Why is homosexuality wrong?

[Ifreann]

I find it interesting that God says "Man shall not lay with man," but dosen't say ''Woman shall not lay with woman."

Because lesbians are hawt. And no, you can't watch.

Bah, I'll have my own lesbian sex. With blackjack. And hookers!

[Mavorpen]

...I've been gone too long.

The name should have been a clue, but understandable. Check his post history (warning: it's dangerous)

I did. Not enough German porn.

[Mavorpen]

Because lesbians are hawt. And no, you can't watch.

Bah, I'll have my own lesbian sex. With blackApplejack. And hookers!

Fixed.

[Ammar]

If you're referring to the Bible, I think that God disapproves of homosexuality because gay people can't reproduce.

He dosen't disapprove of lesbians though.

[Divair]

Because lesbians are hawt. And no, you can't watch.

Bah, I'll have my own lesbian sex. With blackjack. And hookers!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBduNcf1eQc

[Objectiveland]

A genetic defect is niether right nor wrong. The problem is to understand the cause, and the more we understand these biological factors, the closer we get to being able to change them.

Why is your name "objectiveland" when you make posts like this, that are subjective?

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

[Scholencia]

So, do you agree that homosexuals in the past followed the mainstream believes of the societies and considered gay marriages as immoral?

No? They didn't give a shit about it.

Alexander the Great says otherwise, according to you he wanted a heir. So, if homosexuals had nt problem in past for not having marrages why do they want now?

[Divair]

Bah, I'll have my own lesbian sex. With blackApplejack. And hookers!

Fixed.

ಠ_ಠ

[Mavorpen]

If you're referring to the Bible, I think that God disapproves of homosexuality because gay people can't reproduce.

He dosen't disapprove of lesbians though.

It also doesn't say that Jesus wasn't a Velociraptor.

[Raeyh]

A genetic defect is niether right nor wrong. The problem is to understand the cause, and the more we understand these biological factors, the closer we get to being able to change them.

By that logic we can turn heterosexuals into homos because it is a genetic defect.

Or we could remove sexual desire entirely and rely on logic to decide when it is a good time to have children rather than instinct.

[Divair]

By that logic we can turn heterosexuals into homos because it is a genetic defect.

Or we could remove sexual desire entirely and rely on logic to decide when it is a good time to have children rather than instinct.

Let's do none of the above.

[Mavorpen]

Why is your name "objectiveland" when you make posts like this, that are subjective?

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

[Jormengand]

Why is your name "objectiveland" when you make posts like this, that are subjective?

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

Correct. However, it is neither genetic (or it'd go damned quick) nor a defect. Thus, it need not be "cured."

[Jormengand]

Using science. Many studies strongly indicate that homosexuality is biological rather than a lifestyle choice. Scientents are working on identifing the cause and where science leads, technology follows. Hopefully this will lead to cures possibly in utero. A good place for you to start reading is http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/gay-br ... th-defect/

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

Only it's not a disorder either.

[Mavorpen]

Fixed.

ಠ_ಠ

You're welcome to join.

[Farnhamia]

Was formal adoption even a thing 2000 years ago? Could anyone actually adopt a child?

Only royals, no?

The only one I know about was the Roman practice and it was a well-established one. Confined to the aristocracy, I suspect, as the regular folks didn't lack for children. The adopted son - females were never adopted out - assumed a name in his new family but added his old surname in adjectival form. For instance, Scipio Aemilianus: He was born the younger son of Lucius Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus, the conqueror of Macedonia, and fought when he was 17 years old by his father's side at the Battle of Pydna, which decided the fate of Macedonia and made northern Greece subject to Rome. He was adopted by Publius Cornelius Scipio, the eldest son of Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus, and his name was changed to Publius Cornelius Scipio Aemilianus. Nice fellow, though a trifle given to melancholy.

[Mavorpen]

That's nice, but apparently you don't know that a defect is a subjective term. That's why scientists and medical professionals use the term disorder.

Only it's not a disorder either.

I'm trying to go by a pace where he can keep up.

[Raeyh]

Or we could remove sexual desire entirely and rely on logic to decide when it is a good time to have children rather than instinct.

Let's do none of the above.

If it were possible, it would be the best option.

[Jormengand]

Or we could remove sexual desire entirely and rely on logic to decide when it is a good time to have children rather than instinct.

Let's do none of the above.

Good call. Trying to "cure" sexual feelings is silly, and I feel such people should be cured of such beliefs.

[Divair]

ಠ_ಠ

You're welcome to join.

[Scholencia]

yes. In every society from the existance of humanity there have been homosexual persons according to the liberal agenda. so there have been revolts of slaves in the past who fought fir more rights. why havent the gays in past fought for their rights to?

I repeat:
Saudi Arabia.

What is with Saudi Arabia?

[Farnhamia]

Because lesbians are hawt. And no, you can't watch.

Bah, I'll have my own lesbian sex. With blackjack. And hookers!

I didn't say you couldn't watch.

[Divair]

Let's do none of the above.

If it were possible, it would be the best option.

No.

[Ifreann]

Was formal adoption even a thing 2000 years ago? Could anyone actually adopt a child?

Only royals, no?

Maybe. Or other people with something worth leaving to an heir. I mean, I'd imagine that one could "adopt" a dead family member's kids without anyone raising an eyebrow. There were probably times and places where you could buy some street urchin's baby for yourself. I don't see why gays would be excluded from those things in those sort of times.

[Divair]

I repeat:
Saudi Arabia.

What is with Saudi Arabia?

yes, but 2000 years ago slaves were eiotin because they were feeling discriminated. why havent gays revolted in ancient american societies?

There are no gay pride parades in Saudi Arabia. Obviously they're treated equally there, right?