CVT Temp wrote:So it's wrong to have gay sex if you don't want to have gay sex? Okay.
this is not what he said but it is what most of us would agree is true.
Advertisement

by Sociobiology » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:05 pm
CVT Temp wrote:So it's wrong to have gay sex if you don't want to have gay sex? Okay.

by Mavorpen » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:05 pm
Objectiveland wrote:
Philosophical claims are different. I am using an objectivist philosophy. I would suggest you check your premiss.

by Condunum » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:06 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Objectiveland wrote:
Philosophical claims are different. I am using an objectivist philosophy. I would suggest you check your premiss.
No, you are not. You are citing a PHILOSOPHICAL CLAIM, and attempting to use that citation in order to justify your objectivist philosophy. The problem? The philosophical claim that Ayn Rand makes has been made before, and the conclusions were different. Thus, Ayn Rand's philosophy about morality is subjective, and your beliefs are in no way objective.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:07 pm
Condunum wrote:Mavorpen wrote:
No, you are not. You are citing a PHILOSOPHICAL CLAIM, and attempting to use that citation in order to justify your objectivist philosophy. The problem? The philosophical claim that Ayn Rand makes has been made before, and the conclusions were different. Thus, Ayn Rand's philosophy about morality is subjective, and your beliefs are in no way objective.
Completely relevant.
.gif)
Samuraikoku wrote:Your Honor, he said "My views". Therefore, it's his views, logically. And since they're are his views, the views of a single subject, his views are subjective.
http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=6262083

by Objectiveland » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:08 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Objectiveland wrote:
Not if sex is between one worthy of receiving and one worthy of providing sex. "Sex, to a rational man…is an expression of self-esteem—a celebration of himself and of existence and for this man (or woman) sex is properly a physical expression of romantic love. Celebration of one's own life and of existence is essential to promoting one's happiness; thus, it is moral to make choices that allow oneself this celebration and immoral to deny or negate it."Ayn Rand, "Of Living Death," The Objectivist, Oct. 1968,
So what you're saying is, rape is moral.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:09 pm

by Gauthier » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:09 pm

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:10 pm

by Mavorpen » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:11 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:Condunum wrote:Completely relevant.
The previous record sustains this objection, Counselor.

by Mavorpen » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:13 pm
"Sex, to a rational man…is an expression of self-esteem—a celebration of himself and of existence and for this man (or woman) sex is properly a physical expression of romantic love. Celebration of one's own life and of existence is essential to promoting one's happiness; thus, it is moral to make choices that allow oneself this celebration and immoral to deny or negate it."Ayn Rand, "Of Living Death," The Objectivist, Oct. 1968,

by Divair » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:13 pm

by Objectiveland » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:13 pm

by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:14 pm

by Mavorpen » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:15 pm


by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:15 pm

by Objectiveland » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:15 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Objectiveland wrote:
of course not force cannot be used."Sex, to a rational man…is an expression of self-esteem—a celebration of himself and of existence and for this man (or woman) sex is properly a physical expression of romantic love. Celebration of one's own life and of existence is essential to promoting one's happiness; thus, it is moral to make choices that allow oneself this celebration and immoral to deny or negate it."Ayn Rand, "Of Living Death," The Objectivist, Oct. 1968,
In other words, ANY decision to make a choice that allows you to engage in dominating sex with a female is moral. Putting words in Ayn Rand's mouth, are we?

by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:15 pm

by Jormengand » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:16 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:16 pm

by Mavorpen » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:16 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Objectiveland wrote:
of course not force cannot be used."Sex, to a rational man…is an expression of self-esteem—a celebration of himself and of existence and for this man (or woman) sex is properly a physical expression of romantic love. Celebration of one's own life and of existence is essential to promoting one's happiness; thus, it is moral to make choices that allow oneself this celebration and immoral to deny or negate it."Ayn Rand, "Of Living Death," The Objectivist, Oct. 1968,
In other words, ANY decision to make a choice that allows you to engage in dominating sex with a female is moral. Even worse, she essentially says that to deny the choice of a male to rape a female, it's immoral. Putting words in Ayn Rand's mouth, are we?

by Condunum » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:17 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Objectiveland wrote:
of course not force cannot be used."Sex, to a rational man…is an expression of self-esteem—a celebration of himself and of existence and for this man (or woman) sex is properly a physical expression of romantic love. Celebration of one's own life and of existence is essential to promoting one's happiness; thus, it is moral to make choices that allow oneself this celebration and immoral to deny or negate it."Ayn Rand, "Of Living Death," The Objectivist, Oct. 1968,
In other words, ANY decision to make a choice that allows you to engage in dominating sex with a female is moral. Even worse, she essentially says that to deny the choice of a male to rape a female, it's immoral. Putting words in Ayn Rand's mouth, are we?

by Objectiveland » Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:17 pm
Advertisement
Advertisement