Constitution of Mankind

[The Holy Empires Embassy]

Scenario:
(Alien attack for instance )

Then i wouldnt want a dezentralisided liberal government!

There can be only one sane reason:
A strong Emperor! Kill the Xenos!

[Norsklow]

Fuck that shit. Just have one rule, "nothing shall be unlawful unless it directly harms or damages interests of non-consenting individual."

Way too vague and open to abuse. Imagine if a party like the GOP only had to abide by a rule like that.

Reagan. So what is the problem?

[Divair]

a dezentralisided

English please.

[Divair]

Way too vague and open to abuse. Imagine if a party like the GOP only had to abide by a rule like that.

Reagan. So what is the problem?

What about him?

[Long Island Nation]

- You lose your right to life if you commit a violent act.
- You have the right to life if you are a fetus late in pregnancy.
- You have the right to bear arms.
- You have the right to live in a nation that does whatever it damn well pleases no matter what one group trying to govern seven whole billion says.

[Wolfine]

Fuck that shit. Just have one rule, "nothing shall be unlawful unless it directly harms or damages interests of non-consenting individual."

So it's illegal to troll. D:

[Old Tyrannia]

I'm sorry, once again I'm completely failing to see your point.

Putting aside my opposition to world government in the first place, I think the key principals of my ideal global constitution would be:

1) The upholding of traditional authority throughout the world.
2) The right to freedom of speech and thought.
3) The right of all people to the basic neccesities of life, as well as to life itself.
4) The right of all living things to be treated with respect, and the condemnation of all forms of cruelty.
5) The obligation to protect the Earth's natural environment.

And no, I must confess that I do not believe any hypothetical constitution I would draw up for a united human race would be deemed acceptable to the rest of the human race.

The bolded, underlined, and italicized. My point is that you're wrong, and I've been trying to get you to see how and why you're wrong.

...
I'm sorry, but I just don't understand what you're trying to tell me. Why am I wrong, again?

Region was perhaps the wrong phrase. Culture may have been better.

Possibly, but how does that alter the basic question?
There are 2 bodies that claim to have traditional authority. They both have a reasonable weight of arguments at their side...

Which of the two bodies traditionally take precedence?

[Norsklow]

Reagan. So what is the problem?

What about him?

Jolly good time in history.

Way too vague and open to abuse. Imagine if a party like the GOP only had to abide by a rule like that

Actually, that makes it sound like a really good idea.

[The Emerald Dawn]

The bolded, underlined, and italicized. My point is that you're wrong, and I've been trying to get you to see how and why you're wrong.

...
I'm sorry, but I just don't understand what you're trying to tell me. Why am I wrong, again?

No, but I will wait while you go re-read it.

[Norsklow]

Which of the two bodies traditionally take precedence?

King George!

[The Holy Empires Embassy]

a dezentralisided

English please.

damn english! many words where singular and plural look alike and no distinction between female and male! How can you even survive with such an imprecise language?

Scenario:
(Alien attack for instance )

Then i wouldnt want a decentralised liberal government!

There can be only one sane reason:
A strong Emperor! Kill the Xenos!

fixed.

[Divair]

Jolly good time in history.

I don't know whether or not this is sarcasm.

[North California]

I'm sorry but I refuse to live under a planetary corporate police state.

Who says it'll be a police state?

Because free and open elections on a planetary scale would be practically impossible. The government would find it much easier to just have no elections.

[Divair]

Because free and open elections on a planetary scale would be practically impossible.

Why?

[Norsklow]

Jolly good time in history.

I don't know whether or not this is sarcasm.

No sarcasm. Jolly good,just like under Charles II. Or Billy Clinton, for that matter.

[Old Tyrannia]

Which of the two bodies traditionally take precedence?

King George!

Then His Majesty is the lawful authority.

[North California]

I'm sorry but I refuse to live under a planetary corporate police state.

Of course the way to escape a pseudo-fascist society is to create change through massive retaliation and violence against one's ideological foes. Because it's important that revolutions do exactly the kind of thing they were pissed off about in the first place, or else humanity might change for the better or whatever.

I'd abolish the world government, and work towards restoring all the countries back to the way they should be.

[Divair]

I don't know whether or not this is sarcasm.

No sarcasm. Jolly good,just like under Charles II. Or Billy Clinton, for that matter.

...

I..

No. I'm not even going to bother.

[Mavorpen]

-
- You have the right to life if you are a fetus late in pregnancy.

No thanks.

[Norsklow]

King George!

Then His Majesty is the lawful authority.

OIC:

OOC: My Traditionalism is better than yours. I've combined High Toryism with Carlism.

[Divair]

-
- You have the right to life if you are a fetus late in pregnancy.

No thanks.

I was more concerned about the death penalty.

[Yewhohohopia]

Of course the way to escape a pseudo-fascist society is to create change through massive retaliation and violence against one's ideological foes. Because it's important that revolutions do exactly the kind of thing they were pissed off about in the first place, or else humanity might change for the better or whatever.

I'd abolish the world government, and work towards restoring all the countries back to the way they should be.

Yeah yeah "the ends are so noble " fucking whatever.

[Great Nepal]

Fuck that shit. Just have one rule, "nothing shall be unlawful unless it directly harms or damages interests of non-consenting individual."

Way too vague and open to abuse. Imagine if a party like the GOP only had to abide by a rule like that.

Its supposed be constitution.
Further laws can be passed while remaining within boundaries set out by the constitution.

[North California]

Because free and open elections on a planetary scale would be practically impossible.

Why?

Because a 7 billion person election would be a procedual nightmare.

I mean, who really wants to count 7 billion votes?

Not to mention each cultural/regional group would vote in its own interests (if there even are elections) at the expense of others. Thus the only way to solve this would be forced migration or brainwashing. Both of which are morally questionable.

[Mavorpen]

I don't know whether or not this is sarcasm.

No sarcasm. Jolly good,just like under Charles II. Or Billy Clinton, for that matter.

The single reason why we performed decent in any way was because of compromise. You know, because the Democrats actually cared about making the country better, unlike the GOP today.