Why is homosexuality wrong?

[Vredlandia]

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_is_AIDS_so_common_in_homosexuals

I've seen better and more reliable sources.

[Mavorpen]

Actually, from the source he gave, no. The fact the source he gave is BS...

Blargh. Didn't see that before I posted.

Nigel Thornberry, is that you?

[Jormengand]

True love should have nothing to do with sex, you tell me, as well all know the real purpose of a man mating with a woman is to produce a baby to carry on the family name, unless it's for pleasure which corrupts love.

That's never been the real purpose.

Actually, though I hate to play the devil, it kind of is.

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

True love should have nothing to do with sex, you tell me,

Who tells you that?

as well all know the real purpose of a man mating with a woman is to produce a baby to carry on the family name, unless it's for pleasure which corrupts love.

How does pleasure corrupt love?

So what's the purpose of a man sleeping with a man?

Endorphin release and/or love.

It's just disgusting and inhumane, simple as that,

What's disgusting and inhuman is discriminating against people simply because of their sexuality.

if liberals can tolerate homosexuals I think it's time fascists like me started tolerating cannibals because according to a liberal it's their "choice" and "hobby" of eating dead humans.

Corpses can't give consent, gay men can. Your false equivalency is false.

[Avenio]

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_is_AIDS_so_common_in_homosexuals

I've seen better and more reliable sources.

What, you mean an unsourced 'answer' page isn't reliable?

Unpossible!

[Mavorpen]

That's never been the real purpose.

Actually, though I hate to play the devil, it kind of is.

Nope, not for humans. It's a combination of social cohesion, pleasure, AND reproduction.

[Veceria]

True love should have nothing to do with sex, you tell me, as well all know the real purpose of a man mating with a woman is to produce a baby to carry on the family name, unless it's for pleasure which corrupts love.

So what's the purpose of a man sleeping with a man?

It's just disgusting and inhumane, simple as that, if liberals can tolerate homosexuals I think it's time fascists like me started tolerating cannibals because according to a liberal it's their "choice" and "hobby" of eating dead humans.

You. Are. Not. A. Fascist.

Real fascists aren't as ignorant as you are.

[Zottistan]

1) It's unnatural - The Aids virus is more aggressive and dominant in homosexual cases than heterosexual for a reason.

Almost everything in your house is unnatural. And AIDS is more common in gays because anal sex is one of the easiest ways to get it, and gay guys don't have vaginas.

2) The idea that it's cool to be gay, people choose to be gay because there is no such thing as a "gay gene" which also proves that it's artificial.

It proves that ideas can be wrong and that people can act like thing's they're not. Now, what about all those genuine gays out there?

Cannibalism or torturing your own body is possible and these stuff like homosexuality are unnatural.

Umm... wah? Please try to string together sentences that make sense in the future.

3) homosexuality is also related and encourages the party pop culture which is corrupt and degenerate.

No, stereotypical homosexuals promote pop culture (which, I'll grant you, is disgusting). But most homosexuals aren't stereotypical. Because most people generally aren't stereotypical.

4) Toleration of homosexuality encourages homosexuality, the more people accept it, the more popular gayism will become and generations yet unborn, when born will become more homosexual...Like I previously said, homosexuality is determined by the environment you grown up in!

I'd say the environment plays a significant factor, yeah. I still fail to see the problem in this. More homosexuality will lead to more tolerance of homosexuality which will lead to a better human race.
Also, "gayism"? Is that even a word?

[Raeyh]

When did we become 4chan?

Since Jesus descended from Heaven and declared, "HENCEFORTH, THIS SHALL BE 4CHAN!"

But 4chan hates sexuality. They kick out everyone who isn't a virgin. If that were the case, more people would side with my arguments.

[Jormengand]

Actually, though I hate to play the devil, it kind of is.

Nope, not for humans. It's a combination of social cohesion, pleasure, AND reproduction.

Actually, sex is the reason for pleasure, rather than the other way around. From an evolutionary standpoint, humans should simply survive to reproduce, and carry on like that.

[Farnhamia]

True love should have nothing to do with sex, you tell me, as well all know the real purpose of a man mating with a woman is to produce a baby to carry on the family name, unless it's for pleasure which corrupts love.

So what's the purpose of a man sleeping with a man?

It's just disgusting and inhumane, simple as that, if liberals can tolerate homosexuals I think it's time fascists like me started tolerating cannibals because according to a liberal it's their "choice" and "hobby" of eating dead humans.

Pleasure corrupts love, does it? This sounds like the "sour grapes" declaration of someone who's never had the pleasure. And stop trying to equate homosexuality to cannibalism. You know it's a false equivalence and no one here is buying it.

[Avenio]

Actually, though I hate to play the devil, it kind of is.

If it was the sole real purpose, then why aren't human females continuously fertile, like in rabbits?

[Mavorpen]

Since Jesus descended from Heaven and declared, "HENCEFORTH, THIS SHALL BE 4CHAN!"

But 4chan hates sexuality. They kick out everyone who isn't a virgin. If that were the case, more people would side with my arguments.

https://1-media-cdn.foolz.us/ffuuka/board/a/image/1336/93/1336934467929.jpg

So you agree your beliefs are really stupid?

[Tamriela]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

[Jormengand]

Actually, though I hate to play the devil, it kind of is.

If it was the sole real purpose, then why aren't human females continuously fertile, like in rabbits?

Tell me where I said that.

[Jormengand]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

Source.

[Veceria]

Since Jesus descended from Heaven and declared, "HENCEFORTH, THIS SHALL BE 4CHAN!"

But 4chan hates sexuality. They kick out everyone who isn't a virgin. If that were the case, more people would side with my arguments.

/b/ isn't all of 4chan. I guess people should know that already.

And I can't open that stuff you linked their. No security certificate available.

[Volnotova]

The anus/rectum is very susceptible to cuts and tears while conducting anal sex. This means there is a greater chance for infected body fluids to enter the blood stream. Sexuality has no direct influence in the prevalence of HIV/AIDS, it is the practices concerned with the sexuality.

Not all homosexuals are into anal sex(I for one am not), and there are many heterosexuals with HIV and many more that are into anal sex.

What is your problem?

Promiscuity - particularly, how many sexual partners one has had and the use of condoms (or lack therefor) in sexual transactions. It has been established that the average homosexual male has considerably more partners than the average heterosexual male in their lifetime, often in high risk locales such as bathhouses, sex clubs, and public places such as parks and bathrooms.

So, let's assume you are right: So what? STDs still occur among heterosexuals.

Gender - Male homosexuals are the group most at-risk for HIV and other STIs. This is largely due to the high prevalence of the virus in semen as opposed to vaginal fluids, and the type of sexual activity associated with this group, e.g. anal sex.

Associated. Again, I know many gay people that are not into anal sex(just like me).

The use of illegal drugs, such as methamphetamine, which lower inhibitions and impair judgment - and weaken the immune system - appears to be considerably higher in the MSM community than the heterosexual and lesbian groups.

And use of those drugs also occurs among heterosexuals.

The existence of a minority within the gay community that willingly seeks infection with HIV and other STDs. Often referred to as "bug chasers", these men communicate on message boards and dating sites specifically oriented around voluntary infection with STIs for erotic and other reasons. Such a phenomenon does not appear to exist in the heterosexual community.

To you.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_is_AIDS_so_common_in_homosexuals

There's your evidence and my summary based on the evidence is, homosexuality is unnatural therefore vulnerable to more diseases, etc.

Cannibalism like homosexuality is also possible, but we all know how unnatural it is.

No it's not unnatural. Cannibalism has not only been observed in other species, but also human societies, even in the 21st century.

A lot of people are bi-sexual and they all go partying. People do disgusting things when their drunk.

I have no idea what you are (trying to) insinuating here, but if you think I engage in what you call "dishusting" things (acts) because I am drunk than you are nothing short of wrong, I am not even into alcohol in the first place.

[Mavorpen]

Nope, not for humans. It's a combination of social cohesion, pleasure, AND reproduction.

Actually, sex is the reason for pleasure, rather than the other way around. From an evolutionary standpoint, humans should simply survive to reproduce, and carry on like that.

No, pleasure evolved for a multitude of reasons, not limited to sex.

[Enadail]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

When someone asks for a source, they want something credible. It should be evidentiary, not arbitrary. Anyone can write anything they want on answers; I could write that you're actually an alien from Venus who has 3 heads. Does that make it true?

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

What? That makes no sense at all.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

You obviously don't understand how environmental factors work. By the way, at what age did you choose to be heterosexual?

[Of the Free Socialist Territories]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

That's because WikiAnswers is not a scientific source any more than a pre-school child is a qualified literary critic.

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

That doesn't make any sense.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

Can you prove any of this pseudo-scientific crap or is it just conjecture divorced from reality?

[Farnhamia]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

Why do you type "bvllshit"? You obviously mean "bullshit," why use such a silly disguise?

[Raeyh]

But 4chan hates sexuality. They kick out everyone who isn't a virgin. If that were the case, more people would side with my arguments.

/b/ isn't all of 4chan. I guess people should know that already.

And I can't open that stuff you linked their. No security certificate available.

http://postimage.org/image/rj8gp5uor/

[Mavorpen]

If it was the sole real purpose, then why aren't human females continuously fertile, like in rabbits?

Tell me where I said that.

Uh? That's what I'm talking about. The individual didn't say it was ONE OF the real reasons, he said it was THE real reason.

[Veceria]

Now it's a new trend, I say something they ask for a source, I don't give them a source they cry so I give them a source they claim it's bvllshit.

The environment is like a stage and the choice part is a probability.

If the environment is lenient towards homosexuality then the probability that a man chooses to be gay in that environment is going to be higher.

The 'source' you gave us is the same as if you just answered yourself, one more time.