NATION

PASSWORD

Atheism and religious hate

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

You are a . . . .

I'm looking for a cop out and this is it.
41
11%
Theist who fears this coming tide
76
21%
Agnostic who fears this coming tide
27
8%
Atheist who fears this coming tide
22
6%
Atheist who welcomes this coming tide
168
47%
Agnostic who welcomes this coming tide
26
7%
 
Total votes : 360

User avatar
Common Territories
Senator
 
Posts: 4704
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Common Territories » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:28 pm

Euronion wrote:I do not hate atheists, I disagree with them sure, but the only cause I've been given to hate on certain atheists is when a certain group of atheists (I'm referring to the Anti-Theist crowd) decide to hate on religion, to call it's proponents stupid, to claim that it is a disease, to claim it is a cancer on the Earth, that it must be fought with a Secular Crusade (oxymoron?) and completely annihilated or in the case of the some big wigs in the U.K. merely most public displays of religion should be annihilated. I have no problem with the atheists that say "I do not believe in God because I find there is no proof of God". I do however harbor a passionate dislike for someone who says, for example, that by funding my local catholic church, helping in St. Vincent de Paul, ect. that I'm stupid, ignorant, blind, and diseased, that if I do not forsake my religious beliefs that I should be put to death or ostracized from society.

This scares me to be quite honest. While I am very aware that the past several thousand years have not been Religious Tolerance Bonanza, I feel very comfortable with the current US position of Religion, and it scares me when I hear people, an increasing minority say such things. It's not that I feel hurt by their words, it's that I fear what may happen when this group becomes such a large hate group that they begin backing up their philosophy with violent action. I have no fear of Secularism, I have a fear of extreme Secularism which is currently going on in Great Britain where Christians are being told they cannot wear the cross on the job and are told they must remove it or face punishment. NSG hasn't exactly assuaged my fears either. I have heard some Atheists cry that since they have been oppressed for the past several thousand years that it is only fair that they get their turn to persecute others and to take revenge on religion. As I said, I am not claiming that they are wrong about being persecuted, but it makes me fear for the safety of my 90 year old self, and my grandchildren and their children if they continue to remain Christian in a time when a hate against Christianity is rising in the world, both from radical Islam and from radical Anti-Theism. I fear what physical harm might befall them from a band of stupid radical teenagers.

By now I am sure you are wondering what the purpose of this thread is. My question to you is have you seen this coming tide? do you think it is a good thing or a bad thing? why or why not?



Ignorant people are ironically the stupid ones in both religious groups and atheistic groups. Simply putting forth the ideas you mentioned above would be in fact ignorant and truly stupid indeed. Dumb and ignorant people plague this world more then any religion has. Im completely non religious so I couldn't care one bit more for atheists or theists.

Basically to put both on fair ground--Both sides have done damage to the world, greater or for lesser an amount. Christianity and many of its followers murder/killed Muslims of the Islamic faith for a piece of land (which can be shared equally and is thanks to Israel) and numerous other reasons. Holy Wars are just the start to what religion has brought negatively to the world, from Christians invading the Middle East and forcing former Vikings to convert, to Muslims invading Spain, to even the former Roman and Greek style of waging war for their god's. Religion has to be honest put a pretty bad stain on human history, technology for one instance was halted from advancing because of Christianity's iron fist corruption (which I'll mention later too) for hundreds of years. Even so, Religion is a faith that brings people together for mostly good deeds and brings morals to people. Faith is not wrong--it can only be corrupted. If you choose to have faith in one of the many religions in the world then good for you.

Now a percentage of both Atheistic and Theist people are pushy and especially ignorant to others. Some Christians only spread hate about going to hell for not believing while some Theists make faith out to be idiocy. Atheists in general are not like this (same goes for other religious people), most in the Atheist community are rational people who simply put science and rationalism before faith. Nothing wrong about this at all. Though the next time you see an ignorant Atheist you can simply tell him that Atheism is a faith as well, only difference is that different atheists believe in separate things; such as the basic "No God" principle, some believe in an after life without a god, reincarnation, and other sorts of beliefs. So calling them a religion can be justified if explained right--They are after all called the "Church of Atheism" in most senses. Anyways. There are those few ignorant bunch that like to spread hate in the atheistic community, simply because science proves them right on most facts and almost everything (not everything yet) can be explained by fact or reason. This is still no excuse for those of that belief to go around being ignorant to others faiths, everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and that should never be inhibited ever. Basically in a short tense, ignorant idiocy exists on both sides from Christian kings killing Muslims in the Crusades, to the ignorant trash that some people say. Understanding each others belief system is better then fighting over such things, I for one know a few Muslims, plenty of Christians, even a few Buddhists, and I as a non-religious person accept them as people even if our beliefs are differed. Plus there is nothing wrong in getting to know other religions cultures if your comfortable, I alone have learned many things from Buddhists in a recent wedding ceremony, and hold the good morals of Christianity/similar beliefs to be good for society in some cases.

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:30 pm

Divair wrote:
Scholencia wrote:10% unemployment, A credit rating, $20 billion deficit. What a
i will post you diferent facr when i come home since i am not on my pc

Really? You're going to pursue this insane claim that religion affects economics?

Have fun.


On the contrary, economics affects religion. Sociological studies suggest that as SES rises, religiosity decreases.
Last edited by Czechanada on Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:30 pm

Ovisterra wrote:
Scholencia wrote:yet there is a colleration. there are scuentific studies. i know it is hard tp accept that religious countries are far more economic successful. i mean what do you think wgy everybody loves the sheiks.

athesrs countries lik north korea are third world countries.


Did you not see what I posted? Denmark, Norway and Sweden always appear in the top 10 of the lists of GDP per capita.

He's immune to facts.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Czechanada wrote:
Divair wrote:Really? You're going to pursue this insane claim that religion affects economics?

Have fun.


On the contrary, economics affects religion. Sociological studies suggest an inverse correlation between SES and religiosity.

That I agree with, but his point that religion affects economics is absurd.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Did you not see what I posted? Denmark, Norway and Sweden always appear in the top 10 of the lists of GDP per capita.

He's immune to facts.


And hence, I ridicule and mock.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Scholencia wrote:this is bullshit. in the hvo there were many muslims just like many non muslims in the army bih. also in bosnua there are not protestants.


The findings about protestants was about the Rwandan Genocide.
Both catholicism and protestantism come off very badly.
With regard to the Croatian war, it's only the catholic militia's which commited war crimes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:C ... osnian_War

And the vatican opposed their prosecution

there was no catholic militia and stop threadjacking the past war with this thread because it has nothing to do with it. in the croat army in bosnia in the city of orasje the commander was an imam. if you like to talk about it make a new thead.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Norsklow wrote:


Actually, I would put it in terms rather different terms. Simply a First Law of Mankind. ( analogous to the Three Laws of Robotics )
'It is not permitted to hold yourself as better than others.'


Thought crime? Really dude? At least put a stipulation about acts to that effect, not thought, being prohibited in there :p


Ya O'Reilly. The Thought being only provable by observing the Act, of course.
Just about every bit of evil nuttiness you have noted, including just about every instance of it being 'justified' through culture, or religion, has an element of 'I'm better than thou' to it.

( The Abid/Sayid dichtomy was a great example ).

Enforcing a bit of humility upon everyone(including myself, obviously) strikes me as a Good Idea.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Common Territories wrote: Though the next time you see an ignorant Atheist you can simply tell him that Atheism is a faith as well, only difference is that different atheists believe in separate things; such as the basic "No God" principle, some believe in an after life without a god, reincarnation, and other sorts of beliefs.

Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm

Divair wrote:
Czechanada wrote:
On the contrary, economics affects religion. Sociological studies suggest an inverse correlation between SES and religiosity.

That I agree with, but his point that religion affects economics is absurd.


Pretty much.
"Don't lend money it's evil!" - The Catholics
"Lend money, it's fine." - The Protestants

/ suddenly huge economic growth in protestant countries

"The pope just heard god said it's ok to lend money btw! GO GO GO!" - The Catholics
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm

Common Territories wrote:Though the next time you see an ignorant Atheist you can simply tell him that Atheism is a faith as well,


"Faith: noun:

2. belief that is not based on proof

3. belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion

5. a system of religious belief"


No, atheism is not a faith.
Last edited by Ovisterra on Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Common Territories wrote: Though the next time you see an ignorant Atheist you can simply tell him that Atheism is a faith as well, only difference is that different atheists believe in separate things; such as the basic "No God" principle, some believe in an after life without a god, reincarnation, and other sorts of beliefs.

Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.

Missed that. Good catch.

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:32 pm

Divair wrote:
Czechanada wrote:
On the contrary, economics affects religion. Sociological studies suggest an inverse correlation between SES and religiosity.

That I agree with, but his point that religion affects economics is absurd.


I know. My post was directed towards him.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:33 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Divair wrote:That I agree with, but his point that religion affects economics is absurd.


Pretty much.
"Don't lend money it's evil!" - The Catholics
"Lend money, it's fine." - The Protestants

/ suddenly huge economic growth in protestant countries

"The pope just heard god said it's ok to lend money btw! GO GO GO!" - The Catholics

Quite funny to watch.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:33 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Did you not see what I posted? Denmark, Norway and Sweden always appear in the top 10 of the lists of GDP per capita.

He's immune to facts.


Shit.

I got nothing.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Europa Concordis
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Oct 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Europa Concordis » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:34 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
I don't see why I Shouldn't mock someone for believing silly things, nor consider myself superior to them for believing evil things.


Well this entire discussion is pointless, primarily due to your intolerance, so it mus end.
Dyakovo wrote:And here you are declaring yourself better than them, and thus by your own logic an asshole...

Nope. I never declared myself better than them. I merely said they were assholes.
My logic is sound.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:34 pm

Ovisterra wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:He's immune to facts.


Shit.

I got nothing.

I know that feeling. If someone refuses to accept facts and logic.. what do you do? How do you end the debate?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:35 pm

Divair wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.

Missed that. Good catch.

I try to read through those posts as much as I can. They always try to slip something like that in there. :p
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Common Territories
Senator
 
Posts: 4704
Founded: Nov 08, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Common Territories » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:35 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Common Territories wrote: Though the next time you see an ignorant Atheist you can simply tell him that Atheism is a faith as well, only difference is that different atheists believe in separate things; such as the basic "No God" principle, some believe in an after life without a god, reincarnation, and other sorts of beliefs.

Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.


Your wrong. There are various beliefs held by Atheists that vary from person to person. Like I explained some believe in different things while the basic is yes as you stated the "No God" principle which most believe in if not all.

edit: Most have no belief for a deity while having other beliefs about the after life and other various things. I missed placing it above. Basically all atheists don't believe in a deity while some vary in what happens after that principle.
Last edited by Common Territories on Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:35 pm

Common Territories wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.


Your wrong. There are various beliefs held by Atheists that vary from person to person. Like I explained some believe in different things while the basic is yes as you stated the "No God" principle which most believe in if not all.

Gnostic atheists are an absurdly small minority.

So no.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:36 pm

Ovisterra wrote:
Scholencia wrote:yet there is a colleration. there are scuentific studies. i know it is hard tp accept that religious countries are far more economic successful. i mean what do you think wgy everybody loves the sheiks.

athesrs countries lik north korea are third world countries.


Did you not see what I posted? Denmark, Norway and Sweden always appear in the top 10 of the lists of GDP per capita.

you didnt post anything about russia or ukraine and about poland just the unemployme.t ratio from who knows which year. i will post the facts frpm the ecb and imf when i ce home. plus i really can aswer on every ppst.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:36 pm

Divair wrote:
Ovisterra wrote:
Shit.

I got nothing.

I know that feeling. If someone refuses to accept facts and logic.. what do you do? How do you end the debate?

By ending it. Tsk tsk. That should be fairly obvious.
*goes forth to listen to one hand clapping*
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57902
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:36 pm

Common Territories wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.


Your wrong. There are various beliefs held by Atheists that vary from person to person. Like I explained some believe in different things while the basic is yes as you stated the "No God" principle which most believe in if not all.


No, atheists just don't believe in a god.
Is Not Believing in the pink unicorn an act of faith?
Is not believing that elvis is still alive "Just your opinion and equal of value since it's faith based"?
No ofcourse not.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:36 pm

Common Territories wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.


Your wrong.


Wikipedia wrote:Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.


No, you're wrong.
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
New Sapienta
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9298
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Sapienta » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:38 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
NERVUN wrote:There's a difference, and a massive one, between ridiculing someone and applying "societal pressure".


Serious now? Oh, but minor violence is ok?

And please tell me why the religious are ok for ridicule and not, say, black people? Or disabled? Or atheists?



When people say something ridiculous, they should be ridiculed.
It's almost tautologous.
I consider the theists claims ridiculous. Thus, I ridicule.
Anything less would be patronizing to them or doing them a disservice by misrepresenting how they sound to me.
I'm honest with them about how I find their claims.

You know the very idea of morality is an unfounded ridiculous claim?

Just my two cents.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 2:38 pm

Common Territories wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Atheism is lack of belief in a God/gods. So no.


Your wrong. There are various beliefs held by Atheists that vary from person to person. Like I explained some believe in different things while the basic is yes as you stated the "No God" principle which most believe in if not all.


The definition of atheism, as well as the etymology of the word, is simply a lack of belief of gods. Do not say atheism is a faith when the meaning of the word states otherwise.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Ifreann, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Neu California, Norse Inuit Union, Port Caverton, Reloviskistan, Tarsonis, The Two Jerseys, Umeria, Yutopia

Advertisement

Remove ads