Why is homosexuality wrong?

[Veceria]

Well, according to some people on this forum homosexual hadnt been discriminated in the past and yet they didnt demand equal right as the heteros. So, the one conclusion is that they considered homo marriages as immoral or homosexuals didnt exist in some sociteies like the Mayas or Inchas.

Wait, what?

Most logical statement ever, isn't it?

[Ammar]

Destroy their testicals, causing them to not be able to reproduce, then proceed to take away rights simply because they can't reproduce?

Excellent. Why did we not think of this one before?

We now have a weapon against the Republicans.

[Sidhae]

The homosexual Alexander entered a hetero marriage. Are you sure that nobody forced him to marry a women?

Something forced him to. Like, I don't know, the desire for an heir?

Where on Earth did you get that Alexander the Great was a homosexual to begin with? That stupid Hollywood movie doesn't count...

Alexander was a Greek. That means it was acceptable in his culture for a man to fuck anything with two legs and a pulse as long as he was the active partner, his activities did not constitute adultery and was in line with several different smaller taboos. There is no mention of him having an exclusive preference for males, merely texts that suggest he had erotic relationships with men, like many of his contemporaries did (which were quite distinct from the rough gay sex many these days tend to imagine). Greek paederasty as practiced by Alexander's contemporaries was something whole different from this modern "gay" business. For a start, it would not force a particular identity and behaviours associated with it on those involved. A paederast was still expected to follow traditional gender role of a male, which included taking a female for wife and fulfilling his marital duties with her to his best effort.

[Objectiveland]

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

[Mavorpen]

Brainwashing by torture. Mehehehehe.

No, because I believe in the right-to-swing-fist-ends-where-nose-begins philosophy.

I read that as "right-to-fist." MFW.

[Volnotova]

Why is your name "objectiveland" when you make posts like this, that are subjective?

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

A cure, lol?

Get lost you creep, I don't need to be "cured". This is the kind of creepy "logic" mass murderers and tyrants have used troughout history to eradicate entire groups and target them for prolonged humiliation, exploitation and eventual extermination.

I intended to say this earlier, until I realised that the twisted choice of words wasn't unfortunate but rather intentional.

[Raeyh]

Just a thought, so being gay is said to be a sin, so how do all those priests get away with molesting little boys?

They got another priest to do the sacrament of reconciliation.

You have nothing to lose but an inexplicable desire to hump people.

I repeat:
No.

You wouldn't be so attached to sex if you didn't have that genetic defect.

[Samuraikoku]

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

[Jormengand]

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_an ... _evolution

Read the bit about the gay uncle theory.

[Divair]

You wouldn't be so attached to sex if you didn't have that genetic defect.

Listen to me: No.

[Farnhamia]

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

When did homosexuals become the majority of humanity? The race is in no danger whatsoever of dying out because of declining population.

[Mavorpen]

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

It's not. Please, visit ANY medical dictionary.

1. defect /de·fect/ (de´fekt) an imperfection, failure, or absence

If you had any logical sense, you would immediately recognize that "imperfection" is subjective. It has jack shit to do with survival in the medical sense.

[Jormengand]

No, because I believe in the right-to-swing-fist-ends-where-nose-begins philosophy.

I read that as "right-to-fist." MFW.

Oh, I certainly have a right to fist, as should everyone of majority As in age (or even not-quite-majority)

[Ifreann]

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

Being gay doesn't prevent reproduction, as has been explained in this thread. Further, even if that were the case, there are more ways to ensure the survival of the species than popping out a sprog or two.

[Strykla]

No, because I believe in the right-to-swing-fist-ends-where-nose-begins philosophy.

I read that as "right-to-fist." MFW.

LOL! I don't know if anyone can fist that far.

[Divair]

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

Also homosexuals are, and always will be, a minority. It won't cause a major collapse in birth rates.

[Raeyh]

You wouldn't be so attached to sex if you didn't have that genetic defect.

Listen to me: No.

I don't understand why you would protect sex.

[Objectiveland]

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

In-vitro wasn't available to humans hundreds of thousands of years ago.

[Divair]

Listen to me: No.

I don't understand why you would protect sex.

Listen to me: No.

If you want to remove your sexual desires, be my guest. You don't fuck with my body or my future family's body.

[Ifreann]

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

In-vitro wasn't available to humans hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Nor were the works of Ayn Rand. So what?

[Dominion of Nova Scotia]

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

It most certianly is objective. I order for the human race to survive it must reproduce. "It acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction." Therefore acting in contradiction to survival is defective.

Unless reproduction =/= survival of a species.

[Divair]

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

In-vitro wasn't available to humans hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Irrelevant.

[Mavorpen]

Listen to me: No.

I don't understand why you would protect sex.

Because I like being a sexually reproducing mammal.

[Ammar]

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

In-vitro wasn't available to humans hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Well now it is.You no longer have a leg to stand on. Besides,how many homos exist on this planet?

[Jormengand]

In-vitro fertilization. Your argument is invalid.

In-vitro wasn't available to humans hundreds of thousands of years ago.

Stop ignoring my posts. Also, it is now. And time machines are as of yet uninvented.