lol

Advertisement

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:54 am

Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Des-Bal » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:57 am
Zephie wrote:Like what?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The De Danann Nation » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:58 am
Demirysis wrote:... Aaaand this is why I fucking hate feminists. They just want more sexism. It's like they fucking wallow in it.

by Dainer » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:58 am
Zephie wrote:No, for some equality means an equal opportunity without discrimination.
For others, it literally means equality, like communist style.

by Great Yorkshire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:01 pm
I've seen this and it's pretty fucking disgusting.Tahar Joblis wrote:A panel full of commentators on a TV show on a major television show, commenting on a more recent case and laughing their asses off in grand misandrist fashion as they speculate on what he did to deserve it and crack jokes about it.

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:03 pm
Great Yorkshire wrote:I've seen this and it's pretty fucking disgusting.Tahar Joblis wrote:A panel full of commentators on a TV show on a major television show, commenting on a more recent case and laughing their asses off in grand misandrist fashion as they speculate on what he did to deserve it and crack jokes about it.
In a crazy world were men were viewed as having feelings, and a right not to have to put up with assault, the show would have been pulled, there would have been an inquiry, public apologies, people would have lost their jobs.
Luckily the entire TV audience knew better.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Great Yorkshire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:04 pm
Being beaten sucks.Zephie wrote:Great Yorkshire wrote:I've seen this and it's pretty fucking disgusting.
In a crazy world were men were viewed as having feelings, and a right not to have to put up with assault, the show would have been pulled, there would have been an inquiry, public apologies, people would have lost their jobs.
Luckily the entire TV audience knew better.
Being a white male sucks.

by The UK in Exile » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:05 pm
Zephie wrote:Great Yorkshire wrote:I've seen this and it's pretty fucking disgusting.
In a crazy world were men were viewed as having feelings, and a right not to have to put up with assault, the show would have been pulled, there would have been an inquiry, public apologies, people would have lost their jobs.
Luckily the entire TV audience knew better.
Being a white male sucks.

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:06 pm
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Great Yorkshire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:10 pm
Perhaps I am missing something, has a new scientific theory emerged which shows that male flesh regenerates like wolverine's, or that PTSD is solely the product of a bruised ovary?

by Ancient Empire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:11 pm
Dainer wrote:The problem is that Men's Rights activists have a history of constantly and consistently fighting against gender equality.

by Dyonis » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:13 pm

by Des-Bal » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:16 pm
Dyonis wrote:If you ever get caught in a fire or other disaster (which I wish to no one) and you see a 5'2" 125 pounds, firewoman come to drag you out... you will appreciate your right to be equally toasted, so much better than the right to be actually saved.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:18 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Dyonis wrote:If you ever get caught in a fire or other disaster (which I wish to no one) and you see a 5'2" 125 pounds, firewoman come to drag you out... you will appreciate your right to be equally toasted, so much better than the right to be actually saved.
The problem there is the 5'2 125 pound bit not the woman bit. We have the tendency to think of woman to intrinsicly mean a dainty woman. I've known women who were more than qualified to carry a two hundred pound man on their shoulders.

by Mavorpen » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:23 pm
Shnercropolis wrote:what kind of weirdo puts up a poster advocating civil rights for men? I thought we always had them?

by Ancient Empire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:28 pm

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:29 pm
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Ancient Empire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:30 pm

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:31 pm
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Mavorpen » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:34 pm

by Zephie » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:35 pm
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Mavorpen » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:36 pm

by Dyonis » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:37 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Dyonis wrote:If you ever get caught in a fire or other disaster (which I wish to no one) and you see a 5'2" 125 pounds, firewoman come to drag you out... you will appreciate your right to be equally toasted, so much better than the right to be actually saved.
The problem there is the 5'2 125 pound bit not the woman bit. We have the tendency to think of woman to intrinsicly mean a dainty woman. I've known women who were more than qualified to carry a two hundred pound man on their shoulders.

by Ancient Empire » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:39 pm

by Crangy » Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:40 pm
Harrietharmman wrote:There's some interesting stories coming out of Canada with feminists objecting to posters which state "Men's rights are human rights". They've been ripping the posters down despite those posting them having permission to put them up.
How the hell can anyone disagree that men should have rights??(Image) Anyway, here's the video:
it's well worth watching and pretty entertaining stuff if you like to see idiots acting really dumb, skip to 2 mins 10 for the fun!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Jz63_lGuSE
They've finally identified the "star" of the video who was organising the vandalism. Rather worryingly she a teacher:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy0gryjLIsU
Here's a news report on the issue:I think the only solution to such censorship is for people to put up even more posters. What do other people think?Posters in support of men's rights ripped down in Vancouver
There is backlash from both sexes after posters supporting men's rights were ripped down in Vancouver's Commercial Drive neighbourhood.
Some of the posters read "Stop violence against women, but not men, because men don't matter -- despite being more often the victims of violence." Many of the posters have been either taken down or defaced.
News1130 hit the streets to find out what you think about the controversial message. Men and women we spoke with say they should be left up because we don't hear enough about men's rights. They also believe Vancouver is an open-minded city.
"I can understand that there can be violence against men as well. I don't agree that they're being ripped down," says one man.
"I think these posters should definitely be good to go. I mean, anyone who's against violence against either men or women, I'm all behind that," adds a Vancouver woman.
Others say if you don't agree with the movement, then don't look at the posters -- but no one should have the right to vandalize.
"You don't hear a lot about [men's rights] and that's the surprising part. It is very surprising that they're being ripped down. Definitely, they should go back up. You see signs up for everything around here and to select which ones we put up and which ones we don't, it's a little bit ridiculous," explains another man.
In a written statement to News1130, the founder of the local men's rights blog MasculisM.ca, which is behind the movement, says he got involved because of his experiences on the Downtown Eastside.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, EuroStralia, Goat Republic, Greater Marine, Gun Manufacturers, Nazbol England, Necroghastia, Neu California, Nilokeras, Querria, Zerotaxia
Advertisement