NSG's Religious Census

[Abatael]

I have not heard of that one.

It Basiclly just the regular Orthodox church but the branch was started by the first archbishop saint Sava.

Is there any difference in the doctrine of the two?

[Mavorpen]

Believing in evolution is not unorthodox. I believe in evolution and creationism.

There's also theistic evolution.

Honestly, you might as well just believe in only creationism.

[Abatael]

Believing in evolution is not unorthodox. I believe in evolution and creationism.

There's also theistic evolution.

Honestly, you might as well just believe in only creationism.

Why?

[Mavorpen]

Honestly, you might as well just believe in only creationism.

Why?

There's no evidence for "theistic" evolution.

[Abatael]

Why?

There's no evidence for "theistic" evolution.

Yes, I believe there is.

[Mavorpen]

There's no evidence for "theistic" evolution.

Yes, there is.

Then present it, instead of claiming so. I'm also going to need you to publish said evidence in a peer reviewed paper.

[Abatael]

Yes, there is.

Then present it, instead of claiming so. I'm also going to need you to publish said evidence in a peer reviewed paper.

Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at mainline Protestant seminaries.

And "creationism" alone is vague, because there are many types of creationism beliefs.

[Mavorpen]

Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at mainline Protestant seminaries.

And "creationism" alone is vague, because there are many types of creationism beliefs.

So there's no evidence for theistic evolution...? I asked for evidence, not an explanation.

[Threlizdun]

Then present it, instead of claiming so. I'm also going to need you to publish said evidence in a peer reviewed paper.

Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at mainline Protestant seminaries.

And "creationism" alone is vague, because there are many types of creationism beliefs.

He asked for evidence, not a definition.

[Sedikal]

It Basiclly just the regular Orthodox church but the branch was started by the first archbishop saint Sava.

Is there any difference in the doctrine of the two?

No not really. Different patron saits but that's it honestly. Although I haven't given it to much thought since I was about 12 (age I started to become irreligious)

[Kintuckistan]

More Christians than atheist's? Wow.
I have more hope than anticipated

[Abatael]

Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at mainline Protestant seminaries.

And "creationism" alone is vague, because there are many types of creationism beliefs.

So there's no evidence for theistic evolution...? I asked for evidence, not an explanation.

Oh, I thought you meant that creationism and theistic evolution are the same. I misunderstood you.

[Mavorpen]

So there's no evidence for theistic evolution...? I asked for evidence, not an explanation.

Oh, I thought you meant that creationism and theistic evolution are the same. I misunderstood you.

I said they might as well be the same, because neither has any evidence.

[The God-Realm]

New Wicca.

[Abatael]

Oh, I thought you meant that creationism and theistic evolution are the same. I misunderstood you.

I said they might as well be the same, because neither has any evidence.

I see; I thought you meant they both believe in the same stuff, or that the differences between the two are negligible. Sorry about the confusion there.

[Kanag Republika]

Christian, more specifically the Baptist denomination.

[Ethel mermania]

Theistic Evolution says that God creates through evolution. Theistic Evolutionists vary in beliefs about how much God intervenes in the process. It accepts most or all of modern science, but it invokes God for some things outside the realm of science, such as the creation of the human soul. This position is promoted by the Pope and taught at mainline Protestant seminaries.

And "creationism" alone is vague, because there are many types of creationism beliefs.

So there's no evidence for theistic evolution...? I asked for evidence, not an explanation.

god exists, therefore he created evolution.

it is a self evident statement

if you dont believe in god, you believe the statement to be false. if you believe in god, it has to be true.

[Mavorpen]

So there's no evidence for theistic evolution...? I asked for evidence, not an explanation.

god exists, therefore he created evolution.

it is a self evident statement

if you dont believe in god, you believe the statement to be false. if you believe in god, it has to be true.

I get it already, there's no valid evidence.

[Ethel mermania]

god exists, therefore he created evolution.

it is a self evident statement

if you dont believe in god, you believe the statement to be false. if you believe in god, it has to be true.

I get it already, there's no valid evidence.

then why do you keep asking?

[Mavorpen]

I get it already, there's no valid evidence.

then why do you keep asking?

Read through the ENTIRE discussion, instead of reading that one single post.

[Agymnum]

I get it already, there's no valid evidence.

then why do you keep asking?

I think he's questioning why you would believe, then?

If there's no empirical evidence for something, then believing in it is ludicrous. It would be like if someone believed that ponies could actually speak English and fly, and that they controlled the weather. No proof = No logic.

...

Sorry, bronies.

[Mavorpen]

then why do you keep asking?

I think he's questioning why you would believe, then?

If there's no empirical evidence for something, then believing in it is ludicrous. It would be like if someone believed that ponies could actually speak English and fly, and that they controlled the weather. No proof = No logic.

...

Sorry, bronies.

MFW

[Lost heros]

then why do you keep asking?

I think he's questioning why you would believe, then?

If there's no empirical evidence for something, then believing in it is ludicrous. It would be like if someone believed that ponies could actually speak English and fly, and that they controlled the weather. No proof = No logic.

...

Sorry, bronies.

It is called faith.

[Mavorpen]

I think he's questioning why you would believe, then?

If there's no empirical evidence for something, then believing in it is ludicrous. It would be like if someone believed that ponies could actually speak English and fly, and that they controlled the weather. No proof = No logic.

...

Sorry, bronies.

It is called faith.

You spelled gullibility wrong.

[Lost heros]

It is called faith.

You spelled gullibility wrong.

You want to believe that life is pointless, and our pointless lives have no worth, go ahead. I'll continue to have hope.