NATION

PASSWORD

Feminists destroy posters advocating human rights for men

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Merriwhether
Diplomat
 
Posts: 956
Founded: Sep 03, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Merriwhether » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:09 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Merriwhether wrote:
The problem being?

Your being a 14 year old boy might have something to do with your total mischaracterization of feminism.

Thats me giving you the benefit of the doubt. Its the best you'll get.


Do you have, perhaps, a reliable source on hand that I might be able to resolve the errors in my characterization of feminism? I would be appreciative. :)
UNITARY 61% | 39% FEDERAL
DEMOCRACY 74% | 26% AUTHORITY
ISOLATION 51% | 49% GLOBALISM
PACIFIST 65% | 35% MILITARIST
FREEDOM 55% | 45% SECURITY
EQUALITY 74% | 26% MARKETS
SECULAR 76% | 24% RELIGIOUS
PROGRESS 75% | 25% TRADITION
MULTI-CUL. 53% | 47% ASSIMIL.
Favored: Democratic Socialism, Secularism, Humanism, Public Education Reform, Public Utility Internet, Single-payer Healthcare, Carbon Neutrality, Second Bill of Rights, Reformed Federalism, Immigration and Naturalization Reform, Non-interventionism
Neutral: Marxism, Corporatism
Opposed: Dishonesty, Anti-intellectualism, Sectarianism, State religion, Neoliberalism, Laissez-faire, Jingoism, Supremacism, Antisemitism, Social Darwinism

User avatar
Saint Jade IV
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6441
Founded: Jul 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saint Jade IV » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:14 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Saint Jade IV wrote:
Actually, the problem, societally speaking, is more that women are discouraged from expressing their sexuality, or their urges. The "leading a man on" mindset tells women that if they do express sexuality, they are expected to go full-steam ahead, with whatever the man wants, since he has a right to expect that. They are not taught that it is acceptable for them to express their sexuality at a level comfortable for them, without being expected to go further. Women are, from a societal standpoint, pretty much told, "If you don't want to have sex, don't be sexual. At all. Ever."


Funny, I would have thought that between getting dinner ready and doing the laundry you wouldn't have time to learn how to read.


I'm dictating.
When you grow up, your heart dies.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of him was one kind of son of a b*tch or another.
RIP Dyakovo...we are all poorer for your loss.

User avatar
Question Everything
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 154
Founded: Sep 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Question Everything » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:19 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Question Everything wrote:I'd be wasting my time trying to explain anything on a website like this. People here are so deluded by their own echo chambers that facts rarely ever get through. That's why I don't seriously debate on this website anymore, because it's very similar to watching an evolutionist debate a creationist. Both sides just clamor on and resort to verbal abuse when they run out of ideas. Nope. I'm done with that. Take my statement or don't. I really don't care.

So, you have absolutely nothing to back up that feminists celebrated when a man's gentiles were mutilated, other than your victimization complex? Unlike (I suspect) you, I actually know feminists. Intelligent ones, you write about this shit and try and get published. Not a single feminist that I'm aware of was celebrating.

At this point its not unfair of me to say that you're totally full of shit.
And if we're being honest here, there is nothing I can really say that would make you change that stance either, so there is no real point in going out of my way to prove anything to you. Just stick to your guns, and i'll stick to mine.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:19 pm

Saint Jade IV wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
Funny, I would have thought that between getting dinner ready and doing the laundry you wouldn't have time to learn how to read.


I'm dictating.

The castle of aaaaaahhhhggggg?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Althihex
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Oct 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Althihex » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:25 pm

Thing is, we should be equally appalled if it was men destroying posters advocating human rights for women as we are with women destroying posters advocating human rights for men. They're called human rights for a reason, people just need to stop pretending there should be any separation between the genders. I mean, we're pretty much policed into our genders at a young age... 'Pink toys are for girls, cars and building sets and action figures are for boys'. I don't know about you, but i honestly would have preferred getting an optimus prime to a barbie doll for christmas when i was 8.

User avatar
Acro
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1191
Founded: Nov 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Acro » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:26 pm

These are the radical feminists, who think that men are inferior. Regular Feminists think they all sexes are equal, which is what i think
Obligatory For and Against
Pro: Democracy, Bernie Sanders, Relgious Freedom, Palestine, Socialism, and Iran(The Reformists)
Against: Dictatorships, Fascism, Laissez-faire, right wingers, conservativism


I am a proud Shia Muslim, Progressive, Socialist, Liberal, Bisexual and maybe dying of Cancer.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:27 pm

I feel like I would care more if I was in the least bit surprised.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:31 pm

Question Everything wrote:
Choronzon wrote:So, you have absolutely nothing to back up that feminists celebrated when a man's gentiles were mutilated, other than your victimization complex? Unlike (I suspect) you, I actually know feminists. Intelligent ones, you write about this shit and try and get published. Not a single feminist that I'm aware of was celebrating.

At this point its not unfair of me to say that you're totally full of shit.
And if we're being honest here, there is nothing I can really say that would make you change that stance either, so there is no real point in going out of my way to prove anything to you. Just stick to your guns, and i'll stick to mine.

So, you have jack shit?

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:36 pm

Des-Bal wrote:I feel like I would care more if I was in the least bit surprised.

Who'd have thought that a troll might get the reaction they were looking for?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:37 pm

Choronzon wrote:Who'd have thought that a troll might get the reaction they were looking for?


Hope your referring to the women ripping down posters.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:37 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Choronzon wrote:Who'd have thought that a troll might get the reaction they were looking for?


Hope your referring to the women ripping down posters.

No, I'm referring to those posters.

But don't let me get in the way of your mischaracterization.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:38 pm

Merriwhether wrote:
Choronzon wrote:Your being a 14 year old boy might have something to do with your total mischaracterization of feminism.

Thats me giving you the benefit of the doubt. Its the best you'll get.


Do you have, perhaps, a reliable source on hand that I might be able to resolve the errors in my characterization of feminism? I would be appreciative. :)

I haven't forgotten about you, either. I'm still trying to find you something but my internet is fucked at the moment.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:46 pm

Choronzon wrote:No, I'm referring to those posters.

But don't let me get in the way of your mischaracterization.


Go ahead and point out which parts you object to.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Meryuma
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14922
Founded: Jul 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meryuma » Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:46 pm

CVT Temp wrote:Also, the forms of sex that she happens to be most against are those most likely to be engaged in by gay men


Source? Not out of skepticism, just genuine curiosity.

Choronzon wrote:Your being a 14 year old boy might have something to do with your total mischaracterization of feminism.

Thats me giving you the benefit of the doubt. Its the best you'll get.


I'd try and refrain from fighting sexism with ageism.
ᛋᛃᚢ - Social Justice Úlfheðinn
Potarius wrote:
Neo Arcad wrote:Gravity is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies attract with a force proportional to their mass.


In layman's terms, orgy time.


Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.


Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."


Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.



Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.

Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...

*puts on sunglasses*

blow out of proportions."

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

...so here's your future

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:03 pm

Choronzon wrote:
Question Everything wrote:And if we're being honest here, there is nothing I can really say that would make you change that stance either, so there is no real point in going out of my way to prove anything to you. Just stick to your guns, and i'll stick to mine.

So, you have jack shit?

Here, I'll give y'all a freebie:

whatever the judgment of America's patriarchal legal system, Lorena Bobbitt is for most feminists no criminal. She is instead a symbol of innovative resistance against gender oppression everywhere. (NYT letter to the editor, 1994)
1994, NYT.
1993, NYT.
Interesting background article where an acquaintance recounts that Bobbitt suggested she would maim her husband if he cheated on her - which was actually the motivation of a more recent penis-chopping wife.

When I said that Lorena Bobbitt chopping her husband's penis off made her into a feminist folk hero of sorts, I was unfortunately not pulling that out of my ass (just as, when I said that some feminists lept to Valerie Solanas's defense, I was unfortunately simply accurate). A large number of supposed feminists seem unable to see violence against men as problematic, and seem to be trapped in an "us vs. them" mentality.

You can say that these are not true feminists, but if they aren't, then there are quite a few feminist impersonators running around, some of them in prominent positions.

By contrast... this was a major television station's female editorial news show. You don't have to scrounge the more dimly lit and less notable corners of the internet to see women condoning penis-chopping and making very hateful commentary about it; not only assuming that the woman had some good reason, but making spiteful anti-male comments while they do so (suggesting feeding the penis to the dog, countering that "why does the dog have to suffer," et cetera). You can watch it on highly rated cable TV shows on national news networks, see it in the editorial pages of the top newspapers in the world, et cetera.

It's funny... because cafemom.com also has a reaction to the case I posted cable television personalities joking about.

Let's review the comments, shall we? Here:

already saw a post like this i wonder what he did to deserve it must be something bad i told my husband if he ever cheated on me id do that lol <= Assumes he did something to deserve being drugged, tied up, his penis severed, and thrown in the garbage disposal in front of him.
Haahahahhaha I've told my SO if he ever hits me or cheats on me this is gonna happen. Who knows the reasoning but if I had an abusive husband is definitely do it. <= Says that she would do it to her significant other, or would also do it to an abusive husband.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! I told my DH the same thing! <= Agrees with the above poster.
Mr bobbit came back with a bigger Wang. This one will probably sever his upper arm and have it sewn in place <= Particularly tasteless joke, given the difficulty of reattaching a penis thrown in the garbage disposal.
Hey maybe when he gets surgery he will get a bigger one and be happier!!! <= Another clueless poster, same tasteless joke.
that way they can't sew it back on and it won't be usable. no mistakes like lorena made lol. <= Corrects the above poster, congratulates offender for not making Lorena Bobbitt's "mistake" of not getting rid of the severed penis more thoroughly.
Bwahahahahaha!!!!!! <= ...
he must have ROYALLY pissed her off... <= Yet another presumption that somehow, this man did something to deserve it.
LMAO told my SO the samething lol <= Another poster also saying they told their significant other they'd chop off his penis if he cheated.
OMG....I feel bad for the guy that has to clean it out of the garbage disposal...lol <= Equivalent of the "why does the dog have to suffer" tasteless joke made on "The Talk."
Crazy ! Lol ... I wonder who- I mean what he did :/ ... <= Yet another poster assuming he must have done something to deserve being drugged, mutilated, etc.
That's what I'm doing next time dh pisses me off <= Oh, look. Another threat of copycatting.

Now, do you still think that Cafemom.com's posters are such shining paragons? More comments were approving, laughing, or both than bluntly disapproving (a lot were just expressing surprise or grossed out, a very small handful actually said it was wrong.))

Cutting off penises only starts to become bad for most of them when they're confronted with the role reversal. (That, from what I can tell, is why the title is "HaHa ha - Do you find this funny?" in the article you linked to - the user who posted it appears to have been reacting to the chorus of laughter greeting the earlier threads on severed penises... which is why she said "I admit I'm always stumped when I see the double standard." She knows that the a large fraction of the users on cafemom.com will condone anti-male violence, and is unhappy with that.)

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tahar Joblis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:28 pm

Since nobody else seems to have done so, unless my quick readthrough missed it, and I can't be the only one who hates having to wait and watch through YouTube videos to see what's being talked about, here are the two posters mentioned in the OP.

The "men's rights are human rights" poster:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-c ... t-hate.pdf
The "stop violence against women, but not men, because men don't matter" poster:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-c ... st-men.pdf

You may find that useful in putting into context whether or not they are - or should be taken as - provocative.
Last edited by Tahar Joblis on Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CVT Temp
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1860
Founded: Oct 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby CVT Temp » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:33 pm

Meryuma wrote:
CVT Temp wrote:Also, the forms of sex that she happens to be most against are those most likely to be engaged in by gay men


Source? Not out of skepticism, just genuine curiosity.


https://www.google.com/#hl=en&output=se ... 80&bih=709

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=p ... 80&bih=709

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclient=p ... 80&bih=709
Last edited by CVT Temp on Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Иф ю кан рид дис, ю ар рили борд ор ю ар Россияне.

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:38 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:Since nobody else seems to have done so, unless my quick readthrough missed it, and I can't be the only one who hates having to wait and watch through YouTube videos to see what's being talked about, here are the two posters mentioned in the OP.

The "men's rights are human rights" poster:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-c ... t-hate.pdf
The "stop violence against women, but not men, because men don't matter" poster:
http://www.avoiceformen.com/portal/wp-c ... st-men.pdf

You may find that useful in putting into context whether or not they are - or should be taken as - provocative.


Thanks for that. I find both posters rather meh, and probably wouldn't pause long enough in passing to read them right through.

"Meh" meaning neither compelling nor offensive.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Roan Cara
Senator
 
Posts: 3988
Founded: Jul 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Roan Cara » Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:44 pm

Sigh...Just like any other group of people, the ones that are the loudest/angriest/most obnoxious or extreme/fundy get all the attention and the rest get tarred with the same brush. I highly doubt all feminists feel the way those *IMHO* crazy women who tore down the poster's do. Personally I think men and women should have equal rights as far as possible. Seems like people don't want to admit that women can be violent or that they hurt men physically too but it just isn't true. Some women can not only be violent but scarey and sadistic about it. *same as some men* and men have every right to champion their rights as people too.
Married to Big Jim P- I will always love him-ALLways
Roan HaYashurah - Roan the Just... or straight...~Menassa
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. Dr. Seuss[/align]

User avatar
Harrietharmman
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Harrietharmman » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:40 pm

Acro wrote:These are the radical feminists, who think that men are inferior. Regular Feminists think they all sexes are equal, which is what i think


Regrettably, a great many feminists these days seem to be somewhere in between those two position. In particular, the majority of high profile and powerful feminists seem to only want equality when it favours women. I can only guess that a moderate dose of sexism against men is a good way to gain promotion in government jobs or win votes from females.

Feminists really need to start speaking out against the huge amount of misandry in their movement rather than defending or even applauding it.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:47 pm

So TJ shows up and posts a few opinion pages and letters to the editor and then claims that this is somehow evidence that, and I quote, "to most feminists Lorena Bobbitt is no criminal."

Yeah, this thread is now worthless.


Thats the thing TJ. When you find three instances of a wingnut writing opinion pages and letters to the editor and use them to make inaccurate and sweeping statements just to further an agenda you are pulling things out your ass. Three pieces is not a pattern.

User avatar
Choronzon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9936
Founded: Apr 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Choronzon » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:48 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Choronzon wrote:No, I'm referring to those posters.

But don't let me get in the way of your mischaracterization.


Go ahead and point out which parts you object to.

The obvious baiting and trolling?

"Stop violence against women, but not against men, because men don't matter." Seriously, its like you and TJ got together and made that poster yourselves. People object to being slandered, misrepresented, and trolled in public. Go figure.

User avatar
New Socialist New Hampshire
Attaché
 
Posts: 99
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Socialist New Hampshire » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:26 pm

Cool. If I saw a sign demanding "rights" for a group that already holds all the rights and privileges, I'd want to tear it down too.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.10

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:27 pm

what kind of weirdo puts up a poster advocating civil rights for men? I thought we always had them?
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:30 pm

Shnercropolis wrote:what kind of weirdo puts up a poster advocating civil rights for men? I thought we always had them?


It's for recognition of abuse against men, I think. Not civil rights in general.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, EuroStralia, Goat Republic, Greater Marine, Gun Manufacturers, Nazbol England, Necroghastia, Neu California, Nilokeras, Querria, Zerotaxia

Advertisement

Remove ads