NATION

PASSWORD

Should climate change deniers be disenfranchised?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:09 am

Raeyh wrote:
Divair wrote:What the fuck.


It's not that surprising. One of my science teachers in high school was a strong climate change skeptic. I'm sure they are plenty more.

Same here. And he was also...conservative! Seeing a pattern here?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:10 am

Free Soviets wrote:
Anacasppia wrote:Also, I'd think awareness of climate change/environmental issues is somewhat lacking in America. Taking action to build awareness is way more agreeable than disenfranchising any persons.

small problem. education doesn't help matters. it makes it worse.
the more educated the conservative american, the more vehemently they deny climate change.

I'm afraid I have to agree that education in today's America is f**ked up. I'm actually thinking more along the lines of advertising/promotional campaigns to inform people about stuff like climate change, maybe tell them about how it can and will affect them in practical terms, and how they can help curb it.
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:10 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
It's not that surprising. One of my science teachers in high school was a strong climate change skeptic. I'm sure they are plenty more.

Same here. And he was also...conservative! Seeing a pattern here?

The free market fairy will take care of it.



When our cities are flooded, our people are dying, and our resources are gone, of course.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:11 am

Anacasppia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:small problem. education doesn't help matters. it makes it worse.
the more educated the conservative american, the more vehemently they deny climate change.

I'm afraid I have to agree that education in today's America is f**ked up. I'm actually thinking more along the lines of advertising/promotional campaigns to inform people about stuff like climate change, maybe tell them about how it can and will affect them in practical terms, and how they can help curb it.

We need better parenting. Parenting holds more weight overall than school.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:12 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Anacasppia wrote:I'm afraid I have to agree that education in today's America is f**ked up. I'm actually thinking more along the lines of advertising/promotional campaigns to inform people about stuff like climate change, maybe tell them about how it can and will affect them in practical terms, and how they can help curb it.

We need better parenting. Parenting holds more weight overall than school.

Improving parenting will be a far larger challenge than improving education.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:13 am

Divair wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:We need better parenting. Parenting holds more weight overall than school.

Improving parenting will be a far larger challenge than improving education.

Both are intertwined, so not really.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:13 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Divair wrote:Improving parenting will be a far larger challenge than improving education.

Both are intertwined, so not really.

Improve education to improve the next generation of parents?

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:14 am

Hmm I suppose it only gets worse in the future...I mean, what can we expect from parents who've been through screwed up education? They'll only pass on the 'wrong' stuff.
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:15 am

Divair wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Both are intertwined, so not really.

Improve education to improve the next generation of parents?

Ehhh, little more complicated.

1) Bad parenting has a major cause: poverty.
2) Poverty has a major course (not the only, mind you): not enough skilled workers.
3) Not enough skilled workers has a major cause: bad education.
4) Bad education has a major cause: Poverty
5) Poverty contributes to bad parenting.

etc.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:15 am

Anacasppia wrote:Hmm I suppose it only gets worse in the future...I mean, what can we expect from parents who've been through screwed up education? They'll only pass on the 'wrong' stuff.

We need to start somewhere.

User avatar
Free Soviets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Soviets » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:16 am

Divair wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:small problem. education doesn't help matters. it makes it worse.
the more educated the conservative american, the more vehemently they deny climate change.

What the fuck.

i know, right? check this out (from a different paper - there are like a hundred of them out now):


Image
“Scientists predict that global warming may soon have big effects on the polar regions. I will describe some of these possible effects and, for each one, please say whether it would bother you a great deal, some, a little, or not at all if it actually happened.”

the more scientifically literate the conservative, the less concerned they are about what would happen with a 20 foot rise in sea levels. and not less concerned that it will happen, which would be bad enough, but less concerned by it.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:17 am

Free Soviets wrote:
Divair wrote:What the fuck.

i know, right? check this out (from a different paper - there are like a hundred of them out now):


Image
“Scientists predict that global warming may soon have big effects on the polar regions. I will describe some of these possible effects and, for each one, please say whether it would bother you a great deal, some, a little, or not at all if it actually happened.”

the more scientifically literate the conservative, the less concerned they are about what would happen with a 20 foot rise in sea levels. and not less concerned that it will happen, which would be bad enough, but less concerned by it.

How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:18 am

Divair wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:i know, right? check this out (from a different paper - there are like a hundred of them out now):


Image
“Scientists predict that global warming may soon have big effects on the polar regions. I will describe some of these possible effects and, for each one, please say whether it would bother you a great deal, some, a little, or not at all if it actually happened.”

the more scientifically literate the conservative, the less concerned they are about what would happen with a 20 foot rise in sea levels. and not less concerned that it will happen, which would be bad enough, but less concerned by it.

How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.

Image
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:19 am

Divair wrote:How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.


Because climate change is a political issue and not an educational issue.

User avatar
Free Soviets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Soviets » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:20 am

Anacasppia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:small problem. education doesn't help matters. it makes it worse.
the more educated the conservative american, the more vehemently they deny climate change.

I'm afraid I have to agree that education in today's America is f**ked up. I'm actually thinking more along the lines of advertising/promotional campaigns to inform people about stuff like climate change, maybe tell them about how it can and will affect them in practical terms, and how they can help curb it.

the problem explicitly isn't that education is fucked up. we are talking about people who are in fact able to do math and read, etc. the smart ones. for non-conservatives, increased education and awareness of climate change makes them more concerned. for conservatives, it makes them more sure that climate change isn't a problem.

this is a problem of psychology and ideology, not of information.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:20 am

Raeyh wrote:
Divair wrote:How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.


Because climate change is a political issue and not an educational issue.

I know. Many conservatives would deny just to be on the other side of the argument. But why would it increase as they become more educated?

User avatar
Anacasppia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1656
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Anacasppia » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:21 am

Free Soviets wrote:i know, right? check this out (from a different paper - there are like a hundred of them out now):


([url=http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/4884/figure1b.png]Image)[/url]
“Scientists predict that global warming may soon have big effects on the polar regions. I will describe some of these possible effects and, for each one, please say whether it would bother you a great deal, some, a little, or not at all if it actually happened.”

the more scientifically literate the conservative, the less concerned they are about what would happen with a 20 foot rise in sea levels. and not less concerned that it will happen, which would be bad enough, but less concerned by it.


HMM...so happens that I'm highly (if not extremely?) liberal.
Foederatae Anacaspiae
Federated States of Anacaspia
Factbook | Introduction | Federated States Military Forces


Call me Ana.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Don't you?
Anemos Major wrote:Forty-five men, thirty four tons, one crew cabin... anything could happen.

Mmm... it's getting hot in here.

User avatar
Free Soviets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Soviets » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:22 am

Raeyh wrote:
Divair wrote:How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.


Because climate change is a political issue and not an educational issue.

or, rather, because conservatives have a very difficult time seeing anything as something other than a political issue, and so what is a simple matter of fact becomes a matter of power struggle and tribal identity to them.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:23 am

Divair wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
Because climate change is a political issue and not an educational issue.

I know. Many conservatives would deny just to be on the other side of the argument. But why would it increase as they become more educated?


Simply that people who aren't as educated in science would have more doubts that they simply do not understand the subject. The more educated you are, the evidence you have that your view is correct.

User avatar
Sidhae
Minister
 
Posts: 2748
Founded: Sep 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Sidhae » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:23 am

I find the reason that some deny climate change is because promoting it often blatantly straddles the line of propaganda with a clear business interest underneath.

For example - global warming is caused by CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, therefore CO2 emissions are bad and should be reduced to prevent warming, therefore you should buy the new Honda Insight hybrid car to do your part in saving the world. That is how propaganda works - first create a problem (either fabricate it, or use an actual problem as in this case), then promote it, "raise awareness" (by sponsoring many researches that support your problem with scientific evidence, sponsoring apocalyptic films with unbelievably-horrendous disasters caused by your problem, sponsoring advertisement campaigns raising awareness of your problem), and finally, offer a solution by selling everyone your products who are supposedly made with countering that problem in mind.

No wonder many refuse to believe in global warming, considering how much this theme has been exploited to sell something.
Proud National Socialist. Blaming everything on the liberals since 2000.

The world is full of criminal enterprises and terrorist organizations. The most successful ones are known as states.

Life is like surfing the Internet - there's no meaning or purpose, yet you don't really want to quit either.

The fact that slaves are allowed to elect their masters does not abolish the division in masters and slaves.

Don't try to deride me by calling me an "-ist" or "-phobe" unless you are referring to a medical condition or are trying to compliment me.

Socially-liberal capitalist democracy DOES NOT equate to free society.

Contrary to popular belief, National Socialists aren't racists. They simply hate their own race less than others.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:26 am

Free Soviets wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
Because climate change is a political issue and not an educational issue.

or, rather, because conservatives have a very difficult time seeing anything as something other than a political issue, and so what is a simple matter of fact becomes a matter of power struggle and tribal identity to them.

I think it's a matter of their faulure to recognize REAL political issues. Bill Maher put it best.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Free Soviets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Soviets » Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:27 am

Divair wrote:But why would it increase as they become more educated?

the explanation we've been able to tease out from all of this is that the smarter and more educated ones are more aware of what their tribe is supposed to believe and they have more sophisticated abilities to rationalize and selectively ignore contrary evidence, etc. they are more engaged, so they know what their leaders are saying on the matter. and they know what news sources to avoid to keep from seeing stuff they disagree with presented fairly. and they know how to build giant conspiracy theories that let them believe whatever they want.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:28 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Divair wrote:How does this happen? I can't even begin to imagine what the hell caused this.

Image


Sorry...slightly off topic here but that pic...I am not understanding the theme..who is he? What's his thing?

Rubi - not a watcher of all that much TV....
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:30 am

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Image


Sorry...slightly off topic here but that pic...I am not understanding the theme..who is he? What's his thing?

Rubi - not a watcher of all that much TV....

Here you are my good sir.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:32 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Sorry...slightly off topic here but that pic...I am not understanding the theme..who is he? What's his thing?

Rubi - not a watcher of all that much TV....

Here you are my good sir.


Oh dear. All I needed to see was the "Ancient Aliens" on the tab on my browser to explain this guys haircut...

Thanks Mavorpen...
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aldygast, Betoni, Cachard Calia, Google [Bot], Honorlords, Narland, Senkaku

Advertisement

Remove ads