NATION

PASSWORD

Gender titles to be scrapped in Brighton.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should gender neutral titles be introduced?

Yes
164
39%
No
252
61%
 
Total votes : 416

User avatar
Alaje
Minister
 
Posts: 2542
Founded: Oct 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaje » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:19 pm

Zaras wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Yes that's exactly what I'm saying. Exactly that.


Since you've called transgenderism a defect, yeah, you are saying they should be treated differently.

People that are ill are treated differently because they need help, they haven't an appropriate mental or physical state.
I'm a Flamingo
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Progressivism, Atheism, Centrism, Kemalism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Feminism, LGBT

I've been: Communist , Fascist

Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.82

Excess of liberty, whether it lies in the state or individuals, seems only to pass into excess of slavery. - Plato

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:19 pm

Zaras wrote:
Delanshar wrote:
A sig isn't a post smartass


If you can't be arsed to read a sig, it's reasonable to doubt whether you can be arsed to read posts.


A sig generally has nothing to do with a given discussion, thus reading it is usually a pointless waste of time.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Zaras
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7415
Founded: Nov 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaras » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:20 pm

North California wrote:
Zaras wrote:
If politicians get this passed, they'll have more time to deal with more pressing issues. The only reason they might be stuck on it is because of certain people.


They could ignore it.


Top solution there, ignoring it. It's so brilliant.

Instead of making an argument, you just I'm "blundering into a thread and I'm privileged"


1. When you said tax dollars, why shouldn't I assume you didn't read the OP?
2. Yeah, given that you want to ignore the issues facing transgendered persons, you are privileged.

What does my signature have to do with anything. I'm not mad that you formed an opinion, I'm mad that they are based off of nothing really other than that I don't agree with you on politics, which is rather shallow.


It's NSG. Whether somebody agrees with my politics is the main thing I have to go on.

I never said my opinions are perfect, but at least I don't them in everyone's face


Missing a verb there.

and talk about how they don't know shit about taxes and British pounds.


No, but you talk about how you don't care about transgendered people's issues because they don't affect you.
Bythyrona wrote:
Zaras wrote:Democratic People's Republic of Glorious Misty Mountain Hop.
The bat in the middle commemmorates their crushing victory in the bloody Battle of Evermore, where the Communists were saved at the last minute by General "Black Dog" Bonham of the Rock 'n Roll Brigade detonating a levee armed with only four sticks and flooding the enemy encampment. He later retired with honours and went to live in California for the rest of his life before ascending to heaven.

Best post I've seen on NS since I've been here. :clap:
Factbook
RP 1, RP 2, RP 3, RP 4, RP 5
ADS, UDL, GFN member
Political compass (old), Political compass (new)
Bottle, telling it like it is.
Risottia, on lolbertarianism.

User avatar
Zaras
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7415
Founded: Nov 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaras » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:20 pm

Delanshar wrote:
Zaras wrote:
If you can't be arsed to read a sig, it's reasonable to doubt whether you can be arsed to read posts.


A sig generally has nothing to do with a given discussion, thus reading it is usually a pointless waste of time.


In this case it isn't.
Bythyrona wrote:
Zaras wrote:Democratic People's Republic of Glorious Misty Mountain Hop.
The bat in the middle commemmorates their crushing victory in the bloody Battle of Evermore, where the Communists were saved at the last minute by General "Black Dog" Bonham of the Rock 'n Roll Brigade detonating a levee armed with only four sticks and flooding the enemy encampment. He later retired with honours and went to live in California for the rest of his life before ascending to heaven.

Best post I've seen on NS since I've been here. :clap:
Factbook
RP 1, RP 2, RP 3, RP 4, RP 5
ADS, UDL, GFN member
Political compass (old), Political compass (new)
Bottle, telling it like it is.
Risottia, on lolbertarianism.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:21 pm

Alaje wrote:
Zaras wrote:
Since you've called transgenderism a defect, yeah, you are saying they should be treated differently.

People that are ill are treated differently because they need help, they haven't an appropriate mental or physical state.

STILL waiting on you to back this up.

Also, you do know that "appropriate" is subjective, right?
Last edited by Mavorpen on Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:21 pm

Zaras wrote:
In this case it isn't.


He would have no way of knowing that without reading every single sig, which is a waste of time. Suggesting that since he doesn't read every persons sig he isn't reading posts is ridiculous.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Zaras
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7415
Founded: Nov 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaras » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:21 pm

Alaje wrote:
Zaras wrote:
Since you've called transgenderism a defect, yeah, you are saying they should be treated differently.

People that are ill are treated differently because they need help, they haven't an appropriate mental or physical state.


Oh, there you go again with that crap. Stop comparing transgendered persons to people who are ill. You don't get to decide what an appropriate mental or physical state is, especially since you can't tell that using conservapedia in a debate is an automatic loss for you.
Bythyrona wrote:
Zaras wrote:Democratic People's Republic of Glorious Misty Mountain Hop.
The bat in the middle commemmorates their crushing victory in the bloody Battle of Evermore, where the Communists were saved at the last minute by General "Black Dog" Bonham of the Rock 'n Roll Brigade detonating a levee armed with only four sticks and flooding the enemy encampment. He later retired with honours and went to live in California for the rest of his life before ascending to heaven.

Best post I've seen on NS since I've been here. :clap:
Factbook
RP 1, RP 2, RP 3, RP 4, RP 5
ADS, UDL, GFN member
Political compass (old), Political compass (new)
Bottle, telling it like it is.
Risottia, on lolbertarianism.

User avatar
Zaras
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7415
Founded: Nov 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zaras » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:21 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Zaras wrote:
In this case it isn't.


He would have no way of knowing that without reading every single sig, which is a waste of time. Suggesting that since he doesn't read every persons sig he isn't reading posts is ridiculous.


Not all sigs are so huge that they take too long to read.
Bythyrona wrote:
Zaras wrote:Democratic People's Republic of Glorious Misty Mountain Hop.
The bat in the middle commemmorates their crushing victory in the bloody Battle of Evermore, where the Communists were saved at the last minute by General "Black Dog" Bonham of the Rock 'n Roll Brigade detonating a levee armed with only four sticks and flooding the enemy encampment. He later retired with honours and went to live in California for the rest of his life before ascending to heaven.

Best post I've seen on NS since I've been here. :clap:
Factbook
RP 1, RP 2, RP 3, RP 4, RP 5
ADS, UDL, GFN member
Political compass (old), Political compass (new)
Bottle, telling it like it is.
Risottia, on lolbertarianism.

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:22 pm

Zaras wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
The difference is that a post is expected to be immediately relevant a sig is applied to every post regardless of whether or not it's pertinent to the discussion at hand.


Steel Magnolia's sig is pertinent to the discussion at hand.


A fact which you would only learn by reading it. My point is that I don't just read everyone's sig for fun.

Anyway, if your complaining about me not reading someones sig then I think it's fair to say you've run out of legitimate rebuttals about the actual topic at hand.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:22 pm

Zaras wrote:Oh, there you go again with that crap. Stop comparing transgendered persons to people who are ill. You don't get to decide what an appropriate mental or physical state is, especially since you can't tell that using conservapedia in a debate is an automatic loss for you.


You keep doing that "you did this thing therefore everything else you have to say is invalid." It's immature and it's not advancing the dialogue.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:23 pm

Zaras wrote:
Not all sigs are so huge that they take too long to read.


Irrelevant.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Alaje
Minister
 
Posts: 2542
Founded: Oct 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaje » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:24 pm

Zaras wrote:
Alaje wrote:People that are ill are treated differently because they need help, they haven't an appropriate mental or physical state.


Oh, there you go again with that crap. Stop comparing transgendered persons to people who are ill. You don't get to decide what an appropriate mental or physical state is, especially since you can't tell that using conservapedia in a debate is an automatic loss for you.


Yes, but I'm supposed to take your word on everything right? Liberal is correct because Liberal is correct, amirite?
Last edited by Alaje on Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm a Flamingo
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Progressivism, Atheism, Centrism, Kemalism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Feminism, LGBT

I've been: Communist , Fascist

Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.82

Excess of liberty, whether it lies in the state or individuals, seems only to pass into excess of slavery. - Plato

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:25 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Zaras wrote:Oh, there you go again with that crap. Stop comparing transgendered persons to people who are ill. You don't get to decide what an appropriate mental or physical state is, especially since you can't tell that using conservapedia in a debate is an automatic loss for you.


You keep doing that "you did this thing therefore everything else you have to say is invalid." It's immature and it's not advancing the dialogue.

Neither is, "It's a defect, because I say it is." And yet, here you are.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:26 pm

Alaje wrote:
Zaras wrote:
Oh, there you go again with that crap. Stop comparing transgendered persons to people who are ill. You don't get to decide what an appropriate mental or physical state is, especially since you can't tell that using conservapedia in a debate is an automatic loss for you.


Yes, but I'm supposed to take your word on everything right? Liberal is correct because Liberal is correct, amirite?

Pretty much.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:26 pm

Mavorpen wrote:Neither is, "It's a defect, because I say it is." And yet, here you are.


Actually I said "if it meets every single requirement to be considered a defect then it's a defect."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
North California
Minister
 
Posts: 2088
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby North California » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:27 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Alaje wrote:
Yes, but I'm supposed to take your word on everything right? Liberal is correct because Liberal is correct, amirite?

Pretty much.



If being serious: You proved his point
If being sarcastic: You made me laugh
I am a staunch supporter of Austrian Theory economics as defined by Ludwig von Mises, and I consider myself to be a libertarian and I support Ron Paul Gary Johnson. Basically, I am a capitalist revolutionary
Economic Left/Right: 6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.92

Everyone should watch this video

Factbook

Got a US-themed nation, and need a flag? This is the place

American Nationalist. Yet, anti-American government

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:27 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Neither is, "It's a defect, because I say it is." And yet, here you are.


Actually I said "if it meets every single requirement to be considered a defect then it's a defect."

My apologies. Your argument is thus, "It meets every requirement because I say it does."
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Brum Brum
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: May 04, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Brum Brum » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:27 pm

Either the people who proposed this have a sense of humour or are stupid! The titles are there for a reason , they are there so it is easier to identify who in the household the letter is adressed to and who you mean. If its Mr Atto they are male if its Mrs Atto its the wife! It seems to have worked for hundreds and thousands of years so why change it for some stupid supposed political correctness that in all likelihood most people in LGBT communities don't want! We had a case in Birmingham where we had a old building called the Saracens head and it was changed to St Nicholas Place because Saracens head supposed offended the muslims.... Strangely most muslims were not bothered and accepted the name as Saracens head and thought the change was stupid!

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:28 pm

Zaras wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
He would have no way of knowing that without reading every single sig, which is a waste of time. Suggesting that since he doesn't read every persons sig he isn't reading posts is ridiculous.


Not all sigs are so huge that they take too long to read.


Again, you'd only know how big a sig is by looking at it. And I wouldn't be looking at them anyway since 99.9 % are useless to a given discussion. Ergo it's a waste of time..

Nice job derailing the topic btw. Hypocrisy at it's finest, Considering you always accuse me of it.
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:28 pm

North California wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Pretty much.



If being serious: You proved his point
If being sarcastic: You made me laugh

In those cases, I'm almost always being sarcastic.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Alaje
Minister
 
Posts: 2542
Founded: Oct 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Alaje » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:28 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Alaje wrote:
Yes, but I'm supposed to take your word on everything right? Liberal is correct because Liberal is correct, amirite?

Pretty much.


And you applaud this hypocritic circular logic? Atleast I bothered to provide a link.

I'm not suprised to be honest, people don't have commonsense these days.
I'm a Flamingo
Likes: Corporatism, Market Socialism, Progressivism, Atheism, Centrism, Kemalism, Dirigisme

Dislikes: Capitalism, Liberalism, Conservatism, Libertarianism, Abortion, Feminism, LGBT

I've been: Communist , Fascist

Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.82

Excess of liberty, whether it lies in the state or individuals, seems only to pass into excess of slavery. - Plato

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:29 pm

Mavorpen wrote:My apologies. Your argument is thus, "It meets every requirement because I say it does."

Yeah that's about it. Of course I say it does because it's observably true but that's really secondary.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:30 pm

Alaje wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Pretty much.


And you applaud this hypocritic circular logic? Atleast I bothered to provide a link.

I'm not suprised to be honest, people don't have commonsense these days.


Do you know what sarcasm is?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:30 pm

Brum Brum wrote:Either the people who proposed this have a sense of humour or are stupid! The titles are there for a reason , they are there so it is easier to identify who in the household the letter is adressed to and who you mean. If its Mr Atto they are male if its Mrs Atto its the wife! It seems to have worked for hundreds and thousands of years so why change it for some stupid supposed political correctness that in all likelihood most people in LGBT communities don't want! We had a case in Birmingham where we had a old building called the Saracens head and it was changed to St Nicholas Place because Saracens head supposed offended the muslims.... Strangely most muslims were not bothered and accepted the name as Saracens head and thought the change was stupid!

if only we had another name we could use to help identify them

well, mr. and mrs. did not exist for hundreds and thousands of years, but for most of the years they did trans people were marginalized/near non-existent. and now they are not. and because of that it actually kind of does not work anymore. arguments to tradition are kind of dumb. ):
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Delanshar
Minister
 
Posts: 2510
Founded: Feb 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Delanshar » Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:30 pm

Brum Brum wrote:Either the people who proposed this have a sense of humour or are stupid! The titles are there for a reason , they are there so it is easier to identify who in the household the letter is adressed to and who you mean. If its Mr Atto they are male if its Mrs Atto its the wife! It seems to have worked for hundreds and thousands of years so why change it for some stupid supposed political correctness that in all likelihood most people in LGBT communities don't want! We had a case in Birmingham where we had a old building called the Saracens head and it was changed to St Nicholas Place because Saracens head supposed offended the muslims.... Strangely most muslims were not bothered and accepted the name as Saracens head and thought the change was stupid!


This ^
Map: http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/8805/delansharinlucerna14.jpg
Factbook: http://iiwiki.wikkii.net/wiki/Delanshar
USA, Israel, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Gay Rights
The EU, Anarchism, Globalism, Primitivism

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chernobyl and Pripyat, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Lysset, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Stellar Colonies, The Two Jerseys, Trivalve, Vikanias

Advertisement

Remove ads