the (perceived) excessively ideological nature of Old Labour.

In all seriousness, is Miliband endorsing austerity for the Eurozone, or just for the EU as an institution? And does that mean that he's endorsing it for Britain as well, or is he just a selfish, opportunistic jackass?

Austerity = fail. And when ostensibly left-wing politicians promote it (either out of misapplied ideology, or for "political convenience"), I just want to :palm: massively. Also, when Labour repeats the asinine Thatcherisms about Europe ("I want my money back!"), they simply undercut Britain's membership in the EU.


A response to the reality that Old Labour was ideologically bankrupt. What they had qua ideas had just seen its value reduced to a few pennies. Never tried to develop a new Idea afterwards, though.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57896
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:47 am

Norsklow wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Ideology? New Labour?? Surely you jest - New Labour was, as you should recall, started as a response to the (perceived) excessively ideological nature of Old Labour.

In all seriousness, is Miliband endorsing austerity for the Eurozone, or just for the EU as an institution? And does that mean that he's endorsing it for Britain as well, or is he just a selfish, opportunistic jackass?

Austerity = fail. And when ostensibly left-wing politicians promote it (either out of misapplied ideology, or for "political convenience"), I just want to :palm: massively. Also, when Labour repeats the asinine Thatcherisms about Europe ("I want my money back!"), they simply undercut Britain's membership in the EU.


A response to the reality that Old Labour was ideologically bankrupt. What they had qua ideas had just seen its value reduced to a few pennies. Never tried to develop a new Idea afterwards, though.


Essentially it was realized that socialism was untenable, and that a more moderate form of capitalism should be adopted.
(Since the socialists were the enemy, the capitalists on the opposistion were allowed to be EXTREEEEMELY capitalist and free market.
New Labour attempted to blend both and...well, failed. but ideologically thats where they stand (Social Democrat))
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:46 am

New Chalcedon wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Bigger tits on page 1...


I thought this was the BBC, not The Sun.


THIS IS NSG! RAWR! etc
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:51 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Essentially it was realized that socialism was untenable, and that a more moderate form of capitalism should be adopted.
(Since the socialists were the enemy, the capitalists on the opposistion were allowed to be EXTREEEEMELY capitalist and free market.
New Labour attempted to blend both and...well, failed. but ideologically thats where they stand (Social Democrat))



Having said that, the Laundry List school of lefty thinking did not begin with New Labour but was remarkably present in the late 70ies. The Left's willingness to embrace new cliques without a critical examination was much to blame for it's ideological bankruptcy.

This problem still persists.
Exactly what is to be gained from embracing LGBT causes?
Exactly what is to be gained from embracing the interests of religious minorities?
What do you do when these causes and interests collide?
And so on.
Unasked Question: how does this new item on the Laundry List fit into our existing plan?
Last edited by Norsklow on Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:53 am

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
I thought this was the BBC, not The Sun.


THIS IS NSG! RAWR! etc


Not even a "Ba-dum-tish!"?
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:55 am

New Labour=Tories. Seems like the UK has a right wing party and a right wing party. Not sure how things worked out that way.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:09 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
THIS IS NSG! RAWR! etc


Not even a "Ba-dum-tish!"?


:clap: Well played! A veritable 6!
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57896
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:11 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:New Labour=Tories. Seems like the UK has a right wing party and a right wing party. Not sure how things worked out that way.


We needed to have two because everyone was making fun of us for being conservative, so we made two right wing parties and painted one like a socialist party so we could save face.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Wed Oct 31, 2012 1:15 pm

Poor old John Major.

User avatar
Literallystalin
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Literallystalin » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:39 pm

Yewhohohopia wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
Yes they're separate terms and ideologies but they are also the same party, which is part of the reason why Labour is in the identity crisis which the past few posts were pointing at. It's the left, but it's also alot of other things.

Which is a shame. The left needs to take back the party and fuck anyone who disagrees off. First to go: borderline racist cunts like Cruddas who the party only puts up with to gain the votes of the kind of plebs who'd vote NF if they had the courage to.

If only there was a way to remove the unwanted elements of the party that are undermini

User avatar
Literallystalin
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 146
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Literallystalin » Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:48 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:New Labour=Tories. Seems like the UK has a right wing party and a right wing party. Not sure how things worked out that way.

It would be worth remembering for the benefit of any outside observers that the UK does not just have a right wing party and a right wing party. It also has a smaller but still significant right wing party.
Last edited by Literallystalin on Wed Oct 31, 2012 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Thu Nov 01, 2012 10:32 am

It's going to be a gigantic joke on everyone who posted here ( Including myself ) if 53 Tory defectors do bring Cammie down.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:16 pm

it was amusing to watch the tories scrambling to get their shit together and failing miserably. so Ed has my thanks for that.

will it harm Labour? possibly not, this is the second time Ed has had his MP's walk through the lobbies the against their beliefs to fuck the tories. last time was a significant victory.

that said its a dangerous time to be playing politics with the EU.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Fractalnavel, Loddhist Communist Experiment, The Rio Grande River Basin, Ventura Bay

Advertisement

Remove ads